Welcome!

Hello, Unionsoap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DreamGuy (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

1992 Tooheys 1000

edit

Unreferenced? There are quite a lot of references, I think the template you want to use there is the one that states a lack of in-line citations. I suggest you should substitute it. --Falcadore (talk) 22:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your note. I have located the suggested template and have substituted it on the article. Unionsoap (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Cheers. Need to detail your original research issues too though. Refer Talk:1992 Tooheys 1000 --Falcadore (talk) 11:25, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:Carina Axelsson

edit

No, if you read Wikipedia:Non-free content#Unacceptable use before, you did not need to question about it.

Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images.

--Caspian blue 01:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
?! You borrow my banner format and content. :D --Caspian blue 01:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I modified it. Do you mind? (Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery).Unionsoap (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I do not mind (and flattered with a little surprise)--Caspian blue 01:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Could you help me with the formating so the top message will appear in a box like yours. I do not know why the colour is through out. Thx. Unionsoap (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  Done--Caspian blue 02:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

THANK YOU!Unionsoap (talk) 02:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Verification

edit

I prodded this as lacking verification from secondary sources. You deprodded. Can you verify it? Not much point in cleaning it up unless we verify it. [1].--Scott Mac (Doc) 08:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yvon d'Anjou is an award winning French Canadian artist. Most articles on him are published in French. Nonetheless, there are many references to him that can be found with just a google search. I have added some of these links, and have also given the article a significant re-write edit to address what appeared to be copyvio. This article should be kept as a stub. Unionsoap (talk) 13:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that. I am content not to pursue deletion.--Scott Mac (Doc) 13:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Spider Rockets

edit

I closed a previous deletion discussion about this article as delete. However, it has come to my attention that some of the participants were sock puppets. In the circumstances, I would have relisted the discussion to achieve proper consensus had I discounted the sock !votes; I have now relisted this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider Rockets (2nd nomination) and am notifying you as you participated in the first discussion. Stifle (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Teamwork Barnstar
Thanks for helping the article expand!! :) Batreeqah (Talk) (Contribs) 00:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Teamwork Barnstar
Thanks for helping the article expand!! :) Batreeqah (Talk) (Contribs) 00:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 16:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply