Change Your Image
Honest-Abe-Reviews
If I think a movie sucks, then I will tell you it sucks.
Deal with it bitches.
STANDING OVATION! - 10 stars
CHEER! - 7 to 9 stars
JUST OKAY - 5 and 6 stars
JEER - 2 to 4 stars
LOUD BOO! - 1 star
The stage curtains are opening ...
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againAfter voting, please discuss here.
After voting, please discuss here.
After voting, please discuss here.
After voting, please discuss here.
After voting, please discuss here.
Reviews
Prayer of the Rollerboys (1990)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
The day of the rope is coming!
Corey Haim brings his undeniable charm to a new "actiony" role in this futuristic Indie film by director. Rick King (who?), who's only other notable work behind the camera would come a year later for the straight-to-video film, "Kickboxer 3: The Art of War". This is a fun throwback movie for any early 90's action/sci-fi.aficionado that features a young Patricia Arquette as Haim's love interest, and an aging Julius Harris who is best known as the mechanical armed villain in the James Bond film, "Live and Let Die".
We are immediately immersed into a dystopian type of future in a Los Angeles where street violence is rampant and an illegal drug known as "Mist" is sought after by junkie after junkie. Distribution of Mist is primarily controlled by a tight gang called the Rollerboys, who are adorned in long, beige overcoats and rollerblade together on the streets, swaying their arms back and forth with each stride. The Rollerboys are led by Gary Lee, a childhood friend of Griffin (Haim) who is himself an accomplished skater. When Griffin's younger brother, Miltie, becomes enamored with, and becomes ingratiated into, the Rollerboys gang, Griffin agrees to work undercover for the local law enforcement to help shut down their drug operation.
The first time I watched this was back when it was first released to VHS tape in 1990. I walked into a Blockbuster late one night, saw it on the shelf and gave it a try. I'm glad I did, because this was a fun slice of action with some memorable moments and scenes. I felt Haim did well in a role that required him to be more of a stud muffin and yet still maintain his boyish charm - it works here. The supporting cast all seemed to be on board and put in good performances as well. The setting was strong and believeable as a country that had become the toilet of the world, and a gang of young bladers seeking dominance in a dying city - with a secret ingredient in Mist that would forever change the future - the day of the rope.
I rewatched this one again the other night and loved it just as much, maybe even more, than the first time I watched it. It was a welcome return to a good time in my life, though a little bittersweet as well since the passing of Corey Haim. I would recommend this one to anyone who can still find it. It isn't exactly a common or easy film to find anymore, but if you can, I think you'd like it. A strong 7 stars out of 10.
Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F (2024)
JUST OKAY - (5 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Axel: "Okay! All done. So, Ashley ..."
Ashley: "So, Axel. Oh wait. Oh my god. Axel? Ashley? Together we'd be Actually!" (laughs)
There's a scene where Taggart says the line, "Here we go again!" And yes, 40 years after the original "Beverly Hills Cop", and 30 years after the latest installment of "Beverly Hills Cop III", we are finally given the 4th installment into this storied franchise. Three decades has passed since Axel Foley has been on the silver screen. A LOT has changed in that time. Would they be able to create the same magic that we remembered feeling (for those of us who were alive back then)? And for a new generation, would it be modern and viable enough to make it worthwhile? I was truly hoping so.
Axel Foley (in his 60's now) is still working the streets in Detroit and still driving that beat up, old Nova, while his peers are contemplating retirement or are no longer on the force. His old buddy, Billy Rosewood, calls and asks him to come back to Beverly Hills where Axel's estranged daughter, Jane, is in hot water with a corrupt Police Captain and her life is in danger. Despite his differences with Jane, Axel once more finds himself in the land of glitter and sunshine fighting off bad guys while using his usual quick wit, sharp mouth, and antics - all while trying to patch up his relationship with Jane.
First ... the music and soundtrack was spot on. When I first heard the Intro to "The Heat Is On" playing, I smiled. You can't help but smile. It's Eddie Murphy - Axel Foley - the Beverly Hills Cop ... back in action! The throwback music continued. We get treated to all of the hits from the previous movies, bringing back the nostalgia in a big way. Eddie Murphy looks great in this film. John Ashton is in his mid-70's now and looks every bit his age, and in his 60's, Judge Reinhold didn't look much better. And they brought in another actor from that generation with Kevin Bacon, who is starting show his age now too. Infused with these "old guys" were some younger faces and names with Taylour Paige as Jane, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt as her ex-boyfriend and a police detective. Unfortunately, that is pretty much where the smiles ended as this movie progressed.
There's another scene where Axel is in a hotel lobby at the desk about to go into one of his routines when he suddenly stops and says to the clerk, "You know ...to hell with this. I'm just too tired. Do you have any rooms available?" That's how this film felt to me. Tired. Even though it is well produced and polished and looks and sounds good, the magic was gone. For two hours I watched these older actors trying to catch up to their younger selves and they never do catch them. They had fun making it, but honestly, they probably had more fun making it than I did watching it. Axel Foley just seemed so out of place ... and looked like someone trying to be witty and funny, but it is no longer selling. Nobody's buying.
I can't recommend this movie. It really wasn't bad and it's entertaining for 2 hours, but it misses the mark of the previous films. At least it was better than "Coming 2 America" was. I give it a 5 stars out of 10.
Lethal Weapon 2 (1989)
CHEER! - (9 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"Diplomatic immunity!"
Two years after the first "Lethal Weapon", we received this high explosive, action packed sequel featuring our two favorite cops, Riggs and Murtaugh. Mel Gibson and Danny Glover returned to light up the silver screen again, continuing the perfect chemistry they showed us in the first film and building on it for another fun, and memorable experience. Of all the Lethal Weapon movies, this 2nd one is my personal favorite - and for good reason too.
This time our LAPD duo are pitted against a South African consul-general named Arjen Rudd (Joss Ackland) who is hiding behind his diplomatic credentials to illegally smuggle gold in the form of Krugerrands. When Riggs and Murtaugh become a thorn in Arjen's side, measures are taken to rub them out for good - or so he thought. Joining them is Leo Getz (Joe Pesci), a money laundering federal witness, who they are supposed to be protecting - but who proves to be more of a pest than they bargained for. Once again, they become embroiled in a life & death situation, fighting the odds to bring down the corrupt diplomat, finding out in the process that this reaches much further into Riggs's past than even he could've imagined.
This sequel takes what the first movie gave us and doubles it. There is more action, more comedy, more characters, just more of everything and I love it all, front to back. The story is witty and intelligent, and the new characters really help to propel the series forward in the right way. Joe Pesci was perfect as the pain-in-the-neck witness who wants to be a part of everything. Leo Getz ... "whatever you need, Leo gets!" Patsy Kensit as Mel Gibson's love interest worked well in the story and was believable in her role. And we see our buddy cops become closer as friends.
I highly recommend this one at a near perfect 9 stars out of 10. I have seen this movie probably a hundred times and I've never gotten tired of it. I can quote every line, word for word. We are given some great scenes including Rianne's television commercial debut, the toilet bomb scene, a mountain road car chase, the demolishing of a stilt house and an awesome final confrontation aboard a cargo ship. This movie solidified the Lethal Weapon franchise as my all-time favorite buddy cop action/comedy series.
Lethal Weapon (1987)
CHEER! - (8 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
The one that started it all - about 37 years ago. Has it really been that long already? Three and a half decades have passed since this movie was released to theaters. For as many times as I have seen this one, it's a wonder it has taken me this long to finally post a review for it. LONG overdue. Especially since it is probably my most favorite buddy cop action/comedy series of all-time.
We are introduced to Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) and Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover) - both LAPD officers who join forces to take down a tight, efficient drug smuggling operation headed by a former General who served with a covert military unit during the Vietnam war called the Shadow Company. Riggs is an on-the-edge burnout, coping with the death of his wife, trying to find a reason not to eat a bullet every night. Murtaugh is a family man who has just celebrated his 50th birthday, content with life. As they grow to become friends, they are pushed to their very limits when danger hits close to home. To survive, they are going to have to trust each other in a very real life and death situation.
This was everything it was billed to be, and it still is - having withstood the test of time, still holding up well today. Mel Gibson and Danny Glover are the perfect tandem for action/comedy and served as the blueprint for such-like movies to follow. You really come to care about them, and by the end of the movie, they have become your friends. It was the beginning of a "family" that would just continue to grow as the sequels kept coming out. Gary Busey turned in a solid performance as the General's #1, right hand man - a Merc who is thorough and deadly. And Muraugh's family make you feel welcome everytime you revisit their home.
I absolutely love this movie. As I mentioned before, I have seen it countless times over the years and I STILL have not gotten tired of watching it. I never will. Whenever I put this one in, I always just go right to the next one and the next one, until I have seen them all back-to-back. The character arcs in this movie, as well as in the overall franchise, is very well developed. The action sequences are exciting, and the comedy heartwarming. I highly recommend this classic film at a very strong 8 stars out of 10.
The Holdovers (2023)
CHEER! - (8 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"The Holdovers" was a surprise for me. Yes, it has received numerous accolades and awards, and after watching it, it is easy to see why. I just didn't expect it to be as good as it was, I guess. It is a story we've seen before in films, but this movie takes that premise and raises the bar. It has a strong cast with memorable characters - one for the ages.
It is 1970. The setting is Christmas Break at Barton Academy, a New England boarding school, where Professor Paul Hunham (Paul Giamatti) has been asked to remain on campus to watch over the students who have been held over the next couple of weeks for one reason or another. He is a bitter individual and views the assignment as having to babysit misfits and unruly's. One of the students staying over is Angus Tully (Dominic Sessa), and is dealing with issues on the homefront which has made him outspoken and a bit of a rebel. A clash of wills ensues when Professor Hunham imposes a strict study and exercise regiment during the holiday season leading to a situation where one, or both, of them will have to break down and give in.
Bolstered by strong performances by the entire cast, this was such a well developed story. Two of the actors in the film I have never heard of, or seen, before. Dominic Sessa as the rebellious student and Da'Vine Joy Randolph as the resident cook who is dealing with the loss of her only son. They both did such a great job in their respective roles - together with Giamatti's solid work - made for a very believable onscreen depiction. The pacing was spot on, the cinematography perfect for the time period, and the music encapsulates the moment.
The movie bridges the gap between generations, differences of opinions and of perspectives, and shows us that true and long-lasting friendships can be built despite age or background. Sometimes we forget the importance of these things, and "The Holdovers" serves as a reminder in a great "feel good" dramedy. This comes at a very high recommend with a very strong 8 stars out of 10.
Stone Cold (1991)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Chains: "You carrying? You got a gun?"
Stone: "What for?"
Chains: "Well, so he'll hold still, man." (laughs)
"Stone Cold" (1991) starring Brian Bosworth, Lance Henriksen, and William Forsythe is a great slice of early 90's action. During a time when Jean-Claude Van Damme, Steven Seagal, and Dolph Lundgren were at the height of their popularity, other aspiring actors made their bid as an action star such as Jeff Speakman, Wesley Snipes, and THIS guy ... Brian "The Boz" Bosworth. Although this was really the only film that Bosworth made worth watching, it was a good one - with excellent supporting roles.
Alabama cop and tough guy, Joe Huff (Bosworth) is asked to go undercover in a Mississippi biker gang known as the Brotherhood, led by a notorious, violent man named Chains (Henriksen). With the Brotherhood having connections to the mob, and linked to the murders of government officials, this is no easy task. Posing as an independent biker named John Stone, he is under constant suspicion, but proves his mettle and worth, affording him the opportunity to be a 'prospect' for the gang. While there, he uncovers a conspiracy to take out a District Attorney, who is running for Governor, in elaborate fashion. Now it's up to Stone to turn the tables before it's too late.
So. About Brian Bosworth. Growing up, I have always been a Seattle Seahawks fan. "The Boz" is easily the biggest bust in that team's history ... and I was so disappointed in him. When he retired from the NFL after only 3 seasons because of a shoulder injury, it was good riddance to him. Then this movie crops up out of nowhere. I swore I would never watch it and support him. No way, no how. BUT ... seeing who the supporting cast was and after watching the trailer, I caved in and gave it a shot. I'm actually very glad I did. Bosworth could not bring it on the field in the NFL, but he delivered (at least in this movie) on the silver screen.
He had the right charisma for this role, as colorful as he was, and he had an awesome supporting cast. Lance Henriksen was perfect in his role, and NOBODY played the vile, despicable 'bad guy' like William Forsythe did - and he does it again here. Yes, the editing on this film wasn't that great, and the plot was cookie cutter and tropey - but it packs a punch. This is a solid action film to keep most action fans happy. I would recommend it at 7 stars out of 10. It is in my own collection, and deserves its place there.
Pink Cadillac (1989)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Mr. Barton: "I, uh ... don't mean to interfere in your marriage, Miss McGuinn, but it's dangerous messing around with a man's vehicles."
Lou Ann: "You're right about that, Mr. Barton." (turns the ignition to the pink cadillac on and revs the engine). "Very, very right."
"Pink Cadillac" (1989) starring Clint Eastwood, Bernadette Peters, and Michael Des Barres is a lightweight, action/comedy - but it is strong enough to keep you entertained for a couple of hours. I remember watching this one in the theaters back when it was first released, and though it is nowhere near one of Eastwood's best films, I still had a good time with it. It had been quite a while, years in fact, since the last time I saw it, so I decided to get my copy out and give it a spin.
Skip-tracer, Tommy Nowak (Eastwood), is sent to find Lou Ann McGuinn (Peters), because she skipped bail on a counterfeit money case that she unjustly took the fall for. She decides to steal her husband's pink cadillac and hit the road to find a better life for her and her 8-month-old baby girl. Unknown to her, there is $250,000 of real cash stashed away in the car (which she believes to be the counterfeit money) that belongs to a small, white supremacist group that her husband is a part of. Tommy catches up to her in Reno, and soon both he and Lou Ann are being pursued every which way for the loot by her husband and his gang. But when they take her baby from her, Tommy decides to go all the way to get her daughter back.
I had fun with this viewing of the film. To be honest, it really isn't that great of a movie to begin with, and it hasn't aged very well either. There is still something charming about it, though. Bernadette Peters plays off of Clint Eastwood very well ... sort of turning his "stick in the mud" character into someone who can see the lighter side of life. She was very cute in her role, and though it wasn't a peformance that would be considered award worthy, she carried it well. Clint Eastwood is no master of disguises, however, even though he tries. His attempt at being a radio DJ was pretty cringeworthy - but when he started kicking ass in the film, I was like... "Ahh. There we go! That's better!"
We also got an appearance from Michael Des Barres, who plays our film's main 'bad guy' who never changes clothes .. because that black leather outfit and pony tail is just TOO cool. Among other things, Des Barres is also known for being MacGyver's arch-nemesis, Murdoc, from the popular television series. All-in-all, this is not a film to recommend. It really is a guilty pleasure and one I've enjoyed over the years. Nothing to be taken too seriously. I give it a 7 stars out of 10 rating.
Starman (1984)
STANDING OVATION! - (10 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"I look like Scott ... so you do not be ... little bit jumpy."
"Starman" (1984) starring Jeff Bridges, Karen Allen, Charles Martin Smith, and directed by John Carpenter, is easily one of the best Sci-Fi/Dramas I have ever seen. It certainly is one of the best love stories I have ever seen. And it is arguably the best film of Carpenter's career, despite having such great films as "Halloween", "The Thing", and "Escape From New York" on his resume. It is truly a movie that will enamor you and capture you from the opening frame to the last. An 80's classic. Let's just call it what it is - a movie classic.
In response to the gold phonograph record containing greetings in 54 languages, as well as a peaceful invitation to come to Earth, that was jettisoned into outer space aboard the Voyager 2 space probe, an alien species accepts the invitation and sends one of their own to our planet. When his spacecraft crash lands in Wisconsin, he finds his way into the home of Jenny Hayden (Allen), who is coping with the death of her husband Scott (Bridges). He finds a lock of Scott's hair, and using its DNA, he transforms himself into his exact likeness, a clone - which understandably freaks Jenny out. The alien knows he is in a hostile environment and arranges to meet others from his world at a crater in Arizona in 3 days time, or he will perish. He takes Jenny captive and has her drive him there with the government hot on his trail. Along the way, he helps her to heal and she helps him to find the good in humanity.
"Define love". Love is this movie. I absolutely love this movie. I personally DO feel it is not only John Carpenter's best film, but it is my favorite movie that Karen Allen stars in - even above her role in "Raiders of the Lost Ark". The chemistry between Bridges and Allen is spot on, with Bridges playing the inquisitive, curious, 'stranger in a strange land' to perfection, and Allen as the mourning widow trying to believe that she can find meaning in her life again. The soundtrack to this movie was also excellent, really capturing the moments and helping to bring the emotion, and underlying pulse of the film to life. The visual effects were top notch for its time, and still hold up well today.
This is one of those rare occasions where everything falls together so well, it is hard to imagine it ever being any better than it already is. I have rated this a perfect 10 stars out of 10. A love story for the ages in a movie where the journey is actually more important than the final destination. This is one of my all-time favorite movies. Maybe even Top 20 of all-time. If you have never seen "Starman", you are truly missing out.
Fair Game (1995)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Kirkpatrick: "Come on ... I'm off duty."
Lieutenant Meyerson: "Eh, you're lucky. You work my shift, it's like the toilet. It ain't over 'til the paperwork's done."
"Fair Game" (1995) starring William Baldwin and Cindy Crawford, is your typical mindless, action/thriller fare that was the standard of 1990's cinema. We get style over substance with bad acting, cars that explode on impact, bullets whizzing through the air, and near escapes. The plot was subpar, just interesting enough to get the job done. And it features the woman who made having a mole on your face sexy, in a role that is defined as 'all this and brains too' - though I wasn't really convinced with the brains part of the character. And yet, despite all of this, I liked the movie.
When a Miami lawyer, Kate McQuean (Crawford) survives what appears to be a random shooting - taking some shattered glass to the arm, she is brought down to a police station for questioning where she meets Detective Kirkpatrick (Baldwin). She leaves without signing his form, so he is sent to her residence to collect it when the top floor to her home bursts into flame and she is sent flying into some nearby water. A gunman tries to finish the job, but Kirkpatrick scares him away and saves her life. From that point on, they are mercilessly pursued by a terrorist team with little to go on and with more questions than answers. Together, they work to solve the puzzle and put an end to the nightmare.
I saw this when it first came out in my mid-20's, and I remember thinking that it probably wasn't going to be that good. After I watched it though, I was left thinking that it was better than I thought it was going to be. Cindy Crawford did a great job looking like she was really trying to act. She did give the effort, but, she tried to be in character instead of actually being the character. Famed Author, Elmore Leonard, once said, 'If it sounds like writing, rewrite it". In this case, if it looks like you're acting, your not doing a very good job of it.
This movie gets everything else down okay though ... the slow motion running and jumping with everything exploding around them, the hot and saucy sex scene, a formidable opponent who is always one step behind them, tons of gunfire and fast-paced action, and the obligatory shout of frustration from the bad guy at the end who has been foiled - "NOOOOOOO!" Yes, this movie was pretty bad and very predictable, but I STILL liked it. Maybe for sentimental reasons, or maybe because I'm a sucker for movies like this. I have rated it at 7 stars out of 10.
Auntie Mame (1958)
STANDING OVATION! - (10 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"How bleak was my puberty!"
"Auntie Mame" (1958) starring Rosalind Russell is a perfect film with one of the best characters to ever grace the silver screen played by one of the best actresses of her time. I was born 10 years after this movie was released, and I watched it for the first time in my early 20's, so it was already 30+ years old before I had even heard of it. I know, I know ... I was behind the times (as usual). But, better late than never, right? And I am SO glad I have seen it. Such a wonderful film at such a pivotal time in my life. But first ... what it's about.
When young Patrick Dennis loses his father, he goes to live with his only remaining relative, his Auntie Mame (Russell), in Manhattan. Eccentric, yet lovable, wild, yet marvelous, Mame sees the little boy for the first time, and as she says, 'It was love at first sight'. She takes him under her wing and introduces him to a completely different life, wanting to broaden his horizons and keep him from becoming ordinary or boring. We watch as Patrick grows into adulthood as a young man, while he and his Auntie learn to cope with loss and change. Each new situation becomes a landmark in his unorthodox childhood, but they are also near and dear to his heart - as he is to Auntie Mame's heart.
When I was in my early 20's, I was going through a divorce, and I was having a hard time dealing with it. In fact, I was miserable. My Mom got tired of me moping around the house (she took me in during that time to help me get back on my feet), and decided to do something about it. Instead of sitting me down and telling me to get my act together, this is what she did. She made me throw on a jacket, get in the car, and then took me down to the Baskin-Robbins where we got some ice cream. Then we went to the video store (yes, I'm that old) and she rented "Auntie Mame". Together, we sat and ate our ice cream and watched the movie. Sometimes, my Mom's ideas weren't so good ... but on this score, she was 100% right. I will always remember that night.
"Auntie Mame" is a special movie to me. It truly helped me through a rough time in my life. It made me smile and laugh - it made me forget my own troubles for couple of hours, and I am so grateful to my Mom for that night. Rosalind Russell was a gem. She was such a wonderful presence on the screen. And she shines in this movie. I recommend this movie at a perfect 10 stars out of 10. It IS movie perfection. If you are ever feeling down or depressed, watch this. Auntie Mame will always make you feel better.
Hollywood or Bust (1956)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"I'd have never known about the phony ticket or the stealing if you didn't tell me, which means you're very noble. You're as noble as Abraham Lincoln or Raymond Massey."
"Hollywood or Bust" (1956), starring the comedy team of Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis, holds the most fond memories of any of their movies for me. Ironically, it was the most bitter of movies for both Martin and Lewis as this would be their last film together, and then a years-long feud began. In fact, things had gotten so bad between them, that they refused to speak off-camera while shooting this movie - and Lewis stated later that he wasn't ever able to watch this film because it would've been too painful to see. But, for the rest of us, this is still a fun, comedic road adventure.
Steve Wiley (Martin) owes a large gambling debt, so he has counterfeit tickets created to dishonestly win a car during a theater raffle drawing one night. He plans to take the car to Hollywood and sell it for top dollar to pay off his debt. However, when Malcolm Smith (Lewis) clambers aboard the stage waving the real winning ticket, they are both awarded the car ... each owning half. Malcolm also wants to go to Hollywood to meet his dream girl crush, actress Anita Ekberg (playing herself). So, they pack up their bags, Malcolm's Great Dane, 'Mr. Bascomb', and hit the highway. Along the way, they cross paths with another traveler named Terry - and while Malcolm continues to dream of Anita, Steve's eyes are only for Terry. We watch as they have some madcap adventures on their way to the West Coast where things don't quite turn out the way any of them expected.
I first saw this one on TV when I was just a kid, and I loved the Martin and Lewis movies. For some reason, this was my personal favorite one, and the one I remember the most. I liked the concept of both of them winning the car and butting heads along the way to California with the comedic stylings that only Jerry Lewis could bring, and the straight man antics that Dean Martin had down only too well. In an attempt to make Hollywood more glamorous than it might have been, the film is stock full of posing beauties who wave to the traveling duo all throughout the movie - which was highlighted by Anita Ekberg herself.
Even knowing how hard it must have been for them to make this movie, it is still a real pleasure to watch. It is a highly enjoyable film from days gone by when the smallest, happiest things could make movie stars burst into a harmony of song. Jerry Lewis is one of those comedians who could make me laugh just by walking onscreen. I would recommend this classic at a solid 7 stars out of 10. It's too bad that this marked the end of something so good, but it is a good way to go out.
Escape Room: Tournament of Champions (2021)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"So, that makes this what .... tournament of champions?"
"Escape Room: Tournament of Champions" (2021) brings back Taylor Russell and Logan Miller from the first film, and adds to the cast with some new blood. The version of the film I watched was the newer, extended version which is decidedly VERY different from the theatrical release. Deborah Ann Woll was completely removed, and Isabelle Fuhrman and James Frain star in the film with a completely reworked beginning and ending. 'Tournament of Champions" introduces new escape rooms and tries to up the ante.
We pick back up with the survivors from the first film, Zoey and Ben, as they are determined to find the culprits behind these sadistic escape rooms and expose them for what they are. Their trails leads them to Manhattan where they are lured into another very deadly, and creative situation they must escape from ... but this time, they finds themselves in the company of other surviving winners of previous escape rooms - and as one of them astutely surmises, it is a sick tournament of champions. However, the closer to the truth behind the scenes they get, they find that not all is at it seems.
As I mentioned at the outset, I watched the extended version which completely alters the theatrical version into basically a whole new movie. I have always been a fan of Isabelle Fuhrman from the first 'Orphan' movie, and considering her source material, I felt she did a decent job in this one as well. I enjoyed the underlying story and the secrets they uncovered for us during the course of the movie. They did set things up very nicely for a 3rd movie in the series (IF they make it a series). The big question is ... from which ending will they continue the story from? The theatrical version or the extended version?
I didn't feel this one was as good as the first film, but I still had fun with it. The escape rooms that they had to solve the puzzles to were well made and executed, as they were in the first film. They did try to up the ante a bit, making the scenes pop more with larger stakes and more action. I felt the tension was lessoned though, since we have already been exposed to the events of the first movie, and more is revealed with the proverbial 'man behind the curtain'. I would recommend this at 7 stars out of 10. A decent double-feature if you watch them back to back.
Escape Room (2019)
CHEER! - (8 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Danny: "Talk about immersive!"
Amanda: "Immersive? What the hell is wrong with you? That was real!"
"Escape Room" (2019) starring Taylor Russell, Logan Miller, and Deborah Ann Woll is a thrill ride from start to finish with everything you would expect from a movie with this title. I'm gonna be honest here. Some of the reviews I've read, by critics and moviegoers alike, have been less than flattering - stating things like 'this movie fails to deliver on its full potential'. Seriously? I'm not sure what else they were expecting to see. Did they want a YA version of "Saw"? Not enough blood and guts for ya? LOL - THIS was a fun movie and much better than what the so-called experts have billed it to be.
Six very unique individuals with strong personalities have been invited to participate in a game of strategy that requires them all to work together in what is called an Escape Room - or they won't win. As the first room begins their game, they soon find out it is much more than a game. It is very real with very deadly consequences if you can't solve the puzzle in unlocking the way out. It isn't long before they begin second-guessing each other, wondering if someone among them is the orchestrator of their collective demise. As the survivors progress through this deadly maze, they come realize that they are there for a specific purpose, one they could never have guessed.
I read some of the reviews for this before I watched it ... the good and the bad. I didn't have very high expectations going in, and maybe that is why I enjoyed it so much. I don't understand the negativity surrounding this film. I felt each room was original in its design, and the plot behind it all was interesting and engaging. It was decently acted with some great action sequences and thrills. I liked each of the characters as well, as they all brought something to the table worth having. Some of the dialogue was a bit cheesy in parts, I will say that much, but overall, this movie delivers.
I highly recommend "Escape Room" at a solid 8 stars out of 10. Like any movie of this kind, you are going to find loopholes and inconsistencies, but those aside, you are left with a fun ride for 99 minutes. I've seen this movie twice now - the 2nd time because I wanted to freshen up on it before I watched the sequel (which I am about to do right now). If you aren't an extremely picky person and you enjoy a good thriller, this is right up your alley.
The Long, Long Trailer (1954)
CHEER! - (8 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"Oh, I didn't mean we'd ever think of buying it! (laughs) I know we could never do that. But, as long as we're here, let's just look inside. Come on, darling."
"The Long, Long Trailer" (1954) features the husband/wife team of Desi Arnez and Lucille Ball from the very popular television show, "I Love Lucy". It gave adoring fans a chance to finally see them in color instead of black & white. It was actually the 2nd film feature that they appeared in together with "Too Many Girls" (1940) being the first. They both credited that movie as where they met and fell in love. This movie is the first to feature them as a married couple onscreen as well as in real life - and what a fun movie it is!
Newlyweds Nicky and Tacy Collini have decided to take the plunge and purchase a 40 foot / 3 ton mammoth of a travel trailer since Nicky travels a lot for his job. Tacy convinces him that it would be so much more convenient to just pick up roots after each job and move the trailer to the new location, so that they can always be together. She fantasizes about making a nice home for him in their trailer while he frets and worries about the chore of moving it all over the countryside. With each new predicament that owning such a long, long trailer poses, their young marriage is tested to its limits. Would this be enough to derail them, or would they endure this new adventure?
I saw this for the first time way back when I was just a kid. My Mom had grown up watching the original "I Love Lucy" episdoes and was the biggest Lucille Ball fan ... like ever. When this movie was first released on VHS in 1982, my Mom and Dad were among the first in line to rent it, and after fiddling with the color, tint and bright controls for about 20 minutes (it has to be perfect, you know!), they finally settled back and I got to see if for the first time. It was such a good movie, even at that young age. And through the years, I've always enjoyed watching it again from time to time. It showcases everything one would come to expect with new owners of a trailer such as this.
It is one of a few Lucille Ball movies I remember really liking from my youth, and I have a copy of it here in my own collection. I would highly recommend it at a strong 8 stars out of 10. Not only do the laughs come from the trailer scenes, but also from their reactions to each other as a newlywed couple just starting out in life. Despite the fashions and economy of the time, "The Long, Long Trailer" has actually aged pretty well. It is stil viable, still funny, and very entertaining.
The Pope's Exorcist (2023)
JUST OKAY - (6 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Father Esquibel: "Let's go to work."
Father Amorth: "Let's go to Hell."
"The Pope's Exorcist" (2023) starring Russell Crowe and Daniel Zovatto is a loosely based film on the true life story of Father Gabriele Amorth, who was a Catholic Priest and an Exorcist for the Diocese of Rome which is under the direct jurisdiction of the Pope - hence, the title of the movie. I really didn't know what to expect coming in, other than your usual exorcist-type stuff (prayers in chaotic situations from priests standing over a restrained possessed individual tied to a bed). We certainly got that ... and a whole lot more.
Father Gabriele Amorth (Crowe) is being questioned about his methods as an exorcist, one who is perceived as being a bit of a rogue and independent, taking matters into his own hands without receiving the required approvals needed first. But, when a little boy is possessed by a rather strong demon in an abbey in Spain, he is assigned firsthand by the Pope himself to go and investigate, as this particular location has been a sore spot for the church in the past. Expecting this to be the 'usual' situation, Father Amorth finds that this may be the biggest challenge he's ever faced, maybe even at the cost of his own life. This is no small deal ... this is something that could destroy everything he knows and bring the church to its knees. All they need is the demon's name ... without it, they are doomed.
Curious, I did a little research on the actual priest that this movie was based on, and coincidentally enough, he has been described as the "James Bond of exorcists". I say that is coicidental because, after the movie ended, that is EXACTLY what I was thinking. "I'm Amorth. Gabriele Amorth. I am Double O - 666. License to exorcise." I was thinking to myself that if James Bond were an exorcist, this is how he'd be. There is very little to none with the scare factor here. It is heavy on the intrigue, the investigation that leads us to a solemn secret, and tons of special effects and action. We get a lot of the usual cliche'd dialogue lines such as 'God works in mysterious ways', and the like. As well as a formidable demonic force to be defeated.
This wasn't a bad movie, per se. If you are going in expecting a good, scary horror film ... this is not it. Some of the situations were even borderline laughable, but the cinematography was excellent, and Russell Crowe carries the film remarkably, as he often does. I wouldn't recommend it, but I feel it is worth a watch at a rating of 6 stars out of 10. "The Pope's Exorcist" will keep you engaged and interested. It won't scare you, but it will entertain you.
Cocaine Bear (2023)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"Bears are very peaceful creatures."
"Cocaine Bear" (2023) directed by Elizabeth Banks and starring Keri Russell and Ray Liotta (in one of his final film roles), is one of those twisted, bloody affairs that falls under the "it's SO wrong that it's great!" category. This film is VERY loosely based on the true life events surrounding a black bear that overdosed on cocaine it had ingested after it was dumped into a Tennessee forest from a plane flying overhead in 1985. In real life, the bear was found dead in Kentucky with a belly full of cocaine and nothing is known about what transpired from the time it ate the cocaine and the time it died. THIS movie, however, leaves nothing to the imagination.
The story starts with a drug runner inside of an airplane flying over a wilderness, throwing out all of the packaged cocaine onboard before he knocks himself out and falls out, plummeting to his death. The next day, we are introduced to the 'cocaine bear' who attacks a couple of hikers who cannot understand its bizarre behavior. As the story moves along, more characters are introduced who, in one crazy way or another, cross paths with the wasted bear who is on the hunt for blood and more of that white powdery stuff. When the brains behind the drug smuggling ring, Syd (Liotta), shows up, he is not going to let anything stop him from recovering his drugs. Not even the cocaine bear.
If ever there was a movie that deserves BEARing (excuse the innuendo) the label 'guilty pleasure', this is it. The filmmakers took what could have happened and totally ran with it. Of course, none of it would've happened, but who cares? The whole situation and all of the predicaments made me laugh and smile unapologetically. It was wrong, but in all the right ways. I also loved the music used in the film's soundtrack, which was very reminiscent of its time - the mid-80's, when music was so good. The acting was not the focus here. In a movie like this, who cares if the actors can actually act? This was all about having fun.
I would recommend this movie at a solid 7 stars out of 10. This is one I would watch again, and probably enjoy even more with repeated viewings. Right now, it is still fresh and new, but a year or two down the road from now, I can see it being a horror/comedy favorite. It was bittersweet seeing Ray Liotta in this film with his recent passing, but he looked like he was having fun with it. And I had fun watching him in it. "Cocaine Bear" may not be destined to be a classic, but it is a wild 90 minute ride worth taking.
Sister Act 2: Back in the Habit (1993)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"I am not now, nor have I ever been, a Las Vegas showgirl. I am a headliner."
With the huge success of 1992's "Sister Act", it was inevitable that a sequel would soon be on the horizon. In fact, only a year later, in 1993, we got "Sister Act 2: Back in the Habit" - bringing back Whoopi Goldberg as our beloved Delores Van Cartier/Sister Mary Clarence, Kathy Najimy, Maggie Smith, and Wendy Makkena. Also in this movie we see Lauryn Hill and Jennifer Love Hewitt in very early movie roles ... both of them young and motivated. Not to mention an appearance by James Coburn in a rather thankless role.
We catch up with Delores who has moved on from Reno to Las Vegas and is indeed a headlining act, singing to sold out shows nightly. To her genuine surprise, Sisters Mary Robert, Mary Patrick, and Mary Lazarus show up on the behest of the Reverend Mother to fetch her back to San Francisco where her help is direly needed at St. Francis Academy, which is, ironically, the same school that Delores attended when she was a girl. She is tasked with turning an obnoxious, and willful bunch of teenagers into a choir which will represent the school at the 30th Annual All-State Choir Championship. With the threat of the school being closed down looming over their heads, they learn to trust in each other and become not only a great choir, but individuals.
This was a fun movie that definitely had its moments of charm, feel-good vibes, and inspiring music. Whoopi has settled nicely into her role as the reluctant Nun, and provides some more laughs that made the first movie a winner. However, this one fell a little short with me, and though the final act was well done, it just didn't seem to have the same magical appeal that the first film's had. In the first movie, Sister Mary Clarence was trying to save her own life. In this one, she is trying to save the school and the futures of its students.
I would certainly recommend this at a solid 7 stars out of 10. I usually watch the two films together as a double feature and I always feel better after doing so. It's hard to believe that it has already been 30 years since this movie's release. Lauryn Hill was able to springboard into a very successful music career with this movie and Jennifer Love Hewitt became a star in her own right. A 3rd movie is apparently being filmed right now and is expecting a 2024 release. I am looking forward to that one as well.
Sister Act (1992)
CHEER! - (9 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"If this turns into a Nun's bar, I'm outta here."
"Sister Act" (1992) starring Whoopi Goldberg, Maggie Smith, Harvey Keitel, Kathy Najimy, and Wendy Makkena is a surefire crowd pleaser that will have you laughing, singing and cheering. The first time I saw this, I had just gone through a divorce and it almost made me forget my own troubles for a couple of hours. Almost. It became one of my 'go to' movies whenever I needed to be cheered up and has since become one of my all-time favorite comedies.
Delores Van Cartier (Goldberg), a handful as a little girl, grows up to be a lounge act singer in the casinos of Reno. It is a dead-end, thankless job that was set up for her by her gangster lover, Vince (played by Keitel) who also happens to be married. One night, realizing that she is getting nowhere, she goes up to say "good riddance" to Vince, but instead walks in on a murder under Vince's direction. She escapes his clutches and goes straight to the police who place her in protective custody inside of a Nun's convent in San Francisco, where they know she will never be found. She is given the name of Sister Mary Clarence - and what starts out as a nightmare, turns into a heartwarming and endearing experience. When Vince finally comes around she is torn between staying or leaving to save her own skin.
This is, bar none, the best movie of Whoopi's career in a leading role. As she transitions from casino to convent, you can feel the awkwardness that goes along with being a fish out of water, or with being a stranger in a strange land. When she turns a drab and lackluster choir into a talked about attraction, you revel in their accomplishments and delight in their friendships. This movie was perfectly cast. Every single Nun has their own unique personality which adds to the overall feel of the story. And Whoopi nails it in this role. Yes ... I loved her in "Ghost" as Oda Mae Brown (which she was also perfect for), but it was this turn in "Sister Act" that really made me a fan.
I highly recommend this movie at a very strong 9 stars out of 10. I've seen it countless times over the years, never getting tired of it. It helped me through a rough time in my life, it helped to inspire me and give me hope for a positive future. It is a happy and perky movie, just like Kathy Najimy's lovable character, Sister Mary Patrick. Once in a while, a special movie will come along at the right time in your life. "Sister Act" is one of those movies for me.
3 Men and a Little Lady (1990)
CHEER! - (8 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Elspeth: "Mr. Mitchell! What are you doing in my closet?"
Peter: "Sometimes a man has to be alone."
Elspeth: "And sometimes he needs companionship."
"Three Men and a Little Lady" (1990) brings back our three bachelors played by Tom Selleck, Ted Danson, and Steve Guttenberg. Added to the cast in this one is also Nancy Travis (in a much more pronounced role as Mary's mother, Sylvia), Fiona Shaw, and Christopher Cazenove. This was released 3 years after the first movie, and at the age of 22 and married now, I found it to be just as enjoyable as the original, if not more.
It is 5 years after the events of "Three Men and a Baby". Peter, Michael, and Jack all still live together along with Sylvia and Mary ... as one big, happy, unconventional family. Despite the fact that it has worked up to that point, Mary is beginning to feel confused about having a biological father and two honorary fathers. When Sylvia is proposed to by a broadway director named Edward, she feels conflicted because of what the change would mean for Mary. But, even deeper than that, she is in love with Peter, and even though Peter is also in love with Sylvia, he cannot open up to her and admit his true feelings. Sylvia accepts Edward's proposal and they leave for England. Our three bachelors cook up a plan and soon follow them over.
I personally found this movie to be slightly better made and enjoyable than the first film. It flows much better, was better edited, and seemed to gel more at the end. Even so, there is an undeniable charm with the first movie, so overall, I would say I like them about the same. Fiona Shaw's character, Elspeth, caught me slight off-guard at first, as her acting style is definitely off-kilter and unorthodox, but that is her way. After years of watching her in other films, I have grown used to her, and now seeing her in this one is a joy. The chemistry between her and Peter was laugh out loud funny.
I also thought that our young actress, Robin Weisman, was delightful as the little lady, Mary. Some child actors can sometimes grate on you or get on your nerves, but she did not. She did a great job in her role and worked well with our three leading men. I love this one too, and also give it a very strong 8 stars out of 10. It is a high recommend. I cannot watch one without the other, and usually watch them back-to-back as a double feature. If you haven't seen either one, then that is exactly what you should do.
3 Men and a Baby (1987)
CHEER! - (8 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Peter: "Just look out in the hall."
Michael: (opens the door, looks down and laughs) "That's a baby."
Peter: "I know it's a baby. What's it doing there?"
Michael: "It's sleeping."
"Three Men and a Baby" (1987) starring Tom Selleck, Ted Danson, Steve Guttenberg, and directed by Leonard Nimoy, showcases our three main actors at their comedic best in a fun, fast-paced 80's comedy. I saw this movie when it first came out and it quickly became one of my favorites of the time. I was about 19, not married, and entering into my own bachelorhood, and wondering how I would've reacted if I was somehow placed into that situation. I decided that it probably wasn't too far from what I was watching.
Peter (Selleck), Michael (Guttenberg), and Jack (Danson) are three bachelors living together in New York City apartment, all with successful occupations, and all of them also successfully playing the field. Everything comes to a startling and frustrating halt, however, when a baby in a hand basket shows up unexpectedly outside their front door with a note attached. The baby's name is Mary, and she is Jack's daughter left there by her mother, Sylvia, who is no longer able to care for her. As they cope with this change in their lives, all three of them come to care for, and love Mary very much. When Mary's mother shows up asking to take Mary back, they are faced with another new dilemma and decision to make.
This was such a fun movie, despite its obvious flaws. The side story regarding the mysterious 'package' that Jack agrees to accept on behalf of a friend that Peter and Michael mistake Mary as being, was far fetched and a bit distracting. It did add an element of intrigue and action to the story, but ultimately, I felt it was unnecessary. The movie itself doesn't really flow that well, it is a bit choppy, but it still works. The real heart and warmth of the story was with the three men and the baby itself, along with the hilarious situations they get into as they adapt their lives to having her in their home.
Realistically, what would have probably happened in real life is that the baby would have been turned over to social services, the mother turned in for abandoning her 6-month-old baby, and the three bachelors would have continued their carefree lives. But, this is the movies ... the magic of movies. You have to suspend disbelief to a degree for it to work, but if you go in expecting to smile and laugh, this one gets it done. I recommend it at a strong 8 stars out of 10. It is a personal favorite, one I've seen many times and have enjoyed just as much with each viewing.
Scream (1996)
STANDING OVATION! - (10 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"There are certain RULES that one must abide by in order to successfully survive a horror movie!"
"Scream" (1996) directed by Wes Craven, and starring Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, David Arquette, Rose McGowan, Jamie Kennedy, Matthew Lillard, Skeet Ulrich, and Drew Barrymore, was an instant classic in horror - a game changer. I was 28 when this movie hit the silver screen, and I was a HUGE horror film fan, so "Scream" was right up my alley. In an age where horror movies had all but come to a standstill with uninspired plots and straight-to-DVD sequels, "Scream" reinvented the slasher genre that helped inspire other notable films to follow, such as: "I Know What You Did Last Summer", "Urban Legend", and "Disturbing Behavior" (to name a few), while paying homage to the classics that came before.
The movie starts with one of the best opening scenes ever filmed in horror history when a girl named Casey (Barrymore) is home alone one evening. She is getting ready to enjoy some popcorn and watch a scary movie when she receives a phone call from a stranger with deadly intentions. The next day, the whole town of Woodsboro is abuzz with the news of Casey's gruesome murder, especially the students at the high school who can't believe it. Affected more deeply than the others is Sidney Prescott (Campbell), who's mother was a murder victim nearly a year before. A feisty news reporter (Cox) seems to think there may be a connection between the two, and it isn't long before the killer known as 'Ghostface', because of his halloween-like costume, comes calling at Sidney's front door.
Wes Craven has often times been labeled (correctly too) as a master of his craft. This may not be more pronounced than this film. "Scream" is the perfect blend of scares, humor, acting, direction, editing, cinematography, and music as I've ever seen in a horror movie. Ever. That is saying something since there aren't too many horror movies I haven't seen. It was perfectly cast, and I was invested from the very first scene. It has a solid plot as well - it's not just an excuse to have a serial killer chasing after screaaming teenagers. It is a movie that is self-aware, and that is one of its biggest charms.
Nothing is rushed here. Each moment is allowed to build up the tension as it should. It isn't a busy film, but it really is engaging and it will pull you in for its entirety. The final scene alone, the party at Stu's house, was just over 40 minutes. And, at NO time, did it feel like it was too long or drawn out. It is probably the best horror film of its generation out there, and can hold its own against all of the greats. I highly recommend this one at the strongest rating possible of 10 stars out of 10. THIS is good horror. The best.
Delirious (1991)
CHEER! - (8 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"Rachel, I'm a medical doctor! I can't do it!"
"Delirious" (1991) starring John Candy, Raymond Burr (in his final film role), Mariel Hemingway, and Emma Samms is a fun and funny movie that is just as enjoyable today as the day it came out. This is one of my personal favorite John Candy films - and despite what the critics say, it was a good one. Was the script silly? Yep! Were the characters shallow? You betcha! Was the acting poor? You know it! But, that is the whole point. Was it a bad movie? Heck, no!
Jack Gable (Candy) is the producer and main writer for a popular, long-running, daytime soap opera called 'Beyond Our Dreams' that is set in the fictious town of Ashford Falls, which follows the exploits of a rich, ruthless, and corrupt family called the Hedison's. Jack has a crush on the lead actress of the series, Laura (Samms), and writes the most juicy storylines for her. But, after receiving a jarring blow to the chin when the trunk to his car flies up unexpectedly, Jack wakes up inside of his own creation with all of the characters he'd written coming to life. Now, he is a part of their world as the mysterious, yet gallant, Jack Gates, a hero's hero. As things come to a head, he finds that the only way out is to write his way out, or else he might meet with a grizzly end himself.
This was such a wonderful spoof of daytime soaps that is completely over-the-top and exagerated, and 100% entertaining. Bringing in Emma Samms, who was herself an actual Soap Queen at the time, was a stroke of genius and she was perfect for this movie. Many felt that Mariel Hemingway was miscast, but I loved her in this one. And, David Rasche, as the 'medical doctor', was hilarious. Again, perfect for the role. Knowing that it was also the last movie that Raymond Burr would appear in was bittersweet, but he seemed to have fun with it as well.
I liked this movie and would give it a solid recommend at 8 stars out of 10. I felt that, overall, everything worked here. The chemistry, such as it was, was good between the actors pretending to be actors pretending to be soap opera characters. Nothing is to be taken serious. This is a light-hearted, feel good movie that delivers the laughs. It is a permanent part of my own movie collection and I look forward to watching it again.
Armed and Dangerous (1986)
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Judge: "Mr. Kane, you are without a doubt one of the worst lawyers I have ever seen."
Norman Kane: "Oh! Well, then I move for a mistrial."
"Armed and Dangerous" (1986) starring John Candy, Eugene Levy, Robert Loggia, and Meg Ryan was a surprisingly fun movie. This is a straight up, buddy cop action/comedy in the vein of "Stakeout", "48 Hours", or "Tango & Cash" - except they are buddy security guards instead of cops. This is, by far, the most "actiony" movie I've ever seen John Candy in, and despite the poor reviews, I felt he carried it off fairly well.
When police officer, Frank Dooley (Candy), is framed for something he didn't do, he is released from the LAPD and forced to find whatever work he can. He lands a thankless job with Guard Dog Security where he meets and teams up with former lawyer, Norman Kane (Eugene Levy). On their very first assignment on their very first night together, they stumble across a burglary in progress which leads to a company conspiracy that nobody will believe them about. Finally, they get a hearing ear from the Captain's daughter (Ryan), who is one of the trainers. Together, they do their best to uncover the plot before any more damage can be done.
I don't how I've missed watching this one over the years. I remember seeing the VHS tape sitting on the shelves, back in the day, in video rental stores, but I never gave it a chance. I finally found a copy, and decided to watch it and I was pleasantly surprised. It was fun seeing John Candy take on more of a tough guy role, and I thought he did a decent job with it, still delivering some laughs along the way. And this is the most subdued I think I've ever seen Eugene Levy in a movie. He was actually more of the smart guy, the intellectual one, and between the two of them, it works here.
I would recommend this movie at a solid 7 stars out of 10. The critics panned it, but I don't care. I never listen to them much anyway. In fact, if a critic says a movie sucks, I'm probably going to watch it anyway - LOL. "Armed and Dangerous" is action packed with a soundtrack to match, and plenty of carnage, wreckage and explosions to keep even the most critical of action fans happy. It is worth a watch, so if you haven't yet seen it, give it a chance.
Going Berserk (1983)
JEER - (3 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
Ed: "How much money do you make in a year?"
John: "Oh, in a year. I would say anywhere from thirty to eleven thousand a year, Sir."
"Going Berserk" (1983) starring John Candy, Pat Hingle, Eugene Levy, and Ernie Hudson (in a bit role) is a highly forgettable film that aims high, but falls flat. When this movie came out I was about 14 years old, but it flew under my radar. I never even heard of it until years later, and when I finally decided to watch it, I was not impressed. I only needed to see it once to know that that was more than enough for me.
The story starts out with a "you wouldn't believe how I ended up here" type of beginning, and then we flashback to the story leading up to that point. John Candy plays the role of John Bourgignon who runs a limo service with his buddy, Chick (Joe Flaherty) in the big city. He is engaged to be married to a Senator's daughter, much to the chagrin of the Senator. Because of his connection with the Senator, a cult that the Senator is trying to expose, brainwashes John and attempts to have him assassinate the Senator on John's wedding day. Instead of turning John into a deadly killing machine however, the trigger they have put into his mind turns him into a bumbling fool instead, leading to some precarious situations.
The movie had a few laugh out loud moments, but they were very few and very far in between. Overall, "Going Berserk" was very adolescent, dumb, and crude. I honestly don't even think I would've enjoyed this very much even as a teenager. John Candy does a lot of physical comedy in this one, highlighted by the scene where he is handcuffed to Ernie Hudson's character, Muhammed, and while they are on opposite sides of a closed door, Muhammed has sex with his girlfriend. Yeah, let your imagination run wild with that one ... LOL.
After this movie was done, I just kinda yawned and said to myself ... "Oh boy, was that ever stupid". I am rating it at 3 stars out of 10. It is definitely one of the worst John Candy films I've ever seen. The characters were not fleshed out, the plot was pointless, and the gags were not that funny. Everything was staged to set up a joke that just didn't deliver. I suppose if you have some late night time to burn and you don't care what you watch, this movie will suffice.
Who's Harry Crumb? (1989)
CHEER!! - (7 stars out of 10)
The stage curtains open ...
"Not so fast! I've had my eye on you for a while, lady. I knew you were up to something, now here's my proof. It was YOU who were having an affair with your husband all along!"
"Who's Harry Crumb?" (1989) starring John Candy, Annie Potts, Jeffrey Jones, and Shawnee Smith is just one in a long line of inept detective comedy films, and it certainly wouldn't be the last. This movie I did see when it first hit the silver screen, and I really enjoyed it. It isn't the best of its kind I've ever seen, but it isn't the worst either. There are some real duds out there, but "Who's Harry Crumb?" is good entertainment.
Harry Crumb (Candy) is a down-on-his-luck private investigator who thinks more of his skills than he ought to. He is lucky if he can get a job tailing an unfaithful spouse and take racy pictures for a small fee. But when a high class socialite is kidnapped for a hefty ransom, her father demands action. Harry Crumb is brought in to investigate and he solicits the help of the kidnapped girl's younger sister, Nikki (Smith), as he stumbles and bumbles from one clue to the next. In his unorthodox way, Crumb works hard to identify the culprit of the kidnapping, and the results are a surprise, even to him. Everyone seems to have an agenda and everyone is suspect. In a way, Harry Crumb, despite his incompetence, might be the only person who can solve the crime.
In the tradition of the Peter Sellers' character of Chief Inspector Clouseau from the Pink Panther movies, comes John Candy's version, Harry Crumb. And, like Clouseau, Crumb fancies himself as a master of disguise. Despite being idiotic, Crumb has a heart of gold and there is no doubting his devotion to his profession.
This film wasn't as humorous as any of the Pink Panther movies, but I still had a fun time watching it. There were some great gags and I was laughing and smiling through the whole movie. John Candy brings his own unique comedic style to the role, and I felt it works here. I've always been a fan of Shawnee Smith, and I liked her in this movie as well.
I think the critics might've been a little too harsh in their reviews for this film - but, despite these, I remember quite a few people hoping for a sequel, but one never developed. I would certainly recommend it at a solid 7 stars out of 10. It is one of my personal favorite John Candy comedies, one I have seen several times over the years, and I like it just as much with each viewing.