Untitled

edit

I agree - the article and stats are ridiculous. Waste of space.

Is it just me, or are these meticulously detailed demographics with percentages taken to three significant digits totally fuckin ridiculous for a town with a population of twelve?

I don't think the sig figs are off...the percentages really ARE that accurate. But really, why is this an article to begin with? Looks essentially like an article about some rich family and their servants
I agree. Also, how can 25% be <18 (12/4 = 3 people) and 50% <18 be below the poverty line (1.5 people???)