Jump to content

Talk:The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 19:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Grabbing for a review if that is okay. When I was younger, I used to have a thing for the French Revolution and I knew a lot of facts about it for some reason lol. Aoba47 (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lead and infobox
  • I would make the rationale for the infobox image more obvious in the image caption. Also, please add ALT text for the image.
Plot
  • Do you think you should specify in the first sentence that this is the First Doctor? You did this for the lead, and I think it would make it very clear if you mentioned it on the first instance (the rest of the mentions of the character can be just The Doctor).
  • Do you think that you should use the character’s full names on the first use in the body of the article (i.e. Barbara and Susan)?
  • Please link TARDIS.
Production
  • There are a few links here that were already linked in the “Plot” section. Please unlink them here. Some examples of Robespierre and Napoleon.
Reception
  • Do you think that the “Critical response” subsection could be split into two paragraphs (i.e. one for the historical inaccuracy criticsim and the second for the retrospective reviews)? It may help to make the structure of this subsection immediately clear to the reader.
Commercial releases
  • I could find no issues with this section.
References
  • For reference 22, please do not put the word “review” in full caps.
Final comments
Thanks Aoba47! I've gone through and addressed most of your concerns—I left "The Doctor" (rather than "First Doctor") as this is consistent with other articles, such as the FA "The Stolen Earth". Let me know if you have any other concerns. – Rhain 01:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Verdict
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.