Jump to content

User talk:TheBezzle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, TheBezzle, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

East Palestine, Ohio train derailment

[edit]

I made some minor edits to the information you added to the article as I place data on the NADP study in the Emergency Response section. Just wanted to avoid repetition in the two sections. Ratherbelucky (talk) 15:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Avgeekamfot. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Horizon Air have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. We need a better source than WP:Simple Flying to include information like that. Avgeekamfot (talk) 04:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this user's edit was constructive – they were adding information about a real event, and they weren't aware the source they were using was not considered reliable by Wikipedia – and as soon as that was pointed out to them, they replaced it with a better source. I don't think there is a problem with telling them to find a better source, or even reverting their edit until they do so – but saying their edits "did not appear constructive" seems contrary to WP:DONTBITE. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 23:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NDAA 2025

[edit]

I added a new article section National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025#Military right-to-repair provision. Thought I should let you know since you have an obvious interest in that topic. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 23:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to add something: the NDAA hasn't passed Congress yet, but it currently exists in two versions – the House version (H.R. 8070, already passed the House), and the Senate version (S. 4638, still being considered by the Senate). This section (828) is in the current Senate version of the Bill, not the House version. The Senate is currently considering amendments to their version of the Bill. Once that process is over, the Senate will pass their version of the Bill. And then the two versions will go the Conference Committee, which will negotiate a merger of the two Bills. I know you added some text about this to a lot of articles, but you haven't made the situation clear (no doubt because the article you are relying on as a source doesn't make the situation clear.) I don't know if I have it in me to go and update every one of those articles to be more accurate, but maybe you can. There are three possible outcomes going forward (I personally have no clue which one will happen): (1) the Senate will accept an amendment to remove or weaken this section and hence it won't end up in the final Senate version; (2) it will survive in the final Senate version, but the House negotiators will oppose it in the Conference Committee and hence it will be removed or watered down there; (3) the Conference Committee will approve it, in which case almost certainly it will be enacted. Obviously these lobbyists are pushing for outcomes (1) or (2) not (3). SomethingForDeletion (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

AdvaMed
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Aerospace Industries Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Associated Equipment Distributors
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Association of Equipment Manufacturers
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Illinois Manufacturers' Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
International Safety Equipment Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Irrigation Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Metals Service Center Institute
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Motorcycle Industry Council
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
National Association of Manufacturers
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
National Defense Industrial Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
National Mining Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
National Shooting Sports Foundation
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Plumbing Manufacturers International
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Security Industry Association
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services
Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce
added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]