Talk:Edolphus Towns

Baseless claims

The following lines have been moved here from the main article page as they are POV and propaganda. The original lines read as below:-
"This allegation was based on information provided by militant Sikh separatists, specifically the so-called "Council of Khalistan" headed by Gurmit Singh Aulakh, after a massacre of about 50 Sikhs at Chattisinghpora in Kashmir, which was perpetrated by the Islamic Fundamentalist terror group Lashkar-e-Toiba. Some Sikhs have blamed the massacre on fundamentalist Hindus."

Issues:-

1. The lines claim that Ed Towns is operating on instructions from militants but provide no specific information who did research and found that Ed Towns is operation in such a way.
2. The contributor of the lines uses internal link to Khalistan and used the tag "Sikh separatists" preceded by "militant" deliberately using pathos without any logos and tries to get the readers blind folded with prejudice.
3. uses POV and uses the language such as "so-called Council of Khalistan" clearly pouring out the POV and personal feelings of the contributer of these lines.
4. For the Chattisinghpora massacre of Sikhs, the lines read "...about 50 Sikhs" showing the lack of clear information on part of the contributor.
5. Later, the above contributor claims that the attack on the Sikh were "perpetrated" by Islamic Fundamentalists without giving reliable references on this controversial claim.
   

regards,
---- A. S. Aulakh^Talk 22:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edolphus Towns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101216103943/http://www.nydailynews.com:80/blogs/dc/2010/12/ed-towns-steps-down-sources-bl.html to http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2010/12/ed-towns-steps-down-sources-bl.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Edolphus Towns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060704103954/http://www.r8ny.com/blog/rock_hackshaw/kevin_powell_to_withdraw_from_10th_congressional_race.html to http://www.r8ny.com/blog/rock_hackshaw/kevin_powell_to_withdraw_from_10th_congressional_race.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100228025543/http://www.opencongress.org/wiki/Presidential_Library_Donation_Reform_Act_of_2009 to http://www.opencongress.org/wiki/Presidential_Library_Donation_Reform_Act_of_2009
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901170752/http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/index.php/Edolphus_%22Ed%22_Towns to http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/index.php/Edolphus_%22Ed%22_Towns
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926221656/http://reelectedtowns.com/ to http://www.reelectedtowns.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061127103534/http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ed_Towns to http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ed_Towns

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Hypocorism

There's some dispute about whether the lede should mention that Edolphus is known as Ed. Another editor brought up MOS:HYPOCORISM to justify removing it. But, as I explained in my edit comment, the general rule about not mentioning diminutives this way doesn't apply because Edolphus is not a common name. To quote what the policy says:

"If a person has a common[d] English-language hypocorism (diminutive or abbreviation) used in lieu of a given name, it is not presented between quotation marks or parentheses into or after their name."

According to https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/, "Edolphus is not in the top 1000 names for any year of birth beginning with 1920." This confirms what should be obvious: the name isn't common. Since it's not, the reader isn't going to know anything about what diminutives might be common. For example, it may be that people named Edolphus tend to go by Dolph.

Either way, this is a pretty small thing, and MOS:HYPOCORISM explicitly backs me up. 24.47.152.65 (talk) 22:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)