Heartfox
Promotion of Can't Let Go (Mariah Carey song)
editThe Signpost: 8 June 2024
edit- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
Your draft article, Draft:List of works on Mariah Carey
editHello, Heartfox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of works on Mariah Carey".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
New Zealand citation
editHi Heartfox, You are using the {{certification Table Entry}} incorrectly. If you want to use the |source=book
option for New Zealand, then |id=
needs to be the page number in Scapolo's book. Also, if you think the template provides incorrect sales amounts, please discuss this at Template talk:Certification Table Entry. You will find that the sales amounts were usually established after reaching consensus and using reliable sources, though we may always be wrong. If you need any help using the template, let me know and I'd be happy to help. --Muhandes (talk) 20:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you have access to the physical book like I have then you would know that it does not have page numbers and so I used "Mariah Carey" as a pseudo-page number as it is used as a heading in the book. Multi-platinum certifications were only awarded from 1999. "Platinum" albums before this time means shipments 15,000 and above. The book specifies what the "above" number is, yet you are reverting them because the template is inherently flawed. Heartfox (talk) 21:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Heartfox. I don't have access to the actual book and never have. However, when the {{cite Scapolo}} template was created, it was done so at the request of an editor who mentioned it includes page numbers. Are you referring to just the Mariah Carey page or the entire book? Perhaps you are using a different edition? If so, we may need to update the template accordingly. If we don't find another solution, the way you handled it might be acceptable; I don't have a better alternative. Assuming no better solution is found, please add a comment when you restore the edits so other editors are aware and don't revert it by mistake. Regarding the certified amounts, if I understand correctly, the book specifies the exact amount for each album. That's excellent. In this case, simply use the
|salesref=
parameter to indicate this, so the pages don't appear on my cleanup list. This would mean the entire thing will look like:{{certification Table Entry|type=album|region=New Zealand|award=Platinum|source=book|salesamount=15,000|id=Mariah Carey<!--No page numbers-->|refname=Scapolo|salesref=<ref name=Scapolo/>}}
. This should raise less alarms. Is it acceptable? Muhandes (talk) 06:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC) - Just some additional data. I found the original discussion from 2018. Perhaps MrLinkinPark333 or Harout72 would like to comment on the missing page numbers and on the solution you suggested. Also, I notice the template was used very little. --Muhandes (talk) 07:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have a physical copy of Scapolo. In that discussion, I mentioned @Richard3120: updated Wuthering Heights (song) with a page number from Scapolo .I'm not sure if it's the same version or if page numbers do exist in the book.. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I am aware, Dean Scapolo has released two editions of his New Zealand Charts book, the first covering 1966 to 1996, and the updated version to 2006. The latter is in the British Library, and it most certainly has page numbers – I've noted many of them down for various song articles that I have worked on. Richard3120 (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Only the foreword area has page numbers. The actual hundreds of pages with the chart peaks doesn't have page numbers, at least with the 1966-2006 edition I am viewing. Heartfox (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Which is weird, because I have a load of page numbers for various artists that I copied down from the book. Richard3120 (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Only the foreword area has page numbers. The actual hundreds of pages with the chart peaks doesn't have page numbers, at least with the 1966-2006 edition I am viewing. Heartfox (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I am aware, Dean Scapolo has released two editions of his New Zealand Charts book, the first covering 1966 to 1996, and the updated version to 2006. The latter is in the British Library, and it most certainly has page numbers – I've noted many of them down for various song articles that I have worked on. Richard3120 (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have a physical copy of Scapolo. In that discussion, I mentioned @Richard3120: updated Wuthering Heights (song) with a page number from Scapolo .I'm not sure if it's the same version or if page numbers do exist in the book.. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Heartfox. I don't have access to the actual book and never have. However, when the {{cite Scapolo}} template was created, it was done so at the request of an editor who mentioned it includes page numbers. Are you referring to just the Mariah Carey page or the entire book? Perhaps you are using a different edition? If so, we may need to update the template accordingly. If we don't find another solution, the way you handled it might be acceptable; I don't have a better alternative. Assuming no better solution is found, please add a comment when you restore the edits so other editors are aware and don't revert it by mistake. Regarding the certified amounts, if I understand correctly, the book specifies the exact amount for each album. That's excellent. In this case, simply use the
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
edit- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy 4th FAC
editI have brought this article to FAC again and after your comments the previous times, would you care to contribute again? K. Peake 06:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Butterfly (Mariah Carey song)
editQuestions about Newspapers.com access
editHello again. I hope you are doing well. Sorry for this random message, but I have been unable to access Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. Have you had similar issues and do you have any further information about it in general?
When I log on the Wikipedia Library, Newspapers.com has a message that says it is temporarily unavailable. I get a "T322916" error with it. I have tried to post about it on the talk page, but frankly, that area is not really helpful and I did not get a response. I rely on Newspapers.com quite a bit so it is frustrating that access has seemingly been pulled (although things with accessing the site have been weird for a while now).
I think my main question is if you know any way to get access to Newspapers.com again or is it just a matter of waiting for things to hopefully get resolved? Apologies again for this, and I hope you are having a great end to your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- You can disregard this message. I found a workaround mentioned here that works for me even though it is annoying. Aoba47 (talk) 19:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Search form using the proxy occasionally works for me. But we still need to login to make clippings, and the login form continues to be inaccessible. Heartfox (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response. I think I was just lucky the first time that I tried using the workaround method. I have tried it with other instances, and I am running into issues with it so it is not a great solution now that I look at it further. I did not think about clippings (as I was more so focused on just getting access at all), but that does makes sense now that you say it. Unfortunately, it seems like the only solution is to wait for the issue to hopefully be resolved and for the site to be accessible again. I needed a break anyway so it is probably for the best for me lol. Aoba47 (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Search form using the proxy occasionally works for me. But we still need to login to make clippings, and the login form continues to be inaccessible. Heartfox (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 15
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Meaning of Mariah Carey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macmillan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
"Everything I Am"
editHello, what happened to your GA review that has been open for around three weeks please? K. Peake 14:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
edit- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
"Forever" FAC
editJust saw this passed, and well done for obtaining another FA! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Heartfox (talk) 19:54, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Forever (Mariah Carey song)
editThe Signpost: 14 August 2024
edit- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Your draft article, Draft:List of Canadian singles charts and number ones
editHello, Heartfox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Canadian singles charts and number ones".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy 5th FAC
editI have brought this article to FAC again and after your comments the previous times, would you care to contribute again? K. Peake 07:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
edit- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
edit- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
edit- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Your draft article, Draft:List of Canadian number-one R&B albums
editHello, Heartfox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Canadian number-one R&B albums".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Your Girl you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
The article Your Girl you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Your Girl for comments about the article, and Talk:Your Girl/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Short-lived unarchiving
editHi. It seems the bot already re-archived the appeal you restored at WP:AN.
I think you are supposed to add a new comment to stop that from happening (and to explain why you unarchived it). – 2804:F1...C0:E421 (talk) 05:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
edit- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?