User talk:PigeonJesus
Welcome PigeonJesus!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lunartail puffer has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The One and Only Boothsift 06:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Crested oarfish has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Gpkp (u • t • c) 13:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Crested bandfish has been accepted
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
GirthSummit (blether) 18:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Ringed toadfish has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CoolSkittle (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path | |
| Keep up the great work! S0091 (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pacific jellynose fish has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
-- RoySmith (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Papuan lanternshark has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Centrarchiformes has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The One and Only Boothsift 02:49, 5 March 2019 (UTC)AfC notification: Draft:Girella zebra has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Girella zebra (March 5)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Girella zebra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Girella zebra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, PigeonJesus!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Girella zebra (Zebrafish) has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The One and Only Boothsift 07:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Amniataba has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SITH (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Hello! regarding Illacme (Genus), this is redundant to the existing redirect Illacme. If you wish to create an article for the genus (or for the species Illacme tobini) you should expand the redirect (edit and replace the redirect with text), not create redundant articles. Note also that when titles are disambiguated, they should be generally be in lowercase per WP:TITLEFORMAT, unless the disambiguator is a proper noun. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Tachypodoiulus) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Tachypodoiulus.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
I didn't even know there were marine millipedes. Keep up the great work.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barbara (WVS)}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Best Regards, Barbara ✐✉ 20:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Bathyphysa) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Bathyphysa.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
I'm going through your new articles because I am convinced you know what you are doing. After creating 50 articles, you don't need your articles reviewed any more. Good job.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barbara (WVS)}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Best Regards, Barbara ✐✉ 20:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Illacme (Genus)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Illacme (Genus).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Can this be expanded?
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barbara (WVS)}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Best Regards, Barbara ✐✉ 20:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Sericosura) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Sericosura.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Great start! Nice to see more genera being described and listed.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stevey7788}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
— Stevey7788 (talk) 00:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
A sea spider for you!
[edit]
|
Sea Spider Award |
| A spidery award to you for describing little-known invertebrates. — Stevey7788 (talk) 00:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC) |
Dwardius, Pseudocorax species
[edit]In the case of species in a paleontologically extinct genus, standard practice on Wikipedia is not to create separate articles for each species, but to leave the binomials as redirects to the article on the extinct genus. Plantdrew (talk) 03:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Please use edit summaries
[edit]
Categories
[edit]We do not put both parent and child categories on the same article (except in very special cases that don't apply to the articles you've been changing). See Wikipedia:Categorization. So we don't have e.g. Category:Spiders described in 1900 and Category:Animals described in 1900 because the former is a subcategory of the latter. So please fix the changes like this that you made. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- They've been fixed now. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Benoit's lanternfish) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Benoit's lanternfish.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Flaccid lanternfish) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Flaccid lanternfish.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 07:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Gonichthys cocco) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Gonichthys cocco.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work - you have been busy!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 07:51, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Indonesian wobbegong) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Indonesian wobbegong.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Gigantione
[edit]Hello, PigeonJesus,
Thanks for creating Gigantione! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
You love your marine creatures!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
GirthSummit (blether) 22:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Neocrinus decorus) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Neocrinus decorus.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 01:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Hi PigeonJesus! I noticed your edit on Callistoctopus and went ahead and created a redirect to the new article you created from the octopus' scientific name, here. You can see a template filled with common reasons that redirects are made at Template:R template index. Help:Redirect and Wikipedia:Redirect have more information if you haven't come across redirects before. Rhinopias (talk) 22:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
[edit]
Hi PigeonJesus, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- Lofty abyss 19:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
October 2022
[edit]
- Im confused, what do you mean by constructive? I was simply adding a little bit of extra information based on one of the references. PigeonJesus (talk) 01:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Cladonota machinula
[edit]Hi! There aren't enough sources right now for individual species of Cladonota to be listed as standalone articles (Flynn's reviews of the topic are the only ones that come to mind), but the information that's currently in the article can be added to List of Cladonota species! However, if you have more to write about this species in particular, feel free to keep and expand the article. Have a nice day! 😊 Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 10:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)