Jump to content

Anzick-1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Anzick Boy
Common nameAnzick Boy
SpeciesHomo sapiens
Age12,990–12,840 years BP
Place discoveredNear Wilsall, Montana, U.S.
Date discovered1968

Anzick-1 was a young (1–2 years old) Paleoindian child whose remains were found in south central Montana, United States, in 1968. He has been dated to 12,990–12,840 years Before Present.[1] The child was found with more than 115 tools made of stone and antlers and dusted with red ocher, suggesting a deliberate burial.[2] Anzick-1 is the only human whose remains are associated with the Clovis culture, and is the first ancient Native American genome to be fully sequenced.[3]

Paleogenomic analysis of the remains revealed Siberian ancestry and a closer genetic relationship to modern Native Americans of Central and South America than to those of North America.[4][3] These findings support the hypothesis that modern Native Americans are descended from Asian populations who crossed Beringia between 23,000 and 14,000 years ago.[4][3]

Anzick-1's discovery and subsequent analysis has been controversial. The remains were found on private land, so compliance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) was not required in their study. However, some Native American tribal members in Montana felt they should have been consulted before the researchers undertook analysis of the infant's skeleton and genome.[5] Montana State law does require consultation with Native Americans concerning disposition of ancient skeletal remains.

After consultation, Anzick-1 was reburied on June 28, 2014, in the Shields River Valley in an intertribal ceremony.[2] The numerous Clovis artifacts associated with the first burial are curated at the Montana Historical Society in Helena, Montana.[2]

Discovery

[edit]

The Anzick site was accidentally discovered by two construction workers in a collapsed rock shelter near Wilsall, Montana, on private land.[6][7] The remains were found on the ranch of the Anzick family.[5]

The Anzick-1 remains were found buried among numerous tools: 100 stone tools and 15 remnants of tools made of antler. The site contained hundreds of stone projectile points, bifaces and flake tools.[7] All of the artifacts were covered in red ocher.[7] The stone points were identified as those of the Clovis culture because of their distinct shape and size.[6] Radiocarbon dating of the artefacts and the remains of Anzick-1 indicate an age of around 12,990–12,840 years Before Present for the burial.[1] Skull fragments of a second individual (Anzick-2), a child of around 6-8 years of age, were also found at the site 6 metres (20 ft) east of Anzick-1, which lack ocher staining. The two individuals were originally thought to be contemporaneous, but later carbon dating revealed that the skull fragments of Anzick-2 date to around 9530 to 9600 years ago, several thousand years younger than Anzick-1, and thus was unrelated to the Anzick-1 and the Clovis artefacts.[6][4]

The tools found at the site appear to exhibit use-wear, and therefore were not manufactured specifically for the burial.[8] The antler artifacts were in the form of rods at least some of which appeared to have been beveled. Similar rods have been found at other Clovis culture and Paleoindian sites. The function of these rods is unknown, but may have served as foreshafts to which stone points were hafted.[9] Genetic analysis of the antler rods found with Anzick-1 indicates that the antlers used to create the artifacts were those of elk,[4] representing some of the oldest records of elk in North America south of the Laurentide Ice Sheet.[8] The antlers were radiocarbon dated to between 56 and 483 years before Anzick-1's death and as such, it is questionable if artifacts found at the site such as the Clovis points were actually produced by Anzick-1's community.[10]

Osteological findings

[edit]

Anzick-1's skeletal remains included 28 cranial fragments comprising much of the calvaria, the left clavicle, and several ribs.[6] These bones were discovered in highly fragmented states; however, partial reconstruction of the crania allowed for age estimation, investigation of basic health indicators, and some information about cultural practices. Originally, investigators thought the left clavicle showed evidence of cremation, but further analysis revealed that the discoloration was the result of groundwater staining and not fire.[6] Additionally, all of the Anzick-1 remains were stained with ocher, which masks the natural color of the infant's bones.[6]

Due to the incomplete nature of the remains of Anzick-1, no cause of death could be ascertained.[6]

Age estimation

[edit]

The age at death of an individual can be determined from several skeletal markers, including cranial suture closure, tooth eruption rates, rates of epiphyseal fusion on long bones, and others.[11] Cranial bones fuse together along suture lines throughout the life of every human, and can be used to estimate the age at death of human remains.[11] The small size and lack of suture closure of Anzick-1's crania revealed that the individual was 1–2 years old.[6] The metopic suture is also present in the frontal bone of Anzick-1. This suture is present in most human infants but closes well before adulthood. The presence of a frontal suture in Anzick-1's remains corroborates the age estimation of 1–2 years old.

Isotopic analysis

[edit]

δ13C analysis of the remains of Anzick-1 (which probably reflect the diet of his mother) are more consistent with a diet primarily consisting of mammoth, possibly supplemented with those of deer and equines, rather than of bison, though there is uncertainty due to possible minor contamination.[8]

Paleogenetic findings

[edit]

A team of researchers throughout the United States and Europe conducted paleogenetic research on the Anzick-1 skeletal remains. They sequenced the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), the full nuclear DNA, and the Y-chromosome, and compared these sequences to those of modern populations throughout the world.[4] The results of these analyses allowed the researchers to make conclusions about ancient migration patterns and the peopling of the Americas.

These analyses revealed that the individual was closely related to Native Americans in Central and South America, instead of being closely related to the people of the Canadian Arctic, as had previously been thought likely. (The people of the Arctic are distinct from Native Americans to the south, including in lower North America and Central and South America.) The infant was also related to persons from Siberia and Central Asia, believed to be the ancestral population of indigenous peoples in the Americas. This finding supports the theory that the peopling of the Americas occurred from Asia across the Bering Strait.

Nuclear DNA analysis

[edit]

The genome of Anzick-1 was sequenced and analyzed to look for specific mutations that might shed light on the population history of modern Native Americans.[4] Anzick-1's genome was compared to over 50 Native American genomes for comparison, and researchers found that it was significantly more similar to these than to any modern Eurasian population.[4] Anzick-1's genome was closer to 44 Native American populations from Central and South America than to 7 Native American populations from North America; samples from North America were limited as tribes in the United States have been reluctant to participate.[4]

Mitochondrial DNA analysis

[edit]

Morten Rasmussen and Sarah L. Anzick et al. sequenced the mitochondrial DNA of Anzick-1 and determined that the infant represents an ancient migration to North America from Siberia. They found that Anzick-1's mtDNA belongs to the haplogroup D4h3a, a "founder" haplogroup that might represent people taking an early coastal migration route into the Americas.[4] The D haplogroup is also found in modern Native American populations, which provides a link between Anzick-1 and modern Native Americans.[12] Although it is rare in most of today's Native Americans in the US and Canada, D4h3a genes are more common in native people of South America. This suggests a greater genetic complexity among Native Americans than previously thought, including an early divergence in the genetic lineage some 13,000 years ago. One theory suggested that after crossing into North America from Siberia, a group of the first Americans, with the lineage D4h3a, moved south along the Pacific coast and finally, through thousands of years, into Central and South America. Another line may have moved inland, east of the Rocky Mountains, ultimately populating most of what is now the United States and Canada.[4]

Y-chromosome analysis

[edit]

The Y-chromosome of Anzick-1 was sequenced, and researchers determined that his Y-chromosome haplogroup is Q-L54*(xM3), one of the major founding lineages of the Americas.[4]

Implications

[edit]

Anzick-1's mtDNA, nuclear DNA, and Y-Chromosome analysis revealed a close genetic affinity to modern Native Americans and provided evidence of gene flow from Siberia into the Americas nearly 13,000 years ago, earlier than thought.[4] These findings tend to support the Beringia Hypothesis of the peopling of the Americas, and tend to refute the Solutrean Hypothesis which argues for Pale-European migration to the New World and which had little academic support even prior to the sequencing of Anzick-1's genome.[13][4]

The Beringia Hypothesis is the mainstream model for the peopling of the Americas, which posits a migration of early Amerindians from Siberia across a land bridge that spanned the Bering Strait.[14] This hypothesis is supported by genetic and archaeological evidence that places the migration no earlier than 32,000 years ago.[15] Ancient Native Americans could have entered the New World across the Beringian land bridge, and passing south from Alaska through an ice-free corridor in Canada. Another concept is that they used boats to sail along the coast of Siberia, the Beringia land bridge, and the Pacific coast of North America.[15] Archeological evidence at the former area of the land bridge or a coastal path has been lost because of the rise in sea levels. The Anzick-1 paleogenetic analysis lends support to the Beringia Hypothesis theory, showing that humans had arrived in Montana by nearly 13,000 years ago.[3]

Ethics

[edit]

Studying the remains of ancient Native Americans has been described as an "ethical minefield" because it calls into question "ownership" and interpretation of the past.[5] Historically Native American remains were routinely excavated and analyzed without the consultation with, or permission of, contemporary Native Americans.[16] Under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act passed in 1990 US law protects the remains and artifacts of Native Americans found on federal lands or stored by institutions that receive federal funding. It requires restoration of remains and artifacts to tribes associated with the remains or culture.[17]

After the remains of Anzick-1 were excavated in 1968, they were analyzed by several teams of researchers and eventually returned to the Anzick family.[5][6] The daughter of the Anzick family, Sarah Anzick had become a genetic researcher. She hoped to conduct genomic analysis on the Anzick-1 skeleton.[5] She was cautious because a previous case, involving the ancient remains of a Native American called Kennewick Man, caused a great deal of controversy.[5]

Because Anzick-1 was discovered on private property, Sarah Anzick was not legally required to consult tribal members before conducting analysis of the remains. She discussed her goals with representatives of several Montana tribes that now inhabit the area, to determine whether to use the required techniques (which destroy some material) to analyze the remains of Anzick-1.[5] Because she was unable to achieve consensus, she temporarily gave up the project. She eventually conducted DNA analysis on the remains of Anzick-1.[4][5]

After the results of the analysis revealed a link between Anzick-1 and modern Native Americans, the team of researchers sought consultation from several Montana tribes.[5] Eske Willerslev, a Danish genetic researcher, visited several Indian reservations in Montana in 2013 to try to engage community members in the decision-making related to the research of Anzick-1.[5] He met with Shane Doyle, who became a co-author of the paper. A member of the Crow tribe, Doyle works in Native American studies at Montana State University.[5] There were mixed opinions about the research conducted on Anzick-1, but many tribal members said that they would prefer to have been contacted before the destructive techniques were performed, not after.[5] The overwhelming response from Montana tribal members was that the remains of Anzick-1 should be reburied according to tribal ritual.[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Becerra-Valdivia, Lorena; Waters, Michael R.; Stafford, Thomas W.; Anzick, Sarah L.; Comeskey, Daniel; Devièse, Thibaut; Higham, Thomas (2018-07-03). "Reassessing the chronology of the archaeological site of Anzick". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (27): 7000–7003. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.7000B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1803624115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6142201. PMID 29915063.
  2. ^ a b c French, Brett (June 28, 2014). "Remains of ancient child ceremoniously reburied". Billings Gazette. Retrieved 28 Jan 2018.
  3. ^ a b c d Raff, Jennifer; Bolnick, Deborah (February 13, 2014). "Palaeogenomics: Genetic roots of the first Americans". Nature. 506 (7487): 162–163. Bibcode:2014Natur.506..162R. doi:10.1038/506162a. PMID 24522593.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Rasmussen, Morten; et al. (February 13, 2014). "The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from a Clovis burial site in western Montana". Nature. 506 (7487): 225–229. Bibcode:2014Natur.506..225R. doi:10.1038/nature13025. PMC 4878442. PMID 24522598.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Callaway, Ewen (February 12, 2014). "Ancient genome stirs ethics debate". Nature. 506 (7487): 142–143. Bibcode:2014Natur.506..142C. doi:10.1038/506142a. PMID 24522580.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i Owsley, Douglas W; Hunt, David (May 2001). "Clovis and early Archaic crania from the Anzick site (24PA506), Park County, Montana". Plains Anthropologist. 46 (176): 115–124. doi:10.1080/2052546.2001.11932062. S2CID 159572593. ProQuest 214770823.
  7. ^ a b c Lahren, Larry; Bonnichsen, Robson (October 11, 1974). "Bone Foreshafts from a Clovis Burial in Southwest Montana". Science. 186 (4159): 147–150. Bibcode:1974Sci...186..147L. doi:10.1126/science.186.4159.147. JSTOR 1738153. PMID 17744223. S2CID 38667901.
  8. ^ a b c Morrow, Juliet E., and Stuart J. Fiedel. 2006. “New Radiocarbon Dates for the Clovis Component of the Anzick Site, Park County, Montana.” In Paleoindian Archaeology: A Hemispheric Perspective, edited by Juliet E. Morrow and C. Gnecco, 123–138. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
  9. ^ Sutton, Mark Q. (2018-07-03). "Paleoindian-Era Osseous Rods: Distribution, Dating, and Function". PaleoAmerica. 4 (3): 183–201. doi:10.1080/20555563.2018.1525600. ISSN 2055-5563.
  10. ^ Oppenheimer, Stephen (et al.). 2014. Solutrean Hypothesis: Genetics, The Mammoth in the Room. World Archaeology Volume 46(5): 752-774
  11. ^ a b Buikstra, Jane E.; Ubelaker, Douglas H. (1994). Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History. Arkansas Archaeological Report Research Series. ISBN 978-1563490750.
  12. ^ Reich, David; et al. (August 16, 2012). "Reconstructing Native American population history". Nature. 488 (7411): 370–374. Bibcode:2012Natur.488..370R. doi:10.1038/nature11258. PMC 3615710. PMID 22801491.
  13. ^ Meltzer, David J. (2009). First Peoples in the New World. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 188.
  14. ^ Peterson, Barbara Bennett (2011). Peopling of the Americas : Currents, Canoes, and DNA. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  15. ^ a b Jobling, Mark; et al. (2013). Human Evolutionary Genetics. Garland Science. ISBN 978-0815341482.
  16. ^ Martin, Debra L.; Harrod, Ryan P.; Pérez, Ventura R. (2013). Bioarchaeology: An Integrated Approach to Working with Human Remains. New York: Springer. pp. 32–36. ISBN 978-1461463788.
  17. ^ "Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act". www.nps.gov. Retrieved 2015-04-05.
  • White, Samuel Stockton V. 2015. M.A. Thesis: "The Anzick Site: Cultural Balance and the Treatment of Ancient Human Remains (Toward a Collaborative Standard)." Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, Missoula, MT: University of Montana, ScholarWorks, Graduate School. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5415&context=etd
  • White, Samuel Stockton V. 2019 Ph.D. Dissertation "THE ANZICK ARTIFACTS: A HIGH-TECHNOLOGY FORAGER TOOL ASSEMBLAGE" (2019). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11338. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11338
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anzick-1&oldid=1256443515"