User talk:Jon Deen

Welcome!

Hello, Jon Deen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Zhenya Gershman, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zhenya Gershman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zhenya Gershman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhenya Gershman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhenya Gershman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 16:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've up-dated the proposed article for deletion with appropriate citations and edits based on the recommendations from the talk page. Please advise.Jon Deen (talk) 06:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zhenya Gershman

Hey, I noticed that an article you created about Zhenya Gershman has been nominated for deletion. My email is stevvys at gmail dot com should you need help on how to not get articles you create deleted. 154.122.243.174 (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 23:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zhenya Gershman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhenya Gershman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhenya Gershman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 18:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zhenya Gershman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Frank. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jon Deen, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:49, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi, Jon Deen: For Zhenya Gershman, do you happen to have at hand a source for "will be featured in the permanent collection at Arte Al Limite Museum to be open in 2017 in Santiago, Chile" please? FeatherPluma (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Hi, Jon Deen: If you don't, I will remove the assertion as uncited. You can add it back if you have a supporting source. FeatherPluma (talk) 01:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks FeatherPluma - your edits are great. I'll add the source when I get a chance.Jon Deen (talk) 05:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the source: https://www.arteallimite.com/featured_item_category/coleccion/ Many thanks for adding back in!

Speedy deletion nomination of Place article name here

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Passengerpigeon (talk) 23:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Gershman-Pepper (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jon Deen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Gershman-Pepper (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable sources that contain significant coverage of their subject. The Columbian is a good start. The Yahoo! piece, however, is a press release (not independent). The capsule bio on From the Top is written by her or her publicist, it is not the product of independent research by the program. The Flute Review is a primary source interview, with no independent analysis by the interviewer, it's just Gershman-Pepper talking about Gershman-Pepper. Soundclound is a generally unreliable source. The sources use words like "young", "rising star", and "promising". These characterizations are almost synonymous with not-yet-notable. Being up-and-coming is not a reason for Wikipedia to have an article about someone, so much so that there's an essay about it, Wikipedia:Up and coming next big thing. She may become notable as her career progresses, but for now it is WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper

Hello, Jon Deen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nikka Gershman-Pepper

Hello, Jon Deen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nikka Gershman-Pepper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]