User talk:Hemalataeditor
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Hemalataeditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! So glad to have you here! :) Siko (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you Siko ! Hemalataeditor (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
hi
[edit]- Glad to meet you hemalata . Wasnikj (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
hi hemalata! this is bilqischondol!Bilqischondol (talk) 22:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Hemalataeditor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:13, Thursday, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
- Hi! this is sjoseph17! sjoseph17 Sjoseph17 (talk) 17:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Greetings Hemalata
[edit]Hello Hemalata Regards Sganguly58 (talk) 19:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.—SpacemanSpiff 10:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Spiff for the valuable information. Hemalataeditor (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]
- Don't copy from sources (as you did, for example, here, using this). Also, in those same edits you have completely misrepresented some other sources, which do not even touch on what you claim. You have also introduced Telugu script despite the consensus being that we do not use Indic scripts in that way - see WP:INDICSCRIPT.
- Please also note that sources are not reliable just because they exist on the web. Be particularly wary of hagiographic writings, which are commonly published by memorial committees etc in India and are rarely acceptable. Sitush (talk) 06:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Death of Merit
[edit]Death of Merit needs a lot of work. You haven't actually shown notability, despite your sourcing. Your sources comprise press releases etc issued by the activist group and news stories about the deaths (not the documentaries that are the subject of the article). As such, it looks like a way to shoehorn into Wikipedia your "righting great wrongs" agenda concerning treatment of Dalits. It isn't good enough and unless something turns up soon I think that the article will be deleted. - Sitush (talk) 06:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Sitush for writing to me. I will do the needful. I will provide the link for all the documenaries if that is required. Also, the article is still in progress, to note. Hemalataeditor (talk) 04:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sitush And what did you mean by 'not the documentaries that are subject of the article' regarding the sources? Well I was informed that people who are experienced editors do the edits in good faith. If it were in good faith, I would expect editors to have a discussion and not delete or revert. And what is it you are looking for when you say 'unless something turns up'? I would rather look forward to your comments on improving this article than aiming at deleting it. Hemalataeditor (talk) 08:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Article subjects have to be notable. That can be shown by providing reliable sources, which (among other things) means ones that are independent of the subject itself. Therefore, websites operated by the documentary makers, press releases and suchlike do not validate the notability. Nor do news stories about the deaths because they are not the subject of the article. - Sitush (talk) 08:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Category:Caste atrocities in India has been nominated for discussion
[edit]
Category:Caste atrocities in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Category:Institutional murder has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:Institutional murder, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Categorising
[edit]Look, you can't do this. Not only did you leave Category:Dalit people in the article, which meant it was overcategorised but you were compounding a violation of our policy regarding biographies of living people because his Dalit status wasn't sourced anywhere in the article. - Sitush (talk) 12:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
You've also done this at Eshwari Bai after I spent a lot of time fixing the previous errors made by you and others. Like it or not, we only use surnames (or the equivalent) after the first mention of a person's full name, unless doing so would cause confusion with some other person mentioned in the article.
You're inexperienced, I understand that, but you need to show that you are taking on board valid comments made by others otherwise it could appear that you lack the competence to contribute here. In this instance, all you had to do was raise your point on the article talk page or directly with me. Yes, we do say "be bold" but that doesn't mean "be reckless" - you knew that an experienced editor (me) had recently trawled through the article and, while no-one is perfect, such a widespread change would therefore likely be correct. - Sitush (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sitush His being a Dalit is mentioned in the article and if you want a proper source, that can be provided too [1][2]. Regarding Eshwari Bai's article, you might be experienced editor but you definitely seem to be ignorant about names and their usage. Read the article carefully or do some research about the person before you attempt to edit. I can see that you are definitely not familiar with the topic. Firstly, Bai is not her surname it is part of her first name. Her surname/last name is Jetti. Calling surname in India is also calling the person with their caste name, do you want to do that, now that your whole argument is not to relate a person with their caste? Well you don't need to reiterate that I'm inexperienced on WP, I am familiar with the topic.
- To talk about surnames and their positioning, North Indians follow first name and then last name. When you go down south, their legal documents show surname first and the given name (First name) like this. If you go to some of the states in South, surnames are completely abolished like in Tamil Nadu. They use their father's name as their last name. You can't address them with their father's name, do you? Some use their place name (where they were born) as their last name like in Karnataka.
- I am sure to edit WP, just being an experienced editor is not sufficient, one has to be familiar with the subject and context. Before spending a lot of time fixing the previous errors you consider others have made whom you or experienced editors like you might tag as lacking competence, spend some time reading or getting more information about the subject. Now will you please clear the mess you have created on Eshwari Bai's page? Hemalataeditor (talk) 05:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I am well aware of Indian conventions, which vary around that country. Wikipedia is not Indian but rather multinational and the convention for that particular person is uncertain except in your own opinion. I also specifically said "surnames (or the equivalent)" and, by the way, such names are not "abolished" in South India - it is just that some people choose not to use them. - Sitush (talk) 06:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I see you have inserted two sources into your original comment here after I replied. Alas, they do not show Kamble self-identifying as a Dalit - that is a requirement for living people. - Sitush (talk) 08:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ Astill, James (9 July 2013). The Great Tamasha: Cricket, Corruption, and the Turbulent Rise of Modern India (e-edition ed.). Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. ISBN 978-1408192207.
{{cite book}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help);|edition=has extra text (help) - ^ S, Anand. "The Retreat Of The Brahmin". Outlook India. Outlook. Retrieved 17 July 2017.
Moving articles
[edit]Hi, you recently moved Eshwari Bai. I have moved the article back to that title because of the guidance at WP:COMMONNAME. As far as I can determine, Eshwari Bai is indeed the commonly-used name.
I added your alternate spelling to the footnote in the article. If, after reviewing the guidance, you still think that you were correct then I suggest you open a discussion on the article talk page to see if you can obtain consensus for your proposed change. The article about requested moves might also be worth reading. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 08:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sitush I have started a thread on the talk page which probably you should have done rather than discussing here. The article talk page needs this message there so that the other editors of the article may pitch in and we can take other's opinion too. And by the way Eshwari Bai is not commonly used name. I have stated all the commonly used names in the talk page for reference.Hemalataeditor (talk) 08:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- I mentioned it here because it is a behavioural thing - a move that was likely to be contested - and you're new-ish to Wikipedia and thus probably unfamiliar with such esoterics as COMMONNAME. The burden was on you to start the thread because you were the one proposing the change. In future, I won't bother to treat you with kid gloves because, clearly, you do not want to be treated thus. I'll just treat you in the manner I would treat any contributor with years of experience. - Sitush (talk) 09:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Battle of Koregaon edit
[edit]Hi,
Please explain why the edit showing protests regarding Battle of Koregaon on January 1, 2018 was removed from the article. The following is one of the several news sources about this event.
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/pix-dalit-protests-rock-mumbai-over-bhima-koregaon-pune-violence/20180102.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan (talk • contribs) 18:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Ayonpradhan Firstly, the Dalits who were going towards Bhima Koregaon were attacked, it was not a mere clash. Secondly, the reference you provided is of the protests aftermath, not about yesterday's attack. Please provide proper references. Hemalataeditor (talk) 18:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. This site is neutral of politics so I am not going to debate as to what is a "mere clash" and who was attacked and why. I reiterated what the news media had stated. In addition, the references are correct since the protests of the aftermath also reference the actual attacks. Anyhow, I have added other references as well to the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan (talk • contribs) 22:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse Invitation
[edit]Hello! Hemalataeditor,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Hemalataeditor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 14:27, Saturday, May 12, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Hemalataeditor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 14:32, Saturday, May 12, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
add Savitri parents with Surname NISSANKARARAO,, Remove Kommareddy Surname & add She belongs to Kapu Community
[edit]Open main menu Wikipedia Search Show my notifications Edit this pageStop watchingRead in another language Savitri (actress) For other uses, see Savitri. Savitri (4 January 1936 – 26 December 1981) was an Indian film actress, playback singer, dancer, director and producer. She appeared mainly in Telugu and Tamil language films but also in Kannada, Malayalam and Hindi language films.
Savitri సావిత్రి కొమ్మారెడ్డి -Yesteryear's leading actress savithri.jpg Savitri as Sasirekha in Mayabazar Born 4 January 1936 Chirravuru, Guntur district, Madras Presidency, (present-day Andhra Pradesh, India Died 21st December 1981 (aged 45) Madras, Tamil Nadu, India Nationality Indian Other names Mahanati Savitri Nadigaiyar Thilagam Spouse(s) Gemini Ganesan (1952–1981) Children Vijaya Chamundeswari Sathish Kumar Ganesan Awards Rashtrapati Award Nandi Award Savitri's first significant role was in the 1952 Telugu film Pelli Chesi Choodu. In 1960, she received the Rashtrapati Award for her performance in the Telugu film Chivaraku Migiledi. In 1968, she produced and directed the Telugu film Chinnari Papalu, for which she received the state Nandi Award for Best Feature Film (Silver). She was honoured among "women in cinema" at the 30th International Film Festival of India.
She is best known for her work in award-winning films such as Ardhangi (1955), Thodi Kodallu (1957), Mayabazaar (1957), Mangalya Balam (1958), Chivaraku Migiledi (1960), Mooga Manasulu (1963), Doctor Chakravarthy (1964), and Varakatnam (1968).
Her Tamil work includes Kalathur Kannamma (1959), Pasamalar (1961), Pava Mannippu (1961), Paarthal Pasi Theerum (1962), Karpagam (1963), Karnan (1963), Kai Koduttha Dheivam, Navarathri (1964), and Thiruvilaiyadal (1965).
Savitri's later career, from the late 1960s, tumbled into a spiral of financial problems and alcoholism that necessitated her taking on film roles of little merit.
Early life Savitri was born on 4 January 1936 in Chirravuru, Guntur district, Madras Presidency, now part of Andhra Pradesh. Her father died when she was six months old, after which her mother took Savitri and an older sibling, Maruti, to live with an aunt and uncle. Her uncle, Kommareddy Venkataramaiah Chowdhury, enrolled her in classes when she began to show a talent for dance.[1]
Savitri married Tamil actor Gemini Ganesan in 1952, having first met him in 1948. The marriage led to a permanent rift with her uncle because Ganesan was already married, had four daughters and was involved in an affair with Pushpavalli.[1] Her marriage became public when she signed a photograph as Savithri Ganesh.[2] Ganesan later acknowledged that he had two daughters with Pushpavalli while married to Savitri, with whom he had a daughter and a son.[1]
Career Death Awards and recognition References
Kalyanam, Rajesshwari (22 December 2013). "Drama In Real Life". The Hans India. Retrieved 23 March 2018. "Star and a versatile actor". Chennai, India: The Hindu. 15 August 2003. Retrieved 11 July 2011. Vijayakumar, B. (12 October 2014). "Chuzhi: 1973". The Hindu. Retrieved 2018-03-01. Adivi, Sashidhar (26 April 2017). "I never watched amma's films: Vijaya Chamundeswari". Deccan Chronicle. Retrieved 2018-03-01. "Drama in real life". The Hans India. Retrieved 2018-05-04. Devipriya (January 1999). "Savitri: A Moon Among Stars" (PDF). 30th International Film Festival of India '99. Directorate of Film Festivals. p. 150. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 January 2013. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
Further reading External links Savitri on IMDb Talk Last edited 1 hour ago by Hemalataeditor RELATED ARTICLES Chivaraku Migiledi 1960 film by Gutha Ramineedu
Pelli Chesi Choodu (1988 film) 1988 film by Relangi Narasimha Rao
Mahanati 2018 film by Nag Ashwin
Wikipedia Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of UsePrivacyDesktop Close Add Savitri parents with surnames to her bio & add right Surname "Nissankararao" to her & remove Chowdhury caste title of her uncle NissankaraRao Savitri was born to Nissankararao Guravayya & Subhadramma at Chirravuru in Guntur district. Her Surname is Nissankararao & not Kommareddy. Her guardian( elder brother of father) 's Surname is Kommareddy (Venkatramaiah Chowdhury). As per Indian law Her Maiden Surname Should be same as her father & not that of guardian. She belongs to Kapu Caste & & Chowdhury word used for' Kamma' Community. Please remove Chowdhury to avoid "wrong impression that she belongs to Kamma Community". U need not Mention that she belong to Kapu coz she is respected by whole South India for what she achieved & she's above the Caste / Community tag. I have got concrete proofs regarding my version.
To sum up ,, I request following changes to honour "First Lady superstar of Indian cinema"
1. ADD HER PARENTS WITH SURNAMES TO BIO 2 REMOVE WRONG SURNAME OF "KOMMAREDDY BEFORE HER NAME" & ADD NISSANKARARAO INSTEAD 3 REMOVE UNNECESSARY CASTE TITLE " CHOWDHURY" AFTER HER GUARDIAN 'S NAME TO AVOID DISTORTION OF FACTS. 4 IF U WISH TO MAINTAIN CHOWDHURY TITLE THEN ADD A LINE "SHE BELONGS TO KAPU COMMUNITY OF ANDHRA" THANK U FOR CONTACT & Info regarding my version Praveenroyalu@gmail.com NVS Praveen (talk) 15:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Reply
Note your reply will be automatically signed with your username. By saving changes, you agree to the Terms of Use and agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses.
Save
NVS Praveen (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Jop Sibongile Chibwe Singini (talk) 09:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
hey Hema
[edit]hello i am on wikipedia...can we connect Hravarn (talk) 10:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Thulasi Helen for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thulasi Helen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thulasi Helen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBGconverse 13:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Death of Merit for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Merit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Merit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBGconverse 13:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Death of Merit for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Merit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Merit (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBGconverse 18:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Hemalataeditor,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on and off wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages. [1]
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English). [2]
Find more information about this project. [3] Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Hemalataeditor,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation's annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well the Wikimedia Foundation supports your work on and off wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Jyotirao Phule -> Jotirao Phule
[edit]Hi, am writing since you had earlier discussed the subject and had provided reasons why the move needs to be done. Since there is a redirect already present at Jotirao Phule, I submitted a requst for technical help in completing the move. An editor [4] felt that fresh consensus should be sought. I have created a new thread in the Phule Talk page. Would appreciate your inputs, thanks! - Sdsouza (talk) 12:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Death of Merit for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Merit (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.