User talk:ChiefjusticeDS
| This article was nominated for deletion on January 12th 2012.
The result of the discussion was Delete.
|
|||
FUCK YOU CHIEF
Seriously, you flounce off dramatically, ban Moardildoes and don't even ban me for a second? FUCK YOU MAN, you used to be cool. And it's coming up to MINCE PIE SEASON. Asshole. I'm going to bug 'Dillo on Facebook to abuse his 'crat powers and temporarily re-op me just so I can ban the fuck out of you. Or eat a ham and cheese toastie. One or the other.
In other news: bye Chief. --UU - natter 
Congratulations! You are still on our list![edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
Anton (talk) 10:01, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
Constantly changing and not evolving newspaper - the UnSignpost[edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
Anton (talk) 17:20, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
Islam[edit]
Hello
could you please kindly remove the pages on Islam and its related pages like Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him Jesus, peace be upon him Allah and so on. these are really offensive and hurtful, and as rational human beings we should respect others beliefs. uncyclopedia has some funny stuff but it mocks a lot of religions and beliefs, id really like to have this removed and im sure many feel the same, thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ssj-noodles1994 (talk • contribs)
- On this topic, I feel I can respond in place of the Chief. Islam and the related pages are not going anywhere. Thank you for noticing that Uncyclopedia "mocks a lot of religions and beliefs." As this was your first edit anywhere, it gives the impression that you are not here to help us write humorous content but to claim that stuff is "offensive and hurtful." To that claim, sir, please go pound sand. Spıke Ѧ 16:00 6-Nov-13
- Anton, Ssj's request was not that we look for offensive text but that we cease to have articles on religion and founders of religion; that is, that we stop being Uncyclopedia. This request does not deserve that we look for a way to go halfway. Spıke Ѧ 19:49 6-Nov-13
- I cannot object. Anton (talk) 20:00, November 6, 2013 (UTC)
- If you can write funny stuff about Islam without being offensive as was done with Jews then if it is funny enough with a vote from the community it could replace what is there. But doing this without consensus is a definite no no. This site's purpose is to be funny not to be politically correct. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 20:51, November 6, 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't even realise there was an apple based slam product. • Puppy's talk page • 10:55 06 Nov 2013
Thank you for your responses anyway. I hope one day we will be able to cut out behavior like this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.219.118.2 (talk • contribs) 09:39, November 7, 2013
Who said 'late'?[edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
The last UnSignpost of the year[edit]
Happy New Year![edit]
And welcome back, even if for only a moment. Do drop by more often. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:04, January 9, 2014 (UTC)
If[edit]
You still want to contribute here, please, you can help to choose Forum:Top Ten Articles of 2013! But I am not forcing you in any way, in case you can't or don't want to. Anton (talk) 12:27, January 20, 2014 (UTC)
The first UnSignpost of the year[edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
That time I was nearly caught reading the UnSignpost, so now I am delivering it to you! Have a nice time reading it! Anton (talk) 19:49, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
90s[edit]
Thanks for the Pee Review on the 1990s article. Feel free to make any edits/improvements if you wish. Also, about the list of shows: do you think I should delete any shows that don't have articles here? I was thinking about it, but I know many of these shows are often name-dropped and form a crucial part of "90s" culture, even if they don't have articles. And what do you think of the "Music" section? I wrote that section as a parody of "90s kids" who think they were the last generation to listen to REAL music like the Beatles (not that sissy Justin Gayber crap).--EpicWinner (talk) 20:40, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm more than happy to make a few changes to the article. The thing about the lists is that they aren't amusing on their own, lists can be funny but they have to have something that merits that, we want to avoid just listing TV shows that are name dropped. Perhaps we could select a couple and talk about them at a bit more length. The article doesn't have to cover everything connected to the 90's or we'll be there all day, it only has to be funny, we could do that by mentioning lots of TV shows or none. I'll make a couple of changes to that section to show you what I'm getting at, then you can have a read and see what you think. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:49, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Which shows do you think warrant a mention?--EpicWinner (talk) 21:02, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- I've made a change to the television section to illustrate what I mean. It could be expanded to discuss other shows but I was struggling to do so without repeating myself. I only mention a couple of shows but that could easily be remedied. I've focussed the text on speaking about 90's television in general using a single show as example. I'm sure we could put in some others if you really want to. I think you need to be more general about things and speak more about the style of television broadcasting than individual shows. What are your thoughts? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 21:32, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Nice job. What about some info about the 90s shows on Nick, CN, and Disney Channel? Those channels are usually brought up when people talk about the 90s, and how good they used to be. I have to admit, since I'm technically not a "90s kid" (despite watching re-runs of 90s shows) it's a bit hard to write about the decade in general.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:58, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- I'd be very cautious about just listing shows, less is more in this regard. If you're just listing shows and have very little to say about them then it's better to leave them out entirely rather than include them just for the sake of including them. It's not necessary to know everything about the 90's to write about them. If you're struggling have a look at the wikipedia page for ideas and then adapt those to fit your article. You're making some good improvements, but I still think some of the filler material should be removed. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:58, March 21, 2014 (UTC)
- How's the article look now? Feel free to make edits/improvements.--EpicWinner (talk) 23:14, March 21, 2014 (UTC)
- I'd be very cautious about just listing shows, less is more in this regard. If you're just listing shows and have very little to say about them then it's better to leave them out entirely rather than include them just for the sake of including them. It's not necessary to know everything about the 90's to write about them. If you're struggling have a look at the wikipedia page for ideas and then adapt those to fit your article. You're making some good improvements, but I still think some of the filler material should be removed. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:58, March 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Nice job. What about some info about the 90s shows on Nick, CN, and Disney Channel? Those channels are usually brought up when people talk about the 90s, and how good they used to be. I have to admit, since I'm technically not a "90s kid" (despite watching re-runs of 90s shows) it's a bit hard to write about the decade in general.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:58, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- I've made a change to the television section to illustrate what I mean. It could be expanded to discuss other shows but I was struggling to do so without repeating myself. I only mention a couple of shows but that could easily be remedied. I've focussed the text on speaking about 90's television in general using a single show as example. I'm sure we could put in some others if you really want to. I think you need to be more general about things and speak more about the style of television broadcasting than individual shows. What are your thoughts? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 21:32, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Which shows do you think warrant a mention?--EpicWinner (talk) 21:02, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
WTF IT'S CHIEF[edit]
I know you... You are the one that sucks, right? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 20:44, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
- I sometimes blow as well. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:45, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
Funnybony[edit]
Since Funnybony today has asserted his desire to be the only Uncyclopedian permitted to censor posts on his talk page, I will provide background here. He submitted to UnNews, then to VFH, UnNews:Abby Martin ‘non-notable’ Wikipedia ban boosts notability, and made it clear on VFH that the main purpose of this news was to provide ammunition ("independent" proof of notability) to push a debate at Wikipedia. On that basis — that it pimped Uncyclopedia — I moved it off UnNews and into his userspace. Later, I VFH'd the Satanic Verses article to welcome a newbie, and Funnybony decided that its title could not be named on his talk page or linked to in an article. That is all. Spıke Ѧ 21:58 20-Mar-14
- I have left a note on your talkpage about the issues. Hopefully that will be the end of it. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 22:04, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
Hello![edit]
Great to see you back! Is there a specific issue with the 'new' review template or is it just that you prefer the old one? If you don't like something, it could be fixed. How are you anyway? Anton (talk) 12:13, March 21, 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see what this is about or an edit the Chief made — Give us a link? Chief, during your absence, we debated and endorsed an optional, less rigorous format for reviewing articles. Spıke Ѧ 12:26 21-Mar-14
- Also: Paint thinner, as I recall. Spıke Ѧ 13:49 21-Mar-14
I'm mildly enthused to see you back[edit]
So lets all have a bowl of Regular K ;) ;) ;) --ShabiDOO 02:48, March 22, 2014 (UTC)
- That sounds incredibly average. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 06:21, March 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Meh. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- Meh. -- Sir Mhaille
Rollbacks with custom change summary[edit]
I saw that you were undoing users' edits rather than reverting them and so I thought that maybe you don't know about the tool that allows you to revert while leaving a change summary. It is described at UN:HAX#Custom_change_summary. Anton (talk) 08:00, March 24, 2014 (UTC)
- You young people and your newfangled ideas and tools. I remember when rollback was an anonymous exercise in confidence destruction. I don't really think the tool would be that much faster, but thanks for letting me know about it. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 09:11, March 24, 2014 (UTC)
Great to see your footsteps...[edit]
...and thanks for walking them to the faces in the cloud voting page. Appreciated. I missed your and UU's eating contest at Christmas, did you participate in private? Aleister 11:14 24-3-14
- There was nothing formal, but then there's nothing formal about eating mince pies without using your hands. I feel certain I must have won at heart disease this year. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 13:15, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
Police[edit]
In lieu of a Pee Review: I proofread your first draft, which was completely different and ought to live on, for example, as Police orientation. The current draft is more encyclopedia-ish. Nothing requires rework; it would benefit from a little more proofreading. (Set off time/place clauses with a comma and be sure to use full stop at the end of a complete thought.) But a large subset of this article is a type of humor that the rest isn't. In the US, newspaper columns that summarize police reports are called the Police blotter and this could be a home for that stuff. Nothing better, to pad our page count, than to set out to write an article and wind up writing three! I disagree with your comment at Pee Review that the existing page was "a bit schizophrenic"; it was simply ranty. (The fact that it wasn't entirely ranty might be schizophrenic, but surely it was ranty Anons who will continue to be drawn to an article entitled Police.) I think you should use VFD and point to your replacement instead of just replacing the entire article. Spıke Ѧ 12:52 25-Mar-14
- Thanks for the comments, I tend to get a bit carried away when I'm writing and my thoughts of proofreading are dropped off a cliff to be smashed to bits on the jagged rocks below. I am ever the hypocrite as I recommend careful proofreading in my reviews all the time. Perhaps I will resurrect the original first draft at some point, the problem is that I set out with specific ideas for the article in mind and after getting half-way through the first attempt I felt that I wasn't able to make the points I wanted and keep the same style. Your comment "a large subset of this article is a type of humor that the rest isn't" - is that a criticism or is it merely an observation? I'm happy to change things if I've not been consistent, I was quite eager to include a lot of jokes from the first draft so may have let my consistency lapse in places.
- I replaced the original article as I felt that mine was a lot better and didn't anticipate any argument with that point, VFD seemed an unnecessary delay to putting a better article in mainspace. I can't really decide on this myself, it being my own work, if you feel that the site is best served by putting the old version on VFD and asking if it should be replaced with mine then I will do that instead. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 13:29, March 25, 2014 (UTC)
I don't mind the "inconsistency," as any article's History section is necessarily different from the sections dealing with the subject in the modern day; only meant to suggest that you might have two articles for the price of one. And I too feel that your article (or articles) is better than the "ranty" original, and that there would be no dispute about it, but VFD with its notification and one-day wait should be the standard when discarding an entire page of a past writer's work. 14:11 PS--And I don't think the original author of this one cares. For future reference only. Spıke Ѧ 14:48 25-Mar-14
Fuck the Police[edit]
And in other news... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Phwoooar! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 13:30, March 25, 2014 (UTC)
My, you have been busy[edit]
Heya Chief. How have you been? I think it is high time for me to become active again. Anything that needs doing around here, and where I might be able to lend a hand? I need to get back into this wiki thing... --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 22:26, March 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Greetings stout fellow! Hope you are well. There's a few pee reviews that need doing that have been on the queue for almost a year, if you fancy those. Otherwise we're short of VFH voters and people to clean-up articles. If those don't take your fancy I'll be casting around for a new article to do soon and would be happy to collaborate on one, but it's really up to you to help out as you'd like. It's excellent to see you editing again. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 06:19, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Awesome stuff, I will see if I can at least do one or two Pee-reviews. Just gotta figure out how it all works again. Hopefully I will be back in swing soon! Looking forward to seeing your next article, though. --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 10:26, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- You could give me an opinion on my rewrite of Police? I just replaced the mainspace version with it. I've been looking for thoughts as to how good/bad/average it is. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 10:40, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- I just noticed it over at the PEE-review, yes. Would you like a whole Pee-review, and if so, where can I post it? On the article talk page, or somewhere else. Man, it has been a long time. --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 10:45, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- If you're up for doing the pee review I would be eternally grateful. No need to post it anywhere, click on the "do full review" link, fill in the sections and hit save. I'm watching the page so I'll be able to find it when you're done. Any comments or suggestions you could offer are appreciated. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:02, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Right. I will do it in my Sandbox first, just to make sure I don't break anything and upset all the admins right away. I will try to have it done by the end of the (UK) day, so that it is not rushed. --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 11:08, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Take your time. Thanks. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:12, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Right. I will do it in my Sandbox first, just to make sure I don't break anything and upset all the admins right away. I will try to have it done by the end of the (UK) day, so that it is not rushed. --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 11:08, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- If you're up for doing the pee review I would be eternally grateful. No need to post it anywhere, click on the "do full review" link, fill in the sections and hit save. I'm watching the page so I'll be able to find it when you're done. Any comments or suggestions you could offer are appreciated. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:02, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- I just noticed it over at the PEE-review, yes. Would you like a whole Pee-review, and if so, where can I post it? On the article talk page, or somewhere else. Man, it has been a long time. --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 10:45, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- You could give me an opinion on my rewrite of Police? I just replaced the mainspace version with it. I've been looking for thoughts as to how good/bad/average it is. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 10:40, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Awesome stuff, I will see if I can at least do one or two Pee-reviews. Just gotta figure out how it all works again. Hopefully I will be back in swing soon! Looking forward to seeing your next article, though. --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 10:26, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- A delayed congratz on the Police's feature. That article was really a job well done. --BlueSpiritGuy (talk) 08:36, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
Paramedic[edit]
Thanks for the pic. I had wanted to open with that logo, but had not thought along the lines of that excellent caption. Spıke Ѧ 12:04 26-Mar-14
banned[edit]
Thanks, if you hadn't done the ban thing I wouldn't have caught my mistake. I thought that Romartus had added to the hos total, so took one off, and then I realized that his add-on was from a couple of weeks ago. Saved by the toll! Aleister 14:27 26-3-14
- You're welcome. I'll ban you any time and any place. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 07:18, March 27, 2014 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Democratic Oligarchy[edit]
Thanks a mucho Chief! Great review. Sorry about the article I wrote it back in the noob days mainly as a hasty re-write to replace the crap original version. One of those articles where I had one idea, wrote it down and then had no idea how to ellaborate on it. Also if you really are back in business (and you do seem to be) then maybe you might consider popping round for a cup of tea at my place. Father Ted's on the box and I can show you my collection of British politics articles and the template I made connecting them on my mantlepiece - there's still some red link gaps that need filling! Cheerio! Sir ScottPat (converse) 
PS - Check out revamped version of UnSignpost and re-started VFP! Sir ScottPat (converse)
QVFD poopsmith[edit]
I am a poopsmith over at VFD, and SPIKE suggested I become the poopsmith if QVFD too. I thought it was a good idea. And he pointed me here to ask you if I could do the maintenance thing. 
- I see no reason why not, it's fairly self explanatory. Enjoy! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 07:20, March 27, 2014 (UTC)
The UnSignpost is back from holiday[edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
We have not forgotten about you (yet)! Anton (talk) 15:57, March 28, 2014 (UTC)
Two Fucking Hundred![edit]
Holy cockwombles Chiefy, that's some serious reviewin' there. I salute and applaud you, and raise my mug o' reviewin'-strength tea in your direction. Shame we never made an award that would be befitting of such a glorious achievement, but them's the breaks son. You done good! --UU - natter
- UU, it means most coming from you. We did make an award, it's this one: the Outstanding Outhouse. I took the liberty of awarding it to myself and shaking my own hand on an achievement that has overwhelmed both of me. Hope you are well. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 10:10, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Smug gits, the both of you... • Puppy's talk page • 02:52 pm 29 Mar 2014
Thanks for the second pee review[edit]
I did need some inspiration on some of those stagnant articles. By the way could you have a look at this? Thanks. Sir ScottPat (converse)
File:Gibbet.jpg[edit]
Yesterday, Anon changed the File page to claim that this illustration is copyrighted. That doesn't prove it's so, but if it is, we cannot use it here. He should have gone to Wikia, who would have pulled it, and there is no easy way for us to ask him to document his claim. It's used in 2 places on the site. Spıke Ѧ 13:22 31-Mar-14
- If he goes through the proper channels to prove it is a copyrighted piece of work then we will remove it. Otherwise it can and should remain, I'll comment to that effect on the IP's talk page. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 16:43, March 31, 2014 (UTC)
That did the trick, if he sees it. Spıke Ѧ 12:55 2-Apr-14
You Are Gay on VFD[edit]
As the overwhelming opinion (though not 5-vote consensus) is that this article is crap, and your opposing vote is mostly to retain it for rework, why don't you just take it? or more legally, work on it in place as in the case of a "VFD Save"? Also ask dissenting voter Anton199 what he found so funny about the original one. Spıke Ѧ 12:53 2-Apr-14
- "You, <insert name here>, were born several years ago and now you are gay."
- "And that also goes for the dyke right there that just said “I’m not a boy." You’re gay too."
- And a lot of the FAQs. Anton (talk) 15:30, April 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Although I don't like the 'dyke' at the beginning. Anton (talk) 12:04, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm rewriting Death at the moment, so won't get round to this one for a while. Just shift it to my userspace and I'll work on it there. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:51, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
No, remains in mainspace for the month based on deadlock at VFD. Work on it at your leisure. Spıke Ѧ 22:43 3-Apr-14
- As an aside - the only place I've ever found the use of the word "dyke" useful is when using it for the lesbian/water dam pun. And I think I've only used it on Number Bases locally. You also have the "lemon" fruit/lesbian/faulty thing pun that could work, and has more flexibility, and is less offensive. Which I find odd, because the reason why the term came into use was as it suggested that lovers of Sappho were in some way faulty. If you want to go for someone trying to be offensive, then "carpet muncher" is the way to go, much the same as "pillow biter" or "fudge packer". And due to a Freudian slip from several years ago, I've always wanted to do a lover of Sappho/lover of Satchmo joke, especially if it's followed by a wp:scat music/excrement joke. I still can't listen to "It's a wonderful world" without giggling like a 13 year old. • Puppy's talk page • 12:37 am 10 Apr 2014
Could you please[edit]
Put this on your userpage?
 Nominated Reviewer of the MonthThis user has been nominated for Reviewer of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate any helpful reviewers at Reviewer of the Month.
|
Anton (talk) 18:44, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
Ah, I just noticed there haven't been any reviews in April and the rules are clear on the point... But you were planning to review something this week, no? Anton (talk) 18:47, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
IPod Car[edit]
Thank you very much, once again! You managed to summarise the things that couldn't be summarised and I feel I know what I should do, which could be a good sign!
I would certainly be proud of that page if I had written it, but even though I made it look like advertising and added a bit of content, the ideas and the jokes were not mine. But this doesn't change the fact that I would love to see it featured. Thanks for making your own version, I will be very willing to steal it! It is very helpful, and even though I thought the article needed some suspense before the reader could understand that the iPod Car is "simply a car that is linked into an iPod", I'll still find ways to make it better, according to what you said. Anton (talk) 12:54, April 4, 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 14:56, April 4, 2014 (UTC)
Death on VFD[edit]
I am reluctant to blow away a non-horrible article, Chronarion or no Chronarion, based on an Uncyclopedian's assertion that he would like to do it differently. Your article is fine, is more encyclopedic, and ought to be our main article on Death. But can you find a way for the old one to live on somewhere? Perhaps at Mr. Death or some name reflecting its casting as a living [sic] character? Spıke Ѧ 23:16 4-Apr-14
- The article itself isn't great, had I thought it was when I read it I would not have rewritten it entirely. I have no issue preserving it in some way be that through moving the article to another title or a subpage linked from the article itself. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 05:52, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
Formerly on the VFD ballot[edit]
- Can you please keep the first three paragraphs and the picture (intro). Those were the ones written by Chronium (or whatever his name is) the day after he founded the site, so are historically interesting, like the first stuff written by Shakespeare if he'd put up a blog (hmmmmm, an article idea!). All the rest is better replaced by yours. On my userpage here I used to have the first picture uploaded and used on uncy, and asked people to guess what it was. Puppy finally got it, and won no prize! Thanks. Aleister whoops, almost signed my real name, I type these things out every time and haven't done that yet 14:26 4-4-14
- Meaning no disrespect to Chronarion the beginning doesn't really fit with the rewrite. If Chron's immortal words (and image) must be preserved surely they can be preserved on a subpage that I can link to in the see also section in the interest of posterity. Fair deal? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 14:54, April 4, 2014 (UTC)
- How about including the section at the bottom, with some appropriate bridge from your ending to that one? It's not about Chronarion (I never could remember the name), but about uncyclopedia history. If that bridge idea totally doesn't work a subpage would be fine, with a nice write-up on the See also about the "history of death on uncyclopedia" or some name. Aleister 16:35 4-4-14
- How did this end up here, I thought we stopped that practice. This was in the comment section on VFD where we are allowed to have discussions and talks, no matter how long, because they affect the votes of other people. Comments are comments about the VFD nom, and ought to stay where they were put, imnho. Aleister 11:47 6-4-14
- It ended up here because I moved it. The Chief is rewriting this, and both of us have advice on the disposition of the original, which belongs on his (or the article's) talk page, not inside a ballot. As last time: See Uncyclopedia:What VFD is not, Sec. 2, Not a talk page. Spıke Ѧ 12:12 6-Apr-14
- How did this end up here, I thought we stopped that practice. This was in the comment section on VFD where we are allowed to have discussions and talks, no matter how long, because they affect the votes of other people. Comments are comments about the VFD nom, and ought to stay where they were put, imnho. Aleister 11:47 6-4-14
- How about including the section at the bottom, with some appropriate bridge from your ending to that one? It's not about Chronarion (I never could remember the name), but about uncyclopedia history. If that bridge idea totally doesn't work a subpage would be fine, with a nice write-up on the See also about the "history of death on uncyclopedia" or some name. Aleister 16:35 4-4-14
- Meaning no disrespect to Chronarion the beginning doesn't really fit with the rewrite. If Chron's immortal words (and image) must be preserved surely they can be preserved on a subpage that I can link to in the see also section in the interest of posterity. Fair deal? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 14:54, April 4, 2014 (UTC)
Ballot closed[edit]
You have a mandate to replace the page; please add your own {{Oldvfd}}s explaining what happened if the original people should return. Spıke Ѧ 11:41 12-Apr-14
- Cheers mate. I'm without a proper computer until tomorrow evening. I will make the necessary changes then. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 10:52, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
What happens if you do them on an improper computer? Spıke Ѧ 10:56 13-Apr-14
- That's like asking what would happen if you didn't wear a tie and top hat while editing: anarchy, fire and brimstone falling from the sky, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 14:05, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
90s pt. 2[edit]
Chiefjustice, could you perhaps help add some content/make improvements to the 1990s article? I would really like to see it become a FA.--EpicWinner (talk) 05:44, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
- I have very limited internet access until the 13th of April. I don't mind helping, but it won't be until then. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 05:53, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
- How about now?--EpicWinner (talk) 17:05, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
- It's on my list of things to look at. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 10:35, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
- How about now?--EpicWinner (talk) 17:05, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
North African Campaign[edit]
Thanks to your wonderful pee review I have re-written and expanded this article. Please take a look if you wish to! Thanks. Sir ScottPat (converse)
VFS[edit]
Puppy asks me on my talk page to close down VFS as it is far short of its +5 for the current month. Would you do this the right way? Spıke Ѧ 22:30 14-Apr-14
MediaWiki:Sitenotice id[edit]
Your new Sitenotice doesn't go out unless the "id" is incremented, as I just did. That (and the cookie) is how we get it to appear once only. Spıke Ѧ 11:51 16-Apr-14
- Whoops! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:54, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
No thumbnail? C'mon! Spıke Ѧ 14:18 16-Apr-14
- There aren't any thumbnails of Zebra's being punched! I looked! I'm probably on some sort of government watchlist now! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 14:56, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
90s (again)[edit]
Do you have Internet access now? If so, are you able to help me with the 1990s article? Sorry if I'm a little annoying; I would just really like to see it reach FA status.--EpicWinner (talk) 20:52, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, my apologies. I will have a look at it over the next few days. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 05:23, April 17, 2014 (UTC)
- I dabbled a bit at "The Simpsons" to change the "dominant trend" of the decade from civility to really crappy cartoon artwork (culminating, by the way, with Sponge Bob). One thing that struck me in the vicinity of this is that you seem to be trying to serve two masters: not just writing funny stuff but recording your serious reminisces of the decade, especially in the list of TV shows. Unless mention of a given show feeds a joke, it ought not to be included. Spıke Ѧ 01:31 19-Apr-14
Awards[edit]
Thank you! You cannot (or maybe you can, but that would spoil my sentence) imagine what an effect (a positive one) it made on me to see the three award templates on my userpage after one day of absence! Anton (talk) 19:11, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. Keep up the good work. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 06:18, April 20, 2014 (UTC)
Minitrue[edit]
Thanks for all your comments (once again)! I should probably stop asking Pee Reviews for a while and start making actual changes.
It was helpful to know what you thought of the article, the first main draft was a lot shorter and so I was not sure if that amount of content was enough to draw the reader in and then draw him out. I will certainly add more, especially after all your suggestions!
What concerns images, the Stalin ones are not the same, which I now realise, is not something obvious. On one of them he is walking with a man, named Yezhov, on the other one he is walking without him (because he was executed) - this an actual example of how the government modified the truth, which I hope is relevant to the theme of my article.
Do you think making the images bigger and putting them one right after another will make a difference?
I see what you mean by "untidy" at the end and I will certainly ask Puppy, because I used most of the code he put into Microsoft Knowledge Base and adapted it for Minitrue. Again, thank you, and I am surprised at how the quality of your reviews can be so high despite their great amount! Anton (talk) 16:56, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
- I did notice my mistake and edited the review to reflect it, unfortunately I didn't notice until five hours after I'd posted the review. Making the images bigger, doing as you suggest, or perhaps referring to them briefly in the text might be helpful. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:06, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
- OK. I see you chose the same theme for your new article! Anton (talk) 17:31, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Yes! I had that many ideas from reading yours I had to go and try myself. Any comments at this early stage? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:33, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
- I see the article has already passed its early stage! I!'ve written a reviewLITE, so it is easier to separate from the rest of the comments.
- Yes! I had that many ideas from reading yours I had to go and try myself. Any comments at this early stage? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:33, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
- OK. I see you chose the same theme for your new article! Anton (talk) 17:31, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Voilà! I hope this helps you! Anton (talk) 20:09, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's a lot more than I was anticipating. I'll have another look at the bits you mention, which seem to be the bits that try to ape the two minutes hate parts from the novel. The government in Oceania devotes very little time to persuasion and more time to reinforcing and policing the attitudes and thoughts of the people who live there. That being said, I will see if I can put in a few more Goldstein references and will have a go at editing the two minutes hate bit. It saddens me that you were disappointed by the article, so I'll do what I can to change that. Thanks very much. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 05:41, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
- No, I was not disappointed by it! There are some bits that could be improved upon, but even if you consider this as a final version, it is something very good. My thoughts about the two minutes hate are that you are imitating the citizens more than the government, because those who proclaimed Goldstein a traitor probably did not feel that way about him. It needed to be extremely clever to achieve that sort of dominance. Also, you say that "the government in Oceania devotes very little time to persuasion" and yet at the end, O'Brien's dialogue with Smith is pure rhetorics. At the end of the book, I myself was almost convinced by what he said. I think the level of the obedience of the citizens is achieved thanks to such persuasion. Anton (talk) 15:46, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
- At risk of turning this into a very literary discussion, I disagree that what O'Brien does to Winston is persuasion. He is educating Winston, curing him of his insanity by making him love Big Brother. His manner of doing it is to show Winston the truth about the party, demonstrate its superiority and wholly destroy the rebellious feelings Winston harbours towards the it. Power is sought for power's sake there is no need to persuade the populace to believe it because they have either been educated to believe it or believe it out of fear. The party itself does very little to convert minds to its cause, they control the past, present and future, there is no need to persuade anybody they are right because nobody remembers a time when all records did not say that they were. That is my impression of it anyway. I take your point about the article and will have a look at it soon. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:18, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
- No, I was not disappointed by it! There are some bits that could be improved upon, but even if you consider this as a final version, it is something very good. My thoughts about the two minutes hate are that you are imitating the citizens more than the government, because those who proclaimed Goldstein a traitor probably did not feel that way about him. It needed to be extremely clever to achieve that sort of dominance. Also, you say that "the government in Oceania devotes very little time to persuasion" and yet at the end, O'Brien's dialogue with Smith is pure rhetorics. At the end of the book, I myself was almost convinced by what he said. I think the level of the obedience of the citizens is achieved thanks to such persuasion. Anton (talk) 15:46, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
Good[edit]
...to hear from you again. I'm not around much and occasionally start an article and then give up due to lack of time etc. But since you asked, I think the last thing I troubled myself to finish, illustrate and polish a bit was The_Doctor_is_IN --Sog1970 (talk) 15:28, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
pee[edit]
Hi Chief,
I was about to do a pee on that article but I see that it's on VFH. I'd still be happy to do it...just let me know if you still would like me to. --ShabiDOO 18:10, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
- VFH is not a barrier to improvement. It'd be excellent to see how I can improve it. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 18:31, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Done. By the way...you're a great guy and everything and I don't want to lose you know being able to hang out with you and everything but I think I'd like to be just friends. Okay? --ShabiDOO 17:36, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
- You give with one hand and take with the other... Thanks I guess. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:54, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Also... A ballcock is a valve in the cistern of your toilet. They exist all over the world! I think you need to spend a bit more time with your head in the toilet cistern and a little less time out in the fresh air. Romartus is a man of the world, I bet he knows what it is. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:59, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
- I know that as a float valve. I would imagine a lot of non-brits will have no idea what a ball-cock is. Though hey...maybe that's a good thing. In response to what you said on my talk page...yeah I'd happily look over it once you're done again. Take your time and let me know. --ShabiDOO 19:02, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
- A float valve? Nonsense on stilts! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:07, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
- I know that as a float valve. I would imagine a lot of non-brits will have no idea what a ball-cock is. Though hey...maybe that's a good thing. In response to what you said on my talk page...yeah I'd happily look over it once you're done again. Take your time and let me know. --ShabiDOO 19:02, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Done. By the way...you're a great guy and everything and I don't want to lose you know being able to hang out with you and everything but I think I'd like to be just friends. Okay? --ShabiDOO 17:36, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
90s pt. 4[edit]
Sorry to annoy you, but you said you would help edit the 1990s article "over the next few days." How long will that be?--EpicWinner (talk) 21:38, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Today is the day! I have been getting round to it, alas I do not strictly regulate my leisure time. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 05:45, April 25, 2014 (UTC)
The Toes of Justice Avoided[edit]
Thanks for the info Chief, I sort of assumed as much and uploaded with a different name a few minutes later. So out of interest will your signature ever feature a reference to the dreaded 32X? 
- It does now! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:13, April 25, 2014 (UTC)
What a mess[edit]
VFD Poopsmith Nick123 apologized for an Internet outage, and then wandered away again. I have been doing some of it; if you are going to do some too, then we have changed the procedure slightly, as Puppy's automation project and Archive button creates new sections at the end of the Archive file. Spıke Ѧ 02:52 27-Apr-14
Have you forgotten about the UnSignpost's anniversary?[edit]
Anton (talk) 17:29, May 20, 2014 (UTC)
An honest to goodness joke ban![edit]
Goddamn. I think I should award you something that only becomes more appropriate with each passing day. You may already have one - if so, sit this next to it and fool it into thinking you had a mirror put in. --UU - natter
|
Under-used Ninjastar I award you an under-used Ninjastar. Rust may have dulled its cutting edge, but it is still a potent symbol. Yes. – UU.
|
Ruddy Hell...it's Harry and the UnSignpost![edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
Sir ScottPat (converse)
Hello hello[edit]
Hi Chief! How are you? And where is your Papers Please article, which we all want to see ready and in the mainspace? I'm still waiting. Anton (talk) 13:10, July 29, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm still thinking about it. I made a start and, as with most of my article ideas, read it back the next day and screamed in impotent frustration and rage at how terrible it was. I will have another look now and see what I think... --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:40, July 29, 2014 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 21:07, July 29, 2014 (UTC)
You Has a Feature[edit]
For tomorrow...add it to your tally..--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:15, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
- How absolutely topping. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 06:36, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
Why DS?[edit]
Are you a later Phoenix Wright game where he becomes head of the supreme court? What's his position on the 2nd amendment? Does he object? --Nikau (talk) 19:46, September 21, 2014 (UTC)
- OBJECTION! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 16:35, September 22, 2014 (UTC)
Hello hello[edit]
Is there a chance we'll see you write for this PLS? Or, at least, help judge it? I would love to read anymore of your articles. Anton (talk) 20:00, September 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Glad somebody does! I will see what I can do, I can certainly do some judgery if I'm not able to do any scribbling. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 16:35, September 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Or painting and decorating! --
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:40, September 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Judging has already started! (And is supposed to have been already finished, only this is Uncyclopedia and one of the judges is myself, so that explains everything.) Sorry, for not telling you earlier, I didn't have much time. If you don't have much time either or just don't feel like doing the full judging, you can just score one category. It's as you wish! Anton (talk) 12:28, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Or painting and decorating! --
Pee Week 2014[edit]
Hi Chief! I am planning on organizing a Pee Week, that'll start next Saturday. It would be great if you took part in reviewing or judging (judging will take place from Nov 21 to 28 or around that), but if you can't, I understand. In any case, could you, please, unprotect Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pee Week, so I can work on it? Thanks! Anton (talk) 14:13, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
- I have unprotected the page. I'll see what I can do in terms of judging or reviewing, can't make any promises but I will do what I can. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 14:20, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
Here's a very special UnSignpost[edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
Anton (talk) 17:45, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
Power[edit]
I was going to suggest Tyrone Power and Powers Boothe for your article . And you missed the Duracell Bunny!! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:49, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Neither of them have power. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:55, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Like the song then. --
- Like the song then. --
Blocks[edit]
So you blocked a bunch of people, and now the admins are going around blocking each other and Spike has vanished into thin air. What horrors have you unleashed? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 01:14 12 November 2014
- Banbanbanbanbanban. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 07:42, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Too much inhaled wallpaper paste and The Chief is a different man. I think Spike has taken a short break after 365/24 patrolling for the past year. --
- Too much inhaled wallpaper paste and The Chief is a different man. I think Spike has taken a short break after 365/24 patrolling for the past year. --
- Gasp! But I get the same feeling too. Could this be the beginning of the End of the Internet? If the prophesied four Trojan Horsemen of the Apocalypse show up, you'll know it's true. Repent, sinners!
- TheCan (talk) 09:28, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Hope so, then we could all go outside and play rounders. --
- Ah rounders, so much more civilised than baseball. You had to wear shorts and there was no diving. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:50, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Hope so, then we could all go outside and play rounders. --
Ee eek[edit]
Hello Chief! Just [started] read[ing] your review of UnScripts:A Number. Thanks very much! It's funny that it irritates you: but I am sure it can't irritate you more than it irritates me (the article, not the review; and yes, I read things from the end). Anyway, I'll try to finish reading it and then I'll see what I can do.
I also wanted to ask you: do you think anything needs to be done about Pee Week and if yes, than what? It seems that it fell onto a very busy period for a lot of people (including me), and though I'll definitely finish my review, I won't be able to do much else, and it's probable same for others. And you... you're just a colossus.
So what do you think? Anton (talk) 19:55, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
- There's not much that really can be done about Pee Week, we can only hold competitions, we can't force people to participate in them. We can always hold another if it comes to that. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:59, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Do you think it can be prolongated? Oh, and I read your review. Wow, you disturbed Mrs Chief for this?! I can't be more ashamed, as it definitely doesn't deserve her attention. My regards to Mrs Chief and happy early Christmas shopping to her!
The irregular punctuation is deliberate, because in a few places in the real script commas actually come back, and then disappear again, but my joke hasn't been done well. I will definitely try to make something out of this, be it UnScript or not, so thank you for spending so much time and efforts reviewing it! Anton (talk) 17:36, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
Quick question[edit]
What's the protocol for an article that's currently being worked on? Is there a template or something? I want to edit Sonichu up to par but I can't really do it all in one sitting. --Precious Star (talk) 21:36, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
- If I may kibitz — What are you talking about? Sonichu is all yours! You correctly put {{Construction}} at the top so no Admin deletes it before you're done. (Another way to achieve this is to have created it at User:Precious Star/Sonichu.) The only "protocol" is that if you do nothing with it for a week, Uncyclopedia will alert Admins to do something about it. As you picked a user name, the worst we would do is move it to your userspace. Spıke Ѧ 22:03 20-Nov-14
- What he said. You don't even need to add the construction tag to be honest, the article is more than good enough to remain in mainspace as it is. Add the tag if you're making major changes that would strip the article down to just a few lines but otherwise just make your changes as it is. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 07:25, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if we are done or not, but here you go anyway...[edit]
This user has helped to unclog all the stale Pee hanging around Uncyclopedia by completing more in-depth reviews than any other user in Pee Week 2014.
This template can be redeemed for... nothing, but can be displayed with pride, where it is displayed with pride is your business. Want one just like it?
Despite the ve-e-ery small number of participants, you still did a great job!
Anton (talk) 14:53, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
- That template is just as awful now as when I made it! Thanks! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 18:38, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
Featured article[edit]
What's up with the whole "No featured article" thing. The main page looks ugly without one. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 04:32, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
- Never mind on that I guess. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 06:08, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
Miss me?[edit]
Miss me? 
- Always and forever. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:34, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, how sweet. Your welcome inspired me to write UnNews:Obama plans to get millions of girls (with a little help from Spikenerd).
DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:15, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, how sweet. Your welcome inspired me to write UnNews:Obama plans to get millions of girls (with a little help from Spikenerd).
The Scarlet Pimple Returns![edit]
Ah! Suddenly you re-appear. How's the decorating? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:19, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
- I can be summoned, if you are one of those to whom the words of the mystical ritual of Gee-Mayil have been entrusted. A blood sacrifice will do just as well, but is slightly less reliable. How the devil are you? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 13:03, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
- I can't speak for the devil but I am fine. The Spoon is sailin' along...--
- I can't speak for the devil but I am fine. The Spoon is sailin' along...--
Grimsby[edit]
Thanks for remembering how to do that! Spıke Ѧ 16:29 8-May-15
Royal Farts[edit]
Thanks for your suggestions on my article Royal farts. I will copy them on the walls of your bedroom. Outside your bedroom. I'm not going in. :P
- I don't have a bedroom, I sleep outside under a large rock because I am one with nature, also the rent is very reasonable. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 06:37, May 14, 2015 (UTC)
Coming Soon[edit]
I found your comments on coming soon very interesting. Could you do me favour and cut out bits of my grammatical rant? because I know it's long and mainly unfunny, but I have no idea what to take out. Also, the massive fake poster was intended for making it one of those Pages that look like the thing they're about, and I originally wanted to make it just with fancy formatting but I'm shit at that sort of thing. Anyway, I suppose the joke was to create a delay before the article, so I could either make the poster ridiculously long to make that obvious or just make what I have a normal thumbnail if that joke is more annoying than funny. Any thoughts? ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 10:26, May 16, 2015 (UTC)
First-past-the-post voting[edit]
It has taken a while, but I have addressed your judging comments, removing "butt-hurt" and adding more about international voting systems. Wikipedia has a math-oriented article that all but proves that "ninety percent of everything is crap." Spıke Ѧ 15:31 21-May-15
Facebook page[edit]
Please take a look and like our new fb page Chief. Just click the fb icon in the banner to get there. SirScott 09:35, May 22, 2015 (UTC)
Spammer[edit]
Just a heads up: User:DANEYOUSSEF is a notorious Web spammer of many wikis who always self-promotes and virtually never helps, edits, or contributes. Deleting his promotional user page wouldn't hurt. Thanks. 86.139.166.176 23:05, May 29, 2015 (UTC)
Cajek's list[edit]
hey, since I used to maintain the list before I disappeared and everyone else who's maintaining it now seems to be gone, I added a bunch of reviews to Cajek's list. sorry if that was bad of me but there was such a huge backlog and nobody else was doing anything about it that I wanted to help maintain at least a little bit of it. --HM (T) 18:08, July 30, 2015 (UTC)
- That's not a problem, I haven't done it for a long time, just been too busy and it's a job that really needed a regular contributor to manage. Anybody is welcome to poke at it or update it. Good to hear from you. --ChiefjusticeDS (talk) 06:37, August 2, 2015 (UTC)
Howdy CjDS[edit]
Howdy,
Am back from my latest 4-year non-appearance on Uncyclopedia. <friendly commentary>How did you make out whilst I was away?</friendly commentary>
Question pretty pleaseth: How do I review a copy of the original "Chick-fil-a Six-grain Buns Massacre" article as created by myself and deleted by yourself on 13:57, May 3, 2011 as confirmed here at uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Chick-fil-a_Six-grain_Buns_Massacre?action=edit&redlink=1
Not looking to re-post, just want to re-live the good ol' days when everything was funnier.
Thanking you in advance for dropping everything else in your life to pay attention to me...
Bestest wishes, knitwitted 
- Only admins can view deleted content; it's great fun. I have restored the article to your userspace - here. Now I must go, my planet needs me. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 06:18, August 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Many thank yous!! Much appreciated... And thank you keeping up with my planet! Bestest!
I have a lot of friends here! Where we chill 14:33, August 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Many thank yous!! Much appreciated... And thank you keeping up with my planet! Bestest!
- Hola! Newest question prettieth please: Could you kindly possibly restore my http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Wendius_augustus?action=edit&redlink=1 article to my userspace as well? Thanks again for your utmostest attention to my neediness! Best wishes, knit
- Hola! Newest question prettieth please: Could you kindly possibly restore my http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Wendius_augustus?action=edit&redlink=1 article to my userspace as well? Thanks again for your utmostest attention to my neediness! Best wishes, knit
Thanks[edit]
Grateful you popped by to help deal with the vandal spree. Thanks again. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:56, September 26, 2015 (UTC)
- It's what I er.. used to do. Sterling work good fellow; Spike won't notice a thing. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 12:06, September 26, 2015 (UTC)
- I remember! --
- I remember! --
Deletion[edit]
Why did you delete my user and talk page? Expert3222 (talk) 12:16, September 26, 2015 (UTC)
- They were victims of us undoing the changes made by the vandal you reported, I deleted pretty much all of his contributions but evidently forgot to restore your user pages. Fixed now. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 12:43, September 26, 2015 (UTC)
Forum:First writing competition of 2016[edit]
Modusoperandi is in and I have asked Codeine. Would you like to be a Surprise Celebrity Judge of this competition, and perhaps even break ties? Spıke 🎙️03:39 17-Jan-16
- I will step in for now but I prefer the Chief to make a return. The Anti-Moses (he'll get the joke). --
Springtime writing contest[edit]
Would you like to help judge our next writing contest? Spıke 🎙️10:22 28-Mar-16
- I normally only do writing competitions for huge cash lump sums these days. I'm kind of a big deal. I suppose I could do this one though. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:10, March 28, 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. Attached please find a picture of huge cash. Spıke 🎙️11:13 28-Mar-16
- Hail the Chief! --
- The ladies don't call me speed-of-light Chief for nothing. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 11:35, March 28, 2016 (UTC)
- Hail the Chief! --
2016 Springtime contest judging[edit]
Cripes! I see only two contest submissions: User:Chunkles/Lemonade and User:EStop/Boaty McBoatface. We are ready for your verdict. Spıke 🎙️23:52 18-Apr-16
Messsage for the Judge[edit]
Hi Chief. I know you are still around but no one talks to you anymore! Can we continue in counting you as active but hidden or inactive and touring? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:42, April 20, 2017 (UTC)
- It's a bugger isn't it? Feel free to count me as whatever you like, I am a leaf borne aloft on Autumn winds, I go hither and thither and occasionally yon. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:28, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
- Yep...er ok..so I will count you as 'present but absent on French Leave'. How did that decorating go in the end? Four years with a pot of paint and broad brush?? --
- Yep...er ok..so I will count you as 'present but absent on French Leave'. How did that decorating go in the end? Four years with a pot of paint and broad brush?? --
Chief![edit]
The lost leader returns! Can you archive your talk page? How are you doing?? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:50, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
- Yoohooo. What is archiving? Doesn't sound like anybody I know. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:41, November 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Evidently. --
- Evidently. --
Let's face it, you know what this is going to say[edit]
December 2nd. I'm only on my 5th. Am I losing my touch? --UU - natter
- Long answer:yes. Short answer:ditto. --
You were one of the goodies[edit]
:) Miley Spears Discordian American Princess (let's talk) 04:25, May 27, 2018 (UTC)
We started here the same day[edit]
Did you know we both started here the same day, 9 June 2009? Happy Anniversary! Miley Spears Discordian American Princess (let's talk) 16:43, June 2, 2018 (UTC)
- Happy Uncyclopanniversary! Alden Loveshade (talk) 02:27, June 4, 2018 (UTC)
Me Update Good[edit]
Hi, Sysop <insert name here>! I used to be honorable Uncyclopedia editor under a different name, but am now using this account as a sockpuppet so don't tell! Seriously, my time here may be limited, but I do want to help. I'm posting specifically on admin's pages because I thought about doing updates on some out-of-date pages like this. But I don't want to mess with an "officlal" page without getting some sort of permission. (Although I might re-take over I.C. just long enough to redo an article or two when nobody's looking.)
UnSignpost is back from the dead[edit]
| Home | Archives | Articles | Press Room | Subscribe |
❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 03:15 22 June 2019
Status[edit]
Hi ChiefjusticeDS. I retired you from active service as an administrator on this website. I have recommended to the British government that you are eligible for a peerage. Arise LordChiefjusticeDS. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)