Talk:Netizen

Untitled

I think this entry should be taken off the list of ethnic groups...I don't see "netizens" as a proper ethnic group, more like a cultural group.

Vinomcobra- I agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.38.71 (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree with the above comments. It is not an ethnic group.SupperNope (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Does anyone actually use this term? I find it embarrasing.

Removed paragraph about South Korean netizens

In South Korea, Netizen often refers to conservative, (often male) computer users who use the internet as a way to make anonymous attacks on people who do not share their social values. An example being the threat to launch cyber attacks on the Seoul Scene website, unless it removed certain content deemed to be offensive to Korean sensibilities.

I removed above paragraph because it is false. If someone disagrees, please provide a source. --Acepectif 19:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Netizen uk business?

"http://www.netizen.co.uk is also a website design and development company based in the UK."

I don't think this section is relevant to the article or context; a rather cheap attempt to direct traffic to their company's website. Surely they can create their own wikipedia page if needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.51.101 (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

confusing or unclear?

What part of this article may be confusing or unclear? Please list. J. D. Redding 13:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure why he/she added the tag, but I'm guessing it has something to do with the second paragraph, which sounds like it was pulled from a mission statement or credo:

“ Netizens are Internet users who utilize the networks from their home, workplace, or school (among other places). Netizens try to be conducive to the Internet's use and growth. Netizens, who use and know about the network of networks, usually have a self-imposed responsibility to make certain that it is improved in its development while encouraging free speech and open access. ”

It seems to talk about netizens as a kind of special interest group rather than the "every day" user described in the first paragraph. The fact that the "Cyber Rights Now" graphic from WIRED Magazine used in their political opinion pieces and redistributed by EFF, obviously a special interest group, is also on this page leads me to think that even more so. Unless we are going to contend that the only "real" netizens are those who subscribe to EFF's school of thought, I would suggest we either modify or remove the second paragraph and remove the CRN logo as that content belongs on a page about the Net Rights issue and not about Net users in general.Thinkbui (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Seriously?

The whole Description section sounds weird, awkward, kinda like it's somthing that would be writen in the term of agreement of a site, or in some sort of handbook you get when you try to join this exclusive group of people, or in a plaque under a statue of some important representative of the group or somthing... --TiagoTiago (talk) 09:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Why is that picture there?

Why does File:Netizen.jpg appear in the article? It adds no value to the article and it looks like a company logo. Is there a company called "Netizen" trying to benefit from this? (WP Editor 2011 (talk) 11:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC))

Chinese use

This term seems to remain widely used by English-language media to refer to Chinese internet users, even though it's mostly fallen out of favour in other contexts - anyone know why? Sengokucannon (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Have added slightly more detail and links to articles on this issue.

Agree, most uses of the word are found in English-language articles about Chinese online communities. Atlanticatticus (talk) 03:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Netizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150628212148/http://en.rsf.org/nawaat-reporters-without-borders-11-03-2011%2C39776.html to https://en.rsf.org/nawaat-reporters-without-borders-11-03-2011%2C39776.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150421213301/http://en.rsf.org/netizen-prize-2012-27-02-2012%2C41938.html to https://en.rsf.org/netizen-prize-2012-27-02-2012%2C41938.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Changed Quotations from Micheal and Ronda Hauben to Determing factor

Noticed that the block quotes were mostly descriptions on how to distinguish a Neitzen from a regular "Ïnternet user". Summarised into a few sentences instead of having to use too many block quotes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleA94 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Very poorly worded article

This article is extremely poorly worded with many grammatical errors. The whole description section, especially the part about “lurkers” is just clumsy. I think this article should be unlocked for editing Slogmire (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)