Commons:Categories for discussion/Archive/2023/11
Created cat. with wrong title, just created the correct one, sorry. LucaLindholm (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per G1/G7. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Empty category CzarJobKhaya (talk) 02:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello CzarJobKhaya, since the file(s?) must have been deleted and it is empty, obviously the category should be deleted too. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 05:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted. (If in the future we have verified free licensed media, category can be recreated or undeleted.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Empty & useless nonsense category created by a vandal. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom; unused, creator indef blocked. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
I made this category, and I don't want it around anymore. I'd like this deleted. MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 12:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Deleted, unused category, per creator request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Invalid IMO number (it's really an ENI number). Empty cat. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete My mistake at creation time. GeorgDerReisende (talk) 23:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Deleted per above, unused, created by mistake. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
We have only a few dozen photos of Kotlarnia altogether. We don't need a category for a single month, especially with only one photo from that month. Jmabel ! talk 23:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Please delete, overlooked existing appropriate Category:Daimler-Benz DB 600 when creating this one. Files have been moved. Zenwort (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per G7, please use {{SD}} from next time, see COM:CSD. -- CptViraj (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
oops didn't notice it had a page! Category:Craig C. Crenshaw, linking it to the Wikidata page SDudley (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Clear case; made into a redirect to Category:Craig C. Crenshaw. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused empty category Kelly The Angel (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Comment 1950s US animated tv series, popular enough that there were comic book and other marketing in the era. There will no doubt be relevant PD media eventually. Given US copyright formalities of the era (eg requirements of notice, registration, and renewal) there is likely some relevant out of copyright material around already, even if it has not yet been identified and copied to Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep Found some after a few minutes online search; will upload shortly. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Done. No doubt there's more out there for anyone who cares to hunt and check period copyright formality details. @Kelly The Angel: since cat is no longer empty, any objection to closing this listing? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Nope!
- Nope!
Closed, kept, in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm totally unfamiliar with any precedent for naming a category this way. I believe it doesn't fit into our naming standards; is there something I'm missing here? Jmabel ! talk 01:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The same user seems to have created several other categories with similar naming:
- Category:Images by person/Florence Devouard
- Category:Images by person/Jagseer S Sidhu
- Category:Images by person/Jimmy Wales
- Category:Images by person/Manavpreet Kaur
- Category:Images by person/Nataliia Tymkiv
- Category:Images by person/Nilam Karn
- Category:Images by person/Nitesh Gill
- Jmabel ! talk 06:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
I've mentioned this discussion at Commons:Village pump#"Category:Images by person/PERSON NAME" in hopes of getting some independent opinions here. - Jmabel ! talk 06:31, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
The person who created these categories now agrees they were wrong, so I think this is resolved (merging or moving to the usual category for each person). - Jmabel ! talk 20:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
It is a duplicate of Category:Ogives (glaciology) in Alaska Votpuske (talk) 08:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Votpuske, you can go ahead and put
{{category redirect|Ogives (glaciology) in Alaska}}in Ogives in Alaska, as long as the nomenclature of glacial ogive categories is consistent, at least for the US. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirected to Ogives (glaciology) in Alaska. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Is this distinct from Category:Retail in the United States? If so, how? If not, let's merge. Jmabel ! talk 04:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Merged. Allforrous (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Creator of the newer category, Allforrous, agrees to merge. Category:Retail in the United States is much older (dates from 2007) and is parallel to other countries, so I think that is the one I will keep. Leaving Category:Retailing in the United States as a redirect for now, but I have no objection to deleting it. - Jmabel ! talk 21:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
I can't work out why this (currently parentless) category exists. What is it for? Jmabel ! talk 04:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
@Sarang and Timeshifter: perhaps you can explain. - Jmabel ! talk 04:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't remember why I created it. :)
- Maybe I was trying to consolidate all the different PD doc pages. But I see that it is not necessary since the templates that use them are all categorized here:
- Category:PD-ineligible license tag lists
- --Timeshifter (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleting. I think that's pretty safe if the person who created the category can't even remember or work out the intent. - Jmabel ! talk 20:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Empty category with wrong spelling Ooligan (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- {{[ping|Ooligan}} in the future, no need to come to CfD over a blatant misspelling. This is {{C1}}, where C1 comes from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 20:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Meets criteria for speedy deletion
Is this the same as Category:Fernleigh, Cleveland? Anyway it needs to be disambiguated from Category:Fernleigh, Chichester, the other places at w:Fernleigh and quite a few other listed buildings in England. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Looking at Wikipedia and Commons, it looks like Fernleigh (in Cleveland) was the only Fernleigh and didn't require disambiguation. It looks like I came back in 2016 and renamed the article on Wikipedia and created the category Fernleigh, Cleveland on Commons and shifted the photos into it, so I am guessing it was not unique at that time. So do whatever you like with the category Fernleigh. Kerry Raymond (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Make into a disambiguation. (Looking at what's currently in the category, many seem to be of Fernleigh, Ontario, Canada.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Kategorie bitte löschen, wurde wegen Tippfehler im Titel ersetzt Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 10:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Self-promotional spam. Sam Wilson 04:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
your mum 203.37.238.206 23:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Vandalism. --JopkeB (talk) 05:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This reads like an article, not a category page. Previously it didn't even have parent categories; I've added two; they may not be ideal, and improvement would be welcome. I suspect that most of the text on this page should either be moved elsewhere or deleted outright. Jmabel ! talk 05:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. The text should be shortened to about two or three lines, just a short description so that visitors know what the category is about and what kind of files should be in it and which not. This thext looks like it is for Wikipedia, not for Commons. See Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not an encyclopedia, dictionary, guide, or book. JopkeB (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
@Gabriel Mosquera (WMCO): Si desea que esto se haga de una manera que esté bajo su control, le sugiero que lo haga en la próxima semana. - Jmabel ! talk 18:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Jmabel and JopkeB. @Gabriel Mosquera (WMCO): is no longer staff of our Wikimedia Colombia chapter, I am currently vice president of the chapter and I have fixed the problem that existed in the category. Please let me know if everything is correct. Thank you so much. JOAN ~ (Questions?) 16:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- @JOAN: thanks, much better. - Jmabel ! talk 17:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Jmabel and JopkeB. @Gabriel Mosquera (WMCO): is no longer staff of our Wikimedia Colombia chapter, I am currently vice president of the chapter and I have fixed the problem that existed in the category. Please let me know if everything is correct. Thank you so much. JOAN ~ (Questions?) 16:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
JOAN has fixed this. - Jmabel ! talk 17:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
There are no pages or files in this category. 2001:999:681:C617:7987:284:FBBC:FF23 12:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- There are two. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 14:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Now 4. It has several Wikipedia article so is likely to be notable enough for a Commons category, see Commons:Category inclusion criteria. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept. Seems like a clear keep, though it may not have been so when nominated. - Jmabel ! talk 22:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be already deleted. - Jmabel ! talk 22:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Name is spelt "Centre"; see File:Day 1 - November 01, 2023 GS Rwanda (53301925732).jpg. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- OK. --Elkost (talk) 05:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Will move accordingly. - Jmabel ! talk 22:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
This is not a term used by the public. It was coined in 2011 as a critique within the only Engineering community. Here is a quote from a book of the person who created "stroad":
- "I really was writing it as a way to push back at the engineering profession and get my fellow engineers to think about the bizarre things they're building," says Marohn.
The category should be deleted. Thanks Ooligan (talk) 18:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Even though it's a term only used in engineering circles, that's perfectly acceptable to have a category for it. SWinxy (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept per above, clear consensus. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
What is the difference between a walkway and a footpath? If they are synonymous, then Walkways and Footpaths should be merged into a single category. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Similarly, the distinction between Footbridges and Elevated walkways is also pointless. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- I am not a native English speaker, but I think (after a little bit of research) that:
- Footpaths are always on the ground and may be unpaved and may have been originated from people taking the shortest way through an area.
- Walkways are engineered surfaces or structures and may be elevated.
- Footbridges just serve to cross a river, railway, road or other obstacle.
- Elevated walkways may be longer and bring you across a wet field, a garden or mountain area, or just give you the opportunity to enjoy a marvellous view.
- If that is true (I hope a native English speaker can confirm or correct this view), then they are all needed. Perhaps these categories should get good descriptions, which show the differences. JopkeB (talk) 10:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll add the descriptions and close the discussion within two weeks or so. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 03:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Implemented the proposal. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 12:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This category and all of its subcategories use the wrong dash. It needs to be moved to Category:Bethune–Cookman University and its subcategories need to be moved similarly. Denniscabrams (talk) 23:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Oppose We have this come up over and over for categories. The advantage of having category names be able to be typed on an ordinary keyboard exceeds the advantage of using what is technically the more correct character. See Commons:Categories#Category names, first paragraph, last sentence. - Jmabel ! talk 23:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no agreement to rename this category, so it will stay as it is. --JopkeB (talk) 05:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a duplicate of Category:Arnika (NGO). Leyo 11:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Leyo: It's the same thing, is there any way to merge it? Unfortunately I have no experience with editing on Commons. RiniX (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Both category seem to currently contain the same files. Hence, deletion of this category would do. --Leyo 20:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirected to Category:Arnika (NGO). Radiojunkie (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Self-nomination: Main template was already deleted, this maintenance category is no longer useful A1Cafel (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Main template was already deleted, this maintenance category is no longer useful A1Cafel (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree to delete this category. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Main template was already deleted, this maintenance category is no longer useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
delete category. (Typo, correctly named category Category:Graffiti in Tyrol (state) exists.) Luftschiffhafen (talk) 18:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Name of category obviously is a mistake by myself. Please delete this cat. Eweht (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Eweht, you can insert
{{bad name|Graffiti in Tyrol (state)}}in Graffity in Tyrol (state) to delete the misspelt category name. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)- Done. Eweht (talk) 21:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Eweht, you can insert
Already deleted, which seems fine. - Jmabel ! talk 22:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Please delee (typo) Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 11:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deleted by Raymond. In future, please use {{SD}} for these type of uncontroversial reasons, see the criteria. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
The category is empty. Wolverène (talk) 05:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Conclusion: Speedy delete. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
The category is empty. Wolverène (talk) 05:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Conclusion: Speedy delete. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
request by creator; not required anymore Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Categories that are not required anymore and are empty, can be deleted without a discussion, see Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion, and use Template:Speedydelete. JopkeB (talk) 12:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per above. In case of the same reason, please use {{SD}} from next time, see criteria. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 14:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
request by creator; not required anymore Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. In case of the same reason, please use {{SD}} from next time, see criteria. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 14:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
request by creator; not required anymore Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. In case of the same reason, please use {{SD}} from next time, see criteria. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 14:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
What is the difference between Category:Toilets (sanitation fixtures) and Category:Toilet bowls? What kind of files should be in one and which in the other? Can both please get clear descriptions (understandable also for non-native English speakers) and criteria? JopkeB (talk) 06:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- The bowl excludes the tank. It's a part of a toilet (fixture). The fixture category was created, I assume, to differentiate from toilets as rooms or buildings. -- Themightyquill (talk) 09:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, Themightyquill, now it is clear to me. I'll wait another two weeks and then I'll close this category and add descriptions to the categories involved. JopkeB (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved by consensus | |||
| Actions | Add correct descriptions to the categories involved (Category:Toilets (sanitation fixtures) and Category:Toilet bowls), and fix corresponding Wikidata items. Done | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | JopkeB (talk) 09:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
What is the difference between Category:Rubble and Category:Construction debris? Can they both have (more) clear descriptions? How do they relate to each other (parent-child)? JopkeB (talk) 10:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think Rubble is the parent while Construction debris is the child. Per Wikipedia, rubble is "broken stone, of irregular size, shape and texture; undressed especially as a filling-in" and thus they may or may not be found in construction sites. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, Sbb1413. So copying from EN-WP we get:
- Rubble is broken stone, of irregular size, shape and texture; undressed especially as a filling-in. In EN-WP the parent categories are Building materials, Building stone, Natural materials, Building engineering, Stone (material). So nothing about waste or debris, it more looks like construction stones.
- Construction debris is waste from the construction process, debris generated during the construction, renovation and demolition of structures, not only stone, but all kind of materials. In EN-WP (redirect to Construction waste) the parents are Construction, Waste, Building materials.
Conclusions:
- I doubt whether it is a good idea to make in Commons Rubble the parent of Construction debris, since that is not the case in EN-WP either.
- I have doubts whether the files in Commons match with these definitions, because in Category:Rubble I see more files showing debris than (re)usable stone. This also applies to the subcategories (based on a sample).
In Commons we make our own decisions. But it would be strange to give different meanings to words. So I think we now have to decide wether:
- We move the files to categories with descriptions that match their content (my preference). OR
- Give descriptions to both categories that match their files. In this case we have a problem, because the same kind of files are in two different categories.
What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JopkeB (talk • contribs) 25 dec 2023 15:35 (UTC)
Since there was no answer in over four weeks, the EN-WP solution will be implemented on Commons as well.--JopkeB (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | 1) Add the descriptions from EN-WP to both categories. 2) Move the files in Category:Rubble to categories with descriptions that match their content. Done | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Notes | Still to do: subcategories of Category:Rubble by country should be reorganized according to the descriptions. | |||
| Closed by | JopkeB (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
What is the difference between Category:Flushing tanks and Category:Toilet tanks? Can both categories be merged, OR get each a good description showing the differences? JopkeB (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think the two should be merged into Toilet tanks, since I found no difference between flushing tanks and toilet tanks. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 16:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sbb1413, for your reaction. --JopkeB (talk) 11:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved by consensus | |||
| Actions | Merge Category:Flushing tanks into Category:Toilet tanks. Done | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | JopkeB (talk) 11:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
What is this category about? What would be a good description? What are the criteria for files to be in it? JopkeB (talk) 12:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Proposal:
- Move the subcategories and files to proper categories.
- Delete this category and its subcategories.
- When there is no counter reaction on 25-01-2024 then I'll implement this proposal. JopkeB (talk) 11:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | 1) Move the subcategories and files to proper categories. 2) Ask for a speedy deletion for this category. Done | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | JopkeB (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
What is the difference between Category:Market people and Category:Market vendors on Commons? Can they both have clear descriptions showing the differences OR can they be merged (Category:Market vendors is to stay)? JopkeB (talk) 10:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Since there was no reaction for over a month, I implement my proposal to merge both categories.--JopkeB (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions | Merge Category:Market people into Category:Market vendors, rename categories if necessary. Done | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | JopkeB (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
empty cat, which points to commercial youtube channel —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination, seems useless, was created by a LTA. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Category should probably be translated (see Commons:Categories#Category names). Leyo 11:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- That depends on whether this is the official name of a specific movement (than it may stay) or just a category to gather files about environmental movements and their actions in the Czech Republic (then it should indeed be translated). But I cannot be the judge of that because I do not know the first thing about this matter. JopkeB (talk) 14:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is not the official name of a specific movement, it is just category to gather files about environmental movements and their actions in the Czech Republic. So, it can be translated. JPetrlík (talk) 14:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
I am actually unsure whether this category is not even redundant to the existing Category:Demonstrations and protests relating to environmental issues held in the Czech Republic. --Leyo 23:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- The category name (according to DeepL "Czech environmental movement") is not specific to persons. Moreover, it can't be a subcategory of Category:Demonstrations and protests relating to environmental issues held in the Czech Republic, because this category seems to be more specific. Third, we need an English name. --Leyo 19:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, indeed, this category name is not spcific to persons, but it also contains at least one organization. And a movement is not only about demonstrations and protests, so it should not be a subcategory of Demonstrations and protests... The parent, Category:Environmental movements, does not have a similar parent as well but has Category:Demonstrations and protests relating to environmental issues as a subcategory, so it is the other way around. Yes, we need an English name, that is what this discussion is about. JopkeB (talk) 05:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- The category name (according to DeepL "Czech environmental movement") is not specific to persons. Moreover, it can't be a subcategory of Category:Demonstrations and protests relating to environmental issues held in the Czech Republic, because this category seems to be more specific. Third, we need an English name. --Leyo 19:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Move persons to Category:Environmentalists from the Czech Republic. 194.230.147.178 07:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Conclusions and proposals
[edit]- Rename Category:České environmentální hnutí to Category:Environmental movements in the Czech Republic.
- Move persons in this category to Category:Environmentalists from the Czech Republic.
- Category:Demonstrations and protests relating to environmental issues held in the Czech Republic:
- cannot be a parent, because a movement is not only about demonstrations and protests
- should be a subcategory, see category structure of Category:Environmental movements.
- Keep both Category:Environmental movements in the Czech Republic and Category:Demonstrations and protests relating to environmental issues held in the Czech Republic.
@Leyo and JPetrlík: Do you agree? --JopkeB (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay. --Leyo 08:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. JPetrlík (talk) 17:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved by consensus | |||
| Actions | See Conclusions and proposals Done | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | JopkeB (talk) 11:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Delete duplicated category Euskalnat (talk) 20:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Duplicate of what? --rimshottalk 22:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
empty dubious category, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2020/08/Category:Human_Y-DNA_haplogroups_in_Poland - lest delete also this one (last one took three years, lets see how long it will take) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 12:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Category was created in good faith, but combines [Category:Holyrood Abbey Church] and [Category:Queen's Gallery, Edinburgh] (formerly Holyrood Free Church) erroneously. Pretzelles (talk) 01:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request of creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete, as page was disambiguated Fungus Guy (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request by creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete, new name Fungus Guy (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request by creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete - city is abbreviated officially Fungus Guy (talk) 02:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request by creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete, page moved Fungus Guy (talk) 01:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request by creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete, name change Fungus Guy (talk) 02:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request by creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete, name change Fungus Guy (talk) 03:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request by creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete, renamed Fungus Guy (talk) 04:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, prompt request by creator. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The name "Beggs" is incorrect. "Biggs" is correct. Ooligan (talk) 22:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect from improbable typo deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Category is self-promotional, only containing a biography about this man's life, a picture of the man, and a link to his user page. The included picture may need to be looked at too. Clay (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted in February by User:Wdwd -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Empty cat for 2013 maintenance task —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted as empty category, per listing. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Empty category, plus the fact that this is a vehicle that has never been sold. Somegreenguy (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
merge with Category:Children cycling Prototyperspective (talk) 12:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Merge Andy Dingley (talk) 14:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Merge - it's good idea KrzysztofPoplawski (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete superfluous category. See "Bildstock Am Berglein (Poppenhausen)" for the category with the same intended content. WikiMichi (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Should this category include both lower and higher education institutions? The Schools category says that it includes "educational institutions from pre-schools through secondary schools." Therefore, the "schools" that don't come under this criterion should be moved to Higher education institutions by subject, which is currently a redlink. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 12:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- However, if there are both lower and higher education institutions named "X schools" (say), then we would have "X pre-schools", "X primary schools", "X secondary schools", "X higher education institutions" (or "X colleges" and "X universities") and so on under "X schools", and "X schools" would be a subcat of Educational institutions by subject, which is also a redlink. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 12:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is a though one. I am pro practical. Limit categories to those you really need. My proposal:
- Let Category:Schools by subject be only for schools that meet the definition of "School".
- If you use Category:Education by subject, then I think you do not need a Category: Educational institutions by subject, it would be only an extra (and I think redundant) layer and I would question why we need it. The subcategories of this category can serve for all the schools, universities, etc., about a subject. If necessary you can add See also's.
- To be able to categorize the subcategories correctly, I think we need indeed Category:Higher education institutions by subject. Now Category:Higher education institutions by type is used for this purpose, but that is not correct.
- JopkeB (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the proposal. I'll wait for more than a month to get response from other users. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 16:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can this discussion be closed? JopkeB (talk) 08:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the proposal. I'll wait for more than a month to get response from other users. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 16:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is a though one. I am pro practical. Limit categories to those you really need. My proposal:
Closing the discussion with obvious consensus in favor of splitting the category. Courtesy pinging @JopkeB: . --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
What is the difference between Engineering higher education institutions and Technical higher education institutions? I found these two concepts largely overlapping, as I found little to no difference between engineering education and technical education. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 16:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Sbb1413: Technical higher education institutions is a sub of Career and technical education and Technical institutes which are not in the Engineering tree, so it appears that 'technical' includes, but is broader than, 'engineering', which is a specific applied discipline. Hence,
Closing the discussion with clear consensus to keep. However, I need more research to make relationship between engineering and technology. Since they are treated here as separate topics, the nominated category will be kept. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 12:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
empty category Hugo.arg (talk) 12:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved without objection | |||
| Actions |  Speedy delete as empty | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 18:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
I think this category is erroneous. The only member is a category for a type of rail vehicle with this model number, but it's not a number displayed on the vehicles. Jmabel ! talk 03:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, you are correct that "Number 70090 on rail vehicles" and "rail vehicles numbered 70090" are distinct categories and should not be nested in each other, though some content may rightly appear in both. Categorize the sub-cat here correctly under the 'vehicles numbered x' category and make sure if there are any images showing the number 70090 actually on them (e.g. picture of a model number plaque on vehicle) those are also categorized in the 'number x on vehicles' category. If in the end, none actually show the number displayed then this category will be empty and can be speedy deleted. Josh (talk) 18:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: I don't see any category names of the form "rail vehicles numbered…", so I'm not sure what you have in mind here.
- This has exactly one subcat and no images directly in the category. - Jmabel ! talk 22:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel I was thinking of the 'aircraft numbered xxx' analog, but maybe that's not set up for rail vehicles yet. Fallback could be all the way to 'items numbered xxx', but frankly for a number like 70090 it might not be worth the bother, the fallback would be all the way to 70090 (number) which doesn't exist, so in this particular case, I'd be fine with just removing it from this category and SD-ing the category. Josh (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: What about we get rid of this one, create Category:70090, and put the one subcat directly in Category:70090? - Jmabel ! talk 00:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel That sounds fine to me, though I think number cats are supposed to have "(number)" added, so Category:70090 (number), examples: Category:542 (number), Category:26471 (number). Josh (talk) 00:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: What about we get rid of this one, create Category:70090, and put the one subcat directly in Category:70090? - Jmabel ! talk 00:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel I was thinking of the 'aircraft numbered xxx' analog, but maybe that's not set up for rail vehicles yet. Fallback could be all the way to 'items numbered xxx', but frankly for a number like 70090 it might not be worth the bother, the fallback would be all the way to 70090 (number) which doesn't exist, so in this particular case, I'd be fine with just removing it from this category and SD-ing the category. Josh (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
It's been half a year, and the only two of us who have commented are now in agreement, so replacing this with Category:70090 (number). - Jmabel ! talk 01:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
I believe this is misspelled, and should be "Ossetia". Jmabel ! talk 04:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Support as this uncontroversial spelling correction. Josh (talk) 18:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Since the only comment in half a year is a concurrence, I'm taking the liberty of closing my own CfD and moving as proposed. - Jmabel ! talk 22:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
I believe this is intended to be about Revue de l'électricité et de l'électronique (Q29043679), and should be named accordingly (Category:Revue de l'électricité et de l'électronique, the title is a proper noun and should not be translated). However, I see only one of the five images in the category that has any apparent relation to that journal, so I'm posting here in hopes that someone has a better idea what's going on. User:Oliv'96 who created the category seems to be only intermittently active. Jmabel ! talk 21:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Rename category @Jmabel: It was probably a well-meaning attempt to follow category naming policy, but you are correct that in this case, the original title of the work should be used verbatim. I don't see any objections in 6 months so you should feel free to close and implement. Josh (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Moved as proposed, now contains only the one image that had apparent relevance. - Jmabel ! talk 21:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Rename this and all the subcats to Panoramics of the countryside or Countryside panoramics to be consistent with the main category Countryside. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Since there was no reaction for nearly four months, I close this discussion. --JopkeB (talk) 09:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | |
|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved by consensus |
| Actions | Rename this category to Category:Panoramics of the countryside Done |
| Participants | |
- The category will be renamed to Panoramas of the countryside per previous CFDs. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 10:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sbb1413: Which "previous CFDs"? Category:Panoramics of nature still exists, Category:Panoramas by subject is still a mess.--JopkeB (talk) 10:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sbb1413: You are correct that Panoramas of the countryside is the correct target name, per earlier CfD regarding panoramics vs. panoramas. The conclusion was to use plural noun form "panoramas" for the parent (all types of panoramic images), with subs using the adjective form "panoramics" or noun form as appropriate for the given sub-type of image (e.g. "panoramic photographs" or "black and white panoramas"). JopkeB is also correct that it is currently a mess. I have done some implementation there, but there are a lot of categories, and I've not had a lot of cycles for that particular effort lately. Josh (talk) 17:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @JopkeB: My apologies, I totally missed your question on my first response. The previous CfD I am referring to can be found on the talk page for panoramas at Category talk:Panoramas. Josh (talk) 17:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Josh, for the link. Should I rename this category again? Or is this a subcategory for which subs using the adjective form "panoramics" applies? --JopkeB (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @JopkeB: , yes, this category should be Category:Panoramas of rural areas with photographs going in a sub (Category:Panoramic photographs of rural areas) if you need to separate them from other types of panoramas. I suppose if it is all photographs, you could just rename the whole thing Category:Panoramic photographs of rural areas instead, and just create Category:Panoramas of rural areas as a parent if and when other types of panoramas are available. That's really up to you I should think...either way can be done consistent with the Modularity Principle. Josh (talk) 01:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner and Sbb1413: Now I am confused: should it be "countryside" or "rural areas"? Because this discussion was about that issue (not about panoramics or panoramas) and the outcome was "countryside". But Josh used "rural areas" again. --JopkeB (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sbb1413, @JopkeB My apologies!! I meant it should be Category:Panoramas of the countryside! I was just thinking about the 'panoramas' part of the name and not trying to change the consensus regarding countryside/rural areas. Josh (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner and Sbb1413: Now I am confused: should it be "countryside" or "rural areas"? Because this discussion was about that issue (not about panoramics or panoramas) and the outcome was "countryside". But Josh used "rural areas" again. --JopkeB (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- @JopkeB: , yes, this category should be Category:Panoramas of rural areas with photographs going in a sub (Category:Panoramic photographs of rural areas) if you need to separate them from other types of panoramas. I suppose if it is all photographs, you could just rename the whole thing Category:Panoramic photographs of rural areas instead, and just create Category:Panoramas of rural areas as a parent if and when other types of panoramas are available. That's really up to you I should think...either way can be done consistent with the Modularity Principle. Josh (talk) 01:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Josh, for the link. Should I rename this category again? Or is this a subcategory for which subs using the adjective form "panoramics" applies? --JopkeB (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sbb1413: Which "previous CFDs"? Category:Panoramics of nature still exists, Category:Panoramas by subject is still a mess.--JopkeB (talk) 10:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
In the end:
- Category:Panoramics of rural areas has become Category:Panoramic photographs of the countryside because they were all photographs.
- I have asked for speedy deletion of the intermediate versions.
- The subcategories have been renamed too (but there I stopped; though Category talk:Panoramas was closed in 2022, still a lot of categories should be renamed).
- I made a new Category:Panoramas of villages because a template was involved.
--JopkeB (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
I can't really tell what this category is meant to do, and it has no parent categories. Can someone clarify? Jmabel ! talk 21:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- This appears to be automatically added by {{PD-ribbon}}. Proper parent cats should be added, but I'm unfamiliar with the PD tree structure. Otherwise, it appears to be a valid admin category. Josh (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: Thanks. I took a shot at it; could you have a look at the category now & see if we can consider this CfD resolved? - Jmabel ! talk 21:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel That all looks fine to me, I'm okay with closing it. That one parent Category:PD ineligible threw me for a loop, I thought at first it meant stuff that was ineligible for public domain status...but no, it means public domain because they are ineligible for copyright. Not my wheelhouse though...anyway, all good for this one for now, I should think. Josh (talk) 22:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner: Thanks. I took a shot at it; could you have a look at the category now & see if we can consider this CfD resolved? - Jmabel ! talk 21:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Closing this, now that Josh seems to have worked out the intent and I've implemented that. - Jmabel ! talk 00:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
I can't tell what this category is meant to do, and it has no parent categories. Jmabel ! talk 21:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like this is a category in line with other categories such as Category:PD-Art (PD-Ethiopia). I updated it with the appropriate parent categories and templates. Clay (talk) 00:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Resolved by consensus | |||
| Actions | Done | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | Josh (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
This category has an unclear relationship with Category:Seeblatt in heraldry. I'd like to either merge these or have some clear theory of the differences to add to the pages and Wikidata. Ilzolende (talk) 19:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- They are clearly related, but Pompeblêd is West-Frisian, so from Fryslân in the Netherlands, and Seeblatt in heraldry seems to concentrate about the Frisian areas in Germany. Cycn (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate category: should be merged with "Category:Cliffs of the Isle of Wight" ITookSomePhotos (talk) 23:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
It feels like the difference between this and Category:Amazon MGM Studios is minimal. Shows are randomly distributed in both, and the parent category probably isn't big enough to need a subcat for products vs. the logo of the company. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
delete: moved to Indigenous ... Fungus Guy (talk) 03:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of this cateogry so it is not needed anymore. You can safely remove. —Ismael Olea (talk) 11:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Duplicated - Wrong name Yuanga (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Empty Category - i moved all the content to upper category (see Special:Contributions/Mwtipp) - in Case i am wrong discard discussion and undo the 3 changes. Mwtipp (talk) 08:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
old category *angys* (talk) 17:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Merge into Category:Bus routes numbered 300. Josh (talk) 18:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
delete to make shift from Bus routes numbered 300 *angys* (talk) 17:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Change redirect to Category:Bus routes numbered 300 (to contain Category:300 (Rapid KL bus)). Josh (talk) 18:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
All the subcat should be move to "<year> in the Bronx, New York City", as it is a common practice that the year goes first A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Probably. But when I created the ones that aren't, I was going by how the categories for the other boroughs were named. --DanTD (talk) 10:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
All the subcat should be move to "<year> in Staten_Island, New York City", as it is a common practice that the year goes first A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- An ugly practice but agreed that is the inertia for this kind of category so we should be consistent in our poor choice of word order unless we agree to fix it across the board (I'm not holding my breath on this one). Josh (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Empty category. Also, "informal" is overly broad and unclearly defined. Ooligan (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete category. There is no Eppelheimer Straße in Eppelheim. The continuation of Eppelheimer Straße of Heidelberg is called Hauptstraße in Eppelheim. Luftschiffhafen (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I think the first name should be "Georg" (no "e"), per https://www.schmerholz.com Another Believer (talk) 23:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
none of the files show timelines. move files to Category:Gwangmu Reform and then delete. RZuo (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
What is the point of this category? What week? Why only this week? Unnecessary and images already properly categorized elsewhere. Detete. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
empty category Mjrmtg (talk) 20:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete category - redundant and underused since its creation, files would be better suited categorised by body/manufacturer and borough of Manchester they are located in. Hullian111 (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
wrong title, the content has been moved to Demonstration for public health, Ljubljana (2023-11-17) Hladnikm (talk) 07:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Renommage « Homme du Soudan en costume algérien » Lupin~fr (talk) 11:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
empty category Hugo.arg (talk) 12:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
empty category Hugo.arg (talk) 12:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
empty category Hugo.arg (talk) 12:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Maps of communes in Loire seems to follow standard naming of the subcats of Category:Maps of communes in France by department, but we also have Category:Maps of communes in Loire (department) (redlink itself but has 306 subcats). I do not know French geo/social/policitical topics. Are these synonymous, so that the (department) items should be re-categorized into the simple-named one? DMacks (talk) 21:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Created cat. with typo, then created the right one (Category:Domenico Marchioro). Best regards LucaLindholm (talk) 19:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Category for a car that doesn't exist (was never sold as a Lamborghini) Somegreenguy (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Somegreenguy, go ahead an categorize the contents correctly. Then this category will no longer have any legitimate contents and can be speedy deleted. Josh (talk) 18:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deletion, as the page has been moved to Category:European sculptures in the Philadelphia Museum of Art JJonahJackalope (talk) 03:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Is this any different to Category:Motorsports? Proposing to merge this to Motorsports. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Upon reflection, they are not the same. But perhaps more from "motorsports" needs to go to "motor racing". There is a lot of overlap. -- Deadstar (msg)
Category created on 9 November 2023 by User:Krok6kola. As far as I can tell, it is redundant to Category:Lokum, created in November 2007, and linked to en:w and wikipedias in other languages since 2008. I note that Category:Turkish delight was created by User:SpiderMum in December 2013, who just over an hour after creating it made it redirect to Category:Lokum; in 2018 Category:Turkish delight was changed into a disambiguation.
On the talk page for this new category "Turkish delight (confection)" I suggested it was redundant and should be redirected to the existing, well established used category Lokum. Krok6kola disagreed; I offered counter arguments - see Category talk:Turkish delight (confection) for details. Krok6kola still disagrees, so I'm listing it here for input by others. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Either redirect or delete, assuming we see Category:Lokum as unproblematic. - Jmabel ! talk 02:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: What about the enwiki article Turkish delight (which Infrogmation added redirects to Lokumon on enwiki when he filed this)? And the WikiBooks cookbook Cookbook|Turkish Delight}} Aren't we supposed to at least support the images in an enwiki article and other Wikimedia projeects? And are you going to redirect all the images related to "Turkish delight", e.g. the two films, etc. under Category:Things named after Turkey? Or are you going to leave them without any cultural context regarding their name? And a few of those images were uploaded under "Turkey loves folklore or some such. Krok6kola (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- I did not "add redirects" to the en:w article; I'm not sure what you're talking about. The en:w "Turkish delight" article was linked to Commons category "Lokum" since 2008. On 10 November you unilaterally changed the Commons Category link to your newly created category "Turkish delight (confection)" with the comment "fix commons link" (as if it had been broken up until then?). I refrained from reverting you, I restored the link to Commons:Category:Lokum (where the majority of the media was located) in addition to your new category, with the comment "Link both at least until decision is made; has been linked with "Lokum" on Commons since 2008." (Confirmation can be seen at en:w article history [1].) Certainly we "support images" in en:w and all other languages - if something is/was not supported, please explain what. I'm sorry, I don't follow the relevance of the rest of what you say. My perspective is: For over 15 years, we have had one category (with included subcategories) for this type of candy. You added a different separate category for the same thing. Thus far I have seen no argument from you that they are not the same thing, nor that either should be a subcategory of the other. I think redirects and hatnotes work fine to address situations when the same thing is known by more than one name. I do not see how having unconnected categories for the same thing under two different names improves Wikimedia. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: I looked at the article history and you were the last to add a redirect to Turkish delight. Krok6kola (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Krok6kola: article history of what? The en:w:Turkish delight article? Could you please share a link to the edit you are talking about? Puzzled, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Krok6kola: Possibly you're thinking of this edit of mine here on Commons, where I added a "see also Category:Lokum" hatnote (not a redirect) to your new "Category:Turkish delight (confection)" category? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: I looked at the article history and you were the last to add a redirect to Turkish delight. Krok6kola (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- I did not "add redirects" to the en:w article; I'm not sure what you're talking about. The en:w "Turkish delight" article was linked to Commons category "Lokum" since 2008. On 10 November you unilaterally changed the Commons Category link to your newly created category "Turkish delight (confection)" with the comment "fix commons link" (as if it had been broken up until then?). I refrained from reverting you, I restored the link to Commons:Category:Lokum (where the majority of the media was located) in addition to your new category, with the comment "Link both at least until decision is made; has been linked with "Lokum" on Commons since 2008." (Confirmation can be seen at en:w article history [1].) Certainly we "support images" in en:w and all other languages - if something is/was not supported, please explain what. I'm sorry, I don't follow the relevance of the rest of what you say. My perspective is: For over 15 years, we have had one category (with included subcategories) for this type of candy. You added a different separate category for the same thing. Thus far I have seen no argument from you that they are not the same thing, nor that either should be a subcategory of the other. I think redirects and hatnotes work fine to address situations when the same thing is known by more than one name. I do not see how having unconnected categories for the same thing under two different names improves Wikimedia. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: What about the enwiki article Turkish delight (which Infrogmation added redirects to Lokumon on enwiki when he filed this)? And the WikiBooks cookbook Cookbook|Turkish Delight}} Aren't we supposed to at least support the images in an enwiki article and other Wikimedia projeects? And are you going to redirect all the images related to "Turkish delight", e.g. the two films, etc. under Category:Things named after Turkey? Or are you going to leave them without any cultural context regarding their name? And a few of those images were uploaded under "Turkey loves folklore or some such. Krok6kola (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- This discussion seems to be getting stale, but as far as I can see the status quo is awkward and inappropriate. @Krok6kola: If "Lokum" and "Turkish delight (confection)" are not the same thing, please explain the difference. If they are the same thing, the categories should be merged. If one is a variety of the other, it should be a subcategory of the other. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
delete, page moved Fungus Guy (talk) 01:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
delete, name change Fungus Guy (talk) 03:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
delete, renamed Fungus Guy (talk) 04:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
delete, renamed for disambig Fungus Guy (talk) 04:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
What is this parentless category intended to represent? I'm guessing it is just Voronovich (Q109294063) and should be renamed as Category:Voronovich (surname), and given Category:Surnames as a parent category, but maybe it's something more specific. Jmabel ! talk 02:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Rename to Category:Voronovich (surname). The files currently categorised here may be about the same Nikolay Voronovich (Q4125676), but then should be recategorised to the full name, which in turn can be a daughter category of Category:Voronovich (surname). --HyperGaruda (talk) 21:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't this category be located at Category:Uzbek State World Language University? All other universities in Tashkent have English-language category names. Jmabel ! talk 04:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
And also: Category:Moscow FOP cases/Plaques in Moscow. This FoP subcategory by city (Moscow) must be deleted. In accordance with the discussion here (regarding Kyiv subcat), there is no need for FoP subcats by city if there are no differences between the copyright rules of the city and copyright law of the city's country. Moscow has no FoP rules of its own (FoP rules are from Russian copyright law).
Note the subcategory here Category:Moscow FOP cases/Plaques in Moscow is too vague, as there are no case pages listed there but files themselves (treating the subcategory as just like other category for files). Unsure what is the purpose of that subcategory. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- it's already been cleared - no need to keep the empty stub. Retired electrician (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Retired electrician not yet totally cleared. The dubious Category:Moscow FOP cases/Plaques in Moscow is still there, acting like an official category for files even if the "FOP cases" part of the name suggests it should be a maintenance category for deletion requests. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
| This category discussion has been closed. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | ||||
| Actions | The files were up-merged and the categories were deleted per the discussion. | |||
| Participants | ||||
| Closed by | --Adamant1 (talk) 11:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||