My Sandbox. Full of extra pages

User:Chubbennaitor/Sandbox/Newsletter

Sigs.

edit
  1. Chubbennaitor (leave me a message!) 17:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Chubbennaitor 22:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Chubbennaitor 11:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Chubbennaitor 14:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Tests

edit
  1. Chubbennaitor talksig 22:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Chubbenna (t)itor (sig) 22:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Chubbenna(t)itor (sig) 22:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Chubbennaitor 22:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Chubbennaitor 11:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Chubbennaitor 20:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  7. Chubbennaitor

F1 pic of the month November picking

edit
 
 
 

Other peoples sigs I created for them

edit

Sage J Callahan

Almost - instinct

Motofan

You're dreaming eh?

Chibi-anime-Girl

RogueMad2

Christopher 140691

Welcome

edit

Adoption page

edit
Welcome edit
Adoptees edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm either your adopter or an editor. Resources, assignments and discussion will be kept here to guide adoptees through the intricacies of Wikipedia. I am here to help you get accustomed to Wikipedia (WP). For anything more visit my talk page. Chubbennaitor

If you are adopted or have just been adopted by me please write what your name is by: using {{Adopted|your name}}; what your main prospects on Wikipedia are going to be/are now and any general information you want me to know about; beside the next (#).


Wikipedia: I joined because I have an editing fetish. I...I just have to edit things.
General: I think XKCD is funny.
Basics edit
Required Areas edit
Graduation (Read Only) edit

A1

Lesson Mark Passed? Problems?/Remarks
Vandalism Reverting /20   TBA
Creating a page /10   TBA
Concerns 13/15   TBA
Wikitext 20/25   TBA
Theory 10/30   TBA
Total 43/100   Level F TBA

Temporary

A2

Lesson Mark Passed? Problems?/Remarks
Vandalism Reverting /20 TBA TBA
Creating a page /15 TBA TBA
Concerns /10 TBA TBA
Wikitext /25 TBA TBA
Theory /30 TBA TBA
Other /10 TBA TBA
Total /110 TBA TBA

A3

Lesson Mark Passed? Problems?/Remarks
Vandalism Reverting /20 TBA TBA
Creating a page /15 TBA TBA
Concerns /10 TBA TBA
Wikitext /25 TBA TBA
Theory /30 TBA TBA
Other /10 TBA TBA
Total /110 TBA TBA

A4

Lesson Mark Passed? Problems?/Remarks
Vandalism Reverting /20 TBA TBA
Creating a page /15 TBA TBA
Concerns /10 TBA TBA
Wikitext /25 TBA TBA
Theory /30 TBA TBA
Other /10 TBA TBA
Total /110 TBA TBA

Other

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Chubbennaitor, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you carry on you will be blocked eventually Chubbennaitor 20:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


Brawn BGP 001

edit

Chassis

edit

The BGP 001 was designed throughout 2008 and 2009 by Honda and then Brawn after the change over. It was designed, by Loïc Bigois, in similar respects to all the other cars on the grid with a Moulded carbon fibre and honeycomb composite monocoque and a front and rear wishbone and pushrod activated suspension system. Yet, the car had one difference, which was focused on the rear, so called, 'double-decker diffuser' . The diffuser is at the rear of the car and is a route to get downforce and puts the air under the car to good use. The BGP 001 had a different central channel to it's diffuser with the shape of the structure being used to create a sort of double-decker design. The diffuser's controversial aspect was the hole in the rear which increases the speed of airflow as it heads towards the higher rear venturi section, where it expands and creates more downforce. Other teams argued that the presence of the hole is against the regulations. [1]

At the first race of the season in Australia an official complaint was launched by Renault, Red Bull and Ferrari against the diffusers of the Williams FW31, Toyota TF109 and the BGP 001 saying that they were illegal. [2] However the race stewards did not share that view and rejected the other teams' complaints. Subsequently the car was cleared to race in Melbourne. [3] The same problem was faced in Malaysia after BMW tried again but failed.

Over the controversy the 'non-diffuser' teams, Ferrari, BMW Sauber, Red Bull, lodged an official appeal against the design and the date was set for April 14th 2009 for the FIA International Court of appeal (ICA); putting the first two races under appeal meaning the cars' first two wins of the season with Button could have been removed. After discussing the legality of the diffusers on Wednesday 15th the ICA concluded that the diffusers' design were legal and complied with the 2009 regulations rejecting the teams' appeal.[4]

  1. ^ . The Official Formula 1 site. 2009-23-03 http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2009/0/640.html. Retrieved 2009-27-05. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ Official Complaint against Diffusers
  3. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/7965056.stm
  4. ^ . The Official Formula 1 site. 2009-15-04 http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2009/4/9175.html. Retrieved 2009-27-05. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)