Talk:Miracle at Michigan

Latest comment: 9 years ago by X96lee15 in topic 2015 "Michigan State Miracle"

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


The Miracle at MichiganMiracle at Michigan – The Choke at Doak redirects to Choke at Doak. Shouldn't it be the same way with this page? 174.21.150.124 (talk) 03:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. WP:THE. — X96lee15 (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

2015 "Michigan State Miracle"

edit

Other possible titles may include, but are not limited to:

OR

On October 18, 2012, this article finished with a consensus in an AFD to Merge with Michigan-Michigan State Rivalry. If Michigan State were to go on and win the Consensus College Football (FBS) Playoff Championship in 2016, this topic would more than likely be revisited (as the game itself would have had further implications at that point). IF, however, Michigan State loses to Ohio State and the Buckeyes were to win out the 2015 season advancing to the Big Ten Championship, then I will leave the article on it's current user page where it will remain indefinitely for future need/reference. Please feel free to leave any comments or questions on my user talk page! Cheers! Stubbleboy 04:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

As I said in the AFD, if MSU wins the National Championship, that doesn't automatically (or even more than likely) make that game notable. Yes, if that happens, that game will be mentioned, but that still might not be enough to meet WP:GNG. — X96lee15 (talk) 12:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply