User talk:Nemov
Not worthy of a mention?
[edit]Hey, what makes Tarantino's comments on the new Joker not worthy of a mention, when something like this is:
"Films that Tarantino has commented on negatively include Alfred Hitchcock's Frenzy where he remarked, "... might be a piece of crap, but I doubt Alfred was bored making it". He also disliked two Robert Altman films stating, "Brewster McCloud is the cinematic equivalent of a bird shitting on your head ... and Quintet is just terrible, boring, and pointless"."
Tarantino publicly praised a film that flopped at the box office and flopped critically, as well as saying Phoenix had one of the best performances of all time. I would say that's pretty important to include, especially when we include his comments praising other flopped films. Also numerous news outlets reported this once he stated it, so it clearly is important. Locust member (talk) 12:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- The biography is about a filmmaker that's been around for over 30 years. His opinion about a film that just bombed, that was in the news yesterday, isn't central to the biography. This can be reassessed later, but Wikipedia is WP:NOTTHENEWS. I don't think anyone is going to care about this in ten years. Nemov (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's fair, but that would make pretty much that entire section on his page irrelevant, then. I'm sure nobody will care about him favoring The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull over Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in 10 years. Or the fact he felt uneasy during a scene of Monty Python's The Meaning of Life. Might as well just get rid of those too while we're at it, right? Locust member (talk) 13:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's plenty of WP:OTHERSTUFF we could discuss that's wrong with that article. Which I've pointed out in TALK. It could use an editor to cut down much of the content that's superfluous. Nemov (talk) 13:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Understandable, thank you! Locust member (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's plenty of WP:OTHERSTUFF we could discuss that's wrong with that article. Which I've pointed out in TALK. It could use an editor to cut down much of the content that's superfluous. Nemov (talk) 13:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's fair, but that would make pretty much that entire section on his page irrelevant, then. I'm sure nobody will care about him favoring The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull over Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in 10 years. Or the fact he felt uneasy during a scene of Monty Python's The Meaning of Life. Might as well just get rid of those too while we're at it, right? Locust member (talk) 13:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Atlanta Braves
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atlanta Braves you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
Your GA nomination of Atlanta Braves
[edit]The article Atlanta Braves you nominated as a good article has passed 
Your GA nomination of Atlanta Braves
[edit]The article Atlanta Braves you nominated as a good article has failed 