Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Tamil Nadu Premier League

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:17, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Tamil Nadu Premier League

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

2016 Tamil Nadu Premier League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage on independent reliable sources for separate season articles; Should be redirected to Tamil Nadu Premier League. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating,

Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article(s) ''should not be deleted/redirected''. They contain quite a bit of information with sources from TNCA, ESPN cricinfo, Cricbuzz etc.
If required, someone can take initiative in adding more sources for respective pages.
Thanks, Vikram Maingi (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TNCA is the official site, doesn't count on notability. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am also against the deletion of these. While some of these articles might require expansion, copy editing and additional work on citations, generalised deletion is not the way to go. My reasons for the same:
  • There are standalone articles as there are similar articles for similar sporting events and it does not fail notability.
  • There is significant information in these articles. For e.g. the 2024 season page is ~15k bytes in length. I do not think these can be condensed into the original article. With eight seasons and further ones, it will make continue to make the original page unnecessarily longer and difficult to read.
  • While I do agree that some of these would require additional citations and secondary sources, generalisation as failing WP:RS is an overreach. Say the e.g. the article for the 2024 season has more than ten citations, of which a larger proportion seem to be independent secondary sources and quite a number of them are reliable.
Update: I have started working on the page for the 2024 season.

Magentic Manifestations (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magentic Manifestations: Here is a ref analysis on the 2024 article (28 refs),
  • Refs 10 & 14 from TNCA site & 8 from TNPL site - WP:PRIMARY
  • Refs 2, 4, 5, 7, 15, 20, 25, 26, 27 & 28 are from ESPNcricinfo - WP:ROUTINE
  • Refs 1, 3, 11, 13, 18 are about TNPL itself and not specific to season
  • Refs 21, 22, 23, 24 are about the stadiums
  • Remaining refs,
  1. Refs 6 & 9 - Sporting news
  2. Refs 12 & 16 - mykhel
  3. Ref 17 - Cricket corner
  4. Ref 19 - Sportstar
Just 4 unique sources, mostly just WP:ROUTINE coverage; fails WP:GNG. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2016_Tamil_Nadu_Premier_League&oldid=1250384349"