Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:AAAAAA!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:AAAAAA!

Page serving no obvious purpose. This page, whose entire text consists of "AAAAAA!" just as the title implies, was created in March with the {{humor}} template on it from the outset -- but precisely because anybody could just add that template to absolutely anything in projectspace (e.g. failed drafts, total nonsense, hoaxes, etc.) that they wanted to "immunize" against deletion, the use of that template has traditionally required a consensus to be established that the page warranted retention on the grounds of humor.
Then a few days later the creator tried to add it to a redlinked (i.e. non-existent) category for "Articles that their creator doesn't remember writing", before immediately reverting themselves within less than a minute -- and then the page saw no further activity for the next seven months until last Thursday, when a different editor with no prior connection to it tried, for no obvious reason, to unrevert it back into the redlinked category with the edit summary "hummus" (i.e. no genuine explanation of why they were doing it, or how they even found the page in the first place given that absolutely nothing in Wikipedia links to it.)
So, basically, this is just silliness that's only inviting unconstructive editing rather than serving any purpose. Bearcat (talk) 18:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Delete - The nutshell to the Project namespace guideline says: Project pages are for information or discussion about Wikipedia.. This has nothing to do with Wikipedia. However, the nominator, User:Bearcat, forgot to notify the originator of this page that they were nominating it for deletion. Since User:The Master of Hedgehogs is a current editor, they should be notified, and have a right to explain or at least try to explain what their purpose is for creating this page. I will change this to a Delete if the originator is notified and does not give an explanation of this page, or gives an explanation that doesn't make sense. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: As the creator, I never wanted to "immunize" this page from deletion. The Master of Hedgehogs ^(converse) ^(hedgehogs) 15:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete serves little purpose. _{what an odd article, I must say. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Yes, this is indeed...a JoJo reference.)} 17:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)}[reply]

Delete - Newly created and silly. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 01:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, its kinda silly (which can have its place), but this really doesn't have anything to say about Wikipedia. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I think it serves the WP:FUN purpose. Seems like a parody of Uncyclopedia. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 19:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.