Bookkeeperoftheoccult

Barbara Gordon / "Sexiest Women in Comics"

Hey there. The "Sexiest Women" item/"Reception" section that you just edited (thank you) is one of several I've created today to try to correct over-prominence of this factoid which appeared in the Intro/Lead sections for 32 female superheroes. We 100% agree that this bit of trivia doesn't merit its own Reception section. I think in many cases it doesn't merit any inclusion at all in these articles, but discussion here convinced me that deleting these rankings from articles would catalyze reverts. Moving the information to a "Reception" section was my best effort to address even-more-undeserved emphasis in the prior iterations of the articles. If you have the knowledge and inclination to make similar improvements to some of my other edits, please do! A full list of the superhero pages I edited today is in my contributions page.--GDswamp (talk) 20:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Living people needs your help! Categorize: WP:UBLP Check new BLPs: WP:NEWBLP Participate in AFDs: BLP AFDs Help resolve content issues: WP:BLP/N Monitor recent changes to BLPs: BLP watchlist Remove BLP vios: WP:BLPFIX, Unsourced statements, All unreferenced BLPs, BLPs lacking sources Possible vandalism or libelous edits, as detected by edit filters 39 and 189. Removal of Category:Living people (filter 117)

American Horror Story (season 6)

Would you mind submitting your opinion on the latest proposal to the "Cast and Characters" section. LLArrow (talk) 23:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Request for 5 minute survey

Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 23:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bookkeeperoftheoccult. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

... and five --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

... and six --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!!

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!

Hello Bookkeeperoftheoccult! Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk) For more information about Wiki Loves Pride, → click here ←.

Happy Birthday

Wishing Bookkeeperoftheoccult a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 01:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Janet-Jackson-Dammn-Baby-2016.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Janet-Jackson-Dammn-Baby-2016.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bookkeeperoftheoccult. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Possibility of providing your input on a Peer Review for Regine Velasquez's entry

Hi Bookkeeperoftheoccult,

I'm writing to ask whether you would consider having a look at the article. I'm aware that you've been involved with a few PRs before. I've given it a major rewrite and complete overhaul. I began working on the article late October when it looked like this and somehow ended up rewriting the whole thing and aiming for potentially FA. This isn't a process I've been through before, but I have been reading the reviews here in preparation, and am familiar with FAC demands. I would very much appreciate a fresh set of eyes and happily address any concerns you may have.

Thanks! Pseud 14 (talk) 13:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Barbara Gorden/Batgirl

Hi. I am going through old GAs with clean up tags. These two articles (Barbara Gordon and Batgirl have the same tag on them. I do feel they fail the {{WP:GACR|focus criteria]], Gordan has 70KB readable prose as well so is very long for a fictional character. I just wanted to draw your attention to them, with the hope you may be able to fix them. The rest of the articles looks very nice. AIRcorn (talk) 04:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Batwoman

Batwoman, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Madefornowcover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Janet Jackson EP

Just wanted to chime in and let you know that Harmony Samuels mentioned the EP in the fall at these two sources [1][2] and Janet herself states in an interview with iHeartRadio that "Made for Now" is the first single off a small project coming this fall.[3] It's not a full-length album.Partyclams (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Animatedbatwoman.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Animatedbatwoman.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bookkeeperoftheoccult. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ƏXPLICIT 23:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Supergirl v4 1.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Supergirl v4 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alternative versions of Barbara Gordon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative versions of Barbara Gordon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Barbara Gordon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alternative versions of Supergirl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative versions of Supergirl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Supergirl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:All Star Batman and Robin 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Star Batman and Robin 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thrillkiller.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thrillkiller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

"All for You (Álbum Janet Jackson)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect All for You (Álbum Janet Jackson). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 19#All for You (Álbum Janet Jackson) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 02:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

It's Been a While....

It is good to see you are still active. I am hoping to return one day - though I am sure much has changed. Keep fighting the good fight :)

--— R² 14:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Janet Jackson as a gay icon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janet Jackson as a gay icon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madonna as a gay icon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Bookkeeperoftheoccult a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Guardian article cited 11 years ago

It's been a long time, but can you remember what source you were tapping when you added this 1993 Guardian review by Caroline Sullivan? I have been trying and failing to find it online. The Guardian lists Sullivan's works back to 1995,[4] not 1993. Is it possible you were looking at a reprint at janetjackson.com? I know that website has hosted reviews of Janet's works in the past. Or was it rocksbackpages.com? The latter has some Sullivan writings from 1993[5] but not about Janet. Binksternet (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Janet Jackson & Justin Timberlake's wardrobe malfunction.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janet Jackson & Justin Timberlake's wardrobe malfunction.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

File:JanetUnbreakableSingle.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JanetUnbreakableSingle.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 00:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Hey, Bookkeeperoftheoccult. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Avi :D (talk) 12:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Batgirl

Batgirl has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Barbara Gordon

Barbara Gordon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for LGBT themes in comics

LGBT themes in comics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)