Talk:Assouline Publishing
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 17-06-2017.
|
Untitled
editHello All,
This page has been deleted due to the marketing tone of its content.
Can anyone suggest improvements to the voice of the article?
I studied the Wikipedia tutorials before creating the article and compared it to other luxury brands/publishers before saving my changes, but I seem to have missed the mark.
Any insight and advice for revisions that you can offer would be greatly appreciated!
Kind regards, SusanSmith2 (talk) 15:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC) Susan Smith
Editing with a conflict of interest
editAs this article is often edited by editors with a clear conflict of interest, some tips may be helpful: please read WP:COI and suggest substantial edits here on article talk instead of adding them yourself. Secondly, avoid using self-published or obvious marketing sources. Such sources should be used sparingly and only for uncontroversial minor content - basing extensive parts of the article on such sources violates Wikipedia's content guidelines. Lastly, such an article is only meant as an encyclopedic overview. Not every single collection or minor detail of the company's history needs mentioning, especially when such details have not been previously covered by independent reliable sources. Focus on the most relevant, noteworthy facts and skip minor details and extensive lists of secondary information. GermanJoe (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)