User contributions for 96.237.148.44
Appearance
Results for 96.237.148.44 talk block log logs global block log filter log
27 June 2009
- 23:2023:20, 27 June 2009 diff hist +4,318 Talk:Fine-structure constant/Archive 2 →About alpha, Eddington, and numerology
- 20:4320:43, 27 June 2009 diff hist +2,337 Talk:Fine-structure constant/Archive 2 →About alpha, Eddington, and numerology
- 17:4917:49, 27 June 2009 diff hist +449 Fine-structure constant →Numerological explanations: More complete quote from Feynman.
- 17:3217:32, 27 June 2009 diff hist −5,770 Inverse-square law Revert a whole pile of WP:OR. This article is not about acoustics per se, but about the inverse square law which applies to gravity, EM, as well as acoustics. Tag: blanking
- 17:0617:06, 27 June 2009 diff hist +1 Fine-structure constant Undid revision 298933939 by Alphatronic Read the entire discussion page. Eddington's (or Gilson's) "research" that alpha = 1/137 is numerological.
- 03:5803:58, 27 June 2009 diff hist +1 Fine-structure constant Undid revision 298798915 by Alphatronic (talk) Caveat notwithstanding. It's numerology, by definition.
22 June 2009
- 15:5015:50, 22 June 2009 diff hist +613 Fine-structure constant Undid revision 297881182 by KarlFrei (talk) It's a reliable source to someone with some credentials postulating a mathematical val
- 03:1003:10, 22 June 2009 diff hist +26 Natural units →Heaviside-Lorentz units: Last touch up.
- 03:0203:02, 22 June 2009 diff hist +28 Natural units →Heaviside-Lorentz units: Linkify
- 02:5902:59, 22 June 2009 diff hist +28 Natural units →Heaviside-Lorentz units: Linkify
- 02:5702:57, 22 June 2009 diff hist +4 Natural units →Heaviside-Lorentz units: Linkify
- 02:5302:53, 22 June 2009 diff hist 0 Natural units →Heaviside-Lorentz units: sp. fix red link.
- 02:5202:52, 22 June 2009 diff hist +891 Natural units →Heaviside-Lorentz units: Like geometric units, H-L units do not define a complete set of length, time, and mass, without something else getting tied down.
3 June 2009
23 May 2009
- 20:1920:19, 23 May 2009 diff hist +16 Word divider →History
16 February 2009
- 04:4204:42, 16 February 2009 diff hist +215 United States congressional apportionment →The Equal Proportions Method: It's originally called "Method of Equal Proportions".
- 04:3604:36, 16 February 2009 diff hist +336 Edward Vermilye Huntington Expanded reference regarding Huntington-Hill method. Added reference.
- 04:3104:31, 16 February 2009 diff hist +58 Joseph Adna Hill Disambig. Added reference.
- 04:2404:24, 16 February 2009 diff hist +848 Huntington–Hill method Added some relevant information and references.
- 04:0604:06, 16 February 2009 diff hist +445 Joseph Adna Hill Added reference to Huntington-Hill method.
15 February 2009
- 04:3604:36, 15 February 2009 diff hist +4 United States congressional apportionment →The Equal Proportions Method: Linkify geometric mean.
- 04:2904:29, 15 February 2009 diff hist +1 United States congressional apportionment →The Equal Proportions Method: Missed a symbol.
- 04:2704:27, 15 February 2009 diff hist +1,152 United States congressional apportionment →The Equal Proportions Method: Fixed some inconsistent math. Cleaned up a little. A little more expository.
- 03:2003:20, 15 February 2009 diff hist +22 United States congressional apportionment →The Equal Proportions Method
- 03:1403:14, 15 February 2009 diff hist +767 Talk:United States congressional apportionment →Can the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?
- 03:0503:05, 15 February 2009 diff hist +382 United States congressional apportionment →The Equal Proportions Method: Another reference.
- 02:1502:15, 15 February 2009 diff hist +202 United States congressional apportionment →The Equal Proportions Method: Added a more direct reference to census.gov regarding the apportionment method. It appears to be the law, but this geometric mean makes no sense.
14 February 2009
- 19:3019:30, 14 February 2009 diff hist +1,219 Talk:United States congressional apportionment →Can the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?
- 18:5818:58, 14 February 2009 diff hist +38 Talk:United States congressional apportionment →Can the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?
- 18:5718:57, 14 February 2009 diff hist +38 Talk:Huntington–Hill method →Can the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?
- 18:3518:35, 14 February 2009 diff hist +4,245 Talk:Huntington–Hill method →Can the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?: new section
- 18:3218:32, 14 February 2009 diff hist +4,245 Talk:United States congressional apportionment →Can the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?: new section
- 01:5701:57, 14 February 2009 diff hist +3,866 Talk:Hare quota →Can this or the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?: new section
- 01:4901:49, 14 February 2009 diff hist +3,858 Talk:Apportionment paradox →Can the Huntington-Hill method, sometimes called "method of equal proportions" be clarified or justified?: new section
13 February 2009
- 06:1406:14, 13 February 2009 diff hist +8,019 Pacifism Undid revision 270065128 by 166.122.10.93 (talk) There's no good reason to delete this section.
11 February 2009
- 23:1623:16, 11 February 2009 diff hist +777 User talk:Buridan →Hi Buridan. What don't you like about Enlightened self-interest?
- 22:5622:56, 11 February 2009 diff hist +376 Talk:LIGO →Dubious
- 06:1706:17, 11 February 2009 diff hist +508 User talk:Buridan →Hi Buridan. What don't you like about Enlightened self-interest?: new section
4 February 2009
- 00:2700:27, 4 February 2009 diff hist −314 Sampling (signal processing) →Theory: It "more or less" says nothing solid. Give us a big solid.
3 February 2009
- 00:0400:04, 3 February 2009 diff hist +21 ARM architecture family →ARM cores: Wikilinked first occurance of SoC to System-on-a-chip
31 January 2009
- 16:5016:50, 31 January 2009 diff hist +878 Talk:Planck units →new edit for invariant scaling
- 03:4603:46, 31 January 2009 diff hist +662 Talk:Anthropic units →I think that this is a good article ...
- 03:0603:06, 31 January 2009 diff hist +85 Dimensionless physical constant Make this a little more clear. The article should be (again) titled "Fundamental physical constant" or this lede should be put in a disambiguation page of that title.
- 02:5702:57, 31 January 2009 diff hist +4,777 Talk:Planck units →Need to revise 'Planck units and invariant scaling of nature'