「 very」を含む日記 RSS

はてなキーワード: veryとは

2025-02-15

anond:20250215190442

トランプは高IQでそれネタにしとるやで

一方でホーキングは、下記のようにバッサリやで

“People who boast about their I.Q. are losers.”

(自分IQを誇っている人は敗者)

https://www.newsweek.com/what-stephen-hawkings-iq-score-late-physicist-called-people-who-care-losers-843895

  

関連:Good News Donald Trump, You Don't Have to Be Very Smart to Be a Good Leader

https://www.newsweek.com/intelligence-leadership-donald-trump-710376

 

関連:Why highly intelligent people suffer from more mental and physical disorders

https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/why-highly-intelligent-people-suffer-more-mental-and-physical-disorders/

 

2025-02-02

Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart

ChatGPT

Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluating planetary prospects

OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.

Identifying potential candidates

I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.

Assessing potential candidates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.

Assessing habitable zones

I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revisiting exoplanet options

I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.

Refining odds

I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.

Clarifying speculative nature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.

Mapping out speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessing likelihoods

I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.

Piecing together speculative odds

I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.

Piecing together

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.

Assessing civilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.

Below is a very speculative chart thatbased on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIST-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIST-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIST-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?

Earth’s Example:

On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIST-1 System (e, f, g):

These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.

A Final Note

All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!




あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation's value

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.

The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually written as:

𝑁

=

𝑅

×

𝑓

𝑝

×

𝑛

𝑒

×

𝑓

𝑙

×

𝑓

𝑖

×

𝑓

𝑐

×

𝐿

N=R

×f

p

×n

e

×f

l

×f

i

×f

c

×L

Where:

𝑅

R

: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

n

e

: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.

𝐿

L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Some factors, like

𝑅

R

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.

Highly Speculative Factors:

The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

,

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

,

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

, and

𝐿

L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of Possible Values:

Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for

𝑁

N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.

Heuristic, Not Predictive:

The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.

In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.




あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.

Piecing together possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.

Reflecting on potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallel evolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.

Evaluating life exploration

I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.

Adapting the equ Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 21:12

Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart

ChatGPT

Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluating planetary prospects

OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.

Identifying potential candidates

I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.

Assessing potential candidates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.

Assessing habitable zones

I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revisiting exoplanet options

I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.

Refining odds

I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.

Clarifying speculative nature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.

Mapping out speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessing likelihoods

I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.

Piecing together speculative odds

I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.

Piecing together

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.

Assessing civilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.

Below is a very speculative chart thatbased on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIST-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIST-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIST-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?

Earth’s Example:

On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIST-1 System (e, f, g):

These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.

A Final Note

All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!




あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation's value

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.

The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually written as:

𝑁

=

𝑅

×

𝑓

𝑝

×

𝑛

𝑒

×

𝑓

𝑙

×

𝑓

𝑖

×

𝑓

𝑐

×

𝐿

N=R

×f

p

×n

e

×f

l

×f

i

×f

c

×L

Where:

𝑅

R

: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

n

e

: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.

𝐿

L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Some factors, like

𝑅

R

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.

Highly Speculative Factors:

The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

,

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

,

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

, and

𝐿

L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of Possible Values:

Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for

𝑁

N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.

Heuristic, Not Predictive:

The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.

In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.




あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.

Piecing together possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.

Reflecting on potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallel evolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.

Evaluating life exploration

I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.

Adapting the equ Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 21:12

2025-01-16

[] The Dichotomy of Intellectual Engagement in Digital Media Consumption: A Profound Exegesis

In the labyrinthine realm of digital content dissemination, an enigmatic phenomenon has surfaced, challenging our axioms regarding the nexus between content ubiquity and viewer cognitive acumen. This disquisition endeavors to elucidate the paradoxical inverse correlation between video viewership metrics and the intellectual quotient of the audience, propounding that audiovisual content amassing prodigious view counts tends to captivate viewers with a mean Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of 100, while their more esoteric counterparts allure a demographic boasting an average IQ of 120.

Epistemological Framework and Methodological Paradigms

To fathom this counterintuitive paradigm, one must first grapple with the multifarious nature of human cognition and the intricate interplay between intellectual capacity and media predilections. This hypothesis, positing an inverse relationship between a video's popularity and the mean IQ of its viewership, necessitates a rigorous examination of the underlying psycho-sociological and neurocognitive factors that may engender such a paradoxical outcome.

The application of Cognitive Load Theory to media consumption habits provides a plausible explication for this phenomenon. Videos achieving viral status often employ reductionist narratives and readily assimilable information, minimizing cognitive strain. Conversely, less ubiquitous videos may delve into more abstruse subject matter, demanding heightened cognitive engagement and a more sophisticated intellectual framework for comprehensive assimilation.

Algorithmic Hegemony and Epistemic Bubbles

The pervasive influence of recommendation algorithms in content distribution platforms cannot be discounted in this analysis. These algorithmic arbiters, designed to maximize user engagement, may inadvertently engender epistemic bubbles that reinforce existing cognitive predispositions. Individuals with superior IQs may actively seek out more intellectually challenging or esoteric content, thereby circumventing the algorithmic propensity towards homogenization and cognitive stasis.

Socioeconomic Stratification and Information Asymmetry

It is imperative to consider the socioeconomic dimensions that may influence both IQ development and media consumption patterns. Higher IQ individuals often correlate with elevated socioeconomic status, potentially affording them greater access to diverse epistemological resources and fostering a predilection for more intellectually stimulating content. This demographic may be less susceptible to the allure of mainstream, highly-viewed videos that cater to a broader, less discerning audience.

Implications for Content Creators and Platform Architects

The ramifications of this inverse relationship between viewership and viewer IQ are profound for content creators and platform developers alike. It challenges the prevailing paradigm that equates popularity with quality or intellectual value. Content creators targeting a more intellectually discerning audience may need to recalibrate their expectations regarding view counts and engagement metrics, focusing instead on cultivating a dedicated niche audience that values cognitive stimulation over mass appeal.

Conclusion: Navigating the Intellectual Chasm in Digital Media

In summation, the observed dichotomy between high-viewership videos attracting an audience with an average IQ of 100 and their less popular counterparts appealing to viewers with a mean IQ of 120 underscores the complex relationship between intellectual capacity and media consumption in the digital age. This phenomenon necessitates a reevaluation of how we measure content value and success in the online sphere, prompting a more nuanced approach to content creation, curation, and consumption that acknowledges the diverse cognitive needs of the audience spectrum. The implications of this paradigm shift extend far beyond mere metrics, touching upon fundamental questions of epistemology, cognitive diversity, and the very nature of intellectual engagement in the digital era.

[] The Erroneous Notion of English as a "Hostile Language": A Comprehensive Analysis

The assertion that English constitutes a "hostile language" is emblematic of a profound misunderstanding of the intricate relationship between language, culture, and communication. Such a reductionist viewpoint, often stemming from cultural insularity or an oversimplified interpretation of global dynamics, fails to recognize the multifaceted and adaptive nature of language as a vehicle for connection rather than division.

The Essence of Language as a Communicative Tool

Language, in its most fundamental form, serves as a sophisticated instrument for human expression and interaction. It encapsulates the complexities of thought, emotion, and cultural nuance. To label English as "hostile" is to overlook its role as a global lingua franca that facilitates dialogue among diverse cultures. This designation not only undermines the rich tapestry of English-speaking societies but also dismisses the language's capacity for evolution and adaptation, reflecting the very societies it serves.

Cultural Imperialism vs. Linguistic Agency

Critics often conflate the global dominance of English with cultural imperialism, positing that its prevalence signifies an erosion of local languages and cultures. However, this perspective neglects the agency of non-native speakers who actively adopt and adapt English to meet their communicative needs. The expansion of English is not merely an imposition; it is a testament to its utility and flexibility in diverse contexts. By embracing English, individuals from various linguistic backgrounds enhance their communicative repertoire without relinquishing their cultural identities.

The Fallacy of Inherent Hostility

To characterize English as "hostile" implies an intrinsic aggression or antagonism within the language itself—a notion that is fundamentally flawed. Hostility is not an inherent characteristic of language but rather a reflection of the sociopolitical contexts in which it is employed. The potential for misunderstanding or conflict arises not from the linguistic medium but from the intentions and attitudes of its speakers. Thus, vilifying English misplaces responsibility for interpersonal and intercultural tensions that are often rooted in broader societal issues.

The Role of English in Global Connectivity

In an increasingly interconnected world, English functions as a crucial bridge across cultural divides. It enables collaboration in vital fields such as science, technology, diplomacy, and commerce, fostering innovation and mutual understanding. Proficiency in English can empower individuals and communities by providing access to resources and opportunities that might otherwise remain elusive. This empowerment challenges the notion of hostility; instead, it highlights the language's role as an enabler of progress and cooperation.

Conclusion: A Call for Intellectual Rigor

In conclusion, the characterization of English as a "hostile language" represents a reductive oversimplification that fails to capture the complexities inherent in linguistic interaction within our globalized society. Rather than viewing languages through a lens of hostility or division, we should embrace their potential for fostering understanding and collaboration. It is imperative to cultivate a more nuanced appreciation for the role of English—and indeed all languages—in shaping our shared human experience. Only through such intellectual rigor can we transcend divisive narratives and celebrate the rich diversity that language offers in our interconnected world.

[] The Hatena Anonymous Diary: A Critical Examination of Its Flaws

The Hatena Anonymous Diary, while undeniably a distinctive fixture within the tapestry of Japanese internet culture, has garnered substantial criticism for its content and the implications of its operational framework. This discourse aims to elucidate the reasons underpinning its characterization as "problematic."

The Paradox of Anonymity

At the crux of the Hatena Anonymous Diary's appeal lies its hallmark feature: anonymity. This veil of secrecy ostensibly facilitates unrestrained discourse, allowing individuals to articulate their thoughts without fear of retribution. However, this very anonymity engenders a paradoxical effect; it cultivates an environment ripe for irresponsible commentary and vitriolic defamation. The absence of accountability diminishes the sense of responsibility that typically accompanies public expression, resulting in a proliferation of emotionally charged diatribes and baseless assertions. Such dynamics render the establishment of constructive dialogue increasingly elusive, thereby stifling meaningful engagement.

Superficiality of Content

Moreover, the content disseminated through the Hatena Anonymous Diary frequently exhibits a disconcerting superficiality. Many entries lack substantive depth, failing to provide rigorous analysis or innovative perspectives. Instead, they often succumb to the allure of trending topics or sensationalism, prioritizing ephemeral relevance over intellectual rigor. This trend not only undermines the potential for serious discourse but also contributes to a culture where shallow engagement with complex issues prevails. In an era marked by information saturation, this deficiency in content quality is particularly egregious, as it detracts from the cultivation of critical thinking and informed debate.

Cultural Homogeneity and Social Responsibility

Additionally, the cultural ramifications of this platform warrant scrutiny. By amplifying certain dominant narratives or viewpoints, there exists a palpable risk of eroding diversity within public discourse. The emergence of "groupthink" within specific communities can lead to the marginalization of dissenting voices, creating an echo chamber that stifles pluralism. In such an insular environment, diverse perspectives are systematically excluded, resulting in a homogenized narrative that fails to reflect the complexities of societal discourse. This phenomenon not only undermines individual expression but also poses significant risks to the overall health of democratic dialogue.

Conclusion: A Call for Reflection

In conclusion, while the Hatena Anonymous Diary ostensibly champions free expression through its anonymous framework, it simultaneously fosters a milieu characterized by irresponsibility and superficiality. The cultural influence wielded by this platform raises critical concerns regarding its impact on diversity and social responsibility. Thus, characterizing it as "problematic" is not merely an exaggeration; it is an imperative recognition of its shortcomings. Moving forward, it is essential to scrutinize how this platform might evolve and address these inherent flaws in order to foster a more enriching and responsible discourse.

2025-01-13

https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/528f479f-fd3c-43fd-9463-7c2923560573

ある人の嗅覚倫理に関する論文だけど、文献だけで匂いが影響を与えると書いてるから女性学位を与えるのは無駄だと言われる。

論文書くなら、裁判官センサーを取り付けるなり、何人かの被験者ルールを守った上で反応を調べるとかやりようはあったはず。

アタリマエのことを調べるというのは裁判での証拠提出のときに役立つからもっと調べてほしい。

けど、統計学的手法を駆使するなどして、裁判官が9割型認める内容でないと価値がない。

contemporary relevance. I suggest that smell very often invokes identity in a way that signifies an individual’s worth and status in an inarguable manner that short-circuits conscious reflection. This can be accounted for by acknowledging olfaction’s strongly affective nature, which produces such strong bodily sensations and emotions that reflexivity is bypassed in favour of a behavioural or cognitive solution that assuages the intense feeling most immediately. Olfactory disgust, therefore, tends to result in rejection, while harmful forms of olfactory desire may result in sublimation or subjugation. My thesis is particularly attentive to tensions and ambivalences that complicate the typically bifurcated affective spectrum of olfactory experiences, drawing attention to (dis)pleasurable olfactory relations that have socio-political utility. I argue that literary fiction is not only an arena in which olfactory logics can be instantiated, but also a laboratory in which possibilities for new kinds of relations and connections can be fostered and tested. Chapter One explores how smell can be used to indicate class antipathies, partly as they relate to homelessness, beginning with George Orwell’s seminal non-fiction text, The Road to Wigan Pier (1936), before considering Iain Sinclair’s The Last London (2017) and Bong Joon Ho’s Parasite (2019). In Chapter Two I explore the fantastical, idealistic, and utopic thinking that surrounds olfaction, which presents smell as fundamentally non-human, by addressing J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999), Virginia Woolf’s Flush (1933), Rachel Yoder’s Nightbitch (2021), and Laura Jean McKay’s The Animals in That Country (2020). Chapter Three focuses on the intersectional olfactory dimensions of ‘misogynoir’—the coextensive anti-Black racism and misogyny that Black women experience—and considers Toni Morrison’s Tar Baby (1981), Bernice McFadden’s Sugar (2000) and Raven Leilani’s Luster (2020). In Chapter Four, I conceptualise an oppressive olfactory logic, which is used against women and girls in order to legitimise their harassment or abuse, drawing primarily on Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita (1955), but also Patrick Süskind’s Perfume (1985). Chapter Five discusses two forms of olfactory desire—perversion and queerness—which have separate moral valences. I address J. M. Coetzee’s The Master of Petersburg (1994), Ann Quin’s Berg (1964), and Sam Byers’ Come Join Our Disease (2020), and argue for fiction’s role in reorienting readers’ habitual relations to olfaction.

Date

2024-06-25

あと、論文の要旨を読んだ限りだとまさに人文系のものなんだが、女性だとこれで通るのか?それとも、男女問わないのか?

2024-11-09

まいど!」って

everytime っていう意味だけど、

まいどおおきにって、

everytime, very much っていう意味だけど、

なんで一番肝心な

Thank you

を省略するのかな?

2024-10-28

anond:20241028144146

あー

多分翻訳ではないので評価できるけど

くっそ不自然

No, you are NOT talking about "accessibility", you are definitely talking about アクセシビリティ.

You are very welcomed to disagree though. How could it, assuming it's "accessibility", different only for '底辺' over 40?

2024-10-15

Anthropicの創業者であるダリオ氏の、AI進化した世界未来予想を読んでる

https://darioamodei.com/machines-of-loving-grace

・Behavioral interventions. I haven’t much mentioned it given the focus on the biological side of neuroscience, but psychiatry and psychology have of course developed a wide repertoire of behavioral interventions over the 20th century; it stands to reason that AI could accelerate these as well, both the development of new methods and helping patients to adhere to existing methods. More broadly, the idea of an “AI coachwho always helps you to be the best version of yourself, who studies your interactions and helps you learn to be more effective, seems very promising.

(Google翻訳)

・行動介入。神経科学生物学的側面に焦点が当てられているため、これについてはあまり触れていませんが、精神医学心理学は、もちろん 20 世紀を通じて行動介入の幅広いレパートリーを開発してきました。AI が、新しい方法の開発と、患者既存方法に従うのを支援することの両方で、これらを加速させる可能性もあるのは当然です。より広い意味では、常に最高の自分になれるよう支援し、あなたのやり取りを研究して、より効果的になる方法を学ぶのを手助けしてくれる「AI コーチ」というアイデアは、非常に有望に思えます

・Everyday problems that we don’t think of as clinical disease will also be solved. Most of us have everyday psychological problems that are not ordinarily thought of as rising to the level of clinical disease. Some people are quick to anger, others have trouble focusing or are often drowsy, some are fearful or anxious, or react badly to change. Today, drugs already exist to help with e.g. alertness or focus (caffeine, modafinil, ritalin) but as with many other previous areas, much more is likely to be possible. Probably many more such drugs exist and have not been discovered, and there may also be totally new modalities of intervention, such as targeted light stimulation (see optogenetics above) or magnetic fields. Given how many drugs we’ve developed in the 20th century that tune cognitive function and emotional state, I’m very optimistic about the “compressed 21st” where everyone can get their brain to behave a bit better and have a more fulfilling day-to-day experience.

(Google翻訳)

・臨床疾患とは考えていない日常的な問題解決されるでしょう。私たちほとんどは、通常は臨床疾患のレベルに達するとは考えられないような日常的な心理的問題を抱えています。怒りっぽい人もいれば、集中力に欠けたり眠気を催すことが多い人もいれば、恐れや不安を感じたり、変化に反応しにくい人もいます今日覚醒集中力を高める薬(カフェインモダフィニルリタリン)はすでに存在していますが、他の多くの以前の分野と同様に、さらに多くの薬が開発される可能性があります。おそらく、そのような薬はもっとたくさん存在し、発見されていないでしょう。また、標的を絞った光刺激(上記オプトジェネティクスを参照)や磁場など、まったく新しい介入方法もあるかもしれません。20世紀に認知機能感情状態を調整する薬がどれだけ開発されたかを考えると、誰もが脳の働きを少し良くし、より充実した日々を送れるようになる「圧縮された21世紀」について私は非常に楽観的です。

Human baseline experience can be much better. Taking one step further, many people have experienced extraordinary moments of revelation, creative inspiration, compassion, fulfillment, transcendence, love, beauty, or meditative peace. The character and frequency of these experiences differs greatly from person to person and within the same person at different times, and can also sometimes be triggered by various drugs (though often with side effects). All of this suggests that the “space of what is possible to experience” is very broad and that a larger fraction of people’s lives could consist of these extraordinary moments. It is probably also possible to improve various cognitive functions across the board. This is perhaps the neuroscience version of “biological freedom” or “extended lifespans”.

(Google翻訳)

人間基本的経験は、もっと良くなる可能性がありますさらに一歩進むと、多くの人が啓示、創造的なインスピレーション、思いやり、達成感、超越、愛、美しさ、瞑想的な平和といった特別な瞬間を経験しています。これらの経験性質と頻度は、人によって大きく異なり、同じ人でも時期によって異なり、さまざまな薬物によって引き起こされることもあります(ただし、多くの場合副作用があります)。これらすべては、「経験可能空間」が非常に広く、人々の人生の大部分がこれらの特別な瞬間で構成されている可能性があることを示唆しています。さまざまな認知機能全面的改善することもおそらく可能です。これはおそらく、神経科学版の「生物学自由」または「寿命の延長」です。

まだ途中までしか読んでないけど、この辺が特に印象的だった。

発達障害持ちでスペックが低い上、達成感とかの青春感情体験できなかった自分からすると夢のようだが、同時にこういうのを人工的に作れて皆良い人間になれるのってなんか怖くもあるな

はてなだとシロクマ先生とかがよくそういう話してる気がするけど

でも、実際そういう時代になったら自分はあっさり享受しちゃいそうだなあ

2024-09-20

anond:20240920143806

Hey guys, we have a gift for you! We just need you to answer a few questions first, then you'll earn a nice reward. It's very quick and simple! It only takes a minute. So come on, click on the following link to claim your gift. Don't wait, time is running out! Click on the link and enjoy your free gift. Now hurry up!

2024-09-05

anond:20240904032316

anond:20240904032316についてたブクマカの初めて買ったCDリリース年を調べた。

スクレイピング

Chromeコンソールから

for (let a of document.body.getElementsByClassName('entry-comment-text js-bookmark-comment')) console.log(a.textContent) 

ってやってテキスト集める。

AIリリース年を教えてもらう

Microsoft Copilotに「以下の文章に出てくる、音楽CDタイトルリリース年を一覧で表にしてください。」って指示。

タイトルリリース
パンチ・ザ・クロック (エルヴィス・コステロ)1983年
ハイランドハードレイン (アズテックカメラ)1983年
TSUNAMI (サザンオールスターズ)2000年
ロケット団永遠に (ポケモン)1998年
パラダイス銀河 (光GENJI)1988年
さよなら人類 (たま)1990年
SUPER BEST II (CHAGE&ASKA)1992年
LOVEマシーン (モーニング娘。)1999年
treasure (B’z)1998年
pleasure (B’z)1997年
POP LIFE (JUDY AND MARY)1998年
F-ZERO GX サウンドトラック2003年
Chicago 17 (Chicago)1984年
Wind Climbing ~風にあそばれて~ (奥井亜紀)1997年
バロック音楽不明
季節がいく時 (SPEED)1999年
天外魔境 (ゲーム)1989年
旅人のうた (中島みゆき)1995年
ドリームシフト (地球防衛組)1991年
INNOCENT SORROW (abingdon boys school)2006年
カルトグラススターズ (ミッシェルガンエレファント)2000年
悪の華 (BUCK-TICK)1990年
風が通り抜ける街へ (ZARD)1993年
My Little Lover1995年
globe1996年
小松未歩 ファーストアルバム1997年
愛の言霊 (サザンオールスターズ)1996年
そばかす (JUDY AND MARY)1996年
中村めいこ不明
ポケットモンスター赤緑 BGM音源1997年
TWO-MIX TRUTH1996年
Wind Climbing ~風にあそばれて~ (魔法陣グルグル)1997年
ジュラシックパーク サウンドトラック1993年
After Burner サウンドトラック (SEGA)1987年
Love Wing (ハミングバード)1993年
super best 2 (CHAGE&ASKA)1992年
中山美穂 8cmCDシングル不明
C-Girl (浅香唯)1988年
天晴 (サディスティック・ミカ・バンド)1974年
Hi! (光GENJI)1988年
CAROL (TM NETWORK)1988年
DORA THE BEST (ドラえもん)1999年
がじゃいも1997年
美少女戦士セーラームーン~In Another Dream1992年
交響曲ドラゴンクエストIV 導かれし者たち N響1990年
ポケモン言えるかな1997年
dear (大江千里)1989年
めずらしい人生 (KAN)1990年
BECAUSE (有頂天)1986年
スーパーゼビウス 12inchEP (細野晴臣)1984年
ZUTTO (永井真理子)1990年
愛は勝つ (KAN)1990年
クラシックCD (100円ショップ)不明
ブルーハーツ ファーストアルバム1987年
I’m Here (小比類巻かほる)1988年
微笑みの爆弾 (幽遊白書)1992年
くじら12号 (JUDY AND MARY)1996年
無罪モラトリアム (椎名林檎)1999年
愛のままにわがままに 僕は君だけを傷つけない (B’z)1993年
WORST (聖飢魔II)1990年
BADDEST (久保田利伸)1989年
Delight Slight Light KISS (松任谷由実)1988年
リフレインが叫んでる (松任谷由実)1988年
Gift for Fanks (TM NETWORK)1987年
もっと強く君を抱きしめたなら1994年
Che Che-Bye Bye (種ともこ)1991年
負けないで (ZARD)1993年
愛と虐殺の日々 (聖飢魔II)1991年
ペットショップボーイズ1986年
機動戦士Zガンダム オリジナルサウンドトラック1985年
マルコじいさん (さねよしいさこ)1995年
めざせポケモンマスター1997年
淋しい熱帯魚 (Wink)1989年
キャロル (TM NETWORK)1988年
幽遊白書 ミュージックバトル編1993年
蜘蛛の糸 (筋肉少女帯)1990年
Winners (サイバーフォーミュラー)1991年
だんご3兄弟1999年
Achtung Baby (U2)1991年
faith (George Michael)1987年
ダイアモンド (プリンセス プリンセス)1989年
The very best of Unicorn1993年
ALFEE GOLD (ALFEE)1985年
そして伝説へ (鴻上尚史)1986年
マシンガンズの集い (SEX MACHINEGUNS)1998年
FF4 アレンジミニアルバム1991年
ブルーウォーター (森川美穂)1990年
鉄骨飲料1990年
SPY (槇原敬之)1994年
尾崎家の祖母(3) (まりちゃんズ)1977年
TIME (REBECCA)1986年
もう一度TENDERNESS1995年
HIGH LANDER (爆風スランプ)1989年
空耳の丘 (遊佐未森)1990年
Yellow Yellow Happy (ポケットビスケッツ)1996年
リッジレーサー2 サウンドトラック1994年
フラッシュパパメンソール (電気グルーヴ)1995年
さよなら人類 (たま)1990年
倉木麻衣アルバム不明
カルミナ・ブラーナ (輸入盤)不明
スキャットマン (Scatman John)1994年
白い雲のように (猿岩石)1996年
幽☆遊☆白書 オリジナルサウンドトラックVol2~魔界の扉編~1994年
ヴェルディ川崎応援歌不明
ShinWeAre (BoA)2003年
忘れない/風の住む星 (西脇唯)1995年
ヴィヴァルディ四季不明
田園 (小学館クラシック・イン」)不明
ゼルダの伝説 風のタクト オリジナルサウンドトラック2003年
MUSIC from HYDLIDE31987年
君だけのTomorrow (ドロンズ)1997年
松浦亜弥アルバム不明
ドラクエサントラ不明
マンモスフラワー (フラワーカンパニーズ)2000年
めざせポケモンマスター1997年
ユグドラシル (BUMP OF CHICKEN)2004年
マリオRPG サウンドトラック1996年
ファイナルファンタジーVII リユニオントラック1997年
Time to Destination (Every Little Thing)1998年
ショパンアルバム (アルゲリッチ)不明
ここは春の国 (谷山浩子)1988年
Valkyrie Notes (TONERICO)2019年
Love Phantom (B’z)1995年
with you (三上博史)1993年
夏の日の1993 (class)1993年
いとしのエリー (サザンオールスターズ)1979年
Round About Midnight (Miles Davis)1957年
Gift for Fanks (TM NETWORK)1987年
ez do dance (TRF)1993年
イージューライダー (奥田民生)1996年
ロマサガ サウンドトラック1992年
ドラクエ2 ドラマCD1990年
DATE (岡村靖幸)1988年
ETERNAL WIND (森口博子)1991年
ARAKAWA魂 (荒川ラップブラザーズ)2003年
愛の言霊 (サザンオールスターズ)1996年
ドラゴンクエスト3 サウンドトラック1988年
モールワールド (ヒューイ・ルイス&ザ・ニュース)1988年
HOME (Mr.Children)2007年
trfアルバム不明
ガニ (とんねるず)不明
暴動 (There’s a Riot GoinOn) (Sly and the Family Stone)1971年
カミワザ -dIvine works-不明
シングルベスト10 おまけつき (シャ乱Q)1997年
カウボーイビバップ サウンドトラック1998年
ガンダムF91 サウンドトラック (森口博子)1991年
暴れだす (ウルフルズ)1995年
団子3兄弟1999年
エルドラド (THE ALFEE)1997年
foo? (ポルノグラフィティ)2001年
Until Strawberry Sherbet (林原めぐみ)1997年
勇気のしるし~リゲインテーマ~ (時任三郎)1989年
いとしさと切なさと心強さと (篠原涼子 with t.komuro)1994年
REVIEW (GLAY)1997年
愛の言霊 (サザンオールスターズ)1996年
ナイスビート (キンモクセイ)2002年
Carol (TM NETWORK)1988年
サン=サーンスオルガン (マルティノン)不明
銀河鉄道の夜 (細野晴臣)1985年
ロード第二章 (THE 虎舞竜)1993年
IT’S ONLY LOVE (福山雅治)1994年
バザール3兄弟音頭不明
さよなら人類 (たま)1990年
フロムイエスタデイ (桑田佳祐)1992年
アスタリスク (ORANGE RANGE)2005年
ark (L’Arc~en~Ciel)1999年
春よ、来い (松任谷由実)1994年
ray (L’Arc~en~Ciel)1999年
ポケモン言えるかな1997年
ニーベルングの指環 管弦楽曲集 (ショルティ/VPO)1986年
minoru land (向谷実)1986年
1stアルバム (人間椅子)1990年
the great escape (JUDY AND MARY)2001年
bluebird (浜崎あゆみ)2006年
Variety (竹内まりや)1984年
Watermark (エンヤ)1988年
BEAT EMOTION (BOOWY)1986年
ARAKAWA魂 (荒川ラップブラザーズ)2003年
MYSELF ~風になりたい~ (徳永英明)1991年
ひとりじゃない (DEEN)1996年
ドリームハンター麗夢 サウンドトラック1985年
シンディ・ローパー不明
Keep The Faith (Bon Jovi)1992年
君がいるだけで (米米CLUB)1992年
シェイク (SMAP)1996年
決戦は金曜日 (DREAMS COME TRUE)1992年
SelEVENTH MOON (FireBomber)1995年
田園 (玉置浩二)1996年
プロビジョン (スクリッティ・ポリッティ)1988年
クラッシュ万事休す不明
yellow yellow happy (ポケットビスケッツ)1996年
STONED TOWN (akeboshi)2004年
ナイトフォール・イン・ミドルアース (ブラインド・ガーディアン)1998年
1st (ブルーハーツ)1987年
FENCE OF DEFENSE III (FENCE OF DEFENSE)1988年
カラクリハウス (レピッシュ)1989年
just communication (two-mix)1995年
マーラー交響曲7番「夜の歌」ロリン・マゼール指揮ウィーンフィル不明
未来航路 (La’cryma Christi)1997年
BELLS (吉田美奈子)1986年
原子心母 (Pink Floyd)1970年
プリパラミュージックコレクション不明
トラブル・イン・ヘブン (宇都宮隆)1994年
Kiss me (氷室京介)1992年
Past Masters1 (The Beatles)1988年
super donuts (スターダストレビュー)1990年
ザ・タイマーズ1989年
LIFE (小沢健二)1994年
FF5 サウンドトラック1992年
踊るポンポコリン (B.B.クィーンズ)1990年
イノセントマン (ビリー・ジョエル)1983年
だんご3兄弟1999年
ベト5シューベルト未完成 (カルロ・マリア・ジュリーニ)不明
MAGIC OF LOVE (アニメ魔法陣グルグル)1994年
ラグランジュポイント サウンドトラック1991年

途中で切れたので分割する。 続き→ anond:20240905115337

2024-08-12

A secret of the Japanese

There are some things that people who come to Japan to visit should be aware of. I have not read much mention of this and it may be new to many of you.

That is, many Japanese do not like the smell of perfume. On trains, in crowded places, and in restaurants, the smell of perfume is considered very annoying. In Japan, it is considered good public manners to wear perfume only to the extent that it is only faintly fragrant or faintly scented.

Some people may want to use perfume to control body odor. Even in Japan, body odor is an important issue, especially during the hot and humid summer months.

The single most important measure against body odor in Japan is to keep the body clean. Take a bath at least once a day, or twice if necessary. This is the norm in Japan, a country blessed with abundant water resources.

In addition, paper wet-sheets for wiping perspiration are sold everywhere, including convenience stores and pharmacies. They are a necessity during Japan's dangerous summers.

In short, the important thing is to get rid of body odor. If you try to cover it up with a stronger smelling perfume, you will be disliked by the Japanese.

2024-08-09

Nagasaki, Israel, Ukraine



Once I had a quite cold attitude to Nagasaki’s Atomic Bomb Victims Memorial Peace Prayer Ceremony, I was likehere comes another Peace rally LMFAO”. But just look at this, the ambassador of Israel attacked Nagasaki’s mayor fiercely saying “The mayor took over the ceremony for his ideology”, a bigwig at the Simon Wiesenthal Center said “the Nagasaki’s atomic bomb ended World War 2” and now he’s criticizing the non-invitation of Israel’s rep to the ceremony asunethical”, and top of that, the ambassador of the US, the one who dropped the atomic bomb, is talking nonsense, saying “if Israel don’t join we also don’t join lol.” With hearing all these I’m so surprised of finding myself very much pissed off…are you all making light off victims of such a cruel weapon you sons of bitch?

If you want to beat up the mayor of Nagasaki, it's fine to criticize the Shinkansen project in Kyushu area, corruption, welfare arrangement, or other issues (*This is just an example of some topics, I'm not claiming that I’m actually frustrated by any of these). But don’t these morons know that the Nagasaki’s peace ceremony is essentially a memorial ceremony? No one is crazy enough to start screaming in memorial service about his relatives whom he doesn’t like. If someone was yelling, ”Why didn't you invite me to the memorial service!!”, Its clear in everyone’s mind saying, ”It's because you behave that way..” … If you claim yourself as a grown-up, “it was really a shame, lets talk it over and get things straight” should be your response. Does Gillard Cohen realize that he is making a personal attack on someone who in Western terms would be the director of the Auschwitz museum?

(as a side note, I am fed up also to the vulgar accusation by the Palestinian Ambassador when Hiroshima City invited the Israel rep to their ceremony. Please go ahead and be aggressive in UN conferences, but again is that a proper behavior in connection with the memorial ceremony?)

I haven’t say enough to the reaction of reps of Western countries to Nagasaki. Why don’t you think twice before reacting impulsively? No doubt Japan is one of the most pro-Western countries in Asia, they support Ukraine most earnestly among Non-NATO countries. Still even quiet and shy Japanese people is totally put off by military operations of Israel. It is too easy to imagine how Israel is hated in non-pro-Western countries. When will you have an imagination to realize your such attitude making many countries having distance from Ukraine. If western countries close their eyes to horrors in Gaza and be determined to defend Israel anyway, why aren’t others allowed to keep their relationship with Russia even after devastating scenes in Bucha?

(btw I was so impressed when Zelenskyy expressed his support to Israel, are you serious? Don't you think of a scenario where Ukrainian militias rise up in Donetsk or in Luhansk, resulting in heavy casualties among Russian settlers, leading to Russia denouncing this as a despicable terrorist attack targeting Russian civilians? That's exactly what's happening in Palestine.)

Anyway you morons should come to your senses, and admit Israel’s outrageous actions are no difference from that of Russia. And know that calling the criticism to Israel as “antisemitism” is making you look so smart. Refusing Neo-Nazism ain’t discrimination to Germans, doxing Zaitokukai (*a nationalist group which calls for an end to state welfare and alleged privileges afforded to Koreans in Japan) ain’t Japanese-hate, and impeachment against Zionists ain’t anti-Jewish either.

にほんご:https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20240808145754

anond:20240808145754

海外在住でも自称弱者男性の俺が無償英訳してやったぞ。乱暴な口調もできるだけ残しておいたんでGoogle翻訳にかけて粗を探すなり海外掲示板投稿するなりどうぞ

Nagasaki, Israel, Ukraine

Once I had a quite cold attitude to Nagasaki’s Atomic Bomb Victims Memorial Peace Prayer Ceremony, I was likehere comes another Peace rally LMFAO”. But just look at this, the ambassador of Israel attacked Nagasaki’s mayor fiercely saying “The mayor took over the ceremony for his ideology”, a bigwig at the Simon Wiesenthal Center said “the Nagasaki’s atomic bomb ended World War 2” and now he’s criticizing the non-invitation of Israel’s rep to the ceremony asunethical”, and top of that, the ambassador of the US, the one who dropped the atomic bomb, is talking nonsense, saying “if Israel don’t join we also don’t join lol.” With hearing all these I’m so surprised of finding myself very much pissed off…are you all making light off victims of such a cruel weapon you sons of bitch?

If you want to beat up the mayor of Nagasaki, it's fine to criticize the Shinkansen project in Kyushu area, corruption, welfare arrangement, or other issues (*This is just an example of some topics, I'm not claiming that I’m actually frustrated by any of these). But don’t these morons know that the Nagasaki’s peace ceremony is essentially a memorial ceremony? No one is crazy enough to start screaming in memorial service about his relatives whom he doesn’t like. If someone was yelling, ”Why didn't you invite me to the memorial service!!”, Its clear in everyone’s mind saying, ”It's because you behave that way..” … If you claim yourself as a grown-up, “it was really a shame, lets talk it over and get things straight” should be your response. Does Gillard Cohen realize that he is making a personal attack on someone who in Western terms would be the director of the Auschwitz museum?

(as a side note, I am fed up also to the vulgar accusation by the Palestinian Ambassador when Hiroshima City invited the Israel rep to their ceremony. Please go ahead and be aggressive in UN conferences, but again is that a proper behavior in connection with the memorial ceremony?)

I haven’t say enough to the reaction of reps of Western countries to Nagasaki. Why don’t you think twice before reacting impulsively? No doubt Japan is one of the most pro-Western countries in Asia, they support Ukraine most earnestly among Non-NATO countries. Still even quiet and shy Japanese people is totally put off by military operations of Israel. It is too easy to imagine how Israel is hated in non-pro-Western countries. When will you have an imagination to realize your such attitude making many countries having distance from Ukraine. If western countries close their eyes to horrors in Gaza and be determined to defend Israel anyway, why aren’t others allowed to keep their relationship with Russia even after devastating scenes in Bucha?

(btw I was so impressed when Zelenskyy expressed his support to Israel, are you serious? Don't you think of a scenario where Ukrainian militias rise up in Donetsk or in Luhansk, resulting in heavy casualties among Russian settlers, leading to Russia denouncing this as a despicable terrorist attack targeting Russian civilians? That's exactly what's happening in Palestine.)

Anyway you morons should come to your senses, and admit Israel’s outrageous actions are no difference from that of Russia. And know that calling the criticism to Israel as “antisemitism” is making you look so smart. Refusing Neo-Nazism ain’t discrimination to Germans, doxing Zaitokukai (*a nationalist group which calls for an end to state welfare and alleged privileges afforded to Koreans in Japan) ain’t Japanese-hate, and impeachment against Zionists ain’t anti-Jewish either.

2024-08-04

朗報】まともなトランスさん、正論を述べる

https://x.com/BuckAngel/status/1820076126234169384

Birth certificate is not proof of sex. My birth certificate was actually changed many years ago to reflect male. I am a biological female XX chromosomes. I can prove to you who keep telling me that Algeria’s Imane Khelif is female because the birth certificate says so. That is proof of nothing. What is proof of sex is XX and XY chromosomes.

This is me before and after testosterone injections. I did NOT change my sex I changed my appearance.

BTW this is a very personal thing I am sharing with the world in order to help us all get back to sanity and fairness in women's sports.

出生証明書性別証明するものではない。私の出生証明書は何年も前に男性に変更された。 私は生物学的に女性のXX染色体を持っている。 アルジェリアのイマネ・ケリフが女性だと言い続けるあなたには、出生証明書にそう書いてあるから証明できる。 それは何の証明にもならない。性別証明するのはXX染色体とXY染色体だ。

これはテストステロン注射の前と後の私です。性別を変えたのではなく、外見を変えたのです。

ちなみに、これはとても個人的なことで、私たちみんなが正気女子スポーツの公正さを取り戻すために、世界と分かち合っているのです。

海外にはまともなトランスもいるんやな

2024-08-02

格ゲープレイヤーモラル天元突破する

賞金総額93億円のEsports World CupEWC)が7/3からサウジアラビアで開催中。

これまで半年ほどかけて出場権をかけた大会が開催され、

今、最後の出場権をかけた最終予選(Last Chance Qualifier:LCQ)がサウジアラビアで行われている。

 

8/2の0時からストリートファイター6のLCQが行われているが、ここでのモラル問題になっている。

ストリートファイター6のLCQには149人がエントリーしていたが50名近い人間がDisqualified(DQ)になっている。

Disqualifiedはスポーツ大会用語では様々な規定違反での「失格」という意味で使われているが、

e-sports界隈では「ドタキャン」の意味でつかわれることが多い。

簡単に言ってしまえば、エントリーはしたが当日会場に来ていなかったので「失格」になったということ。

 

LCQはトーナメント方式となっており、当然だが「全員参加する前提」で試合が組まれている。

3分の1近い参加者DQになったことにより、初日は一試合もせずに通過してしまうような参加者も出ており、

大会公平性に多大な問題が発生している。

 

既に本戦出場を決めているプロゲーマーのOil King選手

Join for the EWC LCQ this time is free, and then I saw that many "well-known" good players were not shown up(DQ).I am really tired of this kind of thing. If you know very early that you can't participate , why not tell the organizer, this makes the bracket very unfair, I hate it

(今回のEWC LCQは無料で参加できるのに、「有名な」上手いプレイヤーがたくさん出てこないのを見て(DQ)、こういうのは本当にうんざりです。参加できないことがかなり早い段階でわかっている場合は、主催者に伝えてみてはいかがでしょうか。これではブラケットが非常に不公平になります。私はそれが嫌いです。)

出ないのがわかってるんなら早く主催に伝えろ。大会不公平になる。

警鐘を鳴らしている。

 

現状、ほとんどの大会大会参加費は無料となっており、誰でもエントリーできるようになっており

また、DQになっても何のペナルティもない。

これはまだ格闘ゲームで安定して大きな金を稼げる人間が多くないことや

新規参入者を阻まないための精神の面も大きいとされている。

なのに多くの"国外"大会で「とりあえずエントリーしておいて当日に参加しない」という行為が横行している。

国外大会に参加するには参加費以外に多大な費用が発生する。

勝てなければ丸々赤字になる。なので大会直前に「やっぱ自信ないからやーめたw」となるのだろう。

だが、こういうことが増えれば参加費の徴収DQした場合ペナルティが課される可能性は非常に高くなる。

こうなると既にファンスポンサーがついていて湯水のごとく金が使えるおじさんはともかく、

新規若者の参加はどんどん困難になっていく。

 

今回のLCQのDQには日本プロ選手も少なくない数含まれていた。

中にはLCQが行われている時間に自宅で他ゲー配信して遊んでいたプロまでいる。

こういう何千万がかかった試合の最終予選ですら「行けたら行くわw」の精神でやってるのを見ると

e-sportsが「たかゲームじゃんw」と言われるのもやむなしだなと思ってしまう。

2024-08-01

ロシアアラスカアメリカに売却したとき、そこに入植していたロシア人はアメリカ人になったのだろうか

ロシア人が新天地植民して毛皮の仕事をしていたら、なんか突然自分国籍アメリカに変わった……変わるのか?

どういう扱いになるんだろう

もともと「ロシア領のアラスカに住むロシア人」がいたとして

アメリカ領のアラスカに住むロシア人」のままなのか

アメリカ領のアラスカに住むアメリカ人」になるのか

国籍が変わる場合いわゆる「帰化」という扱いになるのだろうか

パスポートを発行するのはロシアアメリカのどちらになるのか(パスポート歴史は何年から始まる?)

税金を納める先はロシアアメリカのどちらになるのか

そもそもロシア人」だとか「アメリカ人」だとか、「○○人」であるということはつまりどういうことなのか

国籍って何?という点をそもそも自分はよく知らないのか そこから知る必要があるか

戦争による領土の変更に近くもあり、また違う所もあり

アメリカ独立とか北方領土問題かについて書かれた本でも読んでみるか

そこに住んでいた人の帰属先がどうなるか、についての例を知ることができるかもしれない

あるいは、ずばりアラスカについて書かれた本を探す

ここらへんで紹介された資料でめぼしいものピックアップして目を通しましょうね

アメリカがロシアからアラスカを購入した経緯などが知りたい。 | レファレンス協同データベース

在日朝鮮人とか在朝日本人とかの国籍がどういう扱いかも気になるが、今知りたい内容を知るには他の膨大な話題の海を泳ぐ必要があるから不適か

あっ この本面白そうだな

無国籍複数国籍 あなたは「ナニジン」ですか?』という新書

関係いかもだけどこれも買おう

じゃあ今日の帰りにジュンク堂行きましょうね

(というか、アラスカを売却したタイミングでそこに植民していたロシア人はそもそも存在するのか?植民していたとしても出稼ぎ的な感じで定住しておらず本籍的なものロシアのままだったりしないか?それも知りたいな、やはりレファレンス協同データベース提示された資料第一に漁るべきか)

あー 国籍という概念自体比較最近に生まれたのか 最近……18世紀最近と言ってしまっていいか知らんが……

これでこの日記は終わり

---

oh 英wikipediaに関連する記述があった

Alaska Purchase - Wikipedia

Nearly all Russian settlers left Alaska in the aftermath of the purchase; Alaska would remain sparsely populated until the Klondike Gold Rush began in 1896.

購入後、ほぼすべてのロシア入植者アラスカを去り、1896 年にクロンダイク ゴールド ラッシュが始まるまでアラスカ人口はまばらのままでした。

After the transfer, a number of Russian citizens remained in Sitka, but nearly all of them very soon decided to return to Russia, which was still possible at the expense of the Russian-American Company.

移管後、多くのロシア国民がシトカに留まったが、彼らのほとんどはすぐにロシアへの帰国を決意した。露米会社費用でそれはまだ可能だった。

ほとんどのロシア人はアラスカを去ったのだなあ。じゃあ国籍問題も発生しなかった、と。

疑問は解決したがせっかくなので調べた本は読んでみるか

2024-07-24

歴史改竄でどうこうはアサクリより前からやっている。坂上田村麻呂黒人に始まり、ネトフリでYASUKEアニメ化の時も SHOGUN の時も増田でやってたでしょ

ま~た日本語すら検索すら検索しない人による謎の主張が出ているので、コピペしとくね

 

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the first samurai warrior was a black African? - Quora

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Afro-centrists-claim-that-the-first-samurai-warrior-was-a-black-African

一例:

 

7mo

The original answer and your comment are both wrong. It is very easy to prove Yasuke was a samurai, you just have to check a Japanese dictionary. I searched for 侍・士 (samurai) on the Japanese online encyclopedia コトバンク (Kotobank), which produced a result from 精選版 日本国語大辞典 (Carefully Selected Edition of the Nihon Kokugo Daijiten, aka Shogakukan’s Japanese Dictionary). I’ll post the link at the bottom, but here is the relevant section in Japanese and my translation in English.

 

(3)鎌倉幕府では、侍は僕従を有し、騎上の資格ある武士で、郎従等の凡下と厳重に区別する身分規定が行なわれた。しかし、鎌倉中期以降、その範囲が次第に拡大、戦国時代以降は、諸国大名の家臣をも広く侍と称するようになり、武士一般の称として用いられるようになる。

 

(3) In the Kamakura Shogunate (1185 - 1333 AD), samurai were professional warriors who had servants and were qualified to ride on horseback, and their status was strictly differentiated from ordinary subordinates such as roju. However, from the middle of the Kamakura Shogunate onwards, its scope gradually expanded, and from the Sengoku Period (1467 - 1615 AD) onwards, vassals of feudal lords in various provinces came to be widely referred to as samurai, and it came to be used as a general term for professional warriors.

 

Now we have to ask three questions to see whether Yasuke met this definition:

 

Q: When did Yasuke work for the feudal lord Oda Nobunaga?

 

A: From April 1581 to June 1582. We know this from multiple eyewitness accounts, which I also mention below.

 

Q: Was Yasuke a vassal of Oda Nobunaga?

 

A: Yes, as evidenced by the fact that he was given a stipend, a house, and a job as spear-bearer (a type of bodyguard for the leader of a samurai family). He was also given a short sword called a koshigatana, which was worn as a status symbol and weapon for self-defense at all times by high status samurai. This we know from the Chronicle of Lord Nobunaga, written by Oda Nobunaga’s vassal Ota Gyuichi.

 

Q: Was Yasuke a warrior fighting for Oda Nobunaga?

 

A: Yes, as evidenced by the fact that he fought in three important conflicts. One, Yasuke fought in the Second Tensho Iga War in September 1581. This we can infer because the Jesuits said Oda Nobunaga took Yasuke everywhere with him and he led his own troops into this war. Two, Yasuke fought in the Koshu Conquest from February to March 1582. This we know from the Diary of Ietada, written by Matsudaira Ietada, a vassal of Tokugawa Ieyasu, who was himself a vassal of Oda Nobunaga. Three, Yasuke fought in the Honno-ji Incident of June 1582, in which he tried but failed to save the lives of both Oda Nobunaga and his son Oda Nobutada until Yasuke was the last Oda man standing and surrendered to the traitor Akechi Mitsuhide, who spared his life and returned him to the Jesuits. This we know from letters written by the Jesuits, who were glad to have Yasuke back. According to the Oda family today, Nobunaga’s final order was for Yasuke to help him commit seppuku (ritual suicide by stomach cutting) by decapitating him and bring his head to a courier that returned it to the Oda family, so it could not be used as evidence of victory by Akechi Mitsuhide.

 

So there you have it. Yasuke was a vassal and a warrior for the most powerful feudal lord in all of Japan, during the Sengoku Period. He even assisted his lord’s suicide, a role strictly reserved for samurai. Therefore, he was a samurai. Below is a link to the definition of samurai on Kotobank.

 

 

この界隈で定番日本ことわざは、

"For a Samurai to be brave, he must have a bit of black blood "

(侍が勇敢であるためには、少しの黒人の血を持っていなければならない)

日本人ならそんなことわざないこと誰でも知ってると思うんですけど、当然アサクリ関係ないサイトで見ることになる

 

Where Are The Black People in 'Shogun'? | LEVEL

https://www.levelman.com/where-black-people-fx-shogun/

 

リンク貼れないけど下記とか

"For a Samurai to be brave, he must have a bit of black blood" is an old Japanese proverb. What do they mean with that? : r/AskHistorians

 

 

ちな、悪気なさそうな教師向けサイト子ども向けサイトでも、YASUKEサイキョーは見ます

というか、そもそもUBIがインタビュー動画の中で日系人っぽいアジアンの監修スタッフに『YASUKEは日本で広く受け入れらている』とか言わせてます

 

参考になりましたか

anond:20240724030834

2024-07-14

He can also skateboard very well.

彼はすごい井戸スケートボードができる。

2024-07-08

anond:20240708171325

わいのおすすめはAMVELのHEATBLOCK VERYKAL。ずっとリピしてる。

2024-07-05

アメリカ人婉曲表現京都人がショック死するレベル

トランプ氏とのテレビ討論会バイデン大統領の低調な受け答えが波紋を呼んでいるが、個人的にはアメリカ人婉曲表現があまりに直球で笑ってしまった。「ええ時計してはりますなぁ」 で有名な京都人が言われたら、ショック死するレベルである

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics/house-democrat-call-biden-withdraw/index.html

Earlier on Tuesday, Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois had signaled an openness to replace Biden as the party’s presidential nominee.

(中略)

“We have to be honest with ourselves that it wasn’t just a horrible night, but I won’t go beyond that out of my respect and understanding of President Joe Biden, a very proud person who has served us extraordinarily well for 50 years,” he added.

これに先立ち、イリノイ州民主党下院議員マイク・クイグリー氏は、党の大統領候補をバイデンから変更することに前向きな姿勢を示していた。

(中略)

「単にひどい夜だったというだけではないことに、私達は正直にならなければいけない。だが、50年間、私たちに並外れた貢献をしてきた誇り高き人物であるジョー・バイデン大統領への敬意と理解からそれ以上のことは言わない」と同氏は付け加えた。

「それ以上のことは言わない」」って、それ、もう言ってるようなもんだろ。和訳すると酷い皮肉のようにしか読めないが、英語ネイティブ的にはこれは婉曲表現として機能しているのだろうか。

ログイン ユーザー登録
ようこそ ゲスト さん