User talk:Paroxysm

You OK?

Everything Okay, Paroxysm?Zebruh 05:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reborn

He's probably been reborn somewhere in a far corner of Wikipedia we may never know... --DanielCD 02:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda don't blame him.Zebruh 03:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not such a far corner. He hasn't disappeared at all. -Will Beback 04:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What? Do you know something about Paroxysm we don't, Will? Ineloquent 19:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That depends on what you don't know. -Will Beback 22:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, what he said. --DanielCD 03:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunh... I came here to ask the exact question Zebruh did. Herostratus 08:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Paroxym can you please justify your comment on my page, i at no point mentioned child killing, please leave your own opinions at the door when altering Wikipedia - Kenscanna Unknown date

No problem

Moved your comment. Yes, that was an accident. Sorry. // paroxysm (n) 03:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. But I am confused?? 21:24, February 17, 2006 Ineloquent (support Paraphilia) What'up with the name?? The conversation above?? FloNight ^talk 04:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suck at logging out. // paroxysm (n) 16:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um

Paroxysm, I wanted to apologize for what I said at the Mfd for WikiProject Pedophilia... that was a battle, and in the heat of battle fingers can fly faster than minds can think. But no excuse. The main thing that irritated me about the MfD was that I knew it might compromise my ability to be seen as NPOV in future... enh, what can I say. I look forward to working with you in future. Herostratus 07:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not sure what you're apologizing for so clearly you don't have to apologize for it. :-) // paroxysm (n) 16:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your voting!

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AID

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Contact lens was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Your userpage

Not so hot. Ashibaka tock 14:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lolicon

There is another stawpoll on the disputed offensive image currently underway at Talk:Lolicon. Hipocrite - «Talk» 21:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of shock sites

Someone has put this up for deletion yet again. Care to cast your vote? Skinmeister 10:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

I did a little general clean-up on your userboxes. However, Wikipedia wouldn't let me save the page until I had removed two sites from the page (it has a spam blacklist) so I tried to go around that as well as I could. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 03:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Arms of South Georgia.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 11:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Linkimage

Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brass Eye logo.png

Hello, Paroxysm. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Brass Eye logo.png) was found at the following location: User:Paroxysm/boxes. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I'm of a shared opinion of the non-notability of GC but some of the comments people made about it, you were right to correct them, as they were not appropriate adjectives and were used flagrantly and chastisingly without any evidence. I'm sorry no one else saw fit to correct them at the time. Tyciol (talk) 06:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]