Hotel Rwanda - Obviously, the movie is fictional, but it's an open question as to whether Paul Rusesabagina is morally upstanding or not, based on the sources obtained. Eyewitnesses contradicting each other, POV-pushing, and a displeased third-party observer, Roméo Dallaire. An interesting candidate for a future peer review.
A further wrinkle: according to the commentary, several Rwandans were in the movie as extras, trying to get their story heard by a larger audience.
Rated Pretty much contains everything the end user will ever need to know. (Which IMO, does not include testing.)
Also, that TB guide from the CDC is the worst guide ever... (best case: out of date, worse case: flat out wrong) but it's the only openly available thing that can be cited on Wikipedia. At least I was willing to take a look...
Respirator fit test - Which will stay unfinished until someone with a TDA-99M edits the article.
Just guess what device(s) I own!
Definitely not worth giving myself credit for that...
Minor typos. Minor typos galore. I really hope it isn't due to a pathogen, but I have a feeling it might be. Will Wikisource proofreading help? I don't know.
Also, be careful to use as little improperly-copyrighted material as possible. Use too much, and it could be claimed with an earlier work that was copyrighted, on the basis that it is a derivative work.
(If you do have to do it: Place it below the reflist, and bullet point it. This way, people can compare the Wikipedia copyright notice at the bottom with the exceptions above.)
(and before, more or less) What this means: If original workandcopyviosare found after this date, you cannot incorporate the original work without violating the GFDL. But don't worry―it is still possible to get around this without having to leave copyvios undeleted:
J. Preserve the network location, if any, given in the Document for public access to a Transparent copy of the Document, and likewise the network locations given in the Document for previous versions it was based on. These may be placed in the "History" section. You may omit a network location for a work that was published at least four years before the Document itself, or if the original publisher of the version it refers to gives permission.
Also, who can forget:
H. Include an unaltered copy of this License. H. Include an unaltered copy of this License. H. Include an unaltered copy of this License.
Luckily, the CC license is a lot more forgiving. And if one license is void, the other can take its place.
Idea: If a copyvio spans the date (with original work) split the copyvio request range in two
Did I say four years? I meant 4 years + 60 days for GFDL 1.3. If no one complains for 4 years + 60 days, you get your rights Y back, no questions asked.
(b) permanently, if the copyright holder fails to notify you of the violation by some reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation.
Million Voices (2005) - a little haunting
Professor Wikipedia!
