Jump to content

Talk:Camisole

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with Control camisole

[edit]

The control camisole article does not present sufficient information to stand individually. As it is a type of camisole, it should be merged into this article. Neelix (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article status

[edit]

I've tidied up the article and added references and inline citations so it should satisfy the six B-class criteria. The next step is to add photograph(s) or illustration(s). - Pointillist (talk) 11:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit - Chiscago

[edit]

Was stumbling around looking for the Value of an Old Dictionary I own, and came across this spelling error . Richard416282 (talk) 04:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone bother to PROOF READ this article?

[edit]
  • "Another femanin veriaty has short, puffed sleeves (ballooned sleeves), a low Boat necked or Scoop necked neckline, full or cropped off boddice and genraly has a lacy or embroyed decorations on the neckline, hems and cuffs[11][12][13]. These are konwn as Gypsy tops in the UK and Ierland, and as Peasant blouses in North America. They were poupular imn the UK and Ireland from about 1998 to 2002. Layla from the Winx Club has worn them to."

9 spelling or grammatical errors in one paragraph? Seriously, does WP have NO quality control whatsoever? ;) I'd edit it, but I have no knowledge of the subject and have no idea if the paragraph is even accurate, given the poor quality of the copy and lack of citations. I'd hate to give legitimacy to what could well be nonsense... Who knows? A "femanin veriaty"? I'm sorry, is there a masculine variety of camisole I'm unaware of? Thought this was clothing for women... Period. 98.108.164.197 (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC) (I'd sign in, but this article is hardly worth the time it would take. Or having my good screenname associated with it.)[reply]

The hoax was cut out.--82.27.31.16 (talk) 07:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camisole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Top

[edit]

Just looks like a normal top. How is that intimate underwear? --188.99.177.165 (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Camisole&oldid=1212511434"