Talk:Second Battle of Collierville
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Mdewman6 in topic Proposed merge of Battle of Collierville with Second Battle of Collierville
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed merge of Battle of Collierville with Second Battle of Collierville
editUnneeded CFORK // Timothy :: talk 08:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: a content fork is when two or more articles cover the same subject. In this case, we have several battles and skirmishes over the course of several weeks. The first article and second article do not seem to overlap time periods and appear to be separate engagements with different units and commanders involved. This isn't a fork so no merge is required. BusterD (talk) 11:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per BusterD, these were separate battles and therefore separate subjects and should not be merged. A question might be whether there is a primary topic for simply Battle of Collierville but that could be discussed via an WP:RM or elsewhere. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note also, the way the pages are tagged there is a separate discussion section about the same merge proposal at Talk:First_Battle_of_Collierville#Proposed_merge_of_Battle_of_Collierville_with_First_Battle_of_Collierville. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)