This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Intro: ""Zero Sum" featured the final appearance in the series by Morris Panych; and saw the return of the virus-carrying bees which featured in the season-opener "Herrenvolk" and would later return in the 1998 feature film." I would break into two sentences and writing like this: "'Zero Sum' featured the final appearance in the series by Morris Panych. In addition, the episode saw the return of the virus-carrying bees which featured in the season-opener "Herrenvolk" and would later return in the 1998 feature film."
Plot: "The Smoking Man refuses to provide any details on what he has covering up." I think the 'has' should either be 'was' or 'is'
Production: "The producers, knowing that they would have to write an episode without Dana Scully, decided it was not fair to have David Duchovny carry the same workload as in a normal episode considering her absence, so they decided to write an episode where his involvement would also be light." Sort of lengthy and uses the word 'decide' twice
Production: "This resulted in the decision to write, for the second year in a row, an episode focused on Assistant Director Walter Skinner (Mitch Pileggi)." Is it necessary to mention Pileggi again?
Also, Maybe it's just me, but I think the episode got mixed to positive reviews, rather than just mixed, based on two being largely positive and one being less than stellar, but I don't know. Not a huge deal
I added the Spotnitz quote as rationale for the screenshot, and now it looks good.
Think I've seen to everything you've mentioned; let me know if I've missed anything. Thanks for seeing to this one so quickly! GRAPPLEX22:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply