This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criticism section
edit"The site also has come under criticism for issues related to sensationalism, hyperbole, misleading or naive headlines, and even sexism to attract readers."
To that list could be added a growing habit of their years-old articles trivially 'updated' and republished as "news", apparently to get web traffic by appearing in Google News Science articles. JohndanR (talk) 14:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)