Talk:Paris Opera Ballet
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Substantial contributions
editTo add substantial contents to the article's text you have to refer to French sources (ballet in France, "a world of its own") --Surano (talk) 07:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- After adding French sources I have added and will still try to add sources in English to the article. For some sources there already exist corresponding articles of the English Wikipedia such as La Danse (film) by Frederick Wiseman. --Surano (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Paris Opera Ballet vs Paris Opera National Ballet vs Ballet de l'Opéra de Paris vs Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris
editIn French newspaper articles journalists writing reviews about performances usually refer to the Ballet de l'Opéra de Paris (Paris Opera Ballet), official announcements refer to the Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris (Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris). There is only one opera in Paris presenting performances in two opera houses (Opéra Bastille, Palais Garnier) and there is only one Paris Opera Ballet. Other venues are called theatres such as the Théâtre du Châtelet. --Surano (talk) 08:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Article title
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved per request and discussion. - GTBacchus(talk) 19:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris → Paris Opera Ballet – This is the common English name for this ballet company. For example, it has been used by both The New York Times and The Times of London. A search of English-language books at Google Books for "Paris Opera Ballet" gave about 8,970 hits, while "Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris" gave about 79 hits. (see WP:UE and WP:EN for the relevant Wikipedia naming policies). --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support per WP:USEENGLISH. Powers T 01:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
I found some additional evidence supporting Paris Opera Ballet for the article title. It has been used as the name on the company's English-language website: see "The Ballet" and "Paris Opera Ballet | World Creation: L'Anatomie de la Sensation". In addition, it is the name of the article about the company in The International Encyclopedia of Dance (Selma Jeanne Cohen, editor, Oxford University Press, 2004, ISBN 9780195173697). The first sentence in that article reads: "PARIS OPERA BALLET. Many of the leading European and international ballet companies owe their origin, directly or indirectly, to the fame and influence of the world's oldest ballet company, that of the Paris Opera." --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
There have been so few comments from other editors concerning this requested move that I am adding notices to the talk pages of the affected projects. I suggest that the deadline for leaving comments be extended to after 24 July (seven days from today). --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Support The title is in any case incorrect as "national" should not be capitalised according to French rules. The bolded text in the article is correct, please retain it as alternative title when making the move. You will also need to rename the corresponding category but there are only a few pages to change. --Mirokado (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment – The categories Category:Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris étoiles, Category:Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris dancers and Category:Ballets premiered at the Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris will then probably need moving as well. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Apparently there is a bot that can do this, but I know nothing about how to use it. --Robert.Allen (talk) 17:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- If this RM is successful, then please list those categories at WP:CFD/S under the criterion of matching the parent article and admins will sort out the rest. Jenks24 (talk) 09:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Apparently there is a bot that can do this, but I know nothing about how to use it. --Robert.Allen (talk) 17:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the capitalization of the alternative French name of the company, this is a bit inconsistent in various English-language sources (not to mention French-language sources, which, however, can be disregarded when reliable English sources exist). We have typically used The New Grove Dictionary of Opera as a guide for the capitalization of titles of operas. I would suggest we do the same for French names of opera companies. That source capitalizes adjectives such as "National", for example it gives "Académie Royale de Musique" for the name during the periods of monarchy, "Académie Impériale de Musique" for the name during the empire, and "Théâtre National de l'Opéra" for the name of the company after 1870. --Robert.Allen (talk) 18:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- It is an interesting question! For this article we agree that we should routinely refer to the English name. In parentheses in the lead, it is normal on Wikipedia to state the correct version of a name in the original language as well as a transliteration if necessary or any significant variants. Thus I think the small "n" is correct as in the original French and I would regard the variant with capital "N" as not significant.
- In the case of Ballets Russes we routinely use the anglicised French name. In that case the alternative English translation is given and the original French spelling fr:Ballets russes has clearly been regarded as not worth a separate mention, with which I concur.
- For a name with no established English usage, the practice is to follow the original (for example with diacritics and other letter variations), or a standard transliteration of a foreign script such as Arabic of course, with alternatives as necessary. --Mirokado (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Ballet du Théâtre de l'Académie Royale de Musique
editWhere does the title of the assembly, Ballet du Théâtre de l'Académie Royale de Musique, fit in? It is used as an entry for the On This Day, of June 28th, 2017 Main Page post for the article on the play Giselle, and it is used again in the article Giselle, but it is never used in the article of the theatre itself, Paris Opera Ballet. It is also a redirect to that article, but omitted from reference within the article. Is this an oversight? Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Paris Opera Ballet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150328211844/http://www.operadeparis.fr/videopera/haut-vol to http://www.operadeparis.fr/videopera/haut-vol
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303170402/http://www.schuchprod.com/wp-content/files_mf/revuedepressegraines.pdf to http://www.schuchprod.com/wp-content/files_mf/revuedepressegraines.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.operadeparis.fr/cns11/live/onp/L_Opera/le_Ballet/organigramme.php?&lang=en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)