Jump to content

User talk:Strudjum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome!

[edit]
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Strudjum. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Checkingfax (talk) 07:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strudjum, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Strudjum! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Josie lloyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Channing, Route 66 and The Farmer's Daughter
Olan Soule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rawhide
The Addams Family (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hemlock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lydia Crosswaithe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Addams Family (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolfsbane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Strudjum. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Josie Lloyd, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Josie Lloyd to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Fylbecatulous talk 22:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced opinion to Wikipedia articles, as you did to this one. All opinions presented must be supported by citations from reliable sources. As the bulk of your "Film notes" (not a section title we normally use) entry was unsourced (the only source presented was a dictionary, which is not, of course, sufficient to support specific opinions about the film), it has been removed. Please do not re-add it until you can support every opinion, and every fact for that matter, with a citation from a reliable source. For more on what sources are considered reliable, please see WP:RS. Re-adding the information without sourcing will simply result in its being removed again, by myself or by other editors, and would constitute edit warring, which is not allowed under Wikipedia policy. Your contributions are certainly appreciated, but they must comply with our policies or be rejected. (See WP:Verifiability, which says, in part, "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. ... Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.") Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the "Plot" section is intended as a straight-forward presentation of the events of the movie as they happen, and as can be seen by anyone watching it. The plot section should not include any analysis or interpretation of the meaning of events or of the characters' feelings or emotions, as these would require specific citations from reliable sources. Quoting yourself as a source is not acceptable, as your qualifications as to reliability or expertise is unknown. Simply write what you see occurring in the film, and do not characterize it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you're adding extensive content to the crime section of Memphis, Tennessee, when there is an entire article called Crime in Memphis, Tennessee? Magnolia677 (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your inquiry. Both the subsection on crime in the main entry on Memphis and the related linked "article" you mentioned have references and statistics that needed updating. While I have neither contributed to nor edited the content of the linked article on crime in Memphis, the noted subsection in the main entry had been tagged by another editor as needing updating (since the most recent homicide statistic there dated from 2009). I therefore do not think the inclusion of my three referenced sentences in the main entry (providing updated figures for 2014-2016) constitute an "extensive" addition. Strudjum (talk) 00:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two Arabian Knights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Boyd. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Patricia Barry
added links pointing to Loving and Charlie's Angels (TV series)
High Voltage (1929 film)
added a link pointing to The Flying Fool

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change "Warner Bros." to "Warner Brothers" again. The name of the company was never "Warner Brothers", it was always "Warner Bros." Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ken, will do. On the Wikipedia page on "Warner Bros." it does note the full name as an accepted alternative usage. I had changed it simply to avoid the "visual complication" of having a period within the body of the sentence. I certainly defer to your expertise on this and will not make any such additional changes. Thanks. --Neil (Strudjum)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vera Miles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Spy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alice Backes
added a link pointing to Broadway
Ken Lynch
added a link pointing to The Wild, Wild West

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:J Lloyd on Andy Griffith Show 1962.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:J Lloyd on Andy Griffith Show 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actor Harry Townes on Thriller 1960 resize.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actor Harry Townes on Thriller 1960 resize.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dorothy Green on Gunsmoke resize.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dorothy Green on Gunsmoke resize.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dorothy Green on Gunsmoke 1959 better image.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dorothy Green on Gunsmoke 1959 better image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alice Backes on Gunsmoke 1959.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alice Backes on Gunsmoke 1959.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twice now you've added CN tags to this article when the source for the information tagged has been right there in the paragraph it is part of. Every single sentence doesn't need to have a source indicated, as long as the source provided at the end of a number of sentences or a paragraph covers the information. Please avoid doing this in the future. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CLEAN

[edit]

Hello Strudjum:
You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. North America1000 05:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Strudjum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tina Louise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pygmalion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:J Lloyd on Andy Griffith Show 1962 resize.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:J Lloyd on Andy Griffith Show 1962 resize.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan Hale Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wanted Dead or Alive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strictly Dynamite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garçon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irving Thalberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arbiter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Bertram (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Leonora Ainsworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sanitarium
William C. Dowlan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to American Film Company

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Meston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thespian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Strudjum. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Diamond from the Sky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storyline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Take part in a survey

[edit]

Hi Strudjum

We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey: https://mit.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXJcEhLKioNHuJv

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 01:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norman Macdonnell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vendetta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Maross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Frank McGlynn Sr and other actors in Lincoln in the White House, 1939.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Actors in 1939 short Lincoln in the White.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free screenshot being used in a decorative manner in Lincoln in the White House#Plot. While screenshot are sometimes allowed when they help the reader understand some particular technical aspect or techinique involved in the film making process, they are pretty much never allowed to illustrate plot points, etc. as explained in WP:FILMNFI because the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is almost always lacking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actor Frank McGlynn as Abraham Lincoln in 1939 short.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actor Frank McGlynn as Abraham Lincoln in 1939 short.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actors in 1939 short Lincoln in the White.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actors in 1939 short Lincoln in the White.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content use

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically User:Strudjum/sandbox, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-adding File:Actors in 1939 short Lincoln in the White.jpg to your user sandbox. Non-free files cannot be used there per Wikipedia non-free content use criterion #9. The file has been previously removed a couple of times and edit summaries left explaining why, but you've re-added it each time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Quiet Man

[edit]

You are making a mass of changes to The Quiet Man film article - some of which are unnecessary. If you have to make changes, please ensure that you make them in one or two occasions - the number of changes you have made make it hard to follow and is wasting time. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 12:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Quiet Man

[edit]

Thank you very much for your feedback, David. With regard to the extent of changes I made to the page, my work was in response to a Wikipedia notice that the plot entry for the film was not up to "encyclopedic standards" in its content and style. No other changes, at least on my part, are planned. Thanks again for contacting me. Strudjum (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Quiet Man

[edit]

Thank you very much for your feedback, David. With regard to the extent of changes I made to the page, my work was in response to a Wikipedia notice that the plot entry for the film was not up to "encyclopedic standards" in its content and style. No other changes, at least on my part, are planned. Thanks again for contacting me. Strudjum (talk) 15:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actor Gage Clarke on 1962 episode of Gunsmoke.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actor Gage Clarke on 1962 episode of Gunsmoke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actor Gage Clarke on tv series Gunsmoke 1962.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actor Gage Clarke on tv series Gunsmoke 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you added an item from the 1920 census as the citation for Brinegar being born in Tucumcari, New Mexico. While I know his father lived in Tucumcari during the time of Paul's birth, this census document is from La Luz in Otero County, New Mexico. Perhaps I'm reading it wrong. Can you help me understand how it establishes that Brinegar was born in Tucumcari? Thank you. →Wordbuilder (talk) 17:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Brinegar

[edit]

Thanks for your inquiry. As to your question, the 1920 federal census was used to document and confirm Paul Brinegar’s parents' names and his father's livelihood. The specific location regarding Brinegar's birth is cited in many other records, including various 1995 obituaries, such as the accompanying one from the Los Angeles Times. Thanks again for your question. It led to my rereading and changing the syntax in the related sentence. As previously written, one could have interpreted that Brinegar had three parents (Paul, Louise, and that "farmer")! Strudjum (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying. I'm working to document his place of birth in an effort to have "Birthplace of Actor Paul Brinegar" signs installed in my hometown of Tucumcari. I will take a look at the other sources. →Wordbuilder (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Brinegar

[edit]

Glad you’re doing that. My own research on Brinegar has been pretty limited, although I have always liked him, even outside his most widely recognized role as "Wishbone". Good luck. Let me know if I can be of help in any way. Strudjum (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Music Box, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambassador Hotel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mooseheart, Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dorothy Walters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Paramount
Frank Brownlee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Shore Acres

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actor Gage Clarke as Botkin on Gunsmoke, 1962.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actor Gage Clarke as Botkin on Gunsmoke, 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism temporarily "orphaned" info-box image

[edit]

Page devoted to actor "Gage Clarke" vandalized by MichaelDaPug on August 10, 2019, including malicious changes to the correct title of existing image of Clarke and to other text, resulting in the correct info-box image being temporarily "orphaned". Wiki contributor Strudjum detected vandalism on August 11, corrected the changes, and notified Administrators of the vandalism. MichaelDaPug subsequently blocked from Wikipedia on August 12, 2019. Strudjum (talk) 05:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jessie Ralph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Last of Mrs. Cheyney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1913 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dorothy Gish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Emerson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

likewise

[edit]

TY as well for your work on the project. — Ched (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thank-you!

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Redemption (1930 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posthumous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great writing

[edit]

Excellent work on the Luke the Dog article. Very informative and a fun read! -- Flask (talk) 23:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Adventurous Sex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middle America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Devil's Daughter (1915 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Fool There Was (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Bill Robinson with Putney Dandridge at piano, Harlem Is Heaven, 1932.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Payne (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hell's Headquarters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Mayo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider uploading free images to Commons!

[edit]

Thanks for uploading free images to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider uploading media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view your previous uploads here). Note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons, and uploads of non-U.S. works are normally allowed only if the work is either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work. Thanks, and please continue uploading! --Animalparty! (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Newspaper advertisement for film starring Thunder the Dog, 1924.jpeg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Newspaper advertisement for film starring Thunder the Dog, 1924.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Screenshot of jazz pianist Putney Dandridge in film Harlem Is Heaven, 1932.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

George Terwilliger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Frank Wood

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your comments. It is tough indeed not to get a bit depressed whenever researching in the silent era, to see how little actually survives from our early film history. Thank you too for your earlier work on Burlingham. You certainly deserve the lion’s share of credit for creating the page and drawing readers' attention, including mine, to this interesting filmmaker. Strudjum (talk) 06:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting filmaker. I'm sad more of his work hasn't survived. Do you have any other drafts? Let's get them to mainspace. You do great work. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. It is tough indeed not to get a bit depressed whenever researching in the silent era, to see how little actually survives from our early film history. Thank you too for your earlier work on Burlingham. You certainly deserve the lion’s share of credit for creating the page and drawing readers' attention, including mine, to this interesting filmmaker.

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Terwilliger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Strudjum! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I correct a “Invalid CSRF token”?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silent film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaumont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. Searle Dawley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Charge of the Light Brigade (1912 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Gordon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Gilbert (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbara Bedford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited T. C. Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matinée.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shoes (1916 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal City.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Format catch on Born to Kill page

[edit]

Thanks, User:Strudjum, for catching that I had inadvertently deleted the closing syntax for column format in the cast section of Born to Kill (1947 film), and a minor editing error. Keep up the good work. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 12:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikiuser100: Thank you again, Wikiuser100, for the acknowledgment. I have been a Wikipedia citizen and enthusiastic supporter for many years now, and I do strive to create and edit pages with the utmost care, doing my small part in making this great evolving resource better each day. Although I work predominantly in the silent and pre-Code eras of film, I also enjoy film noir as well as other topics outside the realm of motion pictures. Recently, I noticed that the page on Born to Kill (1947) seriously lacked content regarding its production, critical reactions to the film, and the public controversies that swirled about it after its release. I have enjoyed researching and adding information and references to that page and to working–albeit it indirectly–with colleagues like yourself. We Wiki citizens are mostly just faceless pen names and numbers to one another, so it's nice whenever we can touch base directly like this. Stay well and thrive in 2021! (Strudjum: talk)
Greetings, Strudjum. I have replied to your most recent at my Talk page, but thought I would share a few quick things here, only to recognize you are indeed familiar with two I saw missing there - using a colon (or multiple colons) to successively indent new entries in a string, and signing one's entry with four tildes. Like everything here, it is learn-as-you-go. A couple of other tips also occurred, but escape me now. One thing that does remain is the observation that you are free to edit your User page and either delete the good-faith but errantly placed entry there by another user, or merely transfer it as you see fit to your Talk page.
Also, I'm sure you are familiar with them, but if not there are several valuable tools available under the User drop down menu, helpful in both tracking one's own work and in evaluating the bona fides of another editor. These include the highly comprehensive XTools under Analysis, which gives a very complete picture of anyone's work - including number, type, frequency of edits, etc.; pages created; most frequently edited pages; block and user rights changes logs; and more. There are also shortcuts to pages created, the user's edit summary decorum, and their most frequently edited pages, all valuable tools for getting a quick sense of the type of contributor one may become engaged with. With their User and Talk pages, of course, speaking loudly as well.
You are fortunate to have the background, time, and temperament to be a highly valued contributor here. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bunny Breckinridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joanna Lee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keystone Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Little Darling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 14th Street.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gladys Egan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Behind the Scenes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edgar Allan Poe (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Strudjum

Thank you for creating Trying to Get Arrested.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on this article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 15:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bil Baird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockettes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Screwy Squirrel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carcass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De Voortrekkers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split screen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Strudjum — I am re-formatting an article, and I appreciate your edits on the article "Daisy (advertisement)", but I do want to ask why have you (a) added a you-tube link (b) changes the caption to "without President Johnson's voiceover". I guess the advertisement is complete and have President Lyndon Johnson's voice over. The video is taken directly from the Library of Congress, and is also a Featured media. if you have any source stating the advertisement to be incomplete, please cite, else revert your edit. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 03:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you very much for contacting me. Yes, as stated in the narrative adjacent to the video clip on the page. The clip shown is not complete. A full clip with President Johnson's voiceover (copy as preserved in the LBJ Library) can be reviewed on YouTube at the noted external link (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cwqHB6QeUw). As a long-time contributor to Wikipedia, I work extensively in the realm of film and video, chiefly expanding “stubs” and creating needed pages on films of the early silent era. I work in other areas, however; and, in fact, I vividly remember viewing this 1964 political ad as a child and afterwards had many sleepless nights. I do think the caption needs, in addition to the added runtime reference, to be qualified as not “complete” owing to the absence of the voiceover. Thanks again for the follow-up and inquiry.
Hi @Strudjum – Thanks for replying. I think there's some mis-understanding, either by you or me. The video on Wikipedia (this) is of 60 seconds length. The video link you gave (this) is of 66 seconds length, in which the first six seconds is a still frame. Rest, both the videos are exactly same, and have LBJ's voice-over ("These are the stakes ...... or we must die .... Vote for President Johnson on Nov. 3, the stakes ...) As to the ad being "incomplete", could you please let me know which part is missing. I intend to make this article a Good article, and eventually nominate for Did you know section. I also created another article on Lyndon B. Johnson's 1964 presidential campaign. I appreciate your work on another article, and helping me out with this one. It's a pleasure to talk to someone, who has actually seen this ad on television! Please let me know if I am missing anything. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Kavyansh.Singh – Yes, there are numerous copies of this ad that run at varying lengths. After reviewing discrepancies in several different versions (some with LBJ's voiceover, some without), the copy you have included certainly can be accurately cited as "complete", although I would recommend maintaining the added runtime reference as a caption standard for videos and to differentiate clearly this particular digital copy from others that lurk on different sites with varying runtimes. Sorry for any confusion. I'm a retired historian, so I know all too well that the devil is in the details. Great work!
No issues at all. I'll maintain the runtime reference, while adding various citations. I was surprised when you stated that you had "sleepless nights" after watching this ad in 1964. This ad is still a masterpiece. It's an absolute pleasure talking to you! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, for a 10-year-old boy that ad was a traumatic thing to watch, especially in the highly unsettled post-environment of the Cuban Missile Crisis and President Kennedy’s assassination. I donated to a museum years ago the identification necklace or "dog tags" that were issued to me at my elementary school so, as one official explained to us children at the time, “Your bodies can be recognized in the event of a nuclear attack." Don't worry about me, though, I slept well last night! All the best.
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Bitzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flyleaf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John R. Cumpson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Wife's Mother.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actress Mari Blanchard on Rawhide 1959.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actress Mari Blanchard on Rawhide 1959.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1914 Lubin vault fire

[edit]

Great article! Fascinating to read. — Mainly 18:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1914 Lubin vault fire

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1914 Lubin vault fire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1914 Lubin vault fire

[edit]

The article 1914 Lubin vault fire you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1914 Lubin vault fire for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1914 Lubin vault fire

[edit]

The article 1914 Lubin vault fire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1914 Lubin vault fire for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1914 Lubin vault fire

[edit]

On 14 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1914 Lubin vault fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1914 Lubin vault fire (aftermath pictured) in Philadelphia destroyed several thousand unique early silent films? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1914 Lubin vault fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1914 Lubin vault fire), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Purple Star Hook update
Your hook reached 5,722 views (476.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2021—nice work!

theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 01:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Actor John Dehner in 1957 film Revolt at Fort Laramie.jpeg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Actor John Dehner in 1957 film Revolt at Fort Laramie.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the image I uploaded to the page regarding actor John Dehner. I do think the image in question is an important illustration and directly relevant to the adjacent narrative about the subject's work in a specific film, the 1957 production Revolt at Fort Laramie. The image complements that narrative and provides readers with visual information relating to the actor's physical appearance, costuming, and the historical context of that particular film, which was Dehner's first starring screen role in his long career. If I need to improve my justifications linked to the image's "Details", I would appreciate having your recommendations. Thanks again.Strudjum (talk) 13:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just one follow-up: the screenshot, as noted in its Details, is from one of several full copies of the film freely available to the public on several streaming platforms, including YouTube, Dailymotion, and others. Strudjum (talk) 14:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Dehner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fun with Dick and Jane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Berthelet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry King.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paths of Glory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matinée.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth MacRae, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fabian, Kathryn Grant and Pat Priest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Actress Alice Backes on Gunsmoke 1959 better image.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Actress Alice Backes on Gunsmoke 1959 better image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the full lyrics for a song in blatant violation of WP:COPYVIO

[edit]

Strudjum, I've very confused as to how an experienced editor like yourself wouldn't be aware that adding the full lyrics for a song is a clear violation of Wikipedia's policies on copyright at WP:COPYVIO. Please do not do this. Ss112 13:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your notification and for deleting the lyrics. I certainly will not make that error again. Have a great weekend. Strudjum (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]