User talk:Toweli

Welcome!

Hello, Toweli! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Happy New Year! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 18:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Toweli, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Toweli! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Invite to participate in research and earn $15

Hi Toweli,

Welcome to the Wikipedia community!

It looks like you’ve been editing here for about a month now. Did you know that Artificial Intelligences (AIs) support Wikipedia? I’m personally contacting a small handful of new Wikipedia editors to make sure your voice is heard as we build and refine these AIs.

Will you please provide an interview to share your thoughts about AI on Wikipedia? You don’t need any special knowledge on the topic going into the interview. It will only take about 30 minutes over phone or video chat. We will send you a $15 Amazon gift card as a way to thank you for your time.

I am working in collaboration with Wikimedia Foundation staff to do this research, so if you decide to participate, your opinion could help build the future of Wikipedia. Hope to talk to you soon!

PS. You can learn more about our study here.

Best, Bowen, aka Bobo.03 (talk) 23:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Bully Old Pal!

america Vista9240 (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

"Arzinoa" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arzinoa. Since you had some involvement with the Arzinoa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk) 04:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arzinoa

A tag has been placed on Arzinoa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Glades12 (talk) 13:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gneomar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gniewomir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Sultan Haitham bin Tariq

May I ask why do you insist on keeping your article on that page? It’s insulting to our current sultan Sultan159 (talk) 23:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Per WP:5P2 and WP:YESPOV, articles are supposed to provide differing points of view. I do agree that the article could have some other major sources, Omani or Western, supporting either characterization of his tenure in government prior to becoming Sultan of Oman. However, a source must not be removed if it says something negative about a person. I'd also like to mention that the line that you keep removing does not say that his performance was poor, but rather that it has been described as such, by quite a large [1] publication, the Economist, per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. Again, I agree that if other major views of his tenure do exist (which I'm sure they do), they should be described too, to reach full neutrality. --Toweli (talk) 12:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I just saw that you did reply to my talk, and I apologise regarding my edit on your page, and I did edit it back! I don’t see why this comment is on the page and not all pages have negative comments, I am an Omani, born and raised in Oman and I strongly disapprove what was written regarding our current sultan, since the ministers had their limitations. Sultan159 (talk) 17:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

The edits I have done have done regarding the change of spelling from “tariq” to “Tarik”, there was recently a royal decree stating that the official spelling of the Sultan is, “Haitham bin Tariq”, I can email you the copy. Sultan159 (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

“Haitham binTarik**” Sultan159 (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, I see. I understand that there are limitations in regards to what a minister can do. As for the line, I personally feel it should be kept, and it's ultimately up to the reader to believe/trust it or not, depending on their view of the Economist as a whole, or that article in particular. Finding articles that fit your viewpoint, as I stated before, and adding the viewpoint to the article, would be good. As for the spelling of Tarik, you could request to move (rename) the article on the talk page, and if others do agree, move it. After everything's decided on you could also change all mentions of "Tariq" in the article to Tarik. --toweli (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Great thank you, I apologise again for the edits on your page I was furious. I’m new to the Wikipedia community and currently learning on how to actually use the functions, I apologise again. Sultan159 (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Toweli! You created a thread called Haitham bin Tariq at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giacomo Boni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Minor

I see that you mark all your edits as minor. Please make yourself acquainted with WP:MINOR. Thank you! --T*U (talk) 11:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of punk rock bands, L–Z, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robvanvee 12:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Vérité (Niagara album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eddie Monsoon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 08:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Deng BaoShan 1968.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Deng BaoShan 1968.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 17:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Lau Province

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lau Province, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fiji Village

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fiji Village, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fiji Times

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fiji Times, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Seaqaqa

Hello. What you've done at Seaqaqa is great. Thank you for expanding this article. Super Ψ Dro 20:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Sorry for the late response. I have also recently significantly expanded the Wakaya Island article. toweli (talk) 20:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for always catching and fixing my typos, even in my drafts! I appreciate it! Sergecross73 msg me 18:42, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eau (trigraph), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bureau.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gygax, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Riese and Gigas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Brad (given name)

added a link pointing to Bradney

Semajay Thomas

added a link pointing to Boxer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brad (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bradney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the revert on my edit in the "Valais" page

Hello @Toweli, I've noticed that you have reverted my edit despite the fact that it is the grammatically correct one. I am not sure if there is a policy in which you add an additional comma after a citation, but I don't think there is because it doesn't seem logical as if the article was read without citations it wouldn't make any sense. The citations shouldn't change the grammar or meaning of the article. In fact, I've seen many instances (IN Wikipedia) where it doesn't. So it's hard to believe that you are just complying with a policy. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Please explain your intentions. Thank you.

Ztimes3 (talk) 08:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Apologies, I did not intend to revert your edit, but rather the one preceding it, done by someone else, which added duplicated information (the German name is already stated in the [a] and [b] notes). I don't oppose your edit. toweli (talk) 11:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok thanks, no problem with that. I'm glad I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

Ztimes3 (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Toweli. Thank you for your work on Ossee. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 02:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

I generally try to categorize redirects now, I just don't always remember to do it. (And sometimes I'm not sure what the category for a particular redirect would be.) toweli (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Toweli. Thank you for your work on A.H. Gayton. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 05:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keillor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kaylor and Caylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Toweli. Thank you for your work on Sumner, NZ. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Toweli. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Alexeyevitch^(talk)

Alexeyevitch^(talk) 01:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Eason

added links pointing to Eastham and Esson

Dallin

added a link pointing to Dalling

Ellerbee

added a link pointing to Ellerby

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

AfD listing of HLSW

Hello, you recently nominated HLSW to the Articles for Deletion process (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HLSW) when the article's deletion was probably uncontroversial. AfD requires volunteer work on the part of others, and there is usually a backlog of requests which hinders careful analysis of each nomination. Please consider the speedy deletion or proposed deletion processes first in the future, as recommended by the overall deletion policy. Thank you. Charcoal feather (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll keep that in mind. toweli (talk) 22:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parham (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:03, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

DO NOT REVERT "Black people in Japan" page to the wrong one again.

There was wrong information about Yasuke. See the latest post I put on talk page of it. Those "reliable sources" you say were not appropriate at all. All were based on the Thomas Lockley's false theory. Nothing reliable. In Japanese page of 弥助 (Yasuke) in Wiki, there's no description that Yasuke achieved the status as a Samurai. It's written only in English page, which was also prompted by Thomas Lockely himself to promote his "fantasy fiction" book as if it is true. Don't let foreigners rewrite Japanese history arbitrarily anymore. If you dare to keep the phrase "Yasuke ultimately achieved the status of a samurai", bring the primary sources (NOT a fiction) to validate it like I did. And before doing so, discuss it in talk page. Otherwise your edits will be regarded as vandalism that will result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Penpengusa10 (talk) 04:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Lockley's works are not fiction and have never been described as such by any reliable source. Additionally, there are reliable sources other than Lockley who describe Yasuke as a samurai. Like I suggested, check the talk page of the Yasuke article. Through many discussions, it has been determined by consensus that he should be described as such. (Talk:Yasuke/Archive 3) Feel free to report me if you want to. toweli (talk) 12:50, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

> there are reliable sources other than Lockley who describe Yasuke as a samurai.

List up them here.

As I remarked : Yasuke page in English DOESN'T HAVE CONCENSUS Yet. It's locked without evaluating the objection from Japanese historians who checked these sources. Penpengusa10 (talk) 13:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Did you read the link I gave? (Talk:Yasuke/Archive 3) It has a very long discussion, where it has been determined that "There is a clear consensus that Yasuke should be represented in the article as a Samurai." The conclusion also mentions the Lopez-Vera source. toweli (talk) 13:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I'd already read all of them. They are more or less the same as Lockely's book in terms of the definition of Samurai.

This is tricky arbitrary expression : "Yasuke should be represented in the article as a Samura".

- "articles" meant their conjecture and imagination, not meant "historical records".

Whilst, some Japanese historians analyzed since long and concluded that Yasuke was not a Samurai.

If you cannot know the difference between 侍 (Samurai) and 武士(Bu-shi) in the legitimate Japanese term of definition of that era, do not interfere. Penpengusa10 (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Wrong > Lockley's works are not fiction

It's fiction: Lockley made a small disclaimer in Japanese edition of his books, saying that most parts of his book are mere conjecture without any historical fact-checking, in other words, it's a fiction. But in the English version, he treated those parts of his own fiction as if they were facts,writing them in assertive tone.　 Penpengusa10 (talk) 13:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Check out how the Japanese page of ‟弥助”describes, first. There is no description as "Yasuke was a Samurai". This is the concensus determined after the discussion with others including those foreigners who refered to your "seemingly reliable" sources. Penpengusa10 (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussions made on Japanese Wikipedia and the conclusions they make concern only Japanese Wikipedia. Japanese and English Wikipedia have different policies, standards, and so on. As it stands right now, as of the 12th of August 2024, the consensus of English Wikipedia editors per a lengthy RfC discussion, is that he should be described as a samurai on English Wikipedia. You can go argue your point on Talk:Yasuke, to try to overturn the consensus (it would be more productive than discussing it on my talk page). But, until the consensus is overturned (if that happens), he should continue to be described as such on English Wikipedia. toweli (talk) 13:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

That's really rediculous. Why?

1)The concensus of Japanese page are not only made by Japanese. The foreign editors, who commented on English wiki's Talk:Yasuke, also participated in the discussion of Japanese wiki pages. Why do they have to note completely opposite things, even though the policies, so on are different? The content should be consistent even if the language changes.

2)English page is LOCKED and we cannot OVERTUNE the content even though arguing them on talk page. It appears to us that they try to eliminate the objections.

3) I repeat that the sources you and those English editors brought are nothing more than secondary or tertiary materials based on their own interpretations, either or based on Lockely's theory, negrecting the analysis of the primary sources = real historical records, which I showed in talk:Black people in Japan. They never show the proof that Yasuke was a Samurai. Penpengusa10 (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

I never said that only Japanese people participated in the discussion on Japanese Wikipedia, just that Japanese Wikipedia's decisions apply only to Japanese Wikipedia. Talk:Yasuke is slightly protected to prevent vandalism, not to silence objections (many objections have been voiced on that page over the past few months). I had assumed that you could edit Talk:Yasuke since you have over 10 edits and your account is older than 4 days old (thus presumably making your account autoconfirmed and eligible for edits on that page). Per English Wikipedia's policies, secondary sources are preferred to primary sources (WP:PSTS). toweli (talk) 14:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

> you could edit Talk:Yasuke

Yes, I could.

However, the objections I have were already submitted by many others and I don't need to waste time since I found that these are not concerned (by who?? ) to modify the Yasuke page.

>Per English Wikipedia's policies, secondary sources are preferred to primary sources

I know it. But it doesn't mean you can write something in an assertive tone which has not been confirmed. In that sense, it should be limited to saying, "There is a theory that presume Yasuke was a samurai even though there is no real record of such". Penpengusa10 (talk) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Well, to me it's not surprising that different communities, even with some amount of overlap, would reach different conclusions. Maybe there'll come a day when both English and Japanese Wikipedia say the same thing about the subject. The wording, sources, and so on, are still being actively discussed. Good luck. toweli (talk) 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Daniel Mendoza

Fyi, I've opened WP:ANI#DIPLOMATIQUE916. DeCausa (talk) 21:47, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, that's how I learned about the edits. toweli (talk) 21:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Brown Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neptune, New Jersey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Leonard Riggio

On 2 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Leonard Riggio, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 19:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Courtemanche (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Courdemanche.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Arbitrary redirects

Wikipedia is trying to expand pages about anthroponymy - the study and explanation of the origins of last names. I've noticed that you have arbitrarily redirected a few of my pages on this specific subject under the reasoning that there is only one person with that name. Stop. Please understand that this is entirely irrelevant and is in no way a legitimate reason to redirect a Wikipedia page. Anyone of note with any specific surname name can be listed on those pages as a reference, but this is a feature, not a requirement. Anthroponymy pages are there to specifically explain and detail the origin and history of those names, not the people who may have them. These pages have historical and genealogical value, which is why Wikipedia is trying to expand them. Stop redirecting them. Thank you. Daccho (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

It has been my understanding that given name and surname pages are only notable if there are at least two bearers with Wikipedia articles. However, I now see that there's only an essay regarding this (Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy/Standards#Articles), and not a policy, so, fair enough. Regardless, another issue I had with those articles is that they used unreliable sources, like HouseOfNames, ancestry.com (see WP:ANCESTRY), and forebears.io. While only one of those has been listed as generally unreliable on WP:RSPS by community consensus, both HouseOfNames and forebears.io have been discussed by editors before (see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_371#Houseofnames.com and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_257#Forebears.io). HouseOfNames is blatantly commercial, geared towards selling products and appears to generate the text seen on their website, resulting in incorrect information (like the Patel example brought up in the linked discussion). HouseOfNames and forebears.io don't cite the sources of the information shown on their websites (I'm aware that HouseOfNames does at least sometimes cite sources, but far from always, not necessarily using reliable sources, and not for all text). It's preferable to cite academic sources. toweli (talk) 18:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gast

added a link pointing to Peter Gast

Parham (surname)

added a link pointing to Perham

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Toweli,

Please sign all of your messages on talk pages, noticeboards and discussions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Toweli! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Dice 10000 did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Hey, an edit summary allows editors to patrol edits faster. On one of your recent edits, I had to manually inspect it to see what it was. Do your fellow editors a favor and include an edit summary, please. Dillard421♂♂ ^{(talk to me)} 20:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)