User talk:Techy.Sap

Welcome!

Hello, Techy.Sap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! vghfr (✉ Talk) (✏ Contribs) 12:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your message and welcome. I want to know when I can create and publish a new article, is there any limit for number of edits to complete to be able to publish a new article. I want to work on it in my best way possible. Thanks Techy.Sap (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Techy.Sap. There are no limits on number of edits or time, so feel free to work on articles for as long as you like. Best wishes. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Thank You for your reply. Techy.Sap (talk) 06:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Techy.Sap, and welcome to Women in Red. Our Ten Simple Rules should help you to create biographies of women. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307

Online events:

New: Press women | Alphabet run U, V & W | Central and Eastern Europe

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Wikimedia CEE Spring 2024 - contest with certificates of participation and prizes
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 GOCE drive award

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Techy.Sap for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the support and award. Means a lot. I will try to contribute more next time soon. Techy.Sap (talk) 11:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:This is the logo owned by Asia Pulp & Paper for Asia Pulp & Paper.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:This is the logo owned by Asia Pulp & Paper for Asia Pulp & Paper.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes by mistakenly I uploaded wrong name while uploading. Ok Sure I would have done that today Thanks for your help Minorax Appreciated! Techy.Sap (talk) 06:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orrb (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We don't need a list of every single time Orrb was mentioned, or a technical specification sheet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orrb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Techy.Sap! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orrb has been accepted

Orrb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mdann52 (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. It means a lot I will work on it to add more content. Thank you again. Techy.Sap (talk) 12:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Orrb device by Lee McCormack.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Orrb device by Lee McCormack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mdann52 (talk) 14:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, is this file not for non-free use rationale. I have to reupload again to Commons? Not sure. I have asked in the Media copyright questions page. Techy.Sap (talk) 10:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello Techy.Sap. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Techy.Sap. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Techy.Sap|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bilby (talk) 13:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bilby,

Thanks for reaching out. I am new and active here but I am working hard to learn to edit and create pages in Wikipedia which is my work of interest, experienced editors have also helped me through the process in LiveChat & TeaHouse, even the first Wiki article I created also went through the AfC process, I choose topics which interest me and also try to edit pages which are latest but I am not sure, should I stop editing frequently same page. Please help and guide. Techy.Sap (talk) 13:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main thing you will need to do is add {{paid|user=Techy.Sap|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} to your usepage for the jobs you have done and any you might do in the future. The community asks that you mention both the name of the article and identify who you were hired by. Other than that, in general it is asked that you do not edit pages directly, but instead post edit requests to the talk pages of articles where you are being paid, and, as mentioned above, continue to use Articles for Creation, as I see you did for Orrb. Otherwise it is not easy doing paid edits, but it is possible. The main thing that becomes a problem is when people take jobs for articles or edits which don't fit Wikipedia policies, so I think that the main thing in being successful is to choose clients carefully. - Bilby (talk) 13:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joan Palmiter Bajorek (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joan Palmiter Bajorek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joan Palmiter Bajorek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joan Palmiter Bajorek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Palmiter Bajorek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]