Talk:Hepialidae

Hepialidae was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 18, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Arthropod leg#Hexapoda|tibiae]] Anchor Arthropod leg#Hexapoda links to a specific web page: Hexapoda. The anchor (#Hexapoda) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Feedback

Points that need addressing prior to passing

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The article is generally good and well written, however, I'd like to see the following issues addressed prior to passing:

Possibly insufficient references for a family article (only 9 references?), some material remains unreferenced. Perhaps use intext citations? This makes the article easier to read & verify in my opinion. See WP:CITE. I recommend using footnotes eg: <ref>Brown J (1900) Example study on something ''Journal of Examples'' 18:5678-9876</ref>. See: Wikipedia:Footnotes for more information.
Taxobox - the taxobox creates much white space, I recommend moving the list of genera into the text.
Breadth - I wonder given the limited number of references used whether the article does cover the breadth of the topic. As I'm not an insect biologist I'll leave this for others to determine.

Minor recommendations

Some further images (larvae, pupa) may be of benefit
Notable species? Why are the European fauna dealt with separately/alone?

Cheers, David. MidgleyDJ 21:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

What is the status here? The on hold period expires today. IvoShandor 07:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not completely addressed...sigh... fail for now. MidgleyDJ 08:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Roger that. You'll get there, don't worry. : ) IvoShandor 08:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I proposed but I have not had chance to research any new refs - will be reproposed soon I hopeRichard Barlow 16:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hepialidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ethnopharmacology.org/newsLetter/nl_2004/ISEnl4EE.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808180717/http://www.ethnopharmacology.org/newsLetter/nl_2004/ISEnl4EE.pdf to http://www.ethnopharmacology.org/newsLetter/nl_2004/ISEnl4EE.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hepialidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070317021415/http://www.ento.csiro.au/gallery/moths/Hepialidae to http://www.ento.csiro.au/gallery/moths/Hepialidae

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic