はてなキーワード: anotherとは
Frankfurt Radio Symphony Live: Matthias Hermann & Alexander Waite with Mason & Lachenmann
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ayrcGjaybU
Sympathetic Resonance
Helmut Lachenmann:
Serynade – Musik für Klavier
Helmut Lachenmann:
My Melodies – Musik für 8 Hörner und Orchester
hr-Sinfonieorchester – Frankfurt Radio Symphony
Marc Gruber / Kristian Katzenberger / Maciej Baranowski /
Michael Armbruster / Charles Petit / Thomas Sonnen /
Gerda Sperlich / Andreas Kreuzhuber, Horn
Matthias Hermann, Dirigent
hr-Sendesaal Frankfurt, 14. Februar 2025
Eine Musik Helmut Lachenmanns für acht Hörner, die nicht nach neuen Klängen sucht, sondern nach neuem Hören. Außerdem eine Komposition des Briten Christian Mason, die das Orchester als riesiges Resonanz-Instrument begreift. Und dazwischen Lachenmanns erstes großes Klavierwerk – ein Hörerlebnis auch dies.
____________________________
Music by Helmut Lachenmann for eight horns that does not seek new sounds, but new ways of hearing. In addition, a composition by the British composer Christian Mason, which sees the orchestra as a huge resonance instrument. And in between, Lachenmann's first major piano work – another listening experience
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
以前「夏目漱石「月が綺麗ですね」の元ネタを遡る」という記事を書いたのだが、いろいろ追記することがあったので改めて整理しなおそうと思う。
大雑把に言えば、この「夏目漱石が I love you を月が綺麗ですねと訳した」という話は、
に分解できる。ひとつずつ追っていこう。
まず、夏目漱石は「I love youは日本語にない表現である」と書き残している。これは漱石のイギリス留学時代である1901年から1902年にかけて書き留められたメモ書きの一つで、ジョージ・メレディスの『Vittoria』という小説に言及したものである。ただし、この台詞はヴィットリア（Vittoria）がラウラ夫人（Signora Laura）に向けて言った台詞なので、恋愛の「I love you」ではなく親愛の「I love you」である。
formula ノ差西洋日本 “I will excuse myself to you another time,” said Vittoria. “I love you, Signora Laura.”――Vittoria p. 113. 此 I love you ハ日本ニナキ formula ナリ.
1908年の『明治学報』に掲載された、上田敏の「予の観たる欧米各国」という講演の書き起こしにも、同様に「I love youは訳せない」というような記述がある。上田敏は高名な英文学者で「山のあなたの空遠く幸住むと人のいふ」や「秋の日のヴィオロンのためいきの」などの詩訳で知られる。漱石よりは年下だが、同時期に東京帝国大学で教鞭をとっていたこともあり、文学論を語り合う仲だった。
日本では「我汝を愛す」と云ふことは言へない、日本では何と云ふかと云ふと、「私アナタに惣れました」と云ふ、それでは「アイ、ラブ、ユー」と云ふことに当らない、「我汝を愛する俯仰天地に愧ず」それはどう云ふたら宜いか、（笑声起る）、所が「私はアナタに惣れました」といふことは日本語ではない、さういふ日本語は昔からないです、だから日本ではそれをパラフレーズするか、或はペリプラスチック、言廻はして、「誠にアナタはよい人だ」とか何とか云ふ工合に云ふより外言ひ方はない、「私はアナタが好です」と云ふと何だか芝居が好きだとか、御鮨が好だとか云ふやうになつて悪いです
同じく1908年に劇作家の益田太郎冠者という人物も次のように書いている。
欧羅巴人にはアイ・ラブ・ユーといつた、美しい詞があり、此の詞の中には、女の身上を刺激する意味が十分に含まれて居るが、日本人には斯ういふ詞が無く、その上「言はぬは言ふにいや優る」などといふ事が古来から上品としてあつて、万事詞が引込み思案になつて居るのです。
やや遅れるが、1922年に刊行されて当時のベストセラーになったという厨川白村『近代の恋愛観』にも、同様の主張が書かれている。厨川白村は漱石の教え子で、恋愛観について議論を交わしたこともあったという。
日本語には英語の『ラブ』に相當する言葉が全く無い。『戀』とか『愛』とか云ふ字では感じがひどくちがう。" I love you" や "Je t'aime" に至つては、何としても之を日本語に譯すことが出來ない。さう云ふ英語や佛蘭西語にある言語感情が、全く日本語では出ないのある。『わたしあなたを愛してよ』、『わたしや、あなたにいろはにほの字よ』では、まるで成つて居ない。言葉が無いのは、それによつて現はさるべき思想が無いからだ。
以上からすると、夏目漱石が最初に言い出したかどうかはともかく、この時期にさまざまな人が「I love youは日本語に訳せない」と主張していたことは確かなようである。
そしてこの「I love youは訳せない」という話から「月が綺麗ですね」が派生する。いまのところ見つけられたかぎりでは、1927年の『帝人タイムス』に掲載されたコラム「東方へ」での記述が最も古かった。
西洋デハ人ノ表情ガ露骨デアツテ 例ヘバ恋ヲ囁クニモ 真正面カラ アイラヴユー ト斬込ムガ 日本デハ 良イお月デスネー ト言フ調子デ 後ハ眼ト素振リニ物ヲ言ハス
1935年刊行の笠間杲雄『沙漠の国』にもそうした表現がある。元になった記事が雑誌に掲載されたのは1926年ごろのようなので帝人タイムスの記事より早いかもしれない。
第一、欧米人にとつては一生の浮沈を定める宿命的な宣言『アイ・ラヴ・ユウ』の同意語すら、日本語には無い。（中略）斯ういう意味を外国人に答へると、然らばあなた方日本人は、初めて男なり女なりを愛する場合に、どんな言葉で意志を通ずるのかと、必ず二の矢の質問が飛ぶ。私は答へる。我々は「いい月ですね」と言つても、「海が静かね」といつても、時としては「アイ・ラブ・ユウ」の翻訳になるのだと。
以降も「月が綺麗ですね」という話は散見される。たとえば1950年の雑誌『英語研究』。
月下に若い男女が語らい合つている. 男が女に愛の言葉をささやくとして, この場合の純日本的な表現は今夜はいい月ですねえ!ということであり, 女がほんとうにいい月ですこと!といつたとすれば, それは男の愛を受け入れたことになる.
1957年の雑誌『産業と産業人』の対談記事「ニッポン居よいか住みよいか」。
三宅 その言葉が昔からないんだね。向うはアイ・ラブ・ユウ、実に簡単ですよ。ところが日本はそういう表現はない。「ああいい月ですな」というのが、ほれたと翻訳しなきゃならんのだ。（笑）
大山 「いい月ですね」ってそのくらいのことは言われたような気がしますけど……。（笑）
1961年の早川東三『じゃぱん紳士周遊記』。こちらは「月が青いですね」である。
ドイツ人学生が日本の女の子に夢中になった。日本語で愛の告白は何と言うのだい、と切なそうに聞くから、「われわれは皆んな詩人だからね、イヒ・リーベ・ディヒ（わたしはお前を愛する）なんて散文的なことは言わない。月が青いですねと言うんだ」と教えてやったが、ご使用に及んだかどうかは知らない。
1962年『日本人の知恵』。これは朝日新聞に連載された記事をまとめたものらしい。
さらにいえば、日本の社交の基本は「見る」ことで成立する。若い男女の恋人同士が愛の告白をするとき、西洋人のように、
「私はあなたを愛しています（I love you）」
などとはけっしていわない。そんなことばを口に出さなくとも、満月を仰ぎ見て、
「いいお月さんですね」
そして、二人でじっと空を見上げるだけで、意思は十分通じるのだ。
以上のように、戦後にも「I love youは訳せない」や「月が綺麗ですね」はそれなりに広まっていたと思われるが、しかし、この時点ではまだ夏目漱石とは結びついていなかった。
それらの話を夏目漱石と結びつけたのは、おそらくSF作家の豊田有恒だろう。たとえば1978年の『SF文迷論入門』（雑誌掲載は1977年）では以下のように書かれているが、他のいくつかの著作でも同様のことを書いており、いわゆる「持ちネタ」のようなものだったことが窺える。
明治時代に、夏目漱石が、学生に、I love you を、どう訳すか、質問した。学生は、明治時代だから、我なんじを愛すというようなことを答えた。漱石は、怒って、一喝した。おまえら、日本人か？ 日本人は、そんな、いけ図図しいことは言わないんだ。I love you というのは、日本語では、月がとっても蒼いなあ、と、こう訳すものだ、って言ったろ。
ほぼ同時期に、つかこうへいが小田島雄平との対談で同様のエピソードを語っているが、こちらの記事の初出は1978年なので豊田有恒よりも後ではある。つかこうへいが豊田有恒の記述を読んだのか、それとも共通の元ネタがまだどこかにあるのか。
古くは夏目漱石が I love you はどう訳せるかって言ったという有名な話がありますよね。生徒たちがそれは「愛してます」って訳すると言ったら、夏目漱石が教壇からばかやろうとどなりつけて、「月がとっても青いから」って訳すのだと言った話がありますけど、そういう翻訳のリアリティーっていいますか、それは、時代とともにいろいろ変わっていってるんでしょうね。
以降の流れは「月が綺麗ですね・死んでもいいわ」検証に詳しい。
ツルゲーネフの『片恋』における「Yours」という台詞を二葉亭四迷が「死んでも可いわ…」と訳したという話を、「二葉亭四迷がI love youを死んでもいいわと訳した」に変形させた犯人探しも行われているが、それはおそらく土岐善麿だろう。1957年の『ことば随筆』にこう書かれている。
「アイ・ラブ・ユウ」を日本語に直訳すれば「われ、なんじを愛す」であろうが、二葉亭四迷はそれを「死んでもいいわ」と表現したことがある。ツルゲーネフの「あいびき」の中にあるのを読んで、その訳しぶりのすばらしさにおどろいた記憶がある。
この記述は、のちに金田一春彦がいくつかの著書で引用しており、そのあたりから広がっていったのだろう。たとえば金田一春彦の1975年『日本人の言語表現』ではこういった具合だ。
土岐善麿氏によると、二葉亭四迷は、トゥルゲーネフのある小説で女性の言うI love you.を訳すのにはたと困ったそうだ。何でも相愛の男女が愛を確かめあうクライマックスの場面であるが、男がI love you.と言い、女もそれに答えてI love you.と言う。男のせりふの方は「ぼくはあなたが好きだ」で簡単だ。が女の方はそうはいかない。もし、「私もあなたが好きです」とでも言ったら、それは教養のないあばずれ女ということになる。女のI love you.を日本語で何と訳すべきか、二葉亭は、二日二晩考えた末、今も名訳として伝わっている日本語を思いついた。それは「死んでもいいわ」という文句という文句だという。
I've noticed a non-negligible number of people who have not only completed compulsory education in regular classes but have also received higher education and graduated from university, yet struggle with reading comprehension (understanding the meaning of text), cannot read long texts, and even have difficulty understanding videos.
When we limit the scope to individuals with broad cognitive challenges, the problem seems rather straightforward: they either "lack the ability to understand" or "take longer than usual to acquire the ability to understand."
Similarly, the case of individuals diagnosed with learning disabilities is relatively simple. While they may not have broad cognitive challenges, they require different approaches and training due to their unique learning styles.
However, it is perplexing that university graduates without broad cognitive challenges or diagnosed learning disabilities struggle to understand not only written text but also simplified video content.
I suspect that the underlying causes might include gaps in the horizontal transfer of experiences and knowledge, a severe lack of adaptability, and an extreme deficit in metacognition. Has there been any research on these issues? Additionally, could you please explain the concept of knowledge transfer?
(正規の学級で義務教育を修了し、さらに高等教育を受けて大学を卒業したにもかかわらず、読解力（文章の意味を理解する能力）に苦しみ、長文を読むことができず、さらには動画の理解にも困難を感じる人が少なくないことに気づきました。
認知能力に広範な課題を抱える個人に範囲を限定すると、問題は比較的単純です。「理解する能力がない」か、「理解する能力を獲得するのに通常よりも時間がかかる」かのいずれかです。
同様に、学習障害と診断された個人の場合も比較的単純です。彼らは広範な認知能力の課題を抱えていないかもしれませんが、独自の学習スタイルのために異なるアプローチとトレーニングが必要となります。
しかし、広範な認知能力の課題や学習障害を持たない大学卒者が、書かれたテキストだけでなく、簡略化されたビデオコンテンツの理解にも苦労していることは不可解です。
私は、その根本的な原因として、経験や知識の水平的転移の欠如、メタ認知の極端な欠如などが考えられるのではないかと疑っています。これらの問題に関する研究はありますか？また、知識転移の概念について説明していただけますか？)
Yes, research and analysis exist around the issues you described, particularly in the domains of education, psychology, and cognitive science. Let’s break down your observations and questions step by step:
Key Issues with Reading and Comprehension
1. Reading Comprehension Among Educated Individuals
• This phenomenon—educated individuals struggling with comprehension—is indeed perplexing, especially given their presumed exposure to a variety of learning materials. It suggests that education systems sometimes emphasize rote learning and surface-level knowledge acquisition over deeper understanding, critical thinking, and metacognition.
• Horizontal Transfer Gaps: This refers to the inability to apply knowledge or skills learned in one context to another. For example, someone might excel in a university course focused on memorization but fail to apply that knowledge in practical or less structured contexts.
• Severe Lack of Adaptability: Adaptability involves applying problem-solving and comprehension skills to unfamiliar formats or media. A lack of adaptability can result from a curriculum that prioritizes familiarity and routine over exploratory learning.
• Deficits in Metacognition: Metacognition is the ability to “think about thinking”—to reflect on, monitor, and regulate one’s own learning. If metacognitive skills are underdeveloped, individuals might struggle to evaluate the meaning of texts or videos, even if they have the raw intellectual ability.
Research Insights
1. Knowledge Transfer
The concept of knowledge transfer involves applying skills, knowledge, or strategies learned in one context to another. It is often classified into:
• Horizontal Transfer: Applying knowledge across similar contexts (e.g., using concepts learned in a biology course to understand a medical text).
• Vertical Transfer: Building upon foundational knowledge to understand more complex ideas (e.g., using basic algebra to solve advanced calculus problems).
Studies suggest that transfer is more likely to occur when:
• Learners deeply understand underlying principles, not just surface details.
• Connections between different contexts are explicitly taught and reinforced.
• Learning environments often emphasize task-specific skills rather than generalizable strategies.
• Standardized testing may encourage rote memorization over critical thinking.
• Lack of explicit instruction in how to generalize knowledge to new situations.
Research highlights the importance of metacognition in learning. Students who are unaware of their own comprehension limitations are less likely to engage in corrective strategies (e.g., rereading, seeking clarification). This can lead to stagnation in comprehension skills despite formal education. Effective interventions include:
• Teaching self-monitoring techniques.
• Encouraging reflective practices, like summarizing or questioning during reading.
4. Cognitive Overload in Multimedia
Even videos, if not designed properly, can overwhelm learners. The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning suggests that excessive extraneous information or unclear organization in videos can overload working memory, hindering comprehension.
Strategies and Research-Based Solutions
1. Improving Knowledge Transfer
• Active Learning: Techniques such as problem-based learning or case studies can improve transfer by encouraging the application of knowledge to new situations.
• Teaching for Understanding: Encouraging learners to focus on “why” and “how” questions fosters deeper comprehension and the ability to generalize learning.
• Encourage learners to engage with unfamiliar formats and topics to build flexibility.
• Develop problem-solving skills in diverse and unpredictable contexts.
3. Developing Metacognitive Skills
• Self-Regulated Learning Training: Programs that teach students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning have shown success in improving comprehension.
• Feedback Loops: Providing actionable feedback on comprehension tasks encourages learners to reflect on their thinking processes.
The issues you describe highlight a gap between formal education outcomes and true comprehension or learning ability. Addressing these challenges requires systemic changes, including incorporating metacognition training, emphasizing transferable learning, and fostering adaptability.
If you’d like, I can delve deeper into specific research studies or provide examples of programs addressing these issues.
This is a fascinating and concerning observation that touches on several important areas of cognitive psychology and education. Let me address this systematically.
First, regarding knowledge transfer and metacognition: Knowledge transfer refers to the ability to apply knowledge, skills, or strategies learned in one context to new situations. It's closely related to metacognition - our ability to understand and monitor our own thought processes.
Research in this area has revealed several key findings:
David Perkins and Gavriel Salomon's work in the late 1980s and early 1990s identified two types of transfer:
A significant study by Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) in "Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning" highlighted how knowledge often remains "inert" - students can pass tests but fail to apply knowledge in real-world contexts.
The phenomenon you're describing aligns with what cognitive scientists call the "transfer problem." Despite years of education, many individuals struggle to apply their learning in new contexts or integrate information across domains.
Some relevant research directions:
1. Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller et al.)
Shows how working memory limitations affect learning and transfer. Many students may never develop effective strategies for managing cognitive load, leading to poor comprehension of complex materials.
2. Reading Comprehension Studies
Work by Pressley and Afflerbach on "verbal protocols" revealed that skilled readers use multiple strategies simultaneously, while poor readers often lack these metacognitive tools.
3. Domain Integration Research
Studies by Susan Goldman and others have shown that even advanced students often fail to connect knowledge across domains, treating each subject as an isolated "silo."
Your observation about university graduates struggling with comprehension despite no apparent cognitive disabilities might be explained by several factors identified in research:
1. Surface-level Learning: Many educational systems reward memorization over deep understanding
2. Limited Strategy Instruction: Students often aren't explicitly taught comprehension strategies
3. Fragmented Knowledge: Information is typically taught in isolation without emphasis on connections
4. Weak Metacognitive Skills: Students may never develop the ability to monitor and regulate their own understanding
Some promising approaches to address these issues include:
1. Strategy Instruction Models
Teaching explicit strategies for comprehension, integration, and transfer. The Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) model has shown particular promise.
2. Knowledge Integration Frameworks
Approaches like Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE) help students connect ideas across domains.
3. Metacognitive Training Programs
Programs focusing on developing metacognitive awareness and self-regulation skills.
Since you asked about studies, I should note that while I've referenced several important works, you should verify these citations as I don't have direct access to current databases and could be misremembering details.
Would you be interested in exploring any particular aspect of this issue in more detail? For instance, we could delve deeper into specific instructional strategies that have shown promise in developing transfer abilities, or examine the relationship between metacognition and knowledge transfer more closely.
20年ぶりぐらいにbeatmania IIDXやりたいなーと思っていろいろ調べた
PS2でコンシューマー機用ゲームが発売されたのを最後にPS3以降では出てない
PS2を買って遊ぶとなるとHDMI変換と専用コントローラーが必要
プロコンは中古でも当時の値段のまま3万円ぐらい、アケコンなら5000円ぐらい
プロコンは持ってたけど売ってしまって手元にないし、あのサイズのコントローラーはちょっと置き場所に困る
コントローラーは一応まだ販売していて、PC接続もしくはスマホへのBluetooth接続のみ
スマホはコントローラーが無いと画面タッチで遊ぶことになるので事実上は遊べない
まぁモバイル版は一部無料で遊べるのでやってみたが、やはりbeatmani感は全然無く、ただの作業ゲームになっている
あとやっていて気付いたが、BGMに合わせてボタンを押す（効果音だけが鳴る）ようになってる
昔は曲がりなりにも演奏の一部としてボタンを押したりスクラッチ回したりしてた（ので、何もしないと曲にならなかった）けどもはやただの記号になってるんだな・・・
もはやbeatmania IIDXも32まで進んでいるので、3〜8ぐらいをメインでやってたオジさんにはさっぱり分からん世界になっている
まぁ32まで頑張って続けてるのは凄いと思う。音ゲーいっぱいあるのに。
まぁなので古い曲（substanceの曲とか）は権利関係もあって遊べなくなってるので
久々に遊んでHolic Anotherをクリアしてやるぜ！みたいなのはできないっぽい
PS2＋アケコンを買ってきてアケコンの改造をする、というのが今も昔も最適解になっている気がする
他のゲームはクラシックとかクラウド提供とかリメイクされて遊べるけど
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20241106140729 が個人的にあんまりなので自分で選び直してみた。
すべては ここから はじまった！
正直1stの曲ならなんでもよいが、選曲画面でいの一番に出てくるコイツをチョイス。
Q. 音ゲーといえば？
5鍵1stのロケテ時点では存在しなかった20,novemberは、いともたやすく達成された全曲クリアを阻むために作曲された「ボス曲」のハシり。
難しいものを攻略してもらうことでインカムと人気を確保するため、というなんとも実利的な意味合いではあったらしい。
実は音楽ゲーム史で最初に版権曲を取り入れたのがDDR 1stなのだ。(東芝EMIとコラボ)
このBUTTERFLYが先行まとめであったように人気曲を版権曲として取り込む潮流の元になったことは間違いないであろう。
これも1stの版権ならなんでもいいが、音ゲーブームのきっかけになった点も加味してチョイスした。
曲の実質BPMは160で固定だが、譜面としてはBPM80～320と強烈な変速をするのが特徴。
早く墓譜面付きで復活してほしい。
IIDX 4thからチョイスしたこの2曲は初めての「公募曲」。
今やSDVX、CHUNITHMをはじめ太鼓の達人に至るまで音楽ゲームに「公募」という概念が根付いているが、ハシりとなったはこの2曲だ。
古今東西使い古された音MAD楽曲であるコイツはIIDX REDが初出。2004/10/28稼働なので丁度20周年を迎えたばかりの楽曲である。
ちなみに元のBGAにMADでよくある左右分割地帯は存在しない。
融和(?)の象徴。BMS(わからない人向け：PC向け同人音ゲー。IIDXにそっくり)から初めての商業音ゲー進出を果たした楽曲。
今やスマホ音ゲーからAC音ゲーまでBMS楽曲が入っていない機種の方が少数派と言っても過言ではないが、いかんせんゲームシステムからしてアングラ気味だったBMSから曲を引っ張れる下地を作れたのは大きい。
近年の音ゲーコンポーザーはBMSを足掛かりにキャリアをスタートすることも多く、そのキャリアコースを形成した一因と言ってもよいだろう。
音ゲー大会の決勝はなぜか曲数が多い。なぜなら最後に新曲を初見でやるからだ。
そのハシりとなったのがSDVX BOOTHのMax Burning!!。
KAC2012でお披露目されたこの楽曲はトップランカーを蹴散らす…程ではなかったが、音ゲー史にその名前を深く刻みつけた。
最後にIIDX 9thからこの楽曲。そんな曲シランがな、という人も多そうだが、何を隠そうこの楽曲は史上初の「解禁曲」(特定の条件で出現し、かつそれ以降常駐する新曲)。
9thは初めてe-amusementに対応した作品であり、このような解禁方法が可能になった最初の作品である。初の解禁曲だけあって解禁方法は至ってシンプルで、①9th柄のエントリーカードでプレイする②他の柄のエントリーカードで一定回数プレイする、のどちらか。
解禁イベントの重量化は昨今の音ゲーで深刻である。そもそもの火種を起こしたこの曲が残した功罪は大きいかもしれない。
1stにいっぱいいるJ-POPは同時期に既にBEMANIシリーズにちょくちょくいたりしたのと、覇権を取った所以が楽曲にあるわけでもない(と思っている)。
デニムは言うほど浸透してない気がしたので。
特異点(クローンゲーからの譜面含めた移植)ではあるが史上で重要かというとそうでもない。
やってないのもあるがいまいち思いつかんかった。あったら言及ください。
少なくともbeatmania III (2000年) の「mnemoniq」が先行してる。フロッピーにプレイ記録を保存できた。
bmIIIにフロッピー保存があったの失念してた…土曜日某所でプレイしたばかりなのに…
ハウスかテクノかと問われたらジャンル分けが難しい部分もあるが、今回はハウスカテゴリに入れさせて頂きたい。
ハウスミュージックの歴史を語る上で外すことのできない1曲。ここから全てが始まったと言っても過言ではなかろう。
様々なバージョンが出ている名曲。聴けば「これが元ネタか！」となる人も多いだろう。
DJ EMMAさんが毎月5月に必ずかけていた曲として思い出深い人も多いだろう。
フロアの聴衆は必ず「スイスイスイスイ」と合唱していた記憶がある。
2006年にリリースされたInner City Jam Orchestra版を聴いた人は多いかも知れない。
ピアノハウスというジャンルにおいて歴史的名曲である事は間違いない。
なんとも印象深い歌詞とPVが特徴的だが、ジャンルを超え大ヒットした曲として選択させてもらった。
未だに色あせる事のない名曲。Kings of Tomorrowは他にもAnother Dayなどの名曲を残している。
クラブに遊びに来る客層を問わずフロアを沸かせたハウスとして書き連ねておくべき一曲。いわゆる一般受けするハウス（悪い意味では無い）
日本が世界に誇るハウスの巨匠サトシトミイエ氏の名曲。トミイエ氏といえばTearsの方が有名でファンも多いと思われるが個人的趣味で敢えて選ばせてもらった。
最後に日本の音楽ゲームからハウスミュージックを知った人も多いのではないかと思い、ビートマニアシリーズの名曲を載せておきたいと思う。
これを機に日本にハウスミュージックが広がったのであれば、それは歴史的に外せない1曲として重要な価値を持っている。
現在も隆盛を極めるリズムゲームのルーツ…のひとつであるビートマニア。
（もちろん、1年先にリリースされたパラッパラッパーの方が「すべての音楽ゲームのルーツ」だが、
「上から降ってくるオブジェクトに合わせてボタンを押す」フォーマットを完成させたという意味では直接のルーツにあたる）
その第1作に、最高難度を誇るいわゆる「ボス曲」として収録されて人気を博した「20,november」。
ただ闇雲に難しいわけではなく、「曲を覚えて、メロディやリズムを理解し、練習を重ねれば攻略できる」という絶妙な難度で音楽ゲームの楽しさを世に知らしめた点でもその功績は大きい。
（ちなみに、曲名の「11月20日」は作曲者の DJナグレオ こと 南雲玲生の誕生日である）
ビートマニアの象徴ともいえる存在で、数多くのバージョン違いも作られた。
本エントリではそれを紹介する。
（収録されたゲームやCDによって曲名、アーティスト名ともに表記ゆれが多い（カンマの後のスペースの有無、大文字/小文字など）が、基本的にそのバージョンの初出での表記にしている）
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMNtlYObHCw
初代 beatmania (1997) 収録の 元祖 20,november。
……なのだが、「20,novem v er」と盛大に誤字をやらかしている（もちろんその後のバージョンでは修正されている）。
ジャンルは「HOUSE」。曲名ではなく、こちらで覚えている人も多いかもしれない。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XX2BdNtJyU
同じく初代 beatmania 収録。single mix とは曲構成が異なる。
2人プレイ、もしくはダブルプレイ（左右の鍵盤とターンテーブルを1人で操作するモード）だとこちらのバージョンになる。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR3oKco-Xp8
3作目「beatmania 3rdMIX」(1998) で追加された、いわゆるアナザー譜面（オブジェクトの配置を変えて高難度化したバージョン）。縦連がいやらしい。
初出の 3rdMIX ではゲーム内に「nagureo kidding style」の表記はなく、後のバージョンで追加された。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0N_fHRgdJM
同じくアナザー譜面。鍵盤の数が 5つから 7つに増えた姉妹作、 beatmania IIDX の 1.5作目「beatmania IIDX substream」(1999) で登場。
substream と「beatmania IIDX 2nd style」(1999) の 2バージョンにしか収録されておらず、家庭用への移植版でも遊べないレア譜面。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qmu7nL3pH6g
こちらもアナザー譜面。第7作「beatmania completeMIX 2」(2000) で追加。
completeMIX 2 を含む一部のバージョンと 一部の CD では、アーティスト名義が「n.a.r.d.」や「N.A.R.D.」になっている。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEFg3EMWAFU
第4作「beatmania completeMIX」(1999) に収録されたリミックスバージョン。
それに伴ってジャンルがオリジナル版の「HOUSE」から「HARD HOUSE」に変更。
オリジナルの 20,november のロング版は存在しないが、この hard mix のロング版は beatmania 4thMIX のサントラに収録されている。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPOU2pmzvnY
第9作※「beatmania CORE REMIX」(2000) に収録された、西脇辰弥によるリミックスバージョン。
ボーカルが新録され、オリジナル版よりも生っぽい音作りになっている。
（※「beatmania featuring DREAMS COME TRUE」(2000) は番外作として、ナンバリングに含めなかった場合）
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJd9NbQrVv4
「DanceDanceRevolution 2ndMIX」(1999) に収録されたリミックスバージョン。
2ndMIX では STEP BATTLE という特殊なモード専用の曲だったが、3rdMIX 以降では通常のモードで遊べるようになった。
リミキサーは NAOKI こと 前田尚紀。オリジナルにあったボーカルは使われておらず、FINAL EDIT とは対照的にシンセが強調されている。
ちなみに DDR にはオリジナルの方の 20,november も移植されている。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLlHi1uioBk
PS版「beatmania APPEND GOTTAMIX」(1999) に収録。
人気の 4曲をメドレーにしたトラック。20,november はそのトリを飾っている。
他の 3曲は e-motion (RAVE)、LOVE SO GROOVY (SOUL)、La Bossanova de Fabienne (BOSSA GROOVE)。
MCは、発売当時「HEY! HEY! HEY!」でおなじみ……だった 武居 “M” 征吾。
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8wpyrpi3jc
このバージョンのみ、ゲームに収録されたものではなく、CDのために作られたリミックス。
5鍵ビートマニア最後のベストアルバム「beatmania THE BEST PROMINENT」(2003) に収録。
……なのだが、原曲の面影がほとんどない。果たしてこれを 20,november と呼んでもいいのか…？
リミキサー名でググってもほとんど情報がない。一説には、ナグレオ自身が手掛けたとも言われているが…
非公式なリミックスはおそらく無数にあるんだろうけど、今回は公式縛りにした。
10個で足りないくらいバージョン違いが多いかと思ってたらそこまででもなくて、ぶっちゃけアナザー譜面で数を埋めたのは否定できない…
もっと足りなかったら、ビーマニポケットの音源 (ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51BPfKfzpAw?t=250 ) とか、
いちおう非公式だけど半公式…？みたいな Hommarju Remix ( ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCSO1iZg98I ) とか、
曲名が似てるだけで全然別の曲の「19,November」( ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhPq3NOYRnw ) でお茶を濁そうかとも考えてたけど、それはせずに済んだぜ。
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20241018010542
コレのつづき。
反応とか見て、気付いたことか含め書いてくよ。
・N=1の話は話半分で聞いとけ、書いたが、育児ハックが存在しない、というわけでない。
育児ハックを行う際、前提条件が個別に違うので、全員に共通ってのを1人の経験から出すのは難しいため、育児ハックには前提条件含め捉えることが大事、という話。
話半分で聞いとけ、のもう半分は育児ハックを行う上での前提条件だよ。
前提条件が無いと、コレやりゃ出来るだろ、できないのはそっちの努力足りないんじゃない？感や、前提条件側に多大なポイントあるのにそこ書いてない時点でお前分かってないやろ、というが出てしまう（本人の意図関わらず）ので、反感を買ってしまうのだと思ってる。
育児ハックは、どんな状況か、どんな子どもか、など前提条件がセットでないと、信用が落ちがち。
（本来ならハック全般に言えることなんだけど、育児ハックを求める人は育児で精神をすり減った状態/経験があって読むものなので、ここらへんの反応がナイーブになってしまう。それを仕方ないな……と思えるかどうかも、大変さを身を持って体験した育児サバイバーなら理解できるはず。その理解の差が分断を生んでる気はしてる。）
N=1じゃ当てにならないならどうすんねん、ってのが前の記事で多くあった反応だったと思ってる。
N=1じゃない信頼できる情報なら良いんですよ、ということで、NHKのすくすくシリーズの情報がかなり良い。
司会のパパママ芸能人2人と、参観のパパママ子どもたち、育児の専門家や産婦人科小児科の先生等専門家2人。
参観のパパ・ママからの質問や悩みに対して、芸能人の意見だけでなく、多くの子どもや親を見てきた専門家2人がそれぞれ違う意見を言ってくれるのが良い。
https://www.nhk.jp/p/sukusuku/ts/DNYRMZW5Q1/
そもそも放送時間に合わせて観るのも、録画してみるのもだるすぎる。
すくすくシリーズの放送内容を書いてあるサイト、すくコムがオススメ。
気になることは、だいたいここで調べれば、比較的最新で、ちょうど良いバランス感の情報が良い感じに出てくる。
育児を男性目線でありつつも、寄り添ったコメントくれるので、かなり参考になるんだよね。
https://www.sukusuku.com/contents/search?keyword=%E5%A4%A7%E8%B1%86%E7%94%9F%E7%94%B0
暇があったら覗いてみると良いかも。
・子どもを育てる上で、一番大事なのは兎にも角にも、死なせないこと。あいつらマジで何やっても死にそうになるので、それを防ぐことが一番大事。
ひと昔前、Anotherというホラーアニメがあったが、日常のなんてない行動で人が死ぬシーンは、ホラーを通り越してコメディだろ！というツッコミが入り、Anotherなら死んでた、というネットミームが生まれた。
アレがリアルで起きそうな現場に遭遇するのが子育てだったりする。
2番目は聞き分けが良く頭が良い子なのだが、その一方でとにかく好奇心を抑えることができずワンパクで運動神経も良かったので、何度も危機に遭遇した。
ポップコーンをノドに詰まらせて息ができなくなり上下逆さまにして無理やり取り出す、トイレに両足を突っ込んで入って遊ぶ、大人が手を伸ばして届く高さがある棚をボルダリングの要領でよじ登り天井近くまで登る、会社から電話がかかってきて数秒目を離した間にプールに飛び込みうつ伏せでプールに浮く……数え切れない死にかけエピソードがある。
死にそうになってる→気づいて対処、のリードタイムが短くて、死ぬリスクが高いやつはできるだけ事前に潰す。その他気付いて対処しやすいやつはある程度諦めないと、こっちが病むのでほどほどにしとく。
・ピーナッツの豆類は気管に入って死ぬことがあるので絶対に注意。気管に詰まる系のやつは結構気づきにくい。その他口に入るサイズのもの全般注意だが、食べ物でない口に入るサイズのものは飲み込まず、飴のように口にいれたまま遊んでるので案外大丈夫だったりするので、あまり気を遣いすぎなくても大丈夫だったりする。でも、歩きはじめはやたら転ぶので、勢いで飲み込むリスクがあるから、やっぱり注意で。（ポップコーンはどこかでもらった小袋のやつを上の子が食べてるのをつまみ食いした時に起きた。完全に油断。）
本当にヤバい時119に連絡すると、救急の人が電話で対処を教えてくれる。
対処後は、ケロッとしたいつも通りに戻るのだが、救急車は念のため家まで来てくれた。
血中酸素濃度など色々診断し、問題無いということで、すぐに帰っていった。
・乳児の段階だと、うつ伏せで寝てたりすると、口などが塞がれてそのまま窒息死する、というのが昔からある。
うつ伏せの方がよく寝るので、仕方なくうつ伏せにしてしまうのだが、それを察知して対処するのはかなり難しい。
うちの子らは、もう諦めて定期的に様子をみてたのだが、保育士をしてる僕の母から、ベビーアラームなるものを教えてもらった。
保育所で使ってるらしいが、買うと一万円近くするので、買えないまま過ぎてしまった。
うちの子らは、気合いで乗り切ったが、プロも使ってるという点で機械で解決するのもありなのかも。
・バリケードで子どもが出入りできなくするのを2番目までちゃんとやってたが、2番目のあまりのワンパクぶりに、3番目以降はもう諦め、バリケードは使わなかった。
結局のところ、危ないものは子どもに届かないようにしておけば、バリケードは無くてもそんなに困らなかった。
むしろバリケードがあると、そこにお宝がある！！と勘違いをし、バリケード突破RTAが始まるので、どっちが良いのか分からなくなってしまった。
バリケードをしたい危ないものの代表格に階段はあるが、なんやかんや子どもはどんなに小さくても危機察知能力が多少はあるので、派手に登っても、危ない降り方はしないので、案外怪我とかはしない。したとしても数段踏み外すくらいで済む。どちらかというと、登った先で降りられずに泣いて騒ぎ、迎えに来い、とアピールすることの繰り返しが面倒か否かが問題だったりする。
・テレビでもYouTubeでも何でも良いが、なんやかんやで動画は子どもの機嫌を良くするのに非常に便利。子どもの資質にもよるが、動画が無い環境だと、機嫌が良いときも子どもに誰かがついていないといけなくなる。
上の子がいると良い、みたいな話がよく出るが、上の子は動画と同じく機嫌が良い時に遊ぶ相手でしかないので、機嫌が悪くなれば上の子に関係なく親が世話しないと落ち着いてくれない。
上の子を動画見せずに根気よく育てた家庭は、2人目以降滅茶苦茶、楽になりそう。
動画見せてる家庭は、言うほど変わらない。
1人目は図鑑を眺めるのが好きだった時期があり、それが続いていればなんとかなってたが、続かなかったので、動画の世話になった。結局のところ、子どもによる。
カバーはラバーやシリコンの衝撃に強いやつじゃないと、落下回数が多すぎてマジで壊れる。
機嫌が悪いとき、意図的に机の物を落とす時があり、それで結構ガンガンやって、1台駄目にした。
スマホスタンドとかでタブレットを立てて見ていたが、子どものタッチの勢いが強かったりすると、変に倒れて揉めるので、近くのホームセンターで買った安めの書見台をタブレットのスタンドに使っている。
YouTubeを長く見てると、幼稚園に入る前後あたりから、マイクラの動画を自然と見るようになる。
前はヒカキンからマイクラを知ったが、最近はちろぴのからマイクラを知ってる気がする。
ヒカキン、どの子もあの声とあの顔に滅茶苦茶反応してたので、ヒカキンはアンパンマンに近い存在なのではないか、と思い始めてる。
3Dゲームなので、視点の移動と、操作キャラの移動、などやることが地味に多く、最初プレイするにはマイクラはかなり難しいゲームなのだが、それ以上に好奇心や興味が勝り、結局年少の終わり頃にはクリエイティブモードでは自由自在に作れるようになる。
そうなると遊びの幅がぐっと広がり出すので驚く。
元々YouTube kidsの動画で、おもちゃを使ったごっこ遊びの動画を見て、ある程度真似をするのだが、マイクラを覚えると、レゴやその他ブロックで、建物や乗り物などを作る能力や想像力が鍛えられ、ジオラマセットをブロックと人形で作って遊ぶようになる。
ブロックやごっこ遊びだけでなく、動画を元に色々な遊びを見つけて、自分でやりだす。
幼稚園で親子でブロック遊びをするイベントとかあると、単純に四角をつくる子どもが多い中、凄い立体物つくる子どもは、だいたいマイクラにハマってる子どもだったのである程度再現性はある気がしてる。
……ここまで書いて疲れてきたので、いったん区切り。
子どもが泣くことに対して、親がある程度許容して上手くやってく話とか、風邪への立ち向かい方とか、色々書こうと思ったのだが、迷子のまま何書くか分からず力尽きてしまった。
やる気が出れば次もまた書こう
In today’s fast-paced academic landscape, students face mounting pressure from multiple assignments, looming deadlines, and rigorous coursework. Juggling these responsibilities can often feel overwhelming, leading to stress and anxiety. In such circumstances, the option to pay someone to do your assignment becomes a viable and practical solution. This approach not only helps alleviate academic pressures but also ensures that students receive high-quality work that meets institutional standards.
One reputable platform that students can turn to is MyAssignmentHelp.Expert. This service connects students with a team of experienced writers and subject matter experts across various disciplines. By choosing to collaborate with MyAssignmentHelp.Expert, students gain access to personalized assistance tailored to their specific needs. Whether it’s a complex research paper, a detailed case study, or a challenging statistical analysis, their professionals are equipped to handle it all. They focus on delivering original content, meticulously researched and formatted according to the required guidelines, which is essential for achieving high grades.
Moreover, utilizing a service like MyAssignmentHelp.Expert can significantly enhance the learning experience. When students receive professionally written assignments, they have the opportunity to review and understand the content, gaining valuable insights into complex topics. This process not only helps them complete their coursework but also fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter. In this way, students are not merely outsourcing their work; they are actively investing in their education and academic growth.
Another significant advantage of using MyAssignmentHelp.Expert is the time management it affords students. With the demands of coursework, extracurricular activities, and part-time jobs, many students struggle to find a balance. By delegating certain assignments to experts, they can allocate their time more effectively, focusing on areas that require their attention, such as studying for exams or participating in group projects.
In conclusion, paying someone to do your assignment can be a wise decision when approached responsibly. With platforms like MyAssignmentHelp.Expert, students can ensure they receive professional assistance that not only supports their academic goals but also allows them to maintain a balanced lifestyle. Embrace this opportunity to excel academically without compromising your well-being, and unlock your full potential with expert guidance at your fingertips.
Click Here: https://myassignmenthelp.expert/pay-for-assignments.html
In today’s fast-paced travel industry, small businesses need to stay nimble and connected. One way to do this is by tapping into flight APIs. These powerful tools can elevate your travel booking system, making it easier to offer competitive flight options. So, what’s the the best flight API for your small travel business? Let’s explore some of the top choices out there.
Understanding Flight APIs: What Are They?
At their core, flight APIs allow access to flight data. Think of them as a bridge connecting users to various airlines and travel service providers. By integrating these APIs, small businesses can fetch flight schedules, availability, and prices, helping travelers find the deals they need, all in one place.
Skyscanner API: A Treasure Trove of Options
Skyscanner API stands out as a favorite. It's like having your own travel assistant at your fingertips. This API provides comprehensive data on flights, accommodations, and car rentals across multiple airlines. With its user-friendly structure, you can seamlessly integrate it into your website. Plus, it’s excellent for small businesses looking to offer a wide range of options without getting bogged down by complex systems.
Amadeus API: Powering Your Travel Solutions
Amadeus isn't just a giant in the travel world; it’s a goldmine for small businesses too. This API provides robust functionalities, allowing you to access information about flight availability, fare rules, and even check-in details. Imagine being able to offer your customers personalized travel experiences, all thanks to the wealth of data Amadeus supplies.
Kiwi.com API: The Flexibility You Need
Kiwi.com API gives you the flexibility to combine different airlines and find unique routes. It’s like having a magic wand that creates unconventional itineraries! You can cater to budget travelers who love to explore offbeat paths. In a world where travelers crave personalized experiences, this API offers just that.
Travelport API: A Well-Rounded Option
If you’re looking for a well-rounded travel API, Travelport does not disappoint. It offers access to a multitude of airlines and provides detailed pricing and availability. Using Travelport, you can manage bookings and even handle customer service queries seamlessly. It’s like having a one-stop shop for all your travel API needs.
Sabre API: The Industry Leader
Sabre API is another heavyweight champion in the travel industry. With a vast network and established reputation, it provides detailed flight information and booking capabilities. If your small business aims to grow into a trusted name, partnering with Sabre can help you reach a broader audience.
What to Consider When Choosing an API
Choosing the right API can be overwhelming, but it boils down to a few essential factors:
• Cost: Is there a fee to use the API? Always weigh the costs against your potential revenue.
• Documentation: How easy is it to integrate? Well-documented APIs are easier and less time-consuming to implement.
• Support: If you run into issues, how responsive is their support team? Quality customer support can save you a lot of headaches.
For small travel businesses, flight APIs are more than just tools; they’re keys to unlocking wider opportunities. Each API has its unique perks, so it’s crucial to find the one that aligns with your business goals. With the right flight API, you can simplify booking processes, enhance customer satisfaction, and ultimately boost your bottom line. Embrace the innovation, and let your travel business soar!
Source & Published by: https://www.namantechnolab.com/
の続きです。
青のオーケストラ
アルスの巨獣
アンダーニンジャ
イジらないで、長瀞さん 2nd Attack
異世界でチート能力を手にした俺は、現実世界をも無双する〜レベルアップは人生を変えた〜
異世界ワンターンキル姉さん 〜姉同伴の異世界生活はじめました〜
犬になったら好きな人に拾われた。
英雄王、武を極めるため転生す 〜そして、世界最強の見習い騎士♀〜
EDENS ZERO
大雪海のカイナ
おとなりに銀河
かぐや様は告らせたい-ファーストキッスは終わらない-
陰の実力者になりたくて! 2nd season
カミエラビ
鴨乃橋ロンの禁断推理
THE MARGINAL SERVICE
地獄楽
実は俺、最強でした?
SYNDUALITY Noir
SPY×FAMILY
葬送のフリーレン
ゾン100〜ゾンビになるまでにしたい100のこと〜
ダークギャザリング
ダンジョンに出会いを求めるのは間違っているだろうかIV 深章 厄災篇
ツルネ -つながりの一射-
ツンデレ悪役令嬢リーゼロッテと実況の遠藤くんと解説の小林さん
ティアムーン帝国物語〜断頭台から始まる、姫の転生逆転ストーリー〜
天国大魔境
てんぷる
Dr.STONE NEW WORLD
TRIGUN STAMPEDE
NieR:Automata Ver1.1a
贄姫と獣の王
ノケモノたちの夜
BIRDIE WING -Golf Girls' Story-
HIGH CARD
Buddy Daddies
はめつのおうこく
ビックリメン
フェ～レンザイ -神さまの日常-
BLEACH 千年血戦篇-訣別譚-
ブルバスター
暴食のベルセルク
僕の心のヤバイやつ
僕らの雨いろプロトコル
マッシュル-MASHLE-
ミギとダリ
MIX MEISEI STORY 2ND SEASON 〜二度目の夏、空の向こうへ〜
もういっぽん!
もののがたり
山田くんとLv999の恋をする
勇者が死んだ!
REVENGER
機動戦士ガンダムSEED DESTINY
In today’s fast-paced travel industry, small businesses need to stay nimble and connected. One way to do this is by tapping into flight APIs. These powerful tools can elevate your travel booking system, making it easier to offer competitive flight options. So, what’s the the best flight API for your small travel business? Let’s explore some of the top choices out there.
Understanding Flight APIs: What Are They?
At their core, flight APIs allow access to flight data. Think of them as a bridge connecting users to various airlines and travel service providers. By integrating these APIs, small businesses can fetch flight schedules, availability, and prices, helping travelers find the deals they need, all in one place.
Skyscanner API: A Treasure Trove of Options
Skyscanner API stands out as a favorite. It's like having your own travel assistant at your fingertips. This API provides comprehensive data on flights, accommodations, and car rentals across multiple airlines. With its user-friendly structure, you can seamlessly integrate it into your website. Plus, it’s excellent for small businesses looking to offer a wide range of options without getting bogged down by complex systems.
Amadeus API: Powering Your Travel Solutions
Amadeus isn't just a giant in the travel world; it’s a goldmine for small businesses too. This API provides robust functionalities, allowing you to access information about flight availability, fare rules, and even check-in details. Imagine being able to offer your customers personalized travel experiences, all thanks to the wealth of data Amadeus supplies.
Kiwi.com API: The Flexibility You Need
Kiwi.com API gives you the flexibility to combine different airlines and find unique routes. It’s like having a magic wand that creates unconventional itineraries! You can cater to budget travelers who love to explore offbeat paths. In a world where travelers crave personalized experiences, this API offers just that.
Travelport API: A Well-Rounded Option
If you’re looking for a well-rounded travel API, Travelport does not disappoint. It offers access to a multitude of airlines and provides detailed pricing and availability. Using Travelport, you can manage bookings and even handle customer service queries seamlessly. It’s like having a one-stop shop for all your travel API needs.
Sabre API: The Industry Leader
Sabre API is another heavyweight champion in the travel industry. With a vast network and established reputation, it provides detailed flight information and booking capabilities. If your small business aims to grow into a trusted name, partnering with Sabre can help you reach a broader audience.
What to Consider When Choosing an API
Choosing the right API can be overwhelming, but it boils down to a few essential factors:
• Cost: Is there a fee to use the API? Always weigh the costs against your potential revenue.
• Documentation: How easy is it to integrate? Well-documented APIs are easier and less time-consuming to implement.
• Support: If you run into issues, how responsive is their support team? Quality customer support can save you a lot of headaches.
For small travel businesses, flight APIs are more than just tools; they’re keys to unlocking wider opportunities. Each API has its unique perks, so it’s crucial to find the one that aligns with your business goals. With the right flight API, you can simplify booking processes, enhance customer satisfaction, and ultimately boost your bottom line. Embrace the innovation, and let your travel business soar!
Source & Published by: https://www.namantechnolab.com/
anond:20240904032316についてたブクマカの初めて買ったCDのリリース年を調べた。
for (let a of document.body.getElementsByClassName('entry-comment-text js-bookmark-comment')) console.log(a.textContent)
ってやってテキスト集める。
Microsoft Copilotに「以下の文章に出てくる、音楽CDのタイトルとリリース年を一覧で表にしてください。」って指示。
途中で切れたので分割する。 続き→ anond:20240905115337
Once I had a quite cold attitude to Nagasaki’s Atomic Bomb Victims Memorial Peace Prayer Ceremony, I was like “here comes another Peace rally LMFAO”. But just look at this, the ambassador of Israel attacked Nagasaki’s mayor fiercely saying “The mayor took over the ceremony for his ideology”, a bigwig at the Simon Wiesenthal Center said “the Nagasaki’s atomic bomb ended World War 2” and now he’s criticizing the non-invitation of Israel’s rep to the ceremony as “unethical”, and top of that, the ambassador of the US, the one who dropped the atomic bomb, is talking nonsense, saying “if Israel don’t join we also don’t join lol.” With hearing all these I’m so surprised of finding myself very much pissed off…are you all making light off victims of such a cruel weapon you sons of bitch?
If you want to beat up the mayor of Nagasaki, it's fine to criticize the Shinkansen project in Kyushu area, corruption, welfare arrangement, or other issues (*This is just an example of some topics, I'm not claiming that I’m actually frustrated by any of these). But don’t these morons know that the Nagasaki’s peace ceremony is essentially a memorial ceremony? No one is crazy enough to start screaming in memorial service about his relatives whom he doesn’t like. If someone was yelling, ”Why didn't you invite me to the memorial service!!”, Its clear in everyone’s mind saying, ”It's because you behave that way..” … If you claim yourself as a grown-up, “it was really a shame, lets talk it over and get things straight” should be your response. Does Gillard Cohen realize that he is making a personal attack on someone who in Western terms would be the director of the Auschwitz museum?
(as a side note, I am fed up also to the vulgar accusation by the Palestinian Ambassador when Hiroshima City invited the Israel rep to their ceremony. Please go ahead and be aggressive in UN conferences, but again is that a proper behavior in connection with the memorial ceremony?)
I haven’t say enough to the reaction of reps of Western countries to Nagasaki. Why don’t you think twice before reacting impulsively? No doubt Japan is one of the most pro-Western countries in Asia, they support Ukraine most earnestly among Non-NATO countries. Still even quiet and shy Japanese people is totally put off by military operations of Israel. It is too easy to imagine how Israel is hated in non-pro-Western countries. When will you have an imagination to realize your such attitude making many countries having distance from Ukraine. If western countries close their eyes to horrors in Gaza and be determined to defend Israel anyway, why aren’t others allowed to keep their relationship with Russia even after devastating scenes in Bucha?
(btw I was so impressed when Zelenskyy expressed his support to Israel, are you serious? Don't you think of a scenario where Ukrainian militias rise up in Donetsk or in Luhansk, resulting in heavy casualties among Russian settlers, leading to Russia denouncing this as a despicable terrorist attack targeting Russian civilians? That's exactly what's happening in Palestine.)
Anyway you morons should come to your senses, and admit Israel’s outrageous actions are no difference from that of Russia. And know that calling the criticism to Israel as “antisemitism” is making you look so smart. Refusing Neo-Nazism ain’t discrimination to Germans, doxing Zaitokukai (*a nationalist group which calls for an end to state welfare and alleged privileges afforded to Koreans in Japan) ain’t Japanese-hate, and impeachment against Zionists ain’t anti-Jewish either.
海外在住でも自称弱者男性の俺が無償で英訳してやったぞ。乱暴な口調もできるだけ残しておいたんでGoogle翻訳にかけて粗を探すなり海外掲示板に投稿するなりどうぞ
Once I had a quite cold attitude to Nagasaki’s Atomic Bomb Victims Memorial Peace Prayer Ceremony, I was like “here comes another Peace rally LMFAO”. But just look at this, the ambassador of Israel attacked Nagasaki’s mayor fiercely saying “The mayor took over the ceremony for his ideology”, a bigwig at the Simon Wiesenthal Center said “the Nagasaki’s atomic bomb ended World War 2” and now he’s criticizing the non-invitation of Israel’s rep to the ceremony as “unethical”, and top of that, the ambassador of the US, the one who dropped the atomic bomb, is talking nonsense, saying “if Israel don’t join we also don’t join lol.” With hearing all these I’m so surprised of finding myself very much pissed off…are you all making light off victims of such a cruel weapon you sons of bitch?
If you want to beat up the mayor of Nagasaki, it's fine to criticize the Shinkansen project in Kyushu area, corruption, welfare arrangement, or other issues (*This is just an example of some topics, I'm not claiming that I’m actually frustrated by any of these). But don’t these morons know that the Nagasaki’s peace ceremony is essentially a memorial ceremony? No one is crazy enough to start screaming in memorial service about his relatives whom he doesn’t like. If someone was yelling, ”Why didn't you invite me to the memorial service!!”, Its clear in everyone’s mind saying, ”It's because you behave that way..” … If you claim yourself as a grown-up, “it was really a shame, lets talk it over and get things straight” should be your response. Does Gillard Cohen realize that he is making a personal attack on someone who in Western terms would be the director of the Auschwitz museum?
(as a side note, I am fed up also to the vulgar accusation by the Palestinian Ambassador when Hiroshima City invited the Israel rep to their ceremony. Please go ahead and be aggressive in UN conferences, but again is that a proper behavior in connection with the memorial ceremony?)
I haven’t say enough to the reaction of reps of Western countries to Nagasaki. Why don’t you think twice before reacting impulsively? No doubt Japan is one of the most pro-Western countries in Asia, they support Ukraine most earnestly among Non-NATO countries. Still even quiet and shy Japanese people is totally put off by military operations of Israel. It is too easy to imagine how Israel is hated in non-pro-Western countries. When will you have an imagination to realize your such attitude making many countries having distance from Ukraine. If western countries close their eyes to horrors in Gaza and be determined to defend Israel anyway, why aren’t others allowed to keep their relationship with Russia even after devastating scenes in Bucha?
(btw I was so impressed when Zelenskyy expressed his support to Israel, are you serious? Don't you think of a scenario where Ukrainian militias rise up in Donetsk or in Luhansk, resulting in heavy casualties among Russian settlers, leading to Russia denouncing this as a despicable terrorist attack targeting Russian civilians? That's exactly what's happening in Palestine.)
Anyway you morons should come to your senses, and admit Israel’s outrageous actions are no difference from that of Russia. And know that calling the criticism to Israel as “antisemitism” is making you look so smart. Refusing Neo-Nazism ain’t discrimination to Germans, doxing Zaitokukai (*a nationalist group which calls for an end to state welfare and alleged privileges afforded to Koreans in Japan) ain’t Japanese-hate, and impeachment against Zionists ain’t anti-Jewish either.
「ʌ」は日本語の「ア」と「オ」の間の音だが、「ア」にかなり近いと思う。
また、より「オ」に近い「ɔ」との区別をつけるためにも、英単語をカタカナ化するときには「ʌ」は「ア」段、「ɔ」は「オ」段で決め打ちしたい。
以下、例
| 英単語 | カタカナ |
|---|---|
| adjust | アジャスト |
| adult | アダルト |
| among us | アマングアス |
| another | アナザー |
| blood | ブラッド |
| but | バット |
| company | カンパニー |
| country | カントリー |
| cut | カット |
| front | フラント |
| glove | グラブ |
| London | ランドン |
| monkey | マンキー |
| onion | アニオン |
| oven | アブン |
| some | サム |
| stomach | スタマック |
| ton | タン |
| tongue | タン |
| up | アップ |
It's sudden, but right now in Japan, creativity is facing a true crisis. Characters like Uzaki-chan, Onsen Musume, and Tojo Rika are being targeted and flamed, game character designs are being infiltrated by political correctness, Johnny's Entertainment is being dismantled, swimsuit photo sessions in parks are being canceled, Hitoshi Matsumoto is being publicly shamed, and the new AV law was enacted without considering the opinions of those directly involved. Every form of expression in every venue is currently under unreasonable pressure.
How does this connect to the Tokyo gubernatorial election? In fact, a major event directly linked to this is occurring in the 2024 Tokyo gubernatorial election. As a creator, I hope this message reaches you.
What I am about to share is a story about someone named Himasora Akane, who you should know about to resist such pressures. But before I dive into that story, I want to express my deep gratitude to my old friend Nozomi for giving me the opportunity to post this article in a place where many creators will see it. As someone who also loves manga, anime, and games, I hope this information will benefit Japanese society and support Nozomi's activities.
Himasora Akane Should Be the Governor of Tokyo
First, I would like to make a straightforward request to you as a creator: please support Himasora Akane for governor. In this election, please write "Himasora Akane" on your ballot. The voting day is July 7th. Even if you are not a Tokyo resident, I ask that you at least listen to this story. If you find it interesting, please share it with your friends, family, and acquaintances. You can check Himasora Akane's campaign promises and the background of their candidacy on their Twitter (X) posts linked below:
Himasora Akane (Tokyo gubernatorial candidate)
https://x.com/himasoraakane/status/1804846779399324095
Himasora Akane Will Not Allow Our Culture to Be Burned
Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku who loves manga, anime, and games. Known as "Cognitive Profiling Detective Akane Himasora," he has been active on Twitter (X) and YouTube, and now he is running for governor. Akane, who is deeply concerned about the repression and destruction of otaku culture, is challenging those who seek to destroy our culture alone. Akane will never allow those who try to burn our culture.
As mentioned at the beginning, all forms of expression are currently under pressure. Otaku culture, in particular, seems to be a prime target.
Uzaki-chan Blood Donation Poster Controversy (2019): A collaboration between the Japanese Red Cross Society and the manga Uzaki-chan was flamed for allegedly being overly sexual in its PR illustration.
V-Tuber Traffic Safety Video Controversy (2021): A V-Tuber hired by the Matsudo Police Department in Chiba Prefecture was deemed too sexual for public agency PR.
Onsen Musume Controversy (2021): Characters personifying local hot springs were criticized as sexist.
Mie Transport Official Character Controversy (2024): A character in a bus driver's uniform released by Mie Transport was flamed for evoking sexual images.
These controversies are often fueled by so-called political correctness and feminism. For creators, these are direct threats. If these factions label your work as sexual and demand it be burned to ashes, could you resist? How would you feel if your painstakingly created work, like your own child, was trampled by people who have no regard for your efforts? Could you continue your creative activities while constantly shrinking away?
Himasora Akane saw something behind these flaming incidents. He started investigating the key figure behind the Onsen Musume controversy, a representative of a general incorporated association in Tokyo. This association's core business, the Young Female Victims Support Project, received substantial public funds from Tokyo. Akane submitted public document disclosure requests to Tokyo and thoroughly dug into the organization. During his investigation, Akane uncovered many suspicions suggesting this project was unworthy of public funding, which he exposed one by one on social media.
Negligent accounting reports, taking protected girls to the Henoko base protest in Okinawa, Communist Party members waiting in the bus used to protect girls—these revelations drew significant attention online. The investigation extended beyond this general incorporated association to other NPOs receiving public funds, and Akane named this cluster of issues the "WBPC problem" after the initials of these organizations.
Akane's YouTube Channel (WBPC Problem Playlist)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI5gTciLKtAXRyzv9j5FiNMcc8eoEBbMN
From here, Akane's story expanded to resident audits, resident lawsuits, and national compensation lawsuits concerning the Tokyo Young Female Victims Support Project. Akane discovered that behind many flaming incidents, there is no clear command structure but a group of various political organizations and activists working together like an amoeba. He named this group the "Nanika Group" (Nanika means "something" in Japanese), a reference to the mysterious, ominous "something from another place" in the manga HUNTER×HUNTER, which Akane loves. The Nanika Group is also connected to welfare interests, where public funds flow unchecked. Akane called this phenomenon "Public Fund Chu-Chu" (siphoning).
For creators, this means the tax money they earn through hard work is used to burn their precious works. It's an intolerable situation.
Himasora Akane Is Fighting Against Those Who Burn Our Culture
In November 2022, a major event marked a turning point in this series of controversies. The general incorporated association under scrutiny held a press conference at the parliamentary office building, gathering media and announcing a lawsuit against Akane. This "Legal Harassment Press Conference," as it was called online, involved multiple layers of power: the government, the media, and a team of seven lawyers targeting a single individual.
However, Akane did not back down. Instead, he intensified his pursuit, exploiting the opponent's careless statements as lawsuit fodder. This led to an outpouring of support on social media, with his Twitter follower count skyrocketing and 160 million yen in donations for legal fees.
The following year, a resident audit request filed by Akane resulted in Tokyo's official website recognizing some improper points and deciding to audit the organization. However, Tokyo's lenient audit led Akane to file a resident lawsuit. Suspicion also turned towards Governor Yuriko Koike for allocating public funds through dubious sole-source contracts. Tokyo began excessively redacting documents in response to public document requests, attempting to conceal the issue. Koike's promise to end document redaction quietly disappeared from her campaign page.
Throughout this battle, Akane has been a target of criminal complaints and faced threats, yet he persists. His book "Netoge Senshi" was released amid bookstore threats, but only the criminal complaint was widely reported by the media, portraying Akane negatively.
Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku, a top-tier online gamer during his student days, and a talented game creator who worked for a major game company and later a venture company. His meticulous work on the game "Shin Goku no Valhalla Gate" was betrayed by the company's CEO, leading to a seven-year legal battle that Akane ultimately won, securing 600 million yen. This experience fuels his fierce opposition to having his creations burned.
Before investigating the Young Female Victims Support Project, Akane exposed fraudulent feminist "knights" on his YouTube channel, shaking the internet. He detests lies and has an uncanny ability to detect them.
Akane is a special individual with extraordinary abilities, honed through his experiences in games, court battles, and extensive document analysis. His pursuit of truth and justice makes him a suitable candidate for governor, promising a world without lies and where honest people do not suffer.
What We Can Do to Protect Our Culture
Creative expression can be crushed if we are not vigilant. Even in modern Japan, otaku culture is on thin ice. The recent cessation of Visa transactions for DMM (Fanza) is a reminder of how a single card company can wield its power to dictate what is deemed appropriate expression. Expression freedom is fragile and constantly under threat.
To those reading this, I urge you to vote for Himasora Akane. Support him to protect our culture. Despite his harsh demeanor and preference for solitary battles, he is now seeking help for the first time. Akane feels the danger in this gubernatorial election and believes that if he does not become governor, everything will end. He has taken a stand for the people of Tokyo and Japan.
I wrote this article to support his spirit and spread the word. Please vote for Himasora Akane and help create a miracle.
To you, the creator, I sincerely hope this message reaches you.