Displaying 1-10 of 11 results found.
Completely multiplicative with a(prime(k)) = prime(k+1).
+10
873
1, 3, 5, 9, 7, 15, 11, 27, 25, 21, 13, 45, 17, 33, 35, 81, 19, 75, 23, 63, 55, 39, 29, 135, 49, 51, 125, 99, 31, 105, 37, 243, 65, 57, 77, 225, 41, 69, 85, 189, 43, 165, 47, 117, 175, 87, 53, 405, 121, 147, 95, 153, 59, 375, 91, 297, 115, 93, 61, 315, 67, 111, 275, 729, 119
Tek's flip: Write n as the product of distinct factors of the form prime(i)^(2^(j-1)) with i and j integers, and replace each such factor with prime(j)^(2^(i-1)).
+10
96
1, 2, 4, 3, 16, 8, 256, 6, 9, 32, 65536, 12, 4294967296, 512, 64, 5, 18446744073709551616, 18, 340282366920938463463374607431768211456, 48, 1024, 131072, 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936, 24, 81, 8589934592, 36, 768
Encoded multiplication table for polynomials in one indeterminate with nonnegative integer coefficients. Symmetric square array T(n, k) read by antidiagonals, n > 0 and k > 0. See comment for details.
+10
24
1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 4, 5, 4, 1, 1, 5, 9, 9, 5, 1, 1, 6, 7, 16, 7, 6, 1, 1, 7, 15, 25, 25, 15, 7, 1, 1, 8, 11, 36, 11, 36, 11, 8, 1, 1, 9, 27, 49, 35, 35, 49, 27, 9, 1, 1, 10, 25, 64, 13, 90, 13, 64, 25, 10, 1, 1, 11, 21, 81, 125, 77, 77, 125, 81
COMMENTS
As a binary operation, T(.,.) is related to A306697(.,.) and A329329(.,.). When their operands are terms of A050376 (sometimes called Fermi-Dirac primes) the three operations give the same result. However the rest of the multiplication table for T(.,.) can be derived from these results because T(.,.) distributes over integer multiplication ( A003991), whereas for A306697 and A329329, the equivalent derivation uses distribution over A059896(.,.) and A059897(.,.) respectively. - Peter Munn, Mar 25 2020
Table of powers of squarefree numbers, powers of A019565(n) in increasing order in row n. Square array A(n,k) n >= 0, k >= 0 read by descending antidiagonals.
+10
24
1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 4, 3, 1, 1, 8, 9, 6, 1, 1, 16, 27, 36, 5, 1, 1, 32, 81, 216, 25, 10, 1, 1, 64, 243, 1296, 125, 100, 15, 1, 1, 128, 729, 7776, 625, 1000, 225, 30, 1, 1, 256, 2187, 46656, 3125, 10000, 3375, 900, 7, 1, 1, 512, 6561, 279936, 15625, 100000, 50625, 27000, 49, 14
FORMULA
A(n,k) = A297845(A(n,1), A(1,k)) = A306697(A(n,1), A(1,k)), = A329329(A(n,1), A(1,k)).
Square array A(n,k) = prime(n+1)^(2^k), read by descending antidiagonals (0,0), (0,1), (1,0), (0,2), (1,1), (2,0), ...; Fermi-Dirac primes ( A050376) in matrix form, sorted into rows by their prime divisor.
+10
19
2, 4, 3, 16, 9, 5, 256, 81, 25, 7, 65536, 6561, 625, 49, 11, 4294967296, 43046721, 390625, 2401, 121, 13, 18446744073709551616, 1853020188851841, 152587890625, 5764801, 14641, 169, 17, 340282366920938463463374607431768211456, 3433683820292512484657849089281, 23283064365386962890625, 33232930569601, 214358881, 28561, 289, 19
COMMENTS
A(n,k) is the image of the lattice point with coordinates X=n and Y=k under the inverse of the bijection f defined in the first comment of A306697. This geometric relationship can be used to construct an isomorphism from the polynomial ring GF(2)[x,y] to a ring over the positive integers, using methods similar to those for constructing A297845 and A306697. See A329329, the ring's multiplicative operator, for details.
Multiplicative operator of a ring over the positive integers that has A059897(.,.) as additive operator and is isomorphic to GF(2)[x,y] with A329050(i,j) the image of x^i * y^j.
+10
17
1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 4, 5, 4, 1, 1, 5, 9, 9, 5, 1, 1, 6, 7, 16, 7, 6, 1, 1, 7, 15, 25, 25, 15, 7, 1, 1, 8, 11, 36, 11, 36, 11, 8, 1, 1, 9, 27, 49, 35, 35, 49, 27, 9, 1, 1, 10, 25, 64, 13, 10, 13, 64, 25, 10, 1, 1, 11, 21, 81, 125, 77, 77, 125, 81
COMMENTS
Closely related to A306697 and A297845. If A059897 is replaced in the alternative definition by A059896 (and the definition is supplemented by the derived identity for the absorbing element, shown in the formula section), we get A306697; if A059897 is similarly replaced by A003991 (integer multiplication), we get A297845. This sequence and A306697, considered as multiplicative operators, are carryless arithmetic equivalents of A297845. A306697 uses a method analogous to binary-OR when there would be a multiplicative carry, while this sequence uses a method analogous to binary exclusive-OR. In consequence A(n,k) <> A297845(n,k) exactly when A306697(n,k) <> A297845(n,k). This relationship is not symmetric between the 3 sequences: there are n and k such that A(n,k) = A306697(n,k) <> A297845(n,k). For example A(54,72) = A306697(54,72) = 273375000 <> A297845(54,72) = 22143375000.
a(n) = Product_{k=1..n} prime(k)^(2^(n-k)).
+10
12
1, 2, 12, 720, 3628800, 144850083840000, 272760108249915378892800000000, 1264767303092594444142256488682840323816161280000000000000000
COMMENTS
For n >= 0, a(n+1) is the n-th power of 12 in the monoid defined by A306697.
1, 2, 9, 12, 18, 24, 80, 108, 160, 216, 625, 720, 960, 1250, 1440, 1792, 1920, 2025, 3584, 4050, 5625, 7500, 8640, 11250, 15000, 16128, 17280, 18225, 21504, 24300, 32256, 36450, 43008, 48600, 50000, 67500, 100000, 135000, 143360, 162000, 193536, 218700, 286720, 321489, 324000, 387072, 437400, 450000, 600000
2, 3, 3, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 7, 7, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 23, 23, 23, 23, 23, 23, 23, 23, 23, 29, 29, 29, 29, 29, 29, 29, 29, 29, 29, 31, 31, 31, 31, 31, 31, 31, 31, 31, 31, 31
COMMENTS
Seen as a square array read by antidiagonals, a subtable of the binary operation multiplication tables A297845, A306697 and A329329. - Peter Munn, Jan 15 2020
FORMULA
A(n,k) = A297845(A(n,1), A(1,k)) = A306697(A(n,1), A(1,k)) = A329329(A(n,1), A(1,k)).
a(n) = prime(n)*prime(n+1)*...*prime(2*n-1), where prime(i) is the i-th prime.
+10
3
1, 2, 15, 385, 17017, 1062347, 86822723, 10131543907, 1204461778591, 198229051666003, 35224440615606707, 6295457783127226289, 1331590860773071702483, 310692537866322378582047, 78832548083496383033878901, 21381953681344611984282084241
COMMENTS
For n >= 0, a(n+1) is the n-th power of 15 in the monoid defined by A306697. - Peter Munn, Feb 18 2020
Search completed in 0.015 seconds
|