Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Impeller] Enable mediatek on API 34+. #165156

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jonahwilliams
Copy link
Member

@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams commented Mar 13, 2025

Most of the reported Mediatek issues are API 29/30, maybe up to 31. By 34 it should work, and the mokey device we have works fine with Vulkan and runs on CI. This is necessary to allow MediaTek devices to use HCPP without us having to write a new rendering surface abstraction for GL.

This does not enable PowerVR, which is still denylisted in the vulkan backend.

@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams changed the title [Impeller] Enable mediatek on API 34. [Impeller] Enable mediatek on API 34+. Mar 13, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added platform-android Android applications specifically engine flutter/engine repository. See also e: labels. labels Mar 13, 2025
@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2025 22:07
@flutter-dashboard
Copy link

It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests or get an explicit test exemption before merging.

If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix?

Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing.If you believe this PR qualifies for a test exemption, contact "@test-exemption-reviewer" in the #hackers channel in Discord (don't just cc them here, they won't see it!). The test exemption team is a small volunteer group, so all reviewers should feel empowered to ask for tests, without delegating that responsibility entirely to the test exemption group.

@jonahwilliams
Copy link
Member Author

tested: all of the mokey tests are APi 34 and mediatek, so they will switch back to Vulkan.

@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams requested a review from gaaclarke March 13, 2025 22:08
@jonahwilliams
Copy link
Member Author

Click toggle chart style? works ok for me

Copy link
Member

@gaaclarke gaaclarke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Comment on lines +328 to +329
if (api_level < kMinimumAndroidApiLevelForMediaTekVulkan &&
__system_property_find("ro.vendor.mediatek.platform") != nullptr) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we be using VkPhysicalDeviceProperties to determine this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is more about the SoC than the GPU driver. early mediatek seems to have equal opportunity bugs.

@gaaclarke
Copy link
Member

Click toggle chart style?

That's the ticket!

@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams added the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Mar 13, 2025
@auto-submit auto-submit bot removed the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Mar 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

auto-submit bot commented Mar 14, 2025

autosubmit label was removed for flutter/flutter/165156, because - The status or check suite Google testing has failed. Please fix the issues identified (or deflake) before re-applying this label.

@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams added the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Mar 14, 2025
@auto-submit auto-submit bot added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into flutter:master with commit d64db52 Mar 14, 2025
172 checks passed
@flutter-dashboard flutter-dashboard bot removed the autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App label Mar 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
engine flutter/engine repository. See also e: labels. platform-android Android applications specifically
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants