Potassium–calcium dating, abbreviated K–Ca dating, is a radiometric dating method used in geochronology. It is based upon measuring the ratio of a parent isotope of potassium (40
K) to a daughter isotope of calcium (40
Ca).[1] This form of radioactive decay is accomplished through beta decay.
Calcium is common in many minerals, with 40
Ca being the most abundant naturally occurring isotope of calcium (96.94%),[2] so use of this dating method to determine the ratio of daughter calcium produced from parent potassium is generally not practical. However, recent advancements in mass spectrometric techniques [e.g., thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) and collision-cell inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CC-ICP-MS)] are allowing radiogenic Ca isotope variations to be measured at unprecedented precisions in an increasing variety of materials,[3] including high Ca minerals (e.g., plagioclase, garnet, clinopyroxene)[4] and aqueous (e.g., seawater and riverine) samples.[5] In earlier studies, this technique was especially useful in minerals with low calcium contents (under 1/50th of the potassium content)[2] so that radiogenic ingrowth of 40-Ca could be more easily quantified. Examples of such minerals include lepidolite, potassium-feldspar, and late-formed muscovite or biotite from pegmatites (preferably older than 60 million years ago). This method is also useful for zircon-poor, felsic-to-intermediate igneous rocks, various metamorphic rocks, and evaporite minerals (i.e. sylvite).[6][7]
Method
editPotassium has three naturally occurring isotopes: stable 39
K, 41
K and radioactive 40
K. 40
K exhibits dual decay: through β-decay (E = 1.33 MeV), 89% of 40
K decays to 40
Ca, and the rest decays to 40
Ar via electron capture (E = 1.46 MeV).[1] While 40
K comprises only 0.001167% of total potassium mass, 40
Ca makes up 96.9821% of total calcium mass; thus, 40
K decay leads to significantly greater 40
Ca enrichment than any other isotope.[8] The decay constant for the decay to 40
Ca is denoted as λβ and equals 4.962×10−10 yr−1; the decay constant to 40
Ar is denoted as λEC and equals 5.81×10−11 yr−1.
The general equation for the decay time of a radioactive nucleus that decays to a single product is:
Where λ is the decay constant, t1/2 is the half-life, N0 is the initial concentration of the parent isotope, and N is the final concentration of the parent isotope.
Similarly, the equation for the decay time of a radioactive nucleus that decays to more than one product is:
Where a is the daughter product of interest, λa is the decay constant for daughter product a, and λt is the sum of decay constants for daughter products a and b.
This approach is taken in potassium-calcium dating where argon and calcium are both products of decay and can be expressed as:
Where Ca* is the measured amount of radiogenic 40
Ca in terms of parent isotope 40
K, and K0 is the initial concentration of 40
K.
Age equation
editAge determination using potassium–calcium dating is best done using the isochron technique.[7] The isochron constructed for Pike’s Peak in Colorado and the K/Ca age for the granites in the area were found to be 1041±32 Ma. Rb-Sr dating of the same batholith gave results of 1008±13 Ma,[7] supporting the practicality of this method of dating. For comparison, the isochron method uses non-radiogenic 42
Ca to develop an isochron.
The following equation is used in the construction of the isochron plot:
- t is time elapsed
- ξ is the branching ratio (= λβ / λ total) = 0.8952
- Ca0 is the initial 40
Ca/42
Ca isotope ratio - Ca is the 40
Ca/42
Ca isotope ratio - K is the 40
K/42
Ca isotope ratio
Applications
editChronological applications
editThis technique's primary application is towards determining the crystallization age of minerals or rocks enriched in potassium and depleted in calcium. Due to the long half life of 40
K (~1.25 billion years), K–Ca dating is most useful on samples older than 100,000 years. Given that the chosen sample has a relatively high current K/Ca ratio, and that the initial concentration of 40
Ca can be determined, any error in this initial 40
Ca concentration can be considered negligible when determining the sample's age.[8]
K–Ca dating is not a common radioactive dating method for metamorphic rocks. However, this system is considered more stable than both the K-Ar and Rb-Sr dating methods. This fact, combined with advances in precision of Ca mass spectrometry, makes K–Ca dating a viable option for igneous and metamorphic rocks containing little to no zircon.[8]
Potassium-calcium dating is especially useful for diagenetic minerals and marine sediments, which are both assumed to have had the same initial calcium isotopic composition as Earth's seawater at the time of their formation. As such, being able to assume the initial 40
Ca/42
Ca ratio as a constant, this dating method proves particularly fruitful for these respective samples.[8]
Non-chronological applications
editAside from radioactive dating, the K-Ca system is the only isotopic system capable of detecting elemental signatures in magmatic processes. Normalizing the 40
Ca/42
Ca ratio to non-radioactive isotopes (42
Ca/44
Ca), it was found that the isotopic composition of calcium was similar across meteorites, lunar samples, and Earth's mantle.[8]
Advantages & disadvantages
editDisadvantages
editThe primary disadvantage to K–Ca dating is the abundance of calcium in most minerals; this dating method cannot be used on minerals with a high preexisting calcium content, as the radioactively added calcium will increase calcium abundance in the sample only very slightly. As such, K–Ca dating is effective only in circumstances where K/Ca>50 (in a potassium-enriched, calcium-depleted sample).[2] Examples of such minerals include lepidolite, potassium-feldspar, and late-formed muscovite or biotite from pegmatites (preferably older than 60 million years ago). This method is also useful for zircon-poor, felsic-to-intermediate igneous rocks, various metamorphic rocks, and evaporite minerals (i.e. sylvite).[6][7]
Another disadvantage to K–Ca dating is that the isotopic composition of calcium (40
Ca compared to 42
Ca) is difficult to determine using mass spectrometry. Calcium is not easily ionized using a thermoionic source, and tends to isotopically fractionate during ionization.[2] As such, this dating method does not yield satisfactory results unless performed with extremely high precision. Until recently, K–Ca dating was not considered useful for samples younger than the Precambrian, with extremely depleted Ca to K ratios.
Advantages
editHowever, if used effectively on the aforementioned minerals, the K–Ca dating method provides high-precision dating comparable to other isotopic dating methods. It is also most effective, comparatively, at providing major element abundances for crustal magma sources, if used with high precision.[7]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Potassium-Calcium Isochrons. In: HyperPhysics site.
- ^ a b c d Potassium-calcium dating. A Dictionary of Earth Sciences, 2016.
- ^ Antonelli, Michael A.; Simon, Justin I. (2020-08-20). "Calcium isotopes in high-temperature terrestrial processes". Chemical Geology. 548: 119651. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119651. ISSN 0009-2541. S2CID 218940768.
- ^ Antonelli, M.A.; DePaolo, D.J.; Chacko, T.; Grew, E.S.; Rubatto, D. (February 2019). "Radiogenic Ca isotopes confirm post-formation K depletion of lower crust". Geochemical Perspectives Letters: 43–48. doi:10.7185/geochemlet.1904. S2CID 134582329.
- ^ Antonelli, Michael A.; DePaolo, Donald J.; Christensen, John N.; Wotzlaw, Jörn-Frederik; Pester, Nicholas J.; Bachmann, Olivier (2021-09-16). "Radiogenic 40 Ca in Seawater: Implications for Modern and Ancient Ca Cycles". ACS Earth and Space Chemistry. 5 (9): 2481–2492. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00179. ISSN 2472-3452. S2CID 239659659.
- ^ a b Ahrens., L.H. The feasibility of a calcium method for the determination of geological age. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1 (1951), pp. 312–316.
- ^ a b c d e Marshall, B.D., and DePaolo D.J., Precise age determinations and petrogenetic studies using the K-Ca method. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 46 (1982), pp. 2537–2545.
- ^ a b c d e Geyh, Mebus A. and Schleicher, Helmut, "Absolute Age Determination", Springer Verlag, 1990.