Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment

Welcome to the entertainment section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.

skip to bottom

Select a section:

• Computing
• Entertainment
• Humanities
• Language
• Mathematics
• Science
• Miscellaneous
• Archives

Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

   

How can I get my question answered?

• Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
• Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
• Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
• Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
• Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
• Note:
  • We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
  • We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
  • We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
  • We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

Ready? Ask a new question!

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

• The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

See also:

• Teahouse
• Help desk
• Village pump
• Help manual

March 31

Are there other TV Larry Hagmen?

Larry Hagman got to play the good guy, Tony Nelson on I Dream of Jeannie, and the utterly despicable, highly shootable J. R. Ewing on the aforementioned, original Dallas. Who else starred on TV as both heroes and villains? The best I could come up with is Richard O'Sullivan: the nice, if lecherous, Robin Tripp in Man About the House and the annoying Dr. Lawrence Bingham (for Americans, think Frank Burns if he had gone to medical school in Britain) in Doctor at Large. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia has categories Villains and Heroes, where you might find some crossover. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

• One recent one that comes to mind is Freddie Highmore, who has played both Norman Bates and The Good Doctor.
• Bryan Cranston might qualify.
• Sebastian Cabot played several good guys, and also played Satan in a Twilight Zone episode.
• Delta Burke played mostly comedic roles, but also played a child-snatcher in a TV movie.
• Steven Weber (actor) played a comedic role in the Wings series, and played a thoroughly corrupt and murderous mayor in NCIS: New Orleans.

←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

IMO Cranston is a great example. When this comes up I often think of Kurtwood Smith though he doesn't quite fit C's criteria as his most villainous roles are in film. MarnetteD|Talk 21:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

In the last decade David Tennant played the Tenth Doctor in Doctor Who and the very creepy Kilgrave in Jessica Jones MarnetteD|Talk 23:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Donald Pleasence in The Adventures of Robin Hood (TV series) (bad guy) and The Changing of the Guard (The Twilight Zone) (good guy). Also from the same TV series (bad guy) is Alan Wheatley and in the first ever TV series of Sherlock Holmes (good guy), and was the first person to be killed by a Dalek. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• Angela Lansbury in Murder She Wrote and Sweeney Todd (I think that was a TV production), as well as The Manchurian Candidate (film). — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambridgeBayWeather (talk • contribs) 02:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamfang (talk • contribs) 04:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Just to pick a nit, per Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street#Productions, the version featuring Lansbury was taped from a production of the stage play in LA and shown on a couple different TV stations. She is marvelous in it. The Manchurian Candidate is another good choice. MarnetteD|Talk 04:35, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• Brenda Vaccaro played a cop and an assassin in different episodes of The Streets of San Francisco. —Tamfang (talk) 04:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Hulk Hogan spent nine years telling kids to train, say their prayers and eat their vitamins on WWF Superstars and Saturday Night's Main Event. He then led the New World Order in jumping and spraypainting less fortunate talent on WCW Nitro and attempting to murder the one more fortunate actor on WWE Raw. Good or bad, both runs got the highest ratings this genre's ever seen (which might suggest the demographic itself turned heel in 1996). InedibleHulk (talk) 08:29, April 1, 2018 (UTC)

I was thinking of main cast members on TV shows, because it's a bit jarring to see them switch sides, so to speak. Thanks all. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Does this include characters within the same show?:

• In I Dream of Jeannie, Barbara Eden played both good Jeannie and Jeannie's evil twin sister: "Jeannie's evil fraternal twin sister, mentioned in a second-season episode (also named Jeannie - since, as Barbara Eden's character explains it, all female genies are named Jeannie -- and also portrayed by Barbara Eden in a brunette wig), proves to have a mean streak starting in the third season (demonstrated in her initial appearance in "Jeannie or the Tiger?" [September 19, 1967]), repeatedly trying to steal Tony for herself, with her as the real "master". Her final attempt in the series comes right after Tony and Jeannie get married, with a ploy involving a man played by Barbara Eden's real-life husband at the time, Michael Ansara (in a kind of in-joke, while Jeannie's sister pretends to be attracted to him, she privately scoffs at him). The evil sister wears a green costume, with a skirt rather than pantaloons."
• In Highlander: The Series, Alexandra Vandernoot originally played Tessa Noël, Duncan MacLeod's main love interest. After Tessa was killed-off, Vandernoot returned to the series as "Lisa Halle", a mortal assassin who has had plastic surgery to resemble Tessa. Tessa was a hero, Lisa a villain. Dimadick (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• Hah, I can beat all those! On The Simpsons, Harry Shearer plays both good-guy extraordinaire Ned Flanders and the evil-incarnate Montgomery Burns. Matt Deres (talk) 12:00, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

I'll see Harry Shearer and raise you John Lithgow - who plays his own character, Dick Solomon, and his evil doppelganger in an episode of 3rd Rock from the Sun! --TammyMoet (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• Ian Richardson was Francis Urquhart and Sherlock Holmes. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Very good Gråbergs Gråa Sång. Trust you to mention Ian :-) He not only played Holmes but also a fictionalized version of the inspiration for Sherlock - Joseph Bell - in Murder Rooms: Mysteries of the Real Sherlock Holmes. MarnetteD|Talk 19:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

You know MarnetteD, if they did a british HOC remake (they really shouldn't), Charles Dance could possibly make it work. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

That would be a good choice Gråbergs Gråa Sång but you are right that series doesn't need a UK remake :-) It is worth noting that he is another one who has played both heroes and villains on TV for this list. MarnetteD|Talk 20:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Alan Alda was a good guy in M*A*S*H but these days usually plays a sinister scheming senator (in film). -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 21:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

And for that matter, on the last season of The West Wing he was a senator who was a political opponent of the regular characters. But not really a "bad guy"; he was an ethical man. --69.159.62.113 (talk) 07:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

• Maybe James Spader for going from good-guy lawyer in Boston Legal to bad guy informant on The Blacklist, though neither character was really "good guys" or "bad guys" in a traditional sense. --Jayron32 14:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
• Also in the same vein, Michael C. Hall from the good-ish guy in Six Feet Under to the bad-ish antihero in Dexter. --Jayron32 14:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Solofa Fatu played an evil and grunting Samoan savage named Fatu in 1994, then a kid-friendly and fluent English San Franciscan street preacher and shooting survivor (also inexplicably named Fatu) in 1995. In 1996, he was absolutely mute as The Sultan (you knew he was evil because all-American-hero-turned-crazy-old-man-running-for-President Bob Backlund managed him alongside his former foe and by-then-dated Iranian bastard The Iron Sheik.

In 1999, he returned as Rikishi Phatu, a scantily-clad buxom blonde who attempted to right the perceived historical wrongs the WWF booked upon his "hard-headed" people by running down the foul-mouthed alcoholic insubordinate woman-beating ultra-popular working class babyface ruler of the post-nWo Hollywood world with articulate reasonable argument (and a car). Audiences hated his attitude, and he was sentenced to Hell in a Cell at Armageddon 2000, where he was publicly executed in spectacular haytruck fashion by undead-pseudo-Satanic-mortician-cum-warlock-turned-Kid-Rock-and-Limp-Bizkit-blaring-real-life-biker-badass The Undertaker.

When next seen in the next millenium, he quickly rubbed his naked ass in the face of the boss who turned heel by screwing the heel who doubleturned with the face by whom his own ass turned heel by sitting in the aforementioned driver's seat (by order of the the stinkfaced evil boss' future son-in-law and currently-future-evil boss himself, as it turned out) a century ago and all was forgotten and forgiven again.

Kept his fat mouth mostly shut for and instead focused on suggestive movements in darkened room full of confused children to sketchy synthpop that reminded viewers of his happier days shaking that groove thang for the perpetually-high Grandmaster Sexay and sinisterly-mustachioed Scotty Too Hotty. Kept the crowd (and his employers) wildly amused for the next 14 years, which put his own confusing children through their own evil clown/good clown college years and is how he'll be lovingly remembered forever in the WWE Hall of Fame. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:40, April 5, 2018 (UTC)

April 2

Risk (Board Game / Digital)

Hello,

My friends and i have recently gotten into the classic board game "Risk!". I had played the board game a few times many years ago, but i am honestly more familiar with a digital version. To my surprise, most if not all of the board game versions are for "3 to 5 players", and only have the pieces for such. Is there any version out there that supports more players, perhaps 6 or 8, with colors that are easily distinguishable? How about versions that have more pieces for each player? I am used to seeing the possibility of more players in an online game, and also armies that can build up to over 100 pcs, but this play isn't possible with the board games that only have a handful of "cannons".

Thanks in advance!

216.173.144.190 (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

There are definitely versions for six players: the description on boardgamegeek.com says “2–6 players” is the original intent. If you want more players than that, you will probably have to revise the game or look for a different game. – b_jonas 00:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

There have been so many official and unofficial variants of Risk, that I hesitate to make any sweeping statements, but I've never seen one that officially supports more than six players.

However, there's nothing stopping you from buying some generic game pieces like these and extending the game the way you like. ApLundell (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

So far, that is exactly what various friends had mentioned when i ask this is to suggest something from TheGameCrafter. Alternatively, how easy would it be to buy replacement parts kits and paint the pieces whatever color i desire? Would these look bad, have paint come off too easily, or otherwise be a bad idea? I don't know much about how hard it is to say, spray paint plastic.

216.173.144.190 (talk) 17:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Ordinary acrylic spray-paint probably would probably be fine.

Alternatively, you could look into the kinds of model paints that people normally use with small plastic game pieces[1]. Amazon has some sets for painting gaming miniatures, those same paints would work just fine even if you don't intend to spend long nights painting faces on with a tiny brush.

But that might be a bit involved. If you're not worried about it looking a bit chintzy you can also get two identical sets of pieces and use a Sharpe to add a stripe to one set. In that case, "Red" and "Striped Red" would be different teams.

ApLundell (talk) 23:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Château de …?

The Four Yorkshiremen sketch begins with appreciation of a wine whose name sounds like Château de Chassela, or possibly Chasseleur. Is it a real wine? (I haven't seen a script; pretty sure it's not in The Golden Skits of Muriel Volestrangler, a collection of Cleese's scripts.) —Tamfang (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Chasselas "is a wine grape variety grown in Switzerland, France, Germany, Portugal, Hungary, Romania, New Zealand and Chile." Not sure if that's helpful, but that's what I always thought the word in the sketch was. HiLo48 (talk) 23:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

To elaborate: as HiLo68 has indicated, there is a grape variety called Chasselas, so by definition one can refer to "a Chasselas wine" or just "a Chasselas."

This grape variety originates in and is named for the French commune or township of Chasselas. "Chateau de . . ." is always a reference to a particular wine-growing estate which by convention is assumed to (and often does) have a chateau or manor house, whose name will often also be that of an associated village or township.

A simple googlesearch on "Chateau de Chasselas" reveals that there is indeed a genuine Chateau de Chasselas. Whether or not one of the collaborators on the original script actually knew of it, or hit upon a valid name by luck, we cannot be sure. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.218.14.51 (talk) 00:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

If you're looking for a published script then there's one in Monty Python Live! (2009) where it appears as "Château de Chasselay", but I suppose the spelling is intended to represent the Yorkshire pronunciation. --Antiquary (talk) 09:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Amusingly, there is also the wine-producing Domaine Chasselay, which I suppose a mere foreigner might loosely refer to as "Chateau de" Chasselay. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.218.14.51 (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

And there is also an actual Château de Chasselay. Alansplodge (talk) 01:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

• This was discussed once before, @ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2011 June 28#Fussable Chasselais. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 20:39, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

April 3

This novel's name, ( and/or author's ) please, if possible...

Two brothers living in same city. One (the elder ) is living a bit above his standards and careless about his health, hence  famously obese in the circle of his familiarity. The younger brother - athletic, hardworking businessman, who is ambitious but law-abiding ( especially due to his serious romantic relationship with a TV journalist - dreams of a peaceful future as an ideal father  and husband ), a hardworking handicrafts importer (or perhaps exporter) knows only when his dear elderly brother is nabbed alongwith big-money and cocaine ( or may be it was heroine ), his (elder's) buyer in another part country gets caught along with ( to make the case watertight the fat brother's hotel room is equipped with cameras and bugs that prove hisself being the seller ). The smuggler-brother works under finance of the mob's most ruthless enforcer who is famous for his atrocities for the recovery of the loan provided - the wads of cash, though clearly recorded by the law-agency's cameras are lost because the smuggler-brother, on sensing the arrival of the law with thundering knocks and threats to break the hotel-room door plus loud cop-shouts of their being holding both search and arrest warrants, wisely gets the rid of brief-case holding the unlawful money while pretending to flee the scene by breaking the fourth-floor hotel room window (actually to throw the brief-case to his semi-prostitute girlfriend whom he made to stand in the service-lane, knowing that something may always go berserk during such deals ). But the girl who is a bar-hostess for shows, with just one glimpse of so much cash in the broken brief-case due to direct ground-hit from it's high fall, immediately vacates her tiny residential premises provided by the employing-hotel, and disappears forever ( alongwith the money, of course ).

Now the big brother is not only in a non-bailable cell looking at least at ten years but  also owes big money to the mob's most ruthless enforcer (as the character played by Bradd Pitt in Ocean's Eleven (or some later sequel ) says " the interest, that's killing, man "). The big brother keeps his lips tightly sealed, also extra-pays his lawyer to trace the girl in possession of the money, but no avail. The mob knows better than anyone that it's no use to trace the bitch for money, waits a day or two before beginning their pressure tactics - the brother gets roughed up in jail's common shower room, his ear is severed, while attackers carve an arrow on his lower abdomen pointing to his dick - to give a hint of  their future plans, his mom living in a separate flat is shocked to find her beloved multicolored, speaking parrot beheaded on the dinning table with warnings on the flat walls in the poor bird's blood. Even the younger brother finds his whole wardrobe gone astray with acid spray ( even his gf, living in another country finds a note saying  " it can rain acid anywhere ", along with a behead chicken on her table ).      It takes the elder brother many of his brief prison interviews to pursue the younger brother that the only way to stay alive is to payback the mob's money, which can only happen if the younger decides to undertake his brother's dirty business - turning a respectable handicrafts businessman into a narcotics smuggler. Then a long struggle of the new upstart drug-dealer to pursue his brother's buyers in another country to buy from him. But far more innovative and persuasive than his older sibling he even somehow makes the mob-enforcer himself  to refer him to biggest star - the drug manufacturer living deep in forests of Panama ( or maybe it was Laos ), a man holding enough water to make the poor country's government to protect him.       But the new kid gets nabbed soon by DEA, who plan to use him as a bait ( hence his arrest remains a state secret ). DEA's top priority is to get the manufacturer from the protective country he's currently in. Their plan involves making the bait buy a big bulk - hundreds of kgs ! Knowing such high financing will require face-to-face meeting between the top mobster ( the actual behind the scenes boss of the enforcer who first financed the elder and now recently his younger brother ) and the manufacturer who has ( in spite of being an old man ) has a reputation for beating DEA's most  deadly traps in the past. The younger brother ( bait ) has for some reason developed a genuine liking and respect for the big manufacturer from Panama / Laos and while the shoot and chase scenes which occur due to the greed of a corrupt local police captain ( the DEA bait gets exposed before both the mob and their big-shot guest from abroad ). The local mob decides to kill the big manufacturer too, knowing too well that in case he gets nabbed, he won't hesitate a moment in singing everything about the local mob, for his own benefit. Using car phone the bait somehow convinces DEA to treat the visiting narcotics exporter as approver against the boss. The mob boss, who has always been suspected (  both by the  media and the law-agencies ) to be  the night-face of the one of nation's topmost legitimate business-tycoons, actually turns out to be his spoiled son, who due to testimonies of both the brave young man and big-time manufacturer from abroad, ( kept in judicial custody for standing in the court ), actually due to DEA's and Federal government's anticipatory pardon ( for which the younger brother's emotional side fought while the manufacturer kept the car moving at gunpoint in direction of a certain helipad, where as it happened each time he left his harbor-of-a-nation for a very big deal where financier ( whose hundreds of millions would be at stake ) insisted ( rightly ) on seeing his face, a helicopter was kept ready to flee back to safety ( even that was just one-among-many of his safety back-outs ). At the end, the manufacturer, having undergone the trouble of being a sincere prosecution witness, leaves free as air as does the bait, while the mobboss, due to immense and undoubted evidence against gets nothing less than death punishment. His sidekick, the enforcer who committed inhuman acts against the elder brother commits suicide in prison.150.129.198.144 (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

That much detail, and Google has failed you? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 05:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

"Two brothers living in same city. One (the elder ) is living a bit above his standards and careless about his health, hence famously obese in the circle of his familiarity. The younger brother - athletic, hardworking businessman, who is ambitious but law-abiding" Do you remember the names of the two main characters? They might be more useful for tracking down information than descriptions of their occupations. Dimadick (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

That's a lot of reading to expect of people. :-) The material you've set out is the way that a person would need to collect the detail and that's fine as far as it goes, but it then means that you'd have to stumble upon a person who specifically knows that book from memory (and the wall of text will mean that fewer people will bother to read through all that detail anyway). What would help (and Dimadick has it exactly right) is to figure out specific keywords so that a computer-aided search can be done. Go for specific terms you remember (names especially, but anything that might be unique). Providing a more concise summary will mean more people will read your question and providing more specific items will allow people skilled at searching to help you out even if they've never read the book in question. Matt Deres (talk) 12:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

If the OP lives in the USA, then he may ask one of the subject librarians at his local or university library. Big libraries in the US have a wealth of resources, including subject librarians. Each subject librarian claims to be an expert in a specific field. I will suggest consulting a subject librarian or expert on literature. English-language literature may be well supported, as the librarians are foremost English speakers. 140.254.70.33 (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

That's the trouble, pals - it's been a long-long time since I read it. I know, telling the names of a character or two would be far helpful, if I could remember! Besides I don't live in any western country, let alone USA, but in a third world nation. My only hope is that maybe someone on RD remembers a thriller written long ago ! : OP 150.129.196.211 (talk) 21:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

If you don't remember a name, maybe you can remember some words or phrases that might have been used close together? If so, try a Google Books search. (Use double quotes for phrases.) It might not find anything helpful, but then again it might work. --69.159.62.113 (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

April 5

Top Fashion Designers 2017

Need help regarding the top fashion designers in the United States for 2017. SennaNiks (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

There is no single, definitive list, but this has some leads. --Jayron32 12:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC).

Thanks for the help but I was looking for a specific site. Your help is appreciated. SennaNiks (talk) 05:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Which specific site did you have in mind? --Jayron32 12:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

April 6

Nintendo 3DS on lager screen

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

I was wondering if it is possible to play Nintendo 3DS games on a large screen (I get dizzy from the small screen).

Thank you for your answers--2A02:1205:502E:4030:8DE6:B5D6:1170:ED7F (talk) 18:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Flashback in stageplays?

Flashback is a familiar device in films (and of course novels, narrative poems, epics, etc.) but I can't think of one stageplay I've ever read or seen or heard of that uses that device. None of the examples in article Flashback (narrative) is from a play. Does anyone know of a play that uses flashback? I'm mostly interested in examples from traditional theaters, Western or non-Western, using techniques that were already established by about 1940. Thanks. Basemetal 18:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Patrice Pavis's Dictionary of the Theatre: Terms, Concepts, and Analysis, in its entry on "Flashback", writes: "Although a "cinematic" technique, it pre-existed cinema in the novel. It has enjoyed a certain amount of popularity in theatre since experiments with the narration or story such as MILLER's Death of a Salesman. One of the first occurrences was in A. SALACROU's l'Inconnue d'Arras in 1935." ---Sluzzelin talk 18:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Does telling the story in reverse count? Then Betrayal (play) by Pinter. --69.159.62.113 (talk) 19:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Of course it does. Telling a story backwards is essentially a recurring series of flashbacks, each scene being a flashback from the previous one. In every scene of course time moves forward, they're not walking backwards and speaking English backwards. That would be extreme, but what can you not expect with "new theater"? Interesting example. I did expect post-WWII theater experimented with never before used techniques. Thanks. Basemetal 20:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

I didn't think it was "of course", because usually a flashback is followed by a return to the same time period as before the flashback. --69.159.62.113 (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

When you tell the story backwards and you don't periodically come back to reestablish what the "present" is, it would seem as if the "present" recedes further and further back into the past. That's in theory. But I don't think that distinction is in fact that important for whoever experiences the play. For example if you added a 1977 (or even, say, a 1980) scene at the end of Pinter's play that came back to the "present" would it make a lot of difference as far as the perception of time is concerned? (Not saying it wouldn't change the play in other ways). Yet in theory that would make the 1975 to 1968 scenes flashbacks. Even if you inserted scenes regularly coming back to the "present" it still wouldn't make a lot of difference. It would simply be more cumbersome. The way Pinter structured the play is faster than a series of flashbacks but I don't see a big difference in how time is perceived. Maybe if I see that play acted on the stage I'd change my mind though. Basemetal 01:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

• A parenthetical note prompted by my thinking about the examples kindly provided by Sluzzelin and IP 69.159.62.113. One thing that's become clear to me is that one should distinguish I think a "real" flashback, where the narration moves to a point in the past where the events have some influence on the events of the present, an explanatory flashback as it were, and flashbacks that are just embedded stories without any influence on the events of the present (as for example in the One Thousand and One Nights or the Mahabharata). You'll notice that while these are also technically flashbacks, because most of the time when you tell a story it's about something that's already happened, or at least is purported to have happened, it doesn't really matter at all that the story is in the past. It might as well be in the future and it wouldn't make any difference, as it has no consequence on the frame story. That's very different from, say, the flashback in the Odyssey, where the stories Ulysses tells the Phaecians are an explanation of how he came to land on their island. In any case, I've just discovered the second kind of (fake) flashback, just an embedded story, does occur in at least one classical play I can think of: Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew where the story is assumed to be staged in front of Christopher Sly. There might be other examples like this in classical theater. If you can think of any let me know. Now does any play within the play then trigger a flashback? Not if the present remains present as for example for the The Murder of Gonzago in Hamlet where Hamlet, Claudius, Ophelia, Gertrude, and the rest of the audience, do not "disappear" (compare with the characters of the "Induction" in the the Taming of the Shrew), and you can even hear them talk while the play is going on (such as the famous "the lady doth protest too much"). Finally both kinds of flashbacks may start as a story narrated by one of the characters of the frame story (at some level, if there is a series of embedded levels), but do not necessarily. Or you can, alternatively, just assume that when there's no character that's the explicit narrator, the narrator is the implicit main narrator (that is, the playwright). Basemetal 20:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)