Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DPL bot 4

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

DPL bot 4

Operator: JaGa (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 20:34, Tuesday September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): PHP

Source code available: No

Function overview: Tags and removes tags from articles based on whether they should have the {{incoming links}} template.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 5#Template:Incoming links, User talk:JaGa#Proposal at the Template:Incoming links deletion discussion., Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links#Incoming links DPL bot task

Edit period(s): Twice daily

Estimated number of pages affected: around 600 pages on the first run, after that, somewhere around 5/day

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Y

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Y

Function details: During the deletion discussion for {{incoming links}}, it came up that the template is not getting removed when it should, and it was suggested that a bot should take care of the task similar to dablinks. I've written the bot, using a similar approach as the dablinks task; start with a high threshold (only disambigs with 30+ incoming links would get the template - that's just under 50 disambigs) and gradually lower the limit over time. For removal, it would take down the template for articles with 25 or fewer incoming links. That would de-tag around 600 disambigs.

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. MBisanz ^talk 16:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Results on talk. Everything looks good - the bot added the template only to disambigs with 30 or more incoming links, and removed it only from disambigs with fewer than 25. --JaGa^talk 18:09, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. MBisanz ^talk 17:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.