P. Clodius Pulcher and the Praetorship That Never Was
P. Clodius Pulcher and the Praetorship That Never Was
Abstract
According to Cicero, Clodius had been a candidate for the praetorship of 53 BCE suo anno but deferred his candidacy when the elections were excessively delayed. In an influential paper, Badian argued that Clodius’ proper year was 52 and that Cicero was guilty of misrepresentation. By reviewing the evidence and the workings of the lex annalis, this paper makes the case that Clodius did indeed postpone his praetorship, in order to have more time to pursue his legislative programme. That in turn has implications for our understanding of Clodius the politician and of the place of legislation in Roman politics.
Keywords
P. Clodius Pulcher | Cicero | lex annalis | cursus honorum | praetorship | legislative programmes
References
- 1. Alexander, M. C. (1990)
Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC , Toronto. - 2. Arena, V. (2007) ‘Roman oratorical invective’, in W. Dominik and J. Hall (eds),
A Companion to Roman Rhetoric , Oxford, 149–60. DOI 10.1002/9780470996485.ch12 - 3. Astin, A. E. (1957) ‘The Lex Annalis before Sulla’,
Latomus 16, 588–613. - 4. Astin, A. E. (1958) ‘The Lex Annalis before Sulla’,
Latomus 17, 49–64. - 5. Astin, A. E. (1968)
Politics and Policies in the Roman Republic , Belfast. - 6. Badian, E. (1960) Review of Astin,
The Lex Annalis before Sulla ,CR 10, 176. DOI 10.1017/s0009840x0017088x - 7. Badian, E. (1964)
Studies in Greek and Roman History , Oxford, 140–56 = (1959) ‘Caesar’scursus and the intervals between offices’,JRS 49, 81–9. DOI 10.2307/297626 - 8. Benner, H. (1987)
Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher , Stuttgart. - 9. Brennan, T. C. (2000)
The Praetorship in the Roman Republic , Oxford. - 10. Broughton, T. R. S. (1951–86)
The Magistrates of the Roman Republic , New York/Atlanta. - 11. Broughton, T. R. S. (1991) ‘Candidates defeated in Roman elections: some ancient Roman “also-rans”’,
TAPA 81, i–64. DOI 10.2307/1006532 - 12. Carter, J. M. (1967) ‘Eighteen years old?’,
BICS 14, 51–7. - 13. Crawford, J. W. (1994)
M. Tullius Cicero. The Fragmentary Speeches , Atlanta. - 14. Crawford, M. H. (ed.) (1996)
Roman Statutes , London. - 15. Daguet-Gagey, A. (2013) ‘L’édilité de Cicéron’,
Rev. Ét. Anc. 115, 25–49. - 16. Damon, C. (1992) ‘Sex. Cloelius,
scriba ’,HSCP 94, 227–50. - 17. Develin, R. (1979)
Patterns of Office Holding 366–49 B. C. , Brussels. - 18. Douglas, A. E. (1966)
M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus , Oxford. - 19. Drummond, A. (2008) ‘The ban on
gentiles holding the same priesthood and Sulla’s augurate’,Historia 2008, 367–407. DOI 10.25162/historia-2008-0021 - 20. Dyck, A. R. (2012)
Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speeches on Behalf of Marcus Fonteius and Marcus Aemilius Scaurus , Oxford. - 21. Dyck, A. R. (2014) ‘Cicero,
Pro Murena 47 and 85’,CQ 64, 417–18. DOI 10.1017/s0009838813000864 - 22. Earl, D. C. (1965) ‘Appian
B. C. 1, 14 and “professio”’,Historia 14, 325–32. - 23. Evans, R. J. / Kleijwegt, M. (1992) ‘Did the Romans like young men? A study of the Lex Villia Annalis: causes and effects’,
ZPE 92, 181–95. - 24. Fantham, E. (1975) ‘The trials of Gabinius in 54 B. C.’,
Historia 24, 425–43. - 25. Feeney, D. C. (2007)
Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History , Berkeley. - 26. Ferrary, J.-L (1996) ‘
Princeps legis etadscriptores : la collégialité des magistrats Romains dans la procedure de proposition des lois’,Rev. Phil. 70, 217–46. - 27. Ferrary, J.-L (2001) ‘La législation “de ambitu”, de Sulla à Auguste’, in
Iuris vincula. Studi in onore di Mario Talamanca , Naples, 159–98. - 28. Geiger, J. (1971)
A Commentary on Plutarch’s Cato Minor , diss. University of Oxford. - 29. Geiger, J. (1973) ‘The last Servilii Caepiones of the republic’,
Anc. Soc. 4, 143–56. - 30. Hillard, T. W. (1973) ‘The sisters of Clodius again’,
Latomus 32, 505–14. - 31. Hillard, T. W. (1982) ‘P. Clodius Pulcher 62–58 B. C.: “Pompeii adfinis et sodalis”’,
PBSR 50, 34–44. DOI 10.1017/s0068246200009430 - 32. Jahn, J. (1970)
Interregnum und Wahldiktator , Kallmünz. - 33. Kaster, R. A. (2006)
Marcus Tullius Cicero. Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius , Oxford. - 34. Keeline, T. J. (2021)
Cicero. Pro Milone , Cambridge. - 35. Kumaniecki, K. (1977) ‘Ciceros Rede
De aere alieno Milonis ’,Klio 59, 281–401. DOI 10.1524/klio.1977.59.12.381 - 36. Kunkel, W. / Wittmann, R. (1995)
Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischen Republik .Zweiter Abschnitt. Die Magistratur , Munich. - 37. Levick, B. (1981) ‘
Professio ’,Athenaeum 59, 378–88. - 38. Linderski, J. (1966) ‘Were Pompey and Crassus elected in absence to their first consulship?’, in M.-L. Bernhard (ed.),
Mélanges offerts à Kazimierz Michałowski , Warsaw, 523–6. - 39. Linderski, J. (1972) ‘The aedileship of Favonius, Curio the younger, and Cicero’s election to the augurate’,
HSCP 76, 181–200. DOI 10.2307/310984 - 40. Linderski, J. / Kaminska-Linderski, A. (1974) ‘The quaestorship of Marcus Antonius’,
Phoenix 28, 213–23. DOI 10.2307/1087419 - 41. Lintott, A. W. (1965) ‘Trinundinum’,
CQ 15, 281–5. - 42. Lintott, A. W. (1974) ‘Cicero and Milo’,
JRS 64, 62–78. - 43. Lintott, A. W. (1999)
The Constitution of the Roman Republic , Oxford. - 44. Lintott, A. W. (1999a)
Violence in Republican Rome , Oxford (orig. 1968). - 45. Lintott, A. W. (2008)
Cicero as Evidence, Oxford. - 46. Łoposzko, T. (1979) ‘Gesetzentwürfe betreffs der Sklaven im Jahre 53 v. u. Z.’,
Index 8, 154–66. - 47. Manuwald, G. (2007)
Cicero, Philippics 3–9 , Berlin. - 48. Marshall, B. A. (1985)
A Historical Commentary on Asconius , Columbia. - 49. McDermott, W. C. (1970) ‘The sisters of P. Clodius’,
Phoenix 24, 39–47. DOI 10.2307/1087402 - 50. Meyer, E. (1922)
Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompejus , 3rd edn, Stuttgart. DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139059169 - 51. Mommsen, T. (1887)
Römisches Staatsrecht , 3rd edn, vol. 1, Leipzig. - 52. Morrell, K. (2014) ‘Cato and the courts in 54 B. C.’,
CQ 64, 669–81. - 53. Morrell, K. (2015) ‘Appian and the judiciary law of M. Livius Drusus (
tr. pl. 91)’, in K. Welch (ed.),Appian’s Roman History. Empire and Civil War , Swansea, 235–55. DOI 10.2307/j.ctt1ws7x7f.17 - 54. Morrell, K. (2017)
Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire , Oxford. DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755142.001.0001 - 55. Morrell, K. (2018) ‘“Certain gentlemen say…”: Cicero, Cato, and the debate on the validity of Clodius’ laws’, in C. Gray, A. Balbo, R. Marshall, and C. Steel (eds),
Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions , Oxford, 191–210. DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198788201.003.0012 - 56. Morris, J. (1964) ‘Leges annales under the principate’,
Listy filologické 78, 316–37. - 57. Nicolet, C. (1959) ‘“Confusio suffragiorum”: A propos d’une réforme électorale de Caius Gracchus’,
MÉFRA 71, 145–210. DOI 10.3406/mefr.1959.7446 - 58. Oakley, S. P. (2005)
A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X, Vol. 3: Book IX , Oxford. - 59. Parkin, T. G. (2003)
Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History , Baltimore. - 60. Pina Polo, F. (2011)
The Consul at Rome, Cambridge. - 61. Pina Polo, F. / Díaz Fernández, A. (2019)
The Quaestorship in the Roman Republic , Berlin. - 62. Ramsey, J. T. (1982) ‘Cicero,
Pro Sulla 68 and Catiline’s candidacy in 66 BC’,HSCP 86, 121–31. DOI 10.2307/311189 - 63. Ramsey, J. T. (2020) ‘The date of the consular elections in 63 and the inception of Catiline’s conspiracy’,
HSCP 110, 213–69. - 64. Renders, L. (1939) ‘La date de naissance de Caton d’Utique’,
Antiquité Classique 8, 111–25. DOI 10.3406/antiq.1939.3086 - 65. Rosillo-López, C. (2006–2007) ‘El funcionamiento de un pulso político: discurso, endeudamiento y política en el “de aere alieno, de vi et de ambitu” de Clodio’,
Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie II 19–20, 161–75. DOI 10.5944/etfii.19.2006.4449 - 66. Russell, D. A. (2002)
Quintilian. The Orator’s Education, Volume IV: Books 9–10 , Cambridge MA. - 67. Ryan, F. X. (1994) ‘Cicero,
Mur . 47: text and meaning’,Gymnasium 101, 481–2. - 68. Ryan, F. X. (1996) ‘Ten ill-starred aediles’,
Klio 78, 68–86. DOI 10.1524/klio.1996.78.1.68 - 69. Ryan, F. X. (1996a) ‘The minimum age for the quaestorship in the late republic’,
MH 53, 37–43. - 70. Ryan, F. X. (1998) ‘The biennium and the curule aedileship in the late republic’,
Latomus 57, 3–14. - 71. Schultz, C. E. (2021)
Fulvia. Playing for Power at the End of the Roman Republic , Oxford. - 72. Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–70)
Cicero’s Letters to Atticus , Cambridge. - 73. Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977)
Cicero. Epistulae ad Familiares , vol. 2, Cambridge. - 74. Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1980)
Cicero. Epistulae ad Quintum Fratrem et M. Brutum , Cambridge. - 75. Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1981) ‘Ecce iterum Cloelius’,
Historia 30, 383. - 76. Spielvogel, J. (1997) ‘P. Clodius Pulcher: Eine politische Ausnahme-Erscheinung der späten Republik?’,
Hermes 125, 56–74. - 77. Steel, C. (2013)
The End of the Roman Republic, 146–44 B. C. , Edinburgh. - 78. Stone, A. M. (1980) ‘
Pro Milone : Cicero’s second thoughts’,Antichthon 14, 88–111. DOI 10.1017/s0066477400002811 - 79. Stone, A. M. (2013) ‘A year of one’s own: dating the praetorship of Marcus Crassus’,
Antichthon 47, 101–17. DOI 10.1017/s0066477400000289 - 80. Sumner, G. V. (1963) ‘Lex Aelia, Lex Fufia’,
AJPh 84, 337–58. DOI 10.2307/293232 - 81. Sumner, G. V. (1971) ‘The Lex Annalis under Caesar’,
Phoenix 25, 246–71. DOI 10.2307/1087361 - 82. Sumner, G. V. (1971a) ‘The Lex Annalis under Caesar (continued)’,
Phoenix 25, 357–71. DOI 10.2307/1088064 - 83. Sumner, G. V. (1973)
The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus:Prosopography and Chronology , Toronto. DOI 10.3138/9781487574024 - 84. Tatum, W. J. (1999)
The Patrician Tribune. Publius Clodius Pulcher , Chapel Hill. - 85. Tatum, W. J. (2018)
Quintus Cicero: A Brief Handbook on Canvassing for Office , Oxford. - 86. Taylor, L. R. (1939) ‘Cicero’s aedileship’,
AJPh 60, 194–202. - 87. Taylor, L. R. (1942) ‘Caesar’s colleagues in the pontifical college’,
AJPh 63, 385–412. - 88. Tempest, K. (2017)
Brutus. The Noble Conspirator , New Haven. - 89. Vervaet, F. J. (2020) ‘No grain of salt: casting a new light on Pompeius’
cura annonae ’,Hermes 148, 149–72. DOI 10.25162/hermes-2020-0010 - 90. Weigel, R. D. (1979) ‘The career of L. Paullus, cos. 50’,
Latomus 38, 637–46. - 91. Weinrib, E. J. (1968) ‘The prosecution of Roman magistrates’,
Phoenix 22, 32–56. DOI 10.2307/1087035 - 92. Wex, C. (1846) ‘On the leges annales of the Romans’ (trans. C. K. Watson),
Classical Museum 3, 405–16. - 93. Williamson, C. (1995) ‘The display of law and archival practice in Rome’, in H. Solin, O. Salomies, and U.-M. Liertz (eds),
Acta Colloquii Epigraphici Latini , Helsinki, 239–51. - 94. Williamson, C. (2005)
The Laws of the Roman People , Ann Arbor. - 95. Wiseman, T. P. (1966) ‘The ambitions of Quintus Cicero’,
JRS 56, 108–15. - 96. Yakobson, A. (1999)
Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic, Stuttgart. DOI 10.2307/1089041