User talk:Dannis243

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nordic Resistance Movement

Sorry about the flag. I just wanted to get rid of MisterManhattan's tendentious edits, and I must have misunderstood your edit (which I now see had already reverted MrM). Bishonen | talk 12:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Unblock request 17 October 2016

please look throught my contributions i have never edited ABOUT Eritrea, Eastern Africa or what some regional spelling of coffe so please unblock me i i never knew or heard of him (this so called user Hiyob346) till i was blocked without investigations

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dannis243 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me i do not know who this "Hiyob346" is and never heard of him! reading his sockpuppet investigations and if you see my contribution i have NEVER EDTITED ABOUT Eritrea, Eastern Africa or what he did "Occasionally using the regional spelling of "coffe". please look throught my contributions and this is a great mistake

Decline reason:

After discussing with blocking admin below, I'm not persuaded that this account is not a sockpuppet. I'm sorry @DeltaQuad and DoRD: didn't want to take a look. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dannis243 (talk) 07:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:CheckUser tool confirmed technical connection between your account and several others (including Richard0048). Please, comment on that. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- am living in one of swedens largest institutions where there are several computers and 72 people. please just search thorought my edits for "eritrea", "eastern africa" and "something coffe" see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Hiyob346 they all edit around theese subjects did you ever see in my edits that i have done the same????, no ,do you know how it feels to be innocently blocked indef? Dannis243 (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please, don't panic. Your request will be reviewed. @Ponyo: Can you take a look at this again? Is it possible that this user is innocent? I don't see any behavioral connection. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Vanjagenije and Ponyo: I felt the same so I had a closer look at this account. There is new, very strong behavioural evidence I have posted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chaosname. I would welcome some clarification as to the technical link, as I was pretty convinced that Dannis243 was connected to Hiyob346, and now I think there's a possibility of the two cases being connected. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      @Vanjagenije and Ivanvector: My findings at the SPI were that there were technical links between this account and Richard0048, so it is that connection which should be addressed in any unblock request. With the IP and topic overlap (ethnicity/genetics) as well as some behavioral tells (email me if you'd like additional details) it is likely that is the same editor as Richard0048. That being said, CheckUser is not magic pixie dust, and "likely" is not "confirmed", so there is a possibility of collateral.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should clarify: I'm convinced to certainty that this account is a sock of Chaosname (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), a community-banned user ([1]). While there may be doubt as to the technical connection to Richard0048, this account should not be unblocked. (Non-administrator comment) Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 11:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this is gone to far! did you not hear me????!!! i never edited on africa related topics, my computer is part of a big network/set of ip adress with several computers and 72 people about the "chaosname" am thinking telling me "dont panic" and then accuse me even further is just morally wrong Dannis243 (talk) 10:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, are you Chaosname or not? Vanjagenije (talk) 16:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NO!!!! am neither any eritrian or "chaosname" am dannis243! this is my first and only account! Dannis243 (talk) 10:35, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DeltaQuad and DoRD: Can we compare this account with Chaosname socks (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chaosname/Archive)? I know that the date is stale, but you two performed checks, so maybe you have some data. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Next Qatari general election, 2013 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Qatari general election, 2013. Since you had some involvement with the Next Qatari general election, 2013 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cancelled Qatari general election, 2013 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cancelled Qatari general election, 2013. Since you had some involvement with the Cancelled Qatari general election, 2013 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dannis243. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blue, White and Red Rally for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue, White and Red Rally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue, White and Red Rally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]