[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thafnine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of meeting WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Most sources are primary or YouTube videos. A WP:BEFORE search finds one article [1] which does not contain significant coverage of the subject. – Pbrks (t·c) 15:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Pbrks (t·c) 15:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Article has been moved to Draftspace.Blethering Scot 21:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not while this discussion remains open, you don't. We have the option of draftifying it as the conclusion to this discussion, but the process has to run its course first and you can't cut it short by moving the page into draft before the discussion has been closed through the proper process. Bearcat (talk) 23:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- First of all there is no need for the pointy reply. The article had already been moved by the creator, to an incorrect draft space title of User:Thafnine. As this was not a username it was requested to be deleted by myself and sorted by another admin. I moved it properly to draft space as the article could not sit in a fake user space. Two admins have already been involved, which absolutely highlights the principle of AGF. Blethering Scot 23:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not while this discussion remains open, you don't. We have the option of draftifying it as the conclusion to this discussion, but the process has to run its course first and you can't cut it short by moving the page into draft before the discussion has been closed through the proper process. Bearcat (talk) 23:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
– – Pbrks (t·c) 21:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Howdy, as the creator of this article, I am wondering if I can pull this article back into my sandbox instead of it being fully deleted? I cannot find any other secondary sources or references that can help with the notability of this article, but due to this article being for the Wiki Education program that I am a part of for my college, I am wondering if I could simply pull this article back to my sandbox so that my professor can still see it and grade it as is. Sebastian-SolaceFish (talk) 18:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can this article be userfied or moved to Draft space? Liz Read! Talk! 08:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Userfy per good-faith request of page creator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far, no consensus. Are there any objections to userfying this article as requested by its creator, Sebastian-SolaceFish?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Zero coverage in RS used in the article and none seen in Gnews or a general search. I don't see this person as meeting GNG or any notability guidelines, BLP or otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 21:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)