2022 California Proposition 27
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 No
80–90%
70–80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source: Statement of Vote at the Wayback Machine (archived September 23, 2023) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in California |
|---|
 |
Proposition 27, also known as the Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative was a California ballot proposition that was defeated overwhelmingly by voters in the general election on November 8, 2022. The proposition would have legalized online and mobile sports betting platforms that are associated with an existing gaming tribe.[1]
Proposition 27 was most notable for its large amount of advertising spending and very large margin of defeat, its 82.28% against to 17.72% in favor marks it as one of the largest margins of defeat for any proposition in history. With both Proposition 27 and the similar Proposition 26 failing, sports betting remains illegal in California.[2][1]
Background
[edit]Following the US Supreme Court's decision to strike down a federal sports betting ban, each state has the ability to regulate sports betting.[3] Sports betting is illegal in California under existing state law. For the 2022 election, Proposition 27 was one of two ballot propositions to legalize sports betting, the other being Proposition 26.
Under Proposition 27, sports betting companies who partner with a Native American tribe could offer online sports betting to those 21 or older. To operate in the state, a betting company must either be operating in five other states plus run twelve casinos, or pay a licensing fee of $100 million.[4]
Contents
[edit]The proposition appeared on the ballot as follows:[5]
Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
Allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online/mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. Directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, nonparticipating tribes. Fiscal Impact: Increased state revenues, possibly in the hundreds of millions of dollars but not likely to exceed $500 million annually. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually.
Support and opposition
[edit]Support
[edit]Supporters of the proposition argued legalizing online and mobile sports betting would provide more funding for homeless programs.[6]
- Mayors
- Jerry Dyer, Mayor of Fresno[7]
- Libby Schaaf, Mayor of Oakland[8]
- Robert Garcia, Mayor of Long Beach[8]
- Darrell Steinberg, Mayor of Sacramento[8]
- Tribes
- Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut tribe[9]
- Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians[10]
- Big Valley Ranch of Pomo Indians[11]
- Other
Opposition
[edit]Opponents of Proposition 27 argued that legalizing mobile and online sports betting would impede on tribal sovereignty and that only major gaming companies would benefit from the legalization as written.[6]
Polling
[edit]| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Yes | No | Undecided | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley IGS | November 4, 2022 | 7,602 | ± 2% | 22% | 64% | 14% | 42% |
| UC Berkeley IGS | October 4, 2022 | 8,725 | ± 2.5% | 27% | 53% | 20% | 26% |
| Public Policy Institute of California | September 2–11, 2022 | 1,705 | ± 3.9% | 34% | 54% | 12% | 20% |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b "California Proposition 27, Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
- ^ a b Gedye, Grace (September 6, 2022). "California Prop 27: Online Sports Betting". CalMatters. Retrieved January 24, 2023.
- ^ Purdum, David (May 15, 2018). "Supreme Court strikes down federal law prohibiting sports gambling". ESPN. Retrieved November 10, 2024.
- ^ Gedye, Grace (April 27, 2022). "California sports betting initiative backed by FanDuel, DraftKings would block small competitors". CalMatters. Retrieved November 10, 2024.
- ^ "Proposition 27". Secretary of State of California. Archived from the original on November 5, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
- ^ a b "Arguments For and Against Proposition 27" (PDF). California Secretary of State. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ Anahi Jaramillo, Estela (October 19, 2022). "Propositions 26 and 27 may determine future of sports betting in California". The Collegian. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ a b c Li, David K. (September 8, 2022). "Gambling on the ballot: Competing sports betting plans duke it out for California voters' favor". NBC News. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ a b Lindt, John (August 10, 2022). "Local tribes split on Prop 27, on-line sports betting | John Lindt". The Hanford Sentinel. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ Barber, Phil (August 13, 2022). "Local tribes on opposing sides in fight over sports betting". The Press Democrat. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ Oxendine, Chez (November 14, 2022). "Tribal sovereignty becomes sticking point in California sports betting battle". Tribal Business News. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ Purdum, David (August 12, 2022). "Major League Baseball announces support of online sports betting initiative in California". ESPN. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ Schwab, Frank (October 26, 2022). "Gov. Gavin Newsom opposes California's dying sports betting Prop 27". Yahoo Sports.