13 reviews
"Damn robot people think they own the world!"
In an era of movies like TERMINATOR: GENISYS and CHAPPIE, can a B-grade robot adventure from the mid-90s find an appreciative audience? The answer is yes, at least if it can find its way into my hands. No low-budget filmmaker loved the sci-fi genre more than Philip J. Roth ("APEX"), and this particular cyborg-themed outing highlights the best that he – or almost anyone – could bring to the table under B-movie constraints. Though not terribly original, DIGITAL MAN is engaging and action-packed enough to accommodate its target audience and perhaps win over a few new fans as well.
The story: A squad of futuristic soldiers (led by Ken Olandt) is sent to a backwater Earth settlement to neutralize a deadly combat cyborg (Matthias Hues) run amuck.
It bears emphasizing that viewers who need expensive production values and state-of-the-art special effects to enjoy sci-fi flicks will be disappointed by this one, with its outdated CGI and gooey prosthetics. Personally, I love the production design, which is so skillfully implemented that there's no stylistic discord even when the setting shifts from a high-tech space station to the dusty Earth setting. Despite a handful of esthetic lifts from ALIENS and THE TERMINATOR, DIGITAL MAN looks and feels very much like its own movie, and in the process manages to avoid the artistic pitfalls of basing a production in the desert: it's never not fun to look at, despite its limited color palette.
The action's comprised primarily of explosions and shootouts, with a smattering of kickboxing. Though bluntly effective, the firefights aren't worth the price of the picture alone, and it's disappointing that Hues' physical talents are limited to only a single, one-sided brawl. Despite looking cool in his armor, Matthias is generally the worst-utilized performer of the film, having next to no lines and virtually nothing to do other than stalking and shooting. The rest of the cast does much better, with especially the soldiers getting enough character moments so as to not feel expendable. The rest of the cast is pretty memorable, too: Don Swayze (brother of Patrick) is a decent supporting goof, Amanda Wyss does what she can in an uncredited role, and the great Susan Tyrell has two glorious cameo scenes.
Director Roth infuses the picture with the enthusiastic pacing and gusto so often missing from low-budget productions, thereby keeping the film upbeat and rolling along nicely. He might have also included a tad too much story for his own good, as the paranoia angle of squad members potentially being cyborgs themselves feels unnecessary for a movie this small. Nevertheless, the film is worth a rental, and potentially even a purchase if you still own a VCR.
The story: A squad of futuristic soldiers (led by Ken Olandt) is sent to a backwater Earth settlement to neutralize a deadly combat cyborg (Matthias Hues) run amuck.
It bears emphasizing that viewers who need expensive production values and state-of-the-art special effects to enjoy sci-fi flicks will be disappointed by this one, with its outdated CGI and gooey prosthetics. Personally, I love the production design, which is so skillfully implemented that there's no stylistic discord even when the setting shifts from a high-tech space station to the dusty Earth setting. Despite a handful of esthetic lifts from ALIENS and THE TERMINATOR, DIGITAL MAN looks and feels very much like its own movie, and in the process manages to avoid the artistic pitfalls of basing a production in the desert: it's never not fun to look at, despite its limited color palette.
The action's comprised primarily of explosions and shootouts, with a smattering of kickboxing. Though bluntly effective, the firefights aren't worth the price of the picture alone, and it's disappointing that Hues' physical talents are limited to only a single, one-sided brawl. Despite looking cool in his armor, Matthias is generally the worst-utilized performer of the film, having next to no lines and virtually nothing to do other than stalking and shooting. The rest of the cast does much better, with especially the soldiers getting enough character moments so as to not feel expendable. The rest of the cast is pretty memorable, too: Don Swayze (brother of Patrick) is a decent supporting goof, Amanda Wyss does what she can in an uncredited role, and the great Susan Tyrell has two glorious cameo scenes.
Director Roth infuses the picture with the enthusiastic pacing and gusto so often missing from low-budget productions, thereby keeping the film upbeat and rolling along nicely. He might have also included a tad too much story for his own good, as the paranoia angle of squad members potentially being cyborgs themselves feels unnecessary for a movie this small. Nevertheless, the film is worth a rental, and potentially even a purchase if you still own a VCR.
- The_Phantom_Projectionist
- Jan 27, 2016
- Permalink
Fairly typical sci fi action cheapie
This was my second Philip J. Roth picture in three days, after A.P.E.X., which was also his previous film to this one. Digital Man does some things better and some things worse, mostly it's just stolidly competent. The story boils down to the old saw of a crack military team attempting to take down a renegade robot, although there's context and a spot of complication wrapped around the basic events. Nothing too sophisticated but it at least provides a mild interest to sustain things, which comes in handy once the umpteenth round of gunfire and explosions get tiresome. Set on the outskirts of a desert town there's a feel of arid isolation here that works well as a backdrop and contrasts with the larger than life, bumptious characters, the setting and the more humorous than average writing as well as faint flashes of emotional connection or suspense are the biggest advantages here. Well, fans of explosions and ludicrous guns will be pleased by the frequent pyrotechnics and comically huge weaponry on display. The acting just about conveys the appropriate sense of battle hardened veterans, the anonymous likes of Ken Olandt, Kristen Dalton and Sherman Augustus fill their roles with a kind of solid bad-assery, though the main plaudits go to Don Swayze as a daft redneck and Adam Baldwin as a military bigwig. Swayze is fitfully amusing in his utterly clichéd role, while Baldwin has the right sort of brusque authority to convince. The titular digital man is played by Matthias Hues, he has nothing to do other than walk around slowly and look tough, this he does in fine fashion, being a pretty imposing sized guy. Oh, and there are little cameos for the quirky Clint Howard and scenery chewing favourite Susan Tyrell (Night Warning). All in all nothing to write home about performance wise but everyone is suitably committed. Like A.P.E.X. the one black character is an obnoxious caricature which is a bit sad, but I don't tend to look for sensitivity in these sorts of junk flicks anyhow. Broadly speaking this is worth watching if you go for this sort of low grade sci fi action, I suspect I would have liked it more had I seen it a decade or so back when I first caught sight of the video box in a local rental place but despite its problems I was still glad to finally see it. Occasionally decent in both action and effects, with amusing old school cheap cgi and one or two brief but neat robotic effects, there's just about enough to go on even though its never any great shakes. Worth a watch if nothing else is on and you like the genre
Another sci-fi slog.
- tarbosh22000
- Nov 4, 2010
- Permalink
I have history with this
On September the 10th 2001 I was recovering from a 24 hour virus whilst on holiday in Dubai. I spent the day in the hotel room and when not sleeping I solely watched CNN. I remember there being a news item about the assassination of a Northern Alliance leader by the Taliban in Afghanistan (could there be trouble brewing?). The next day I felt a lot better and planned to go out. My holiday companion wasn't very interested in watching a news channel so switched it over to watch a crappy sci-fi action movie instead. So, to reiterate - 24 hour news channel on all day September 10th, news channel switched off September 11th and crappy movie put on instead. Everyone remembers what they were doing when the Twin Towers were attacked in 2001 - I was watching Digital Man on account of my holiday friend. As it turned out we discovered the news when we were picked up by another friend to visit one of the city attractions - the Emirates Twin Towers, which at that very moment had ascended to the second highest twin towers in the world. It was a very weird day. So, yes, despite having CNN on ALL DAY the day before, I missed the biggest news event of my life in order to watch a pathetic cyborg-on-the-loose sci-fi/action toss-fest. As I watched it last night for the second time I did actually wonder if maybe something of historical importance was happening again. Nothing happened.
- Red-Barracuda
- Sep 19, 2021
- Permalink
Derivative mishmash
This is pretty horrible but there aren't many reviews and I'll add a brief summary.
There are some good things: the acting is surprisingly OK across the board from Ed Lauter and a bunch of people I've never heard of. A bit OTT at times and Ken Olandt (who?) is definitely a cut of wood below the rest. The main cyborg (Matthias Hues) does his deadpan job really well. The comedy relief is ridiculous (but then so is the whole film) and Swayze and Masterson are quite funny. The director keeps the action going - at least you don't have to wait around for the next bit of nonsense to happen.
What's bad. The FX, even for the '90s are awful - some reviewer who says they're great has to be a fake. The story makes no sense. OK, soldiers are hunting a cyborg, something to do with missile launch codes, not sure what, while other soldiers (mainly Lauter) are killing each other - no idea really. There's some big deal about some soldiers being cyborgs too, again no idea why. The action keeps going but it's stupid, stupid, stupid at all times. The cyborg wanders about, apparently at random - arriving for a fight whenever the director wants one, then wandering off again. When a soldier dies (s)he does so by walking straight at the cyborg, firing something ineffective (when all they seem to have to do to survive is run away). The soldiers carry huge guns they can barely lift (think Aliens), blast away with them non-stop and never manage to hit the cyborg standing motionless in front of them (which it does a lot of). When they run out of ammo and start with a pistol, every shot hits but has no effect. These shots are always aimed at the armour, never at the unprotected head. Great that the squad has two racial minorities, two women and only one white guy. But guess who's in charge? The ending is totally lame.
There are some good things: the acting is surprisingly OK across the board from Ed Lauter and a bunch of people I've never heard of. A bit OTT at times and Ken Olandt (who?) is definitely a cut of wood below the rest. The main cyborg (Matthias Hues) does his deadpan job really well. The comedy relief is ridiculous (but then so is the whole film) and Swayze and Masterson are quite funny. The director keeps the action going - at least you don't have to wait around for the next bit of nonsense to happen.
What's bad. The FX, even for the '90s are awful - some reviewer who says they're great has to be a fake. The story makes no sense. OK, soldiers are hunting a cyborg, something to do with missile launch codes, not sure what, while other soldiers (mainly Lauter) are killing each other - no idea really. There's some big deal about some soldiers being cyborgs too, again no idea why. The action keeps going but it's stupid, stupid, stupid at all times. The cyborg wanders about, apparently at random - arriving for a fight whenever the director wants one, then wandering off again. When a soldier dies (s)he does so by walking straight at the cyborg, firing something ineffective (when all they seem to have to do to survive is run away). The soldiers carry huge guns they can barely lift (think Aliens), blast away with them non-stop and never manage to hit the cyborg standing motionless in front of them (which it does a lot of). When they run out of ammo and start with a pistol, every shot hits but has no effect. These shots are always aimed at the armour, never at the unprotected head. Great that the squad has two racial minorities, two women and only one white guy. But guess who's in charge? The ending is totally lame.
Between Terminator and Robocop, there's "Digital Man"
I've seen Digital man almost a decade ago when it came to video. My dad rented me this movie to watch over the weekend since he was leaving with my mom. I loved it so much that I've watched it five or six times in 48 hours !!!
My memories of this movie are quite vague. I can't really remember the quality of the acting and script. But I definitely remember how scary Mathias Hues was as the killer robot. A team is sent in a small community somewhere out in the desert to terminate him but soon find out some of them are robots themselves. Woon and Jackson are two bad*ss soldiers who can't match Digital Man.
I think I'll buy this movie in the near future since I can't find it at the video store anymore. I think fans of Terminator and Robocop would love this movie. It's the traditional "Shoot the bastard !!!" kind of flick with lots of action and sci-fi. I rate it 7/10. See it if you get the chance.
My memories of this movie are quite vague. I can't really remember the quality of the acting and script. But I definitely remember how scary Mathias Hues was as the killer robot. A team is sent in a small community somewhere out in the desert to terminate him but soon find out some of them are robots themselves. Woon and Jackson are two bad*ss soldiers who can't match Digital Man.
I think I'll buy this movie in the near future since I can't find it at the video store anymore. I think fans of Terminator and Robocop would love this movie. It's the traditional "Shoot the bastard !!!" kind of flick with lots of action and sci-fi. I rate it 7/10. See it if you get the chance.
- thebigmovieguy
- May 26, 2003
- Permalink
"If it was me would you pull my tags?"
- hwg1957-102-265704
- May 23, 2022
- Permalink
Digital Putin
- saint_brett
- Apr 17, 2023
- Permalink
Bland, dull action fare; not all bad, but overflowing with weaknesses
I've watched 'Metalstorm: The destruction of Jared-Syn.' I've watched 'Eliminators.' I've even watched 'Cyborg 3.' With all this prior experience, and more where that came from, did I have any expectation that 'Digital Man' would be particularly good? Oh my no; perish the thought. There are some noteworthy names in the cast, yes, for better and for worse; even the imagery found online for marketing purposes, however, casts immediate doubts about the potential. This is to say nothing about the mid-90s computer-generated visuals that greet us underneath the opening credits, wholly bereft of detail or texture; the appearance of Ed Lauter and Paul Gleason on the screen in the next moments, reassuring viewers that yes, there are honest-to-goodness Stars in this flick; and the unreserved forthrightness of even the first touches of plot. I'll say this for filmmaker Phillip J. Roth, he made no bones about the type of thing he was making, and in turn, even sights unseen we viewers shouldn't have any illusions, either.
The unflinching directness of the writing continues to be a foremost element of these ninety-odd minutes, not to mention blunt tactlessness. The dialogue is pretty terrible, characters are fairly bland, and the scene writing is at best empty and characterized by tropes. It may be overly charitable to say the story is baseline serviceable, and one way or another some facets are particularly weak. Make no mistake, all such qualities are absolutely echoed in Roth's direction, and whether one wishes to blame the direction, the writing, or the producers, other facets similarly suffer in some capacity. This arguably applies even to the cinematography, Jim Goodwin's uninspired score, and the manner in which the very obvious CGI is subsequently employed. The actors? Well, I suppose they're doing what they can with the hand they've been dealt; some are more successful than others, including Chase Masterson and Don Swayze - the comedic relief, of all things - and in my opinion Amanda Wyss, who isn't even listed in the film's credits. In fairness, it's an action picture above all else, and the least that can be said is that the stunts and practical effects are pretty swell. It's too bad that there's no meaningful energy or vitality in the proceedings, and no true sense of stakes or thrills. Some would-be action just comes across as hollow and pointlessly overcharged for its own sake.
I suppose the sets are pretty nice, and the costume design, and even the lighting. There's nothing original in the fundamental visuals, but they look decent enough, and the designs of aspects realized through digital wizardry bore possibilities. The filming locations are lovely. For the most part I think all involved did their part, or at least the best they could, and the responsibility for the movie's failings can handily be chalked up to the writing, direction, and/or producers Talaat Captan and Marion Oberauner. I don't think 'Digital Man' is utterly rotten; I've seen the bottom of the barrel, and this isn't it. Why, there are some scattered moments that are actually really fun and well done. The action is wholly unable to evoke the intended excitement, however; the best ideas in the writing are given treatment that is all too meager, and too much of the screenplay was very poorly considered in the first place. In its dull mediocrity the title quite makes one think of a 90s predecessor to The Asylum, and in all earnestness the Band family have churned out some fare that was more solid and entertaining.
What it really comes down to is that there's just no real reason to ever check this feature out. Even if you're a big fan of someone involved, there's just not enough value here for it to earn our viewership. There are worse ways to spend your time, certainly, and I guess if you're looking for something uninvolved to turn on and leave playing in the background this will fit the bill. Any greater hopes for 'Digital Man' will unequivocally be met with disappointment, though, so if you do come across it, just be well aware that this is low-grade action fare for an extra lazy day, and that's about it. And maybe even that is being too kind.
The unflinching directness of the writing continues to be a foremost element of these ninety-odd minutes, not to mention blunt tactlessness. The dialogue is pretty terrible, characters are fairly bland, and the scene writing is at best empty and characterized by tropes. It may be overly charitable to say the story is baseline serviceable, and one way or another some facets are particularly weak. Make no mistake, all such qualities are absolutely echoed in Roth's direction, and whether one wishes to blame the direction, the writing, or the producers, other facets similarly suffer in some capacity. This arguably applies even to the cinematography, Jim Goodwin's uninspired score, and the manner in which the very obvious CGI is subsequently employed. The actors? Well, I suppose they're doing what they can with the hand they've been dealt; some are more successful than others, including Chase Masterson and Don Swayze - the comedic relief, of all things - and in my opinion Amanda Wyss, who isn't even listed in the film's credits. In fairness, it's an action picture above all else, and the least that can be said is that the stunts and practical effects are pretty swell. It's too bad that there's no meaningful energy or vitality in the proceedings, and no true sense of stakes or thrills. Some would-be action just comes across as hollow and pointlessly overcharged for its own sake.
I suppose the sets are pretty nice, and the costume design, and even the lighting. There's nothing original in the fundamental visuals, but they look decent enough, and the designs of aspects realized through digital wizardry bore possibilities. The filming locations are lovely. For the most part I think all involved did their part, or at least the best they could, and the responsibility for the movie's failings can handily be chalked up to the writing, direction, and/or producers Talaat Captan and Marion Oberauner. I don't think 'Digital Man' is utterly rotten; I've seen the bottom of the barrel, and this isn't it. Why, there are some scattered moments that are actually really fun and well done. The action is wholly unable to evoke the intended excitement, however; the best ideas in the writing are given treatment that is all too meager, and too much of the screenplay was very poorly considered in the first place. In its dull mediocrity the title quite makes one think of a 90s predecessor to The Asylum, and in all earnestness the Band family have churned out some fare that was more solid and entertaining.
What it really comes down to is that there's just no real reason to ever check this feature out. Even if you're a big fan of someone involved, there's just not enough value here for it to earn our viewership. There are worse ways to spend your time, certainly, and I guess if you're looking for something uninvolved to turn on and leave playing in the background this will fit the bill. Any greater hopes for 'Digital Man' will unequivocally be met with disappointment, though, so if you do come across it, just be well aware that this is low-grade action fare for an extra lazy day, and that's about it. And maybe even that is being too kind.
- I_Ailurophile
- Feb 7, 2024
- Permalink
Brainless yet entertaining enough
- movieman_kev
- Mar 3, 2013
- Permalink
B for bad
A very good movie!
Digital Man is a very entertaining movie, with good acting, excellent photography and outstanding F/X. It does suffer from a mediocre script however. A very good, overall effort from a bunch of actors who fall into the category of "where have I seen them before?" A rating of 8 out of 10 was given.
WHAT IN GODS NAME
Has the world gone mad if anything this movie is average and i mean AVERAGE the explosion scenes are good but the special effects are pretty bad the scenes are slow the acting is like somthing ive seen on a movie with a budget of about £10 a ive seen sticks with better facial expressions. on a scale of 1-10 this movie is 3 and thats being kind
- hellboundsyco
- Nov 8, 2002
- Permalink