Talk:Al Costello

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleAl Costello has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2007Good article nomineeListed

GA review

edit

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Check back in a day for a more detailed review, but as of right now I don't see much wrong with the article, it looks fine, and passes the quick-fail criteria. The final result and review are to be coming soon. FamicomJL 03:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA pass

edit

1. MoS and prose PASS The prose is fine, it all looks good. I found only two minor errors, and fixed them both. No use in putting an article on hold over such small details.

2. Factual accuracy and verifiability PASS Only minor issue I have is the low amount of sources for the early life section, but since that's goin to be the hardest thing to find sources for, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt there.

3. Broadness of coverage PASS Very well done. The sections on the history of the team, involving Costello, is very well done. I am not a good wrestling history buff of the 60's and 70's, and this article did a fantastic job in having me learn so much about the team.

4. Neutrality PASS Definite pass. No netruality issues here.

5. Stability PASS No edit wars recently, no vandals recently, very stable article.

6. Images PASS The image has its proper fair-use rationale. My only nitpick is with it being the only image. I'd love to see some shots of the team in action.

7. Congratulations on the passing of the article! Good work to all involved, it looks really good! If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask them either on here, or my talkpage. FamicomJL 16:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al Costello. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply