User talk:Viruswitch

Welcome!

Hello, Viruswitch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs 2000 02:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was fast! Thank you! Initially I thought this was an automated message! Thanks again for all the links! I have some reading now to do!Viruswitch 02:37, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I could be of assistance -- Francs 2000

02:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: birthday request

Sorry :) To the best of my knowledge, my birthdate isn't documented precisely anywhere online, and I'm fairly happy keeping it that way ;x

Cheers, Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 04:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, its nowhere online...
Anyway, thanks for the reply. :) Viruswitch 13:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Satyananda Saraswati with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Such "explanations" are not necessary. But you can check the talk page of the article. If you are so "keen" on an explanation.

Discretionary sanctions

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

You've recently resumed editing after a long hiatus, seemingly with the intention solely of challenging something that has consensus. That's fine, if you discuss it but not remotely so if you bludgeon your way through by edit warring. The sanctions note above is important: you'll find yourself subjected to such sanctions unless you stop this disruptive behaviour. - Sitush (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 19:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Viruswitch, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

User:Vigyani 12:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Viruswitch. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 20:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acharavi top view.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Acharavi top view.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]