Jump to content

Talk:Eleanor Farjeon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Genre(s)

[edit]
first of two new sections

At Herbert Farjeon we list the same four collaborations by brother and sister: Kings and Queens (1932), The Two Bouquets (1938), An Elephant in Arcady (1939), and The Glass Slipper (1944). There we call them simply "books" without hint of any public performance or hint what kind of books. Since coverage of his plays and revues, at that point we have briefly covered his theatr-critical work, his theatr-historical books(?) about Elizabethan theatre, and his edition of Shakespeare's plays.

One online biography of HF[1] includes The Two Bouquets in a list of his revues; it names none of the other three. Of his revues it does note that "many of which were published", which implies that many were not and hints that EF's role may have been to write up more promising theatrical stuff for print publication.

Here at Eleanor Farjeon we call the four collabo-works "productions" which hints theatrical material, perhaps without print editions. We also list them without transition from identifying HF as "Shakespearean scholar and drama critic", which hints that some of their collaboration was Shakespearean or critical. (On first reading I supposed that all four were nonfiction works about theatrical-literary stuff. Now I suspect that none were.)

"Productions" also hints that one or both Farjeons served as Theatrical producer.

--P64 (talk) 21:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sequence

[edit]
second of two sections posted at once

The sequence is odd. We mention "childhood" family holidays without date and without transition a 1907 holiday in France at age 26. After her career seems to be underway we go back (careful readers will infer) to her libretto at age 18 without date and hop more than thirty years (careful readers will infer) forward to collaboration with another brother. Did she work with either brother during the 1900s, 10s, 20s?

Roughly when did she enter (and perhaps leave) "life among the literary and theatrical circles of London"? Some specification will be helpful there too.

--P64 (talk) 21:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist

[edit]

Her topical work for The Herald, Reynolds News and New Leader was perhaps the most accomplished of any socialist poet of the 1920s and 30s.

There is no mention of her politics anywhere else in the article. Can we have some support for classifying her as a socialist poet? Valetude (talk) 23:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eleanor Farjeon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eleanor Farjeon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Eleanor Farjeon

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Eleanor Farjeon's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "rpm":

  • From Morning Has Broken: "RPM100 Singles" (PDF). RPM. 17 June 1972. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
  • From RPM (magazine): "Top Forty-5's". RPM. 22 June 1964. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 09:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]