User talk:Ravave

Welcome!

Hello, Ravave, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. —MearsMan ^talk 15:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Babel

Hi Ravave! I had to look around a bit, but from looking at this article it appears that Valencian is commonly known as Catalan outside of the Valencian Community of Spain. I searched a bit more, and it appears that the Babel boxes use the Catalan term to refer to the language, and a list of Catalan babel boxes can be found here. I hope this answers your question, but if not feel free to leave another message on my talk page, or if you perfer you could also try asking someone at the help desk, which is usually monitored by a variety of experienced editors. Cheers! —MearsMan ^talk 16:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Su commentario

Usted no puede usar youtube por referencia. No es fuente fiable. Usted debe leer WP:CITE por mas información acerca de este. Aquí está una traducción por computadora de este página. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo no soy la mejor persona para preguntar acerca de esto. Yo no escribir mucho. Mayormente me quito vandalismo. Usted probablemente debería pedir a alguien más. Lo siento que no ayudarse. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Family Guy Spanish voice actors

I say you're asking the wrong person, sorry. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you go to the WikiProject then, I'm afraid I can't help you. I don't know much about the voice actors, especially not foreign voice actors. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 20:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time I don't much about voice actors, sorry. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 13:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think your right, but I can't really help you. Sorry. With all due respect, BrianGriffin-FG (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Aída

Me parece bien que se quite la plantilla de esbozo, la sección de episodios está bastante completa, a la de personajes aún le falta mucho, espero poder editarla en estos días. Saludos --Daniel bg (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cabrera

Any biography article needs to be longer than one line long, and needs to establish notability. That would be acceptable. Harro5 08:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tico

Hola Ravave. Por supuesto que recuerdo la serie y aunque hablo de memoria podría decir que Tico hablaba con un acento totalmente español (andaluz diría yo). Desde luego que italiano no era. No obstante no tengo ni idea de si en la versión en inglés se usó acento italiano para el personaje pero desde luego en la versión en castellano Tico era con una seguridad del 99,9% (siempre hay que dar un margen al error) de España.--Elemaki (talk) 23:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Family Guy episodes

El editor con el IP anónimo se ha bloqueado de revisar cualquier artículo para un período de 48 horas. Administradores no protegerán una página a menos que hay una proporción alta de vandalismo en un período corto de tiempo. Esperanzadamente con este usuario a bloqueándose durante las 48 horas, detendrá el vandalismo. También marcaré la página y si encuentro una cantidad alta de vandalismo, pediré protección del aministrator de la página. Espero que eso ayuda.--«JavierMC»|Talk 09:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mojinos Escozíos

A tag has been placed on Mojinos Escozíos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. gnfnrf (talk) 20:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy Movie

Nice job finding a reliable source. Schuym1 (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lois

If you are asking why I deleted it, it's because it is a one time quick joke, that didn't even make the episode. If we included every joke, the article would never end, and would give undo weight to these jokes. CTJF83Talk 15:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well if it is deleted, it probably shouldn't be mentioned ever. The problem is, we don't want to give undo weight to one throw away joke (which Family Guy has ALOT of). For example, obviously it is established that she is married to Peter, and is a piano teacher, etc. Peter and Stewie have the biggest jokes about them, especially Peter, so a lot of what happens to him just for a few seconds in a show doesn't need to be mentioned. Like currently on Peter's page, it says "Occasionally Peter soils himself". That is not necessary, as they are just jokes, and have nothing to do with him as a character in general. Also in his infobox, people want to keep adding in ancestry that he is black and Mexican. Again, those are just one time, quick jokes, not to mention that Nate Griffin isn't related to him, so he isn't black at all. This page might give you a little more help too, it is about writing articles about fiction. If you have any more questions, let me know! CTJF83Talk 15:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

No se por qué no me lo preguntas en la cuenta en español, pero bueno... Pues se puede (semi)proteger todo el tiempo que se requiera, hasta se puede determinar que sea indefinido (infinite). Todo depende del caso. --Millars (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

La página estuvo semiprotegida hasta el 24 de septiembre, es decir, lleva 18 días pudiendose editar y aún no ha sido vandalizada. Esperaremos. --Millars (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai Spanish woman

The Indians listed her on their official list of killed people.89.216.236.45 (talk) 23:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fernando Cabrera (Spanish dubbing actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fernando Cabrera (Spanish dubbing actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando Cabrera (Spanish dubbing actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j⚛e decker ^talk 13:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many editors consider IMDB (and I'm less sure about Eldoblaje) to not be a reliable source. The basic criteria for article inclusion at Wikipedia is the general notability guideline. What it asks is that articles be backed by multiple, reliable sources (generally newspapers, magazines, or books) that discuss the article subject in-depth. The idea is that the article, in the best of worlds, should be written from such sources. I'd love to see additional references on this voice actor, and I will be happy to add them to the article and withdraw my nomination at AfD if some are presented. Do you know of any that might be appropriate? Thanks! --j⚛e decker ^talk 15:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If there are newspaper articles, magazines, etc., in Spain, that's fine, but it sounds like maybe not? But don't give up hope yet. One of the reasons that there is a week-long discussion is that it gives other editors a chance to try and look for sources too. I try, but I miss things sometimes, so we require a few editors to take a look at most deletions like this, and speaking personally, I'd much rather that someone found something. --j⚛e decker ^talk 15:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Constantino Romero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to TVE, Antena 3, Pink Cadillac and Escape from Alcatraz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Salvador Puig Antich. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is the "real" nationality about that person. He was born in Catalonia OK, But where's: Spain, France, Mexico?. I just say he was Spanish because Catalonian in those times and nowadays is part of Spain. This user, who i suposse is from Catalonia, is persistent in add Catalonian how if a sovereing country were when actually it doesn't. If the user is Catalonian, he can speak with me in Spanish or Catalonian, but i think he won't (i'm Valencian, almost neighbourgs). --Ravave (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Several of the sources used as a references even states that Salvador is a 'Catalan' anarchist. Catalunya has it's own government for Christ's sake, Catalan is his nationality, mention that Catalonia is under Spanish rule if you must but you will find lots of sources all over the internet including books that all describe him as Catalan. He may have been born under Spanish rule but it does not in any form stop him from being Catalan, or being described as one. It's insulting, especially given what the article goes on to say about Salvador's life. The article in it self describes 'Catalan' political movement. I have not 'vandalized' this article at all, practically every source used as a reference all describe him as being a Catalan. This nationality argument is falling on stony ground I'm afraid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CristofolR (talk • contribs) 01:11, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page is on my watchlist. Thanks for adding more to the discussion on the talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything wrong (policy-wise) with what you did.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I'm sorry, but...

Hi Ravave, thanks for your message. Sorry you disagree with the {{BLP sources}} tag I've added to the Gorka Otxoa article. You must keep in mind however that Wikipedia guidelines tell us that (for neutrality and verifiability purposes) all articles should be referenced by multiple, independent reliable sources... which is an issue that becomes even more critical when the article in question is a biography of a living person. I regret to inform that the interview links you've suggested would most likely be regarded as primary sources, and insufficient for the purpose. If you are currently unable to locate additional reliable sources, be patient, as the {{BLP sources}} template automatically adds tagged articles to a hidden backlog category which is continuously being worked by users who are very sharp at finding quality source material, and will eventually work their way through the list to your article. In the meantime, please remember that this maintenance tag is not threatening the existence of the article, nor should it be regarded as a badge of shame. Its purpose is to raise awareness of the issue and invite the participation of others to help improve the quality of the article itself, and Wikipedia as a whole as a result. I hope I've helped answer some of your questions and concerns. Stay well, and happy editing. -- WikHead (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The End (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antena 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brain Drain (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chernobil... ¡Que cuchitril!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RAE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chernobil... ¡Que cuchitril!

The article Chernobil... ¡Que cuchitril! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 03:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No te preocupes, nadie nace aprendido. Mi inglés tampoco es que sea de Oxford, pero ya verás que a base de leer mucho en inglés se le acaba pillando el tranquillo.--Pacostein (talk) 23:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Salamanca AC

Hello Ravave, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Salamanca AC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About Salamanca AC

Hi Ravave,
Salamanca AC didn't meet the speedy deletion criterion "{{db-club}}" It's a real club. It exists. But from what I can see Talk:Salamanca AC, it isn't taking UD Salamanca's place in the Segunda División B.) If it doesn't meet the wider guidelines for a football team, then the place to go is Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion.
Need help with that? Just ask me. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

Please do not add machine translations of foreign language articles to Wikipedia. Due to their poor quality, they are generally not useful and can be very difficult to fix. In the future, please follow the instructions laid out at Wikipedia:Translation.--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi partner, unfortunnately and lately i have forgotten my English aknowledges (long time ago i don't edit in English Wikipedia), and that's the reason i add the template cause someone can clean up the translation. Please, don't delete it, just correct it. Thanks and greetings. --Ravave (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Making something poor and expecting somebody else to fix it is not how the world works. If you're not capable of translating something properly yourself, then don't do it at all, all you're doing is making Wikipedia worse--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!, i don't know why ask you for a help. Sounds familiar to you these politics?: GF and WP:BB. How you can see, my English is much better when talk with somebody, but isn't perfect at all, that's the reason i want to improve it. You should'be know Spain is one of the most country where the English aknowledge level is lowest and the Wikipedians should be help them. Do you know Spanish?, i'm sure you not, but if you try to edit an edition in Spanish wikipedia there aren't any doubt someone help you, so don't tell me you don't do it. --Ravave (talk) 19:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to keep telling me you're replied. We have enough poorly translated articles already, you're not helping matters by making more - I wouldn't try to edit a Wikipedia if I didn't know the language, as I would be aware that I'd just be making things harder for those already there--Jac16888 ^Talk 19:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with Jac16888. Adding machine translations just causes more work for other people who don't like fixing these kind of mistakes. Entiendo español. La traducción automática es inaceptable.--ColonelHenry (talk) 22:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rivales

Copyedit:

their parents must travel to Seville where's the final take place. Meanwhile they are in way, their family and social relationships will come out.

If you seriously think this is good writing (one example among several), you are mistaken.--ColonelHenry (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ravave. You have new messages at Passengerpigeon's talk page.
Message added 10:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Passengerpigeon (talk) 10:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to help with the article on Max. Thous, could you please copy the original Spanish text on to my talk page so I know exactly what is meant: Noyster (talk), 10:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK Ravave, done that - please take a look and see what you think: Noyster (talk), 18:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: María del Monte Tejado Algaba (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:María del Monte Tejado Algaba.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ravave, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answer me although i'm not dissapointed actually. I have a level 2 in English language so i can have any problems with the gramma or the translations. I see the rejection was because haven't more reliable sources (OK, I can search for internet). By the way, the article was partially translated from Spanish language Wikipedia, what do you think the text?, it's comprehensible or i need to improve more the draft?. --Ravave (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The text is not perfect but it's good enough to be understood. Grammar isn't a criteria for acceptance so I didn't initially examine the article for that. Yes, you need more reliable sources. I made a quick search and didn't see anything useful. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:04, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thank you very much. I'm going to search another references (I try find someone in English). Bye. --Ravave (talk) 07:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now is referenced. I'm gonna submit again. --Ravave (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources you added appear to be reliable. Simply finding information on a website isn't enough. If you found information in El País or El Periódico de Catalunya then that would help her notability. Please read the linked guidelines so you understand. The equivalent guidance in Spanish is Artículos sin relevancia aparente. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i will try again. --Ravave (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

El País is a generalist newspaper, i don't think there information about her biography being a singer, at most something about her personal life. There's also yellow magazines who likes make crap about the celebrities, but María del Monte isn't too controversial. --Ravave (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My point is, use reliable (perhaps journalistic) sources. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for answer you with delay, i'd be busy. Search more references will take me for a while, but i'm still searching. --Ravave (talk) 08:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this time i just added more info about her TV career with sources from: Europa Press, an interview from 20 minutos where she talked about her first TV-performance, another one is El Economista where there information about two TV programs (the first how jury member and the second one how tutor in a Childish edition program). I hope that's enough. --Ravave (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, our guidelines state that selling a platinum album counts for notability. I moved the article to Maria de Monte as it appears English Wikipedia doesn't typically list all the Spanish names. I added Template:Spanish name for that reason so please tweak that as necessary. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The template is OK, I guess you say about "tweak" cause her birth name is compound. Well, in Spain and anothers Spanish speak-countries is very often someone has a compund name, for example: María del Mar, María de la Concepción, Francisco José, Francisco Javier, José María, etc. --Ravave (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: María del Monte has been accepted

María del Monte, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Ravave (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salamanca AC

No problem, it was not too poor at all. :)

BTW, SAC was founded by Hidalgo and its inscription was rejected twice, I don't think it has so much relevance either. We could point both teams in UD Salamanca's page, adding references to them (I'll do it later). I can also create a draft to Unionistas' page (drafts are OK if you want to wait until the day they become notable enough, but today I'm not so sure if I'll have that much time on me).

Thanks for the help, mate! Cheers, MYS 77 ^✉ 12:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, and Unionistas play in Primera Provincial, right? Surely they'll be promoted, Salamanca was a huge club and what happened to it was not right. MYS 77 ^✉ 12:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is done, right here. Take a look and add whatever you want to. :) MYS 77 ^✉ 16:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that Tercera División teams are notable too... I'll do some research over this. Happy weekend, MYS 77 ^✉ 17:26, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, my friend! How are you? Long time, huh?

Remember the "new Salamanca"? They were indeed promoted, as I "predicted" some months ago :) I moved my (our, to be honest) draft to a "real article", as they are just one level behind Tercera, and have coverage in Marca, El Norte de Castilla and ABC (all good reliable sources) and have a great past with UDS as its "precessor".

If you want, you can add more to the page.

Cheerio :) MYS 77 ^✉ 03:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ravave. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Roman Zozulya

@Ravave: Hi and thank you for your encouraging message

. Glad to know you want to improve the Spanish article, last time I looked at it yesterday it was pretty bad as it stated that Zozulya is a Nazi, period.

Twitter. I translated the original post on the talk page, it says (in Russian and not in Ukrainian, a horrible crime for a Ukrainian Nazi!) Ох и похожи, which means something like We look alike or So much alike. I don't really think this photo is worth citing beyond the fact it exists: one might also cite that that photo included not just Zozulya and Bandera but also a Minion, and Zozulya's joke was that all three look alike.
Regarding the visit to soldiers, I could find just one source in English: one paragraph here. Still, they do show a photo of Zozulya on the same day, but with supplies instead of a weapon. There is a better source in Ukrainian. The main idea is simple (well, simple for Ukraine where many volunteers are helping military in this way): Zozulya with other footballers bought a minibus of water, hygiene products, food and cigarettes, took some football merchandise and visited military of the uk:Донецький прикордонний загін (Donetsk Border Brigade) of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. The first source shows a picture of this minibus with a logo of Narodna Armiya fund, the second one shows Zozulya with soldiers. I also gave three more links (here, here or here) about Zozulya helping families and children of military. There are more interesting facts there like Zozulya selling his UEFA Europa League medal in order to help children from the war zone (a pretty poor news item in English is available, and it is mentioned in the uacrisis one above).
In addition, there is some information in Spanish on the Ukrainian fact-checking site StopFake: here (August 2016) or here (February 2017).

Good luck and please do not hesitate to ask me if you need any further information — NickK (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quinto Levanta

The article Quinto Levanta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article, no evidence that it would ever meet WP:NSONG guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ham tech person 05:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ravave. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ravave. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of That Cursed House in Amityville for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article That Cursed House in Amityville is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Cursed House in Amityville until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Utopes (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]