User talk:Tryggvia
The article Egill Einarsson has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
- I cannot find any sources to add. Do you have any?
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —C45207 | Talk 01:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of Icelandic Newspapers
[edit]
A tag has been placed on List of Icelandic Newspapers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
{{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Bandaríkin listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bandaríkin. Since you had some involvement with the Bandaríkin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). --hydrox (talk) 08:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Article notability notification
[edit]
Tölva listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tölva. Since you had some involvement with the Tölva redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 05:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Þýskaland listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Þýskaland. Since you had some involvement with the Þýskaland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 00:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of NewsCutter Adrenaline
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on NewsCutter Adrenaline, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Epli listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Epli. Since you had some involvement with the Epli redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Vatn listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vatn. Since you had some involvement with the Vatn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Hagar (company) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hagar (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hagar (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cloudbound (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Andrés önd listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Andrés önd. Since you had some involvement with the Andrés önd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Blaze The Movie Fan (talk) 00:37, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Rauður listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rauður. Since you had some involvement with the Rauður redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 19:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Englaborg listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Englaborg. Since you had some involvement with the Englaborg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Appelsína listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Appelsína. Since you had some involvement with the Appelsína redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Blaze The Movie Fan (talk) 13:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Sjónvarp listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sjónvarp. Since you had some involvement with the Sjónvarp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Óðinn Jónsson
[edit]The article Óðinn Jónsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Nýja-Jórvík listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nýja-Jórvík. Since you had some involvement with the Nýja-Jórvík redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — JFG talk 12:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Ripp, Rapp og Þorfinnur listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ripp, Rapp og Þorfinnur. Since you had some involvement with the Ripp, Rapp og Þorfinnur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Ripp, Rapp og Rupp listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ripp, Rapp og Rupp. Since you had some involvement with the Ripp, Rapp og Rupp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Dettifoss map.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 19:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Einherji.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Einherji.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Leyndardómar Reykjavíkur 2000 for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leyndardómar Reykjavíkur 2000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leyndardómar Reykjavíkur 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anarchyte (talk | work) 14:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
The article Vífilfell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this passes GNG/WP:NCOMPANY. BEFORE shows few mentions in passing/press-releases. Not seeing any good redirect target (just redirecting to Coca-Cola seems unhelpful since there is nothing to merge (no referenced content) and no need for the article about CC to mention this minor bottler.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
"Lundúnir" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
Orphaned non-free image File:Morgunbladid frontpage.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Morgunbladid frontpage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)